Shakhriyar Mamedyarov vs Hao Wang (2013)

Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players ·

Kibitzing

Shakhriyar Mamedyarov vs Hao Wang
FIDE Grand Prix Beijing (2013), Beijing CHN, rd 4, Jul-07
Slav Defense: General (D10) · 1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening	find similar games	27 more Mamedyarov/H Wang games
sac: 18.Bxb2	PGN: download \| view \| print	Help: general \| java-troubleshooting

TIP: Help with kibitzing features can be found on our Kibtizing Help Page.

For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE. [CLICK HERE]

Jul-07-13		notyetagm: Mamedyarov vs Wang Hao, 2013 Wow.

Jul-07-13		notyetagm: Mamedyarov vs Wang Hao, 2013 Game Collection: MAMEDYAROV'S BEST GAMES

Jul-07-13		HeMateMe: Impressive how Mamey kept control of that passed pawn, and the game. On the razor's edge.

Jul-07-13		Nezhmetdinov: Blimey.

Jul-07-13		Everett: I don't understand half the moves in this game. I do know that I would be willing to sac a piece for his d-pawn in any game he has White. He seems always able to drive it straight into the heart of his opponents' positions time and again.

Jul-08-13		FamilyTree: Nice game by Mamedyarov. GM Ipatov's Commentary of the game in chessbase.com <25.d5 Opening up the position to get to Black's king!> You're right Ipatov, but the problem is that 25.d5? allows the black Queen to defend the kingside, and at the same time the b2 pawn is not blockaded anymore. Mamedyarov lost all his advantage after 25.d5? The computers suggest 25.Rfe1 wich seems very logical. Almost every annotated game in Chessbase.com is pure crap. It looks like the annotators dont want to spend more than 5 minutes analysing the games. The exeptions are when 2700's players annotate, Giri and sometimes Caruana.

Jul-08-13		Everett: <Almost every annotated game in Chessbase.com is pure crap. It looks like the annotators dont want to spend more than 5 minutes analysing the games. The exeptions are when 2700's players annotate, Giri and sometimes Caruana.> Perhaps chessbase could use your services.

Jul-08-13		DoctorD: There does appear to be a lot of lazy annotating these days, but I wonder if this has not always been the case and it is simply easier for the amateur player backed up with computers to notice this. Years ago, the "master's word" would have been accepted without much question.

Jul-08-13		Everett: There is an easy response to these complaints, and it has worked for every great player; work on your own chess understanding and wean yourself off of everyone but the most trusted sources for guidance.

Jul-08-13		perfidious: There is no substitute for the ability to think critically, whether it be at the board or in real life.

Jul-08-13		Everett: < perfidious: There is no substitute for the ability to think critically, whether it be at the board or in real life.> As proof, I have critically assessed your contribution as worthy! ;-)

Jul-08-13		Shams: <Everett> Have any thoughts on my query here? Reti Opening (A04) By the way Delchev's book is quite interesting.

Jul-08-13		haydn20: 25. Rfe1 looks logical because of the pressure on e6 & e7, and it seems to work out tactically. 25. d5 was not horrible however, tho' Black (IMO) could have lightened his load with 26...b2. Finally, simply 30...exd5 and White hasn't much but the perp.

Jul-08-13		haydn20: Also, 35. Qh5!? (35. Qf3!) Kxe6! and amazingly Black's K is safe (I think), as it would be after 37... Kxe6 too(OC 37...Kd8? loses as in the game). I suspect that Black had a time problem. BTW, does this patzerish looking opening with poor dewvelopment and many Q-moves have a name other than D10 Slav: general?

Jul-08-13		Everett: <Shams> thanks for tracking me down. I'll respond on that page.

May-17-17		MissScarlett: <Wang Bang, Thank You Mam>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
Nothing in violation of United States law.
No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
No trolling.
The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.