Phony Benoni: There are many ways to react to a loss, a few of which are not violent. A common one is denigrating your opponent and their play, which however can make it difficult to praise your own.Or you can praise your opponent's play to the heavens, crediting them with immortal insight. This is, of course, much more effective if you win the game, but even in a loss you can make your own play seem better.
Santasiere took the latter course here, commenting in the "American Chess Bulletin" (Nov/Dec 1948): <"One of the great games in chess history!">
Well, OK. Santasiere was a poet after all, so he was entitled to a little license at times.
So why don't more players adopt the complementary attitude? It's very hard to admit someone is better than you, even over the course of a single game. Most players seem to have the attitude of Russian novelist Vladimir Brusiloff, as reported in P.G. Wodehouse's short story, "The Clicking of Cuthbert":
<"No novelists any good except me. Sovietski--yah! Nastikoff--bah! I spit me of zem all. No novelists anywhere any good except me. P.G. Wodehouse and Tolstoi not bad. Not good, but not bad. No novelists anywhere any good except me.">