Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

page 1 of 7; games 1-25 of 162  Game   Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening 1. Levenfish vs Ragozin 0-1 38 1936 Ch Leningrad (team) D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 2. Flohr vs Botvinnik ½-½ 42 1938 AVRO D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 3. Keres vs Lilienthal   ½-½ 32 1939 Leningrad/Moscow training D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 4. A S Rocha vs Najdorf   ½-½ 20 1939 Buenos Aires Olympiad prel-A D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 5. W Cruz vs Pelikan   0-1 40 1939 Buenos Aires Olympiad prel-A D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 6. W Cruz vs Letelier   1-0 31 1939 Buenos Aires Olympiad fin-A D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 7. G Safonov vs F Bohatirchuk 0-1 26 1940 Moscow D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 8. Rellstab vs Bogoljubov 0-1 28 1942 Munich D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 9. R Renter vs Keres   ½-½ 26 1945 21.09.45 D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 10. P Trifunovic vs Najdorf   ½-½ 29 1949 Najdorf - Trifunovic D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 11. Najdorf vs Lilienthal 1-0 41 1950 Budapest Candidates D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 12. Kieninger vs Pilnik ½-½ 67 1951 Hoogovens D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 13. Pinzon vs Julio Bolbochan   0-1 37 1951 Mar del Plata Zonal D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 14. Benko vs G Kluger 1-0 44 1951 HUN-ch 07th D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 15. Gligoric vs Puc   ½-½ 40 1951 YUG-ch 7th D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 16. B Rabar vs R Toran Albero   1-0 36 1954 Munich Zonal D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 17. Sajtar vs O Neikirch   ½-½ 17 1954 Amsterdam ol (Men) qual-B D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 18. G Negyesy vs K Honfi 0-1 19 1955 Budapest D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 19. Gligoric vs R Flores Alvarez 1-0 30 1955 Mar del Plata D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 20. Najdorf vs Unzicker   ½-½ 77 1955 Gothenburg Interzonal D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 21. Shocron vs G Idigoras   ½-½ 42 1955 ARG-ch D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 22. Kholmov vs Byvshev   ½-½ 14 1955 URS-ch sf D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 23. W A Bills vs D Ruth   0-1 21 1956 57th US Open D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 24. G Kluger vs K Honfi   0-1 49 1957 HUN-ch 12th D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted 25. W Fairhurst vs Pachman   0-1 43 1957 Dublin Zonal D84 Grunfeld, Grunfeld Gambit Accepted  page 1 of 7; games 1-25 of 162

REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)

Dec-11-02    refutor: does any one else think it's time to redo the eco codes? when something like this has it's own code and only 39 games (including duplicates) and the caro-kann advanced with all it's theory only has one code (b12-1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.other) there's other examples too (evans gambit/king's gambit/modern steinitz ruy lopez v. some of the queen's indian/catalan lines). a system for classification that was developed in the mid 1900s likely isn't appropriate today just my 2 cents ;) Dec-11-02    THE GENERAL: when did eco start? Dec-11-02    refutor: i'm gonna assume the 70s because i have an old informant from 1972 and it's split up into 3 sections C,D,E where it's basically split up into C) stuff other than 1.d4, 1.e4 D) 1.d4 and E) 1.e4 with a few exceptions. if they've changed it since then, i'm sure they could change it again Jun-27-03    Benjamin Lau: Wow this opening is bad. Jun-27-03    drunknight II: I heartily agree w/ refutor. This ECO code stuff does not make any sense to me. They have what 3 areas? but they put like french defense in the same area as double king pawn openings? The classic way is still a great way to think about it. Tartakover divided his book into 3 sections. Open games, w/ e4/e5; semi closed which was e4 vs french, sicilian, carokann, alekhines etc; and then closed which was all based on queens gambit and kings indian, benoni, etc. this makes perfect sense. The old MCO books used to do it this way. Wasnt ECO started in eastern europe as some sort of system for Gligoric and his friends to sort out openings? French defense in same section as Dutch or whatever. Ugh

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members. Nothing in violation of United States law. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members. No trolling. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times. See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator. NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific opening only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC