Sally Simpson: Does Kramnik believe that after all the ballyhoo Hans will come back to chess.com and cheat to win a skittles game that due to who his opponent is will attract world wide attention. I've no idea why Kramnik posted that vid. Halfway through he tells us only grand masters will understand what he is talking about. We are not worthy, smug judge Kramnik is the law.
These 'cry wolf' claims by Kramnik appear every time he loses a game. Soon nobody will take him seriously. Meanwhile Kramnik has posted at Reddit:
GM Vladimir Kramnik - Cheating Tuesdays (sic)
"I would like to inform that from now on will only play events on chess.com with serious anticheating measures such as cameras and share screen.
Unfortunately, to my surprise I have realised that cheating is quite a common practice even among titled players, and since here the approach towards this seems to be quite tolerant (quite a few titled players are using comp assistance during games according to my conclusions based on statistics and mathematical probabilities and getting away with it), it is growing and growing, as far as I can judge by statistics I am collecting last couple of months.
I hope one day some REAL fight against fraud online (and cheating in prize events IS a FRAUD) will start but for now I will keep on publishing statistics and videos, develope anticheating math systems and publish the conclusions.
But since collected enough material for my private investigation, will stop playing Cheating Tuesdays and other events without strong anticheating measures. Thanks for your understanding."
https://www.reddit.com/user/mfqxe33o/
Kibitzing
