chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Magnus Carlsen vs Vugar Gashimov
Tata Steel Group A (2012), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 1, Jan-14
English Opening: Symmetrical Variation. Hedgehog Defense (A30)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 20 times; par: 101 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 9 more Carlsen/V Gashimov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can display posts in reverse order, by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page and checking the option "Display newest kibitzes on top."

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-14-12  whiteshark: http://troll.me/images/serious-owl/...
Jan-14-12  cro777: Gelfand - Giri

53...Rb4 54. Rxb6 Rc7 55. h4 gxh4+ 56. Kh3 Kg7 57. Rd3 Kf7 58. Re3 Kg7 59. Rf3 Rf7 60. Rd3 Rf6


click for larger view

Jan-14-12  notyetagm: http://chessok.com/broadcast/?key=w...

Giri winning now.

67 ... ♖b4-d4


click for larger view

<(68. Rgf1 Kg6 69. Rg1+ Rg5 70. Rb1 b4 71. Rfb3 Rgg4 72. Ra1 Kh5 73. Rab1 Rc4 74. R3b2 Kg5 75. Kh2 Kf5 76. Rd1 Rcd4 77. Re1 Rgf4 78. Re7 Rde4 79. Rf7+ Kg6 80. Rb7 Rg4 81. Kh3 Rc4 82. Rb6+ Kg5 83. Rb5+ Kg6 84. Rb6+ Kg5 <<<Houdini Aquarium (0:01:25) -2.64|d27 Black has a decisive advantage)>>>>

Jan-14-12  elnanes23: carlsen play was flawless. Very Impressing!
Jan-14-12  mrbasso: Gashimovs openings with black are still too risky for the elite and 18...Kh8? is as bad as it looks. why not 18...b5, the most natural move in the world ?
Jan-14-12  maxx4.68: Excellent endgame by Carlsen!
Jan-14-12  LucB: Is Carlsen going to crack 2851 this year?
Jan-14-12  JoergWalter: <LucB: Is Carlsen going to crack 2851 this year?> yes
Jan-14-12  notyetagm: <JoergWalter: <LucB: Is Carlsen going to crack 2851 this year?> yes>

This year? Next week!

Yes, I was once a Carlsen skeptic but now I have become a <TRUE> <BELIEVER>.

Jan-14-12  notyetagm: Game Collection: MAGNUS CARLSEN'S BEST GAMES
Jan-14-12  checkmateyourmove: it looks like carlsen got everything he wanted out of his opening which is deadly for his opponent.
Jan-14-12  JoergWalter: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfuB...
Jan-14-12  ajile: <mrbasso: Gashimovs openings with black are still too risky for the elite>

If this is true then why did Carlsen delay d4 to avoid Gashimov's pet Modern Benoni lines? By playing 1.c4 and subsequent moves White subtly avoids Black's favorite Benoni lines and steers the opening into a game where White has all the positional pluses. Brilliant and strategical play by White to throw Black off balance.

Jan-14-12  Ezzy: <ajile: Brilliant and strategical play by White to throw Black off balance>

Brilliant Indeed! As soon as Gashimov played 28...e5, I truly believe that Carlsen thought he was going to win. All the tactics was basically forced, and that left Carlsen with a nagging edge which he converted to a win in classy style.

Carlsen is no stranger to winning English symmetrical games. Didn't he destroy Aronian in the 2007 Candidates in an A30 Opening.

Carlsen's piece manouevering is mindboggling. There's something uniquely special about this young man.

Jan-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Gashimov lost to Carlsen now.
Jan-14-12  visayanbraindoctor: Carlsen's accurate positional style is particularly effective against Gashimov's wait and see strategy from an inferior position. Notice Carlsen never gave black a chance for counterplay. When there was no clear way to a large advantage, Carlsen simply played solid moves that retained his small edge while giving black chances to commit little mistakes. In this way, all throughout thew game, white's advantage steadily grew until it became overwhelming.
Jan-14-12  mrbasso: 1.Gashimov does not always play Benoni.
2.The hedgehog is strategically at least as risky.

Gashimov was thrown off balance by 16.Rd2, a move almost never played before and maybe never by players above 2500. 16.b3 is standard.

Jan-14-12  hoodrobin: Game boy not bad!
Jan-14-12  wordfunph: "I was slightly better from the opening then we got an endgame with three pawns each and opposite coloured bishops, it looked pretty drawish but I had a passed pawn and my pieces were a little more active. Then he went wrong at some point, he tried to create a mating net round my king but it turned out there was nothing there and then he had just misplaced his pieces and after that I gained a kind of a bind, his knight couldn't move and from then on it was not so difficult."

- Magnus Carlsen

http://chess.co.uk/twic/chessnews/e...

Jan-14-12  twinlark: <51...h5> draws, by allowing fluidity on the king side, rather than being locked in and having to shed pawns to break out.
Jan-15-12  ajile: <mrbasso: 1.Gashimov does not always play Benoni.>

This is true but it is preferred.
And he will even transpose into it from non 1.d4 openings.

1.Nf3.

A Giri vs V Gashimov, 2011

Jan-15-12  ptrckmackay: Why Gashimov in the eleventh move did not played BxNc3. Why? Can someone explain me why he castle instead of taking the knight on c3?
Jan-15-12  SimonWebbsTiger: castles, like, 11...Bxf3, is also a theory move
Jan-15-12  Ezzy: In the Carlsen interview, (Tata website) Magnus stated that his idea of doubling rooks on the 'd' file with the queen on a2 was an idea from Ulf Andersson (The ultimate 1 Nf3 player)

I checked through some of Ulf's A30 games and there it was - Ulf Andersson vs Seirawan, 1982

Carlsen v Gashimov - after 25 Rcd2


click for larger view

Ulf Andersson v Yasser Seirawen - After 27 Rcd2


click for larger view

A good example of a player searching for ideas in an opening.

Jan-15-12  Ulhumbrus: 28...e5 weakens the white squares.

Perhaps Gashimov thinks that as White has not managed to gain anything he should be able to play for a win.

If so, this suggests a very interesting question: If White has not found a way to make progress, does it follow necessarily that Black should be able to find a way to make progress? On the face of it, not. However the position warrants a further look at.

The transaction begun by 32...d5 leads to an ending where White's passed b pawn is more valuable than Black's h6 pawn.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 9)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC