chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Cenek Kottnauer vs Emil Richter
Czechoslovak Championship (1948), Bratislava CSR, rd 11, Aug-27
Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense. Exchange Variation (D59)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more C Kottnauer/E Richter games
sac: 32.Qxe7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you find a mistake in the database, use the correction form. There is a link at the bottom that reads "Spot an error? Please suggest your correction..." Avoid posting corrections in the kibitzing area.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-16-22  Brenin: Easy for a Wednesday: 32 Qxe7 Qxe7 33 Nxe5, and there is no defence against the threat of 34 Ng6+, winning the Q or R.
Feb-16-22  awfulhangover: I cannot remember having seen such a situation before. I had to smile when I realized that black is in zugswang with so many legal moves at hand. I can imagine black becoming so surprised and frustrated when he saw what the naughty donkey on e5 was doing.
Feb-16-22  landshark: What <Brenin> said. Normally the quiet move solutions are harder to find than that.
Feb-16-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: 26. Qxe6 looks winning: 26...Qxb7 27. Qg6 Kg8 28. Qh7+ Kf7 29. e6+ Ke8.
Feb-16-22  mel gibson: Wow -
I didn't even consider that move with the Queen.

Stockfish 14 says:

32.Qxe7

(32. Qxe7 (♕h4xe7 ♕c7xe7 ♘c4xe5 ♗g8-f7 ♘e5-g6+ ♗f7xg6 ♖e1xe7 ♗g6xb1 ♖c1xb1 a7-a6 ♖e7-e5 f4-f3 ♖e5xc5 f3xg2 ♖c5-d5 ♖f8-f6 ♔g1xg2 ♔h8-g8 ♖b1-c1 ♖f6-g6+ ♔g2-f1 d4-d3 ♖d5xd3 ♖g6-g5 ♖c1-c7 ♔g8-h7 ♔f1-e2 h6-h5 ♖d3-d4 ♔h7-h6 ♔e2-e3 ♖g5-g1 ♖c7-c6+ g7-g6 b3-b4 ♖g1-a1 ♖c6xa6 ♖a1-h1 h2-h4 ♔h6-g7 ♖d4-d6 ♖h1-h3+ f2-f3 ♖h3xh4) +9.07/34 142)

score for White +9.07 depth 34.

Feb-16-22  Cheapo by the Dozen: I found the puzzle easy, because I could pretty quickly eliminate all themes EXCEPT Black's lightly defended e5 knight.

In particular, it was easy to see that giving up the queen for rook and knight would quickly become at least giving up the queen for two rooks. Checking the line then showed that, due to a discovered check, White in fact got a tempo to with which to save the knight that would take the f8 rook, adding a further piece to the haul.

Feb-16-22  saturn2: Black threatens f3.
32. Qxe7 and white gets back material with interest. 2 R+N for Q or after 33...Bf7 a plus rook.
Feb-16-22  agb2002: White is one pawn down.

The white knight would like to go to g6. Therefore, 32.Qxe7 Qxe7 33.Nxe5:

A) 33... Qc7(d6,f6,g5) 34.Ng6+ Kh7 35.Nxf8+ wins decisive material.

B) 33... Bf7(h7) 34.Ng6+ Bxg6 35.Rxe7 wins a rook.

Feb-16-22  Refused: eventually found

32.Qxe7 after eliminating everything else.

32.Qxe7 Qxe7 33.Nxe5 and black has no good response to 34.Ng6+

Nine men's morris on the chessboard.

33...Qd8 34.Ng6+ Kf7 35.Nxf8+ Kh8 and the mill is grinding.

Feb-16-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: Games like these make me wonder if Kottnauer was actually much stronger than a "mere" IM.
Feb-16-22  saturn2: In one if my first chess books by a Mr.Mueller about the Olympiad in Helsinki Kottnauer is the top scorer ahead of Smyslov, Geller, Bronstein, Boleslavsky, Kotov etc.
Feb-16-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Dionysius1: What I didn't see was that the white knight escapes, giving more than enough compensation for the queen, not just the 2 rooks. Pah
Feb-16-22  beenthere240: If you back the game up a move you will see that Black had a slight edge but decided on a cheap pawn grab - Nxe4?? Q x e7! is simply the refutation of a blunder.
Feb-16-22  beenthere240: Typo the blunder was Nxe5.
Feb-16-22  whiteshark: After <32.Qxe7 Qxe7 33.Nxe5> Black also loses further material: either the ♕ after <33...Bf7/Bh7 34.Ng6+ Bxg6 35.Rxe7> or the 2nd ♖ on f8 <33...Qf6 34.Ng6+ Kh7 35.Nxf8+ Kh8 36.Ng6+ Kh7 37.Re8>, after which the ♗g8 will also fall.
Feb-16-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: Juggle bloat ven it Qxe7 guild accomodate v it boa ta juggles it v bloat ven it he tom mow it quandary flick up i lob a bug jog on vined it x east ar him clooney wit glock u z it pub divot creak ablush eggshead safe gg mc choose its abled it leeway diffy cinch ha v it douche bag cred it li shuck deaf fade fee c nn do co bah humbug naf axe pe v it ie v bod vin tod a con jog on ro feed it efface v it hub ba c u bum add flack nefarious c lab ill v its bod tod chi v it dt fig c er it calm med c v its cad u hog fit ken t c v it v end been it cc v it deck fane it hug i re v it lid v it c blamed it ra v it cc dt vin he grief it v bo dt c v it v gq be tod c eg kes q at c knee it run tate v it von ok neck toe it a nut er it i keen tock ru v it nate v it lime it i v c herr reti chime it lure ran it van tonk teck key i mile it her trick i teen con it von true knock i tenet a rue it i chart vin rem lie it rent u nes c kone it rat kut gon v its knight no I hog rev it nordic inn c groan why energy cake v its au lime ice it right no gi v it Qxe7 etc;
Feb-16-22  TheaN: I would argue that the situation of 2R+N vs Q is playable for Black, is it not that his position is so horrible as well.

<32.Qxe7 Qxe7> else worse <33.Nxe5> and Black will either throw queen for piece, going a piece down, or a full rook. After either bishop move 33....Bf7 34.Ng6+ Bxg6 35.Rxe7, and <33....Qd8 34.Ng6+ Kh7 (Qxg6 35.Bxg6 +-) 35.Nxf8+ Kh8 36.Ng6+ +-> and White controls the board. I will say this is probably Black's best try, to try and push the d-pawn.

Feb-16-22  AlicesKnight: Saw the gameline fairly quickly; the tasty family fork after Nxe5 ensures material gain.
Feb-16-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  dorsnikov: It took a while but I got It. Not bad for an eighty year old.
Feb-16-22  Cheapo by the Dozen: <Refused>'s post made me smile, because it reminded me of something I mention from time to time:

When she was a little girl, perhaps in 1910 or so, my grandmother played some games of Muehle -- i.e. 9 Man's Morris -- with Emanuel Lasker.

Feb-16-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I think there was a POTD about a week ago but Emil Richter lost that game.
Feb-16-22  0ZeR0: <An Englishman: Good Evening: Games like these make me wonder if Kottnauer was actually much stronger than a "mere" IM.>

Agreed. Kottnauer seems very skilled. He also won some nice scalps in his career including victories against Smyslov, Najdorf, Averbakh, Kotov (twice), and Simagin.

Feb-16-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: In my opinion, laying aside the fact that Kottnauer was awarded the IM title when it was created, in 1950, while he very clearly was of IM strength, I do not believe his results of the period quite justify his making the jump to grandmaster, though he was a tough, solid professional. Without the war, who knows?

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC