Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Dutch, Stonewall (A95)
1 d4 f5 2 c4 Nf6 3 g3 e6 4 Bg2 Be7 5 Nf3 O-O 6 O-O d5
7 Nc3 c6

Number of games in database: 174
Years covered: 1922 to 2019
Overall record:
   White wins 40.2%
   Black wins 25.9%
   Draws 33.9%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Raymond Keene  5 games
Roman Toran Albero  3 games
Vitaly Chekhover  3 games
Carlos Enrique Guimard  10 games
Mikhail Botvinnik  7 games
David Bronstein  4 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Portisch vs Spassky, 2007
Keene vs M Fuller, 1983
Keres vs Bronstein, 1951
Flohr vs Botvinnik, 1933
I Rabinovich vs Botvinnik, 1927
Botvinnik vs Smyslov, 1958
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 7; games 1-25 of 174  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Gruenfeld vs Tartakower  ½-½281922Teplitz-SchönauA95 Dutch, Stonewall
2. I Rabinovich vs Botvinnik 0-1421927USSR ChampionshipA95 Dutch, Stonewall
3. V Makogonov vs A Y Model  1-0511927USSR ChampionshipA95 Dutch, Stonewall
4. Menchik vs Yates 0-1341932Hastings 1931/32A95 Dutch, Stonewall
5. Ragozin vs A Y Model 0-1301932Leningrad ChampionshipA95 Dutch, Stonewall
6. Chekhover vs A Y Model 1-0231932Leningrad ChampionshipA95 Dutch, Stonewall
7. Flohr vs Botvinnik 0-1301933Botvinnik - FlohrA95 Dutch, Stonewall
8. Veresov vs N Sorokin  0-1321934TbilisiA95 Dutch, Stonewall
9. M Yudovich Sr. vs Botvinnik 0-1471934LeningradA95 Dutch, Stonewall
10. Szabo vs E Gereben  ½-½361934SopronA95 Dutch, Stonewall
11. Lisitsin vs Ragozin ½-½471935MoscowA95 Dutch, Stonewall
12. Chekhover vs Riumin 1-0321936All-Union YMA95 Dutch, Stonewall
13. Kan vs Konstantinopolsky 0-1381936All-Union YMA95 Dutch, Stonewall
14. Ragozin vs Botvinnik  ½-½401936Training GameA95 Dutch, Stonewall
15. Pelikan vs J Hasek  ½-½471936Kautsky mem13A95 Dutch, Stonewall
16. Flohr vs Riumin  ½-½311936MoscowA95 Dutch, Stonewall
17. Capablanca vs Botvinnik ½-½421936MoscowA95 Dutch, Stonewall
18. Reshevsky vs Botvinnik ½-½411936NottinghamA95 Dutch, Stonewall
19. Kan vs Riumin  1-0421938Moscow 4mA95 Dutch, Stonewall
20. Chekhover vs P N Troitsky  1-0431938Trade UnionsA95 Dutch, Stonewall
21. E Gerstenfeld vs Menchik  1-0301938LodzA95 Dutch, Stonewall
22. L Laurine vs M Brakmanis  0-1121938Match 2nd Riga - Tallinn Chess clubsA95 Dutch, Stonewall
23. S Landau vs Cortlever  0-1321939Amsterdam/HilversumA95 Dutch, Stonewall
24. Saemisch vs Cortlever 0-1291939Bad HarzburgA95 Dutch, Stonewall
25. G Danielsson vs N B Rometti  1-0281939Buenos Aires Olympiad fin-AA95 Dutch, Stonewall
 page 1 of 7; games 1-25 of 174  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-26-03  BeautyInChess: Look at the winning percentage for black in this opening. It's higher than white at least in the games in this database. I'm surprised that it has not been kibitzed about more.
Aug-26-03  Shadout Mapes: I think this opening is a little positionally suspect due to the gaping hole black leaves on e5, and the pawn wall is rather inflexible. If Botvinnik played it though, I'm sure it's just fine.
Aug-30-03  DTI: who cares of its "suspect due to the gaping hole black leaves on e5", its hard to take advantage of it without compromising one's position. I play it for black as well as for white, it can be very effective and is not as weakening is it may seem.
Aug-30-03  Benjamin Lau: <DTI>

Lots of people care. e5 becomes a nice outpost for opposing knights who can no longer be chased away by pawns. The formation, while strong, also leaves a lot of dark squares weak. That said, it's probably not unsound, and it's just a matter of taste whether you want to play it or not.

Aug-30-03  SicilianDragon: While the more "classical" Stonewall Dutch with the bishop e7 may be somewhat suspect, the Modern Stonewall Dutch, with the bishop on d6, is much more popular today and is considered to be possibly the most solid variation in the whole Dutch system. The problem is that if you play 1. d4 f5 2. c4 Nf6 3. g3 e6, many players will play 4. Bf4 to prevent the dark-squared bishop from coming to d6 or to trade it off if it does. This is why players who play the "Modern" Stonewall often prefer to arrive via a QGD. However, if the bishop gets to d6 with no problem, black is in very good shape.
Sep-01-03  DTI: Benjamin Lau, im aware of black's dark square weaknesses i was just pointing out its difficult for white to take advantage of black's weaknesses without precise play....
Oct-26-03  Helloween: Black only really has to be wary of the typical b3, Ba3 maneouever, which aims to trade off Black's strong Bishop. The Dutch formation with f5, e6, d6 Nf6, Be7, 0-0, and Qe8, as Tal used to play it in the 50's and 60's, seems to be more energetic and offer better kingside attacking chances.
Oct-26-03  colinrpayne: I seem to remember a game or two of Short's where he avoided the problems of the b3, Ba3 manoevre by delaying d5. If white persists with his idea, then after Bxa3, Nxa3, black plays d6 and puts his pawns of black squares. I eventually gave up this opening for another reason - I was continually getting squeezed after Bf4, Bg5 by white and didn't get the stonewall in at all.
Jul-27-04  Giancarlo: Well if you look at Botvinniks play with this opening you can see he did quite well with it.
Oct-14-04  Giancarlo: Black's choice of 7..c6 instead of 7..nc6 seems intresting. Does anyone know if there is a gambit followed up in this line with 7..dxc4?
Jul-06-05  MUG: This 'Stonewall' formation reminds me of another famous wall: the Maginot Line! Both can be defeated in the same way - just go around it! :-)
Jul-06-05  farrooj: I love the stonewall for its solidity. But I just don't know the theory to use it. It's a very cool formation. But is it refuted?
Jul-06-05  paul dorion: <farroj> Botvinnik and Larsen liked it , Petrosian was a Stonewall (and Dutch in general) killer so a good look at their games may tell you what to do or not.
Jul-06-05  farrooj: thanks :)
Jul-06-05  Giancarlo: I wouldn't say it's a refuted opening. Botvinnik took some impressive wins with the system, and no losses. Some wins against rather strong players. I agree that Botvinnik is a model Dutch player.
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: ConLaMismaMano-1863 (Ajedrez 21, 11/12/05) [Fritz 7]: 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 f5 [last book move] 4. h3 Nf6 5. g4 [5. Bg5 Be7 =] fg 6. hg Bb4 [6 ... Nxg4 7. e3 Nf6 8. Bd3 =] 7. Bg5 [7. Bg2 Nxg4 8. e4 Nf6 ] c6 8. Qc2 h6 [8 ... dc 9. Nf3 =] 9. 0-0-0 [9. Qg6+ Kf8 ] Qe7 10. e4 Bxc3 11. bxc3 [11. e5 Bxb2+ 12. Qxb2 Qf8 13. exf6 hxg5 14. Rxh8 Qxh8 15. cd cd 16. Bb5+ Nc6 17. Bxc6+ bxc6 =] de [11 ... Qa3+!? 12. Kb1 Nxe4 ] 12. Bg2 [12. Bxf6 Qxf6 13. Qxe4 c5 ] Rf8 13. Bxf6 [ ] Qxf6 14. Nh3 e5 15. Qxe4 Kf7 16. de Qg6 17. Qxg6+ Kxg6 18. Be4+ [18. Rd6+ Kf7 19. g5 Nd7 20. gh gh ] Kf7 19. g5 Bxh3 20. Rxh3 hxg5 21. Rg3 Nd7?? [21 ... Na6 22. Rxg5 Nc5 ] 22. Rxd7+ [ ] and White won (1-0, 34).

Nice game. I was surprised 14 ... e5 went unnoticed by Fritz, since it seems to drop both e Pawns, then Black self-destructed by trading Queens.

Nov-14-05  ConLaMismaMano: Thanks a lot, tpstar, for taking the trouble of running through Fritz my game, in the following days i'll look carefully at the analysis you provided me!
Mar-07-08  get Reti: The stonewall is now my favorite way to respond to 1.d4. The reasons why I think 1.d4 is stronger than 1.e4 is that after 1.d4 the pawn is protected, and also that after 1.d4, white can automatically establish two pawns side-by-side, with c4, no matter what black plays. If black can't stop c4, then he should try to stop e4. In the stonewall, white is almost permanently stopped from playing e4, and black has two strong points at d5 and f5. White's expansion possibilities are limited. Black can also try to post a knight at e4. The main reason against this line is that white can play Ne5, but the fact that black can somewhat neutralize it with Nbd7 and the above reasons I think compensates for it.
May-23-08  gambitking: I like this opening as black. It's in the spirit of Ol' Blue Light, Stonewall Jackson; leading a fearless counterattack on the Kingside second only to the Greco Counterattack

The Gambit King

Premium Chessgames Member
  ganstaman: <gambitking> How do you avoid Dutch, Stonewall with Ba3 (A94), which looks very good for white?
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: <ganstaman> Usually by -Qe7. The swedish GM Karlson imployed a system with an early Nc6 , ready to answer Ba3 with Nb4.Could look silly ,but it works.

Ulf Andersson - Lars Karlsson is one game.

Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: Sorry . All above is reasonable , but only with the black bishop on d6.
Jul-28-08  FilipinoMaster: The Sicilian for d4 lol!
Nov-08-09  FICSwoodpusher: Why are there no games in the Dutch Stonewall where black plays Bd6?
Nov-08-09  FHBradley: Because that's a different variation of the Dutch Stonewall.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific opening and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC