chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Nimzo-Indian (E20)
1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 Bb4

Number of games in database: 4752
Years covered: 1883 to 2025
Overall record:
   White wins 34.8%
   Black wins 32.4%
   Draws 32.8%

Popularity graph, by decade

Explore this opening  |  Search for sacrifices in this opening.
PRACTITIONERS
With the White Pieces With the Black Pieces
Sergey Volkov  78 games
Viktor Moskalenko  65 games
Shakhriyar Mamedyarov  51 games
Sergei Tiviakov  18 games
Oleg Romanishin  17 games
Eduardas Rozentalis  16 games
NOTABLE GAMES [what is this?]
White Wins Black Wins
Alekhine vs Kmoch, 1930
Gheorghiu vs Fischer, 1966
Kramnik vs Anand, 2008
Jakovenko vs Carlsen, 2007
Nakamura vs Carlsen, 2014
So vs Aronian, 2015
<< previous chapter next chapter >>

 page 1 of 191; games 1-25 of 4,752  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Englisch vs Blackburne ½-½421883LondonE20 Nimzo-Indian
2. Spielmann vs Bogoljubov  ½-½311919Schultz Memorial, StockholmE20 Nimzo-Indian
3. Rubinstein vs Bogoljubov 1-0441920Bogoljubov - RubinsteinE20 Nimzo-Indian
4. Rubinstein vs A Selezniev 1-0701920GothenburgE20 Nimzo-Indian
5. Saemisch vs D Przepiorka 1-0511922Bad PistyanE20 Nimzo-Indian
6. Maroczy vs Saemisch 0-1251922Teplitz-SchonauE20 Nimzo-Indian
7. A Brinckmann vs A Nimzowitsch 0-1301923Match Nimzowitsch - BrinckmannE20 Nimzo-Indian
8. Tarrasch vs Saemisch ½-½581925BreslauE20 Nimzo-Indian
9. V Vukovic vs P Johner ½-½601925DebrecenE20 Nimzo-Indian
10. M Pinsky vs Kozhevnikov  1-0501927Perm championshipE20 Nimzo-Indian
11. C Ahues vs A Nimzowitsch 0-1291927Berlin Freie VereinigungE20 Nimzo-Indian
12. K Ruben vs A Nimzowitsch  ½-½441927Copenhagen Masters PolitikenE20 Nimzo-Indian
13. E Pfenniger vs C Piccardt  0-1311927NSB-RhW SchachverbandE20 Nimzo-Indian
14. Tartakower vs Marshall 1-0531928BerlinE20 Nimzo-Indian
15. Tartakower vs A Nimzowitsch ½-½211928BerlinE20 Nimzo-Indian
16. Tartakower vs G Thomas 1-0401929ScarboroughE20 Nimzo-Indian
17. J A Seitz vs Znosko-Borovsky  ½-½151929ParisE20 Nimzo-Indian
18. Marshall vs H Steiner 1-0321929Bradley BeachE20 Nimzo-Indian
19. G Del Pezzo vs G Padulli 1-0591930FlorenceE20 Nimzo-Indian
20. Kashdan vs R Willman  1-0551930Manhattan CC-chE20 Nimzo-Indian
21. Alekhine vs Kmoch 1-0391930San RemoE20 Nimzo-Indian
22. N Grigoriev vs I Kan ½-½641930National TournamentE20 Nimzo-Indian
23. Duchamp vs Znosko-Borovsky  ½-½321930NiceE20 Nimzo-Indian
24. J A Anderson vs E Steiner 0-1241930Hamburg OlympiadE20 Nimzo-Indian
25. H Weenink vs Saemisch  1-0291930Hamburg OlympiadE20 Nimzo-Indian
 page 1 of 191; games 1-25 of 4,752  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-11-05  acirce: <RookFile> Why are you pretending that White always (or "over and over again") fianchettoes his queen bishop in the Bird's? It can be handled in different ways just like the Dutch.
May-11-05  RookFile: It can be kind of tricky, acire, with us thinking about things with the colors reversed.

I'm drawing a comparison between something like 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bd2 0-0 5. a3 Bxc3 6. Bxc3 b6 7. Nf3 Bb7 8. e3 Ne4 9. Qc2

and something like this:

1. f4 d5 2. e3 Nf6 3. Nf3 c5 4. b3 e6
5. Bb2 Nc6 6. Bb5 Bd7 etc.

So, the Bird's opening is like the
Dutch when you adopt the 'stonewall'
formation, of course. But then neither the Bird's nor the Dutch become relavent to the Nimzo Indian comparison, because in the Dutch, you
usually don't see black play ...Bb4
and trade off that bishop. Normally
in the stonewall, you want to hold onto
that one.

But when you play over any one of the
numerous Bird's games with the
queenside fianchetto, you get ample
ideas to use if you want to play
the Nimzo with ....b6 as Black, like
this game:

J Jongedijk vs Alekhine, 1936

Sep-05-05  chessnewbie: what happens if black pushes the pawn to d5? i play c6 but then he plays c4 to protect his d5 pawn? any suggestions?
Sep-06-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <chessnewbie> Sounds like E52-E58. If you use the Explore this opening link (right below the picture) you can get some info.
May-16-06  positionalbrilliancy: Anyone know where the Indian defense get their name...?
May-16-06  square dance: <Anyone know where the Indian defense get their name...?> well, i read that those defenses are called "indians" because they were considered exotic when they first came into play. but if you mean specifically, the queens and kings indians speak for themselves while the nimzo-indian was named after aron nimzowitch and the bogo-indian was named after efim bogoljubov.
May-23-06  Microbe: I seem to have a problem with two of the defences against 4. Bd2 on here.

The first defence of:

4... 0-0 5. a3 Bxc3 6. Bxc3 Ne4 does seem best I will agree but still good for white after 7. Qc2 ... and now the best response I can come up with is d6. Maybe 7... b6 will help control the diagonal? Any ideas?

The second defence of:

4... c5 5. Nb5 Ne4!? 6. Bxb4 cxb4 seems to have missed 7. Qa4 ... Is there a good response for black to this? 7...a6? doesn't work as 8... axb5?? 9. Qxa8 loses the rook and 7... Nc6 8. e3 gives a good position for white and a scattered, cramped position for black.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm just an amateur who likes the nimzo-indian but has been worrying about this response for over a month now.

May-23-06  euripides: <microbe> I don't play this position for either side. But if White puts his bishop on a silly square like d2 i think Black might encourage him to keep it there. So after 4 Bd2 0-0 5 a3 I guess Black can withdraw his bishop and shouldn't be worse.
May-23-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WTHarvey: Here's 10 puzzles from E20 miniatures: http://www.wtharvey.com/e20.html
May-24-06  Microbe: <euripidies> Thanks for the quick response!

I like the idea of playing on the poorly positioned bishop and cutting and running. But I can't see a way out of the following:

4. Bd2 0-0
5. a3 Be7

(after 5... a5 then 6. b4 Bb6 7. c4 and the bishop is trapped and after 5... Bd6 6. e4 and I cannot find a defence to the advance 7. e5 which scatters black's pieces everywhere or else black loses a piece)

6. e4!

Now white has an overwhelming pawn majority in the centre. Black has not really got a good continuation here. The best I can think of follows. I'm hoping someone can show me something better.

6. ... d5
7. e5 Ne4
8. Nxe4 dxe4

With a serious weakness for black. especially after the queen's pawn is protected after 9. Bb3 or 9. Ne2.

Any more ideas to put an end to this madness anyone?

Jul-05-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: I see that the Nimzo-Indian covers a wide swath of ECO from E20-E59, does this opening favours positional player? What are some of the plus/minus of this opening?

I usually use the KID, but have been thinking about adding another d4 opening as black into my knowledge bank. Thanks in advance.

Jul-05-06  suenteus po 147: <WannaBe> I have heard and read that the Nimzo-Indian is a solid defense against 1.d4, even more solid than the KID, but I can tell you that my tenative experiments have ended in disaster. If you really want something else against 1.d4 I suggest the Tarrasch defense of derivations thereof.
Jul-05-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <suenteus po 147> I shall look into it. =)
Jul-05-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <suenteus po 147> I can't find it with the home page's "opening is", do you have a line or an ECO for it?
Jul-05-06  suenteus po 147: <WannaBe> The first, most common variation is found here: Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch (D32) with only two more variations that follow immediately after in the ECO code.
Jul-05-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <suenteus po 147> Thanks again, I shall start my study there.
Jul-06-06  themadhair: <suenteus po 147><WannaBe><anyone else struggling with this opening> The main reason why this is such a seemingly difficult opening to master is because how much the pawn structures determine what should be played. Black has five main ideas in this opening:

1. Counter attack with d5 to attack whites centre. Strategically fine but tactically complicated. 2.Counter attack with d6 and e5. Playing Nc6 (and not d7) seems neccessary to avoid a cramped game. 3.Counter attack with c5 to break up whites centre. Not the best if black ends up with a weak backward queens pawn. 4.Counterplay with Bxc3 and an attack against the c4 pawn. Usually delayed until white plays a3 but can in some situations be played without white playing a3. 5.Kingside attack - especially if white has weakened the kingside in any way.

Here is the main problem - which plan to play and when to play it? It must be determined by analysing the pawn structure. For example the kingside attack would be effective if the pawn structure was


click for larger view

Bottom line is if you want to learn this opening then you must learn how to handle the pawn structures that arise - and that makes this opening difficult to learn. Is it worth the effort learning it? Depends how much time you are willing to invest in it.

Jul-06-06  suenteus po 147: <themadhair> Thank you for the informative and instructive breakdown about the Nimzo-Indian and major approaches behind it. It will definitely be a defense I want to learn and master in the future, but for now I don't think I'm knowledgable enough to learn and handle pawn structures.
Jul-06-06  themadhair: <suenteus po 147> Think of it this way - if you do devote the time to learn it properly then the knowledge you will have gained about pawn structures will be useful in many other openings. But it is a major commitment.
Jul-06-06  suenteus po 147: <themadhair> I agree completely that the gains from learning the Nimzo-Indian would be enormous if I learned it. But as you also said, it's a big commitment and I just don't have the time at all to begin such a big project. But I will learn it someday precisely of the enormous gain I will earn.
Jul-06-06  ganstaman: <themadhair> I like pawn structure #5. It's like playing the Dutch without having to worry about any annoying gambits, 2.Bg5 (I like playing black against the Tromp, don't like the move in the Dutch), or a kingside fianchetto by white (most likely).

Well, I guess white can still play g3 earlier. Then I guess you'd recommend a Queen's Indian, which you can still turn into the Dutch pawn structure if you want. Turn that solid, drawing QI into a risky, exciting Dutch -- seems like a good plan to me.

Have you tried this much? How does it work out for you?

Jul-06-06  RookFile: With white, Capablanca was absolutely sure that the best approach was 4. Qc2 followed by a3.
Jul-06-06  ganstaman: Oh yeah, I forgot to say this before: can you give some sample move orders than can lead to that pawn structure? I don't think black should try to force the ...f5 too early just for the sake of it, so I'm thinking that the moves leading up to it would be sensible moves in a NI game anyway. I just can't seem to fully be able to figure it out.
Jul-06-06  ganstaman: Oh, I found that move order. Seems that RookFile was convinced a page back that the Nimzo was the Bird's opening in reverse, which is only true when black plays the Nimzo with the Dutch pawn structure and white plays Bb5 in the Bird. Regardless, he showed how to get that position, which is what I wanted.
Jul-06-06  RookFile: Glad I could be of service to you, 007.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 9)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific opening only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC