chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

John William Naylor

Number of games in database: 20
Years covered: 1937 to 1971
Last FIDE rating: 2174
Overall record: +3 -14 =3 (22.5%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games.

Repertoire Explorer
Most played openings
A04 Reti Opening (3 games)
C72 Ruy Lopez, Modern Steinitz Defense, 5.O-O (2 games)


Search Sacrifice Explorer for John William Naylor
Search Google for John William Naylor

JOHN WILLIAM NAYLOR
(born Sep-26-1916, died Aug-17-1978, 61 years old) United Kingdom

[what is this?]
Last updated: 2022-04-10 11:32:03

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 1; 20 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. J W Naylor vs M Wise  0-134193761st Oxford - Cambridge Varsity mE61 King's Indian
2. J W Naylor vs B Cafferty  0-1501957British ChampionshipA47 Queen's Indian
3. J W Naylor vs D Horseman 0-1281957British ChampionshipD30 Queen's Gambit Declined
4. J W Naylor vs R G Wade 0-1241958WhitbyB27 Sicilian
5. J W Naylor vs D A Curtis  ½-½591959British ChampionshipA04 Reti Opening
6. B Cafferty vs J W Naylor  0-1421959British ChampionshipC50 Giuoco Piano
7. J W Naylor vs S Fazekas  0-1601959British ChampionshipA04 Reti Opening
8. D B Pritchard vs J W Naylor  1-0401959British ChampionshipC26 Vienna
9. J W Naylor vs R G Wade  ½-½221959British ChampionshipA04 Reti Opening
10. J H Beaty vs J W Naylor  1-0431959British ChampionshipA07 King's Indian Attack
11. J W Naylor vs J M Soesan  ½-½511959British ChampionshipD55 Queen's Gambit Declined
12. F Parr vs J W Naylor  1-0351959British ChampionshipD61 Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox, Rubinstein Attack
13. J W Naylor vs M Fallone  0-1351959British ChampionshipD02 Queen's Pawn Game
14. J W Naylor vs F Clough  0-1531959British ChampionshipE62 King's Indian, Fianchetto
15. T J Beach vs J W Naylor  1-0401959British ChampionshipD50 Queen's Gambit Declined
16. C Gurnhill vs J W Naylor  0-1331962Whitby BCF Major opC72 Ruy Lopez, Modern Steinitz Defense, 5.O-O
17. W Ritson-Morry vs J W Naylor  1-0421962Whitby BCF Major opC76 Ruy Lopez, Modern Steinitz Defense, Fianchetto Variation
18. D Wright vs J W Naylor  1-0251967BCF-ch Major opA00 Uncommon Opening
19. R Harman vs J W Naylor  1-0391971Bayswater OpenC72 Ruy Lopez, Modern Steinitz Defense, 5.O-O
20. J W Naylor vs W A Linton  1-0451971Bayswater OpenE90 King's Indian
 page 1 of 1; 20 games  PGN Download 
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Naylor wins | Naylor loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-04-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  John Saunders: Blog article with biographical info and photos of John William Naylor - http://johnchess.blogspot.com/2018/...
Apr-10-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: The death index says b. 24 Sep 1916 and the 1939 census has 26 Sep 1916.

There is a family tree saying he died "Jul 1978 Surrey" -- read "Jul-Aug-Sep" 1978 in Surrey. Probate calendar has a John William Naylor died 17 Aug 1978 in Ewell Epsom, which is in Surrey. A little thin ..

Apr-10-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: <1939 census>

It's a register, not a census. Big difference. I mean, they're not even spelt the same.

Apr-10-22  Z free or die: Other than the spelling, then, what is the difference?

.

Apr-10-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: These should cover it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natio...

https://www.ancestry.co.uk/c/1939-r...

https://blog.nationalarchives.gov.u...

The last link mentions the 1915 register - which I didn't know of - but it seems the records were never centrally collated and aren't publicly available. See:

https://www.greatwarforum.org/topic...

Apr-10-22  Z free or die: Thanks, I looked at the first three links quickly and I think I appreciate the difference a bit more now.

But I do think the register is more accurate in intent, but not in deed:

< [Sylvanus Percival Vivian] pointed out that there seemed to be no mechanism in place that would ensure an accurate register as people moved around, joined the armed forces, or died. This was no doubt based on his own experience working in the comparatively new field of National Insurance; the General Register Office had plenty of experience of census-taking, but keeping a register continually updated was a different business altogether.>

From the blog.nationalarchives link.

(Really, the '39 register is basically a rushed '41 census with more resources summoned forth)

Apr-10-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: Whatever. Census is an English word, not Norwegian. Register seems the right word, but I wonder what it was called in 1939.
Apr-10-22  Z free or die: <Tab> - it's not just the word, the Register was a concept to actually track citizens, the Census to make a statistical study of them.

The British did both Census and Register.

If interested (yes, it's a side alley, but still...):

https://blog.nationalarchives.gov.u...

(from <Missy>'s post above)

Apr-10-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Man and woman are English words - can <Tab> tell the difference?
Apr-10-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: On the mysterious destruction of the 1931 census:

https://www.familyhistory.co.uk/193...

Apr-11-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: Wo-man. Call it what you like but the newspapers called it a census. Example from Birmingham Mail 29 Sept 1939:

<CENSUS DAY. To-day is census day. This evening every householder, or other responsible person in the home, must fill up the National Register Schedule with the names of all who are spending the night under that roof, or who are residents there, though working nights.” The form must be filled in fully, giving all the information asked for concerning ages, and occupations, as this will be required for the issuing of identity cards and rationing books. Any householder who does not receive a form, and whose case is not dealt with during the week-end, must make prompt application early next week to the registration officer at the Council House, in the case of Birmingham, or at the offices of the local authority elsewhere. When the enumerator calls for the completed form on or after Saturday, he will have to write an identification card for each member of the household. The authorities ask that he should be given reasonable facilities for writing these in comfort, and not have to write them in discomfort while standing at the door. In the case of hotel keepers and boarding house keepers, etc., the names of guests must be entered, giving their home addresses so that identity cards and ration books may be directly presented.>

Apr-11-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tabanus: Daily Mirror 28 Sep 1939 page 13: <Mr. D. QUINN, of Holborn, E.C.I, writes: — About this National Register. On Friday I shall be staying with friends and shall continue to do so for about a week. The chappie who brought the form says I must register there if I am there on the Friday. Does this mean that I stay there for the duration in order to get my rations? ANSWER: Don't be a great Goon. The Register's primarily for the purpose of checking up on the number of the population .. like a Census. Later on, you get your identification card. And THAT'S when the question of your address comes up. See?>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC