chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Raymond Keene
Keene 
Photograph copyright (c) 2003 Bo Zaunders
courtesy of keeneonchess.com.
 

Number of games in database: 1,909
Years covered: 1960 to 2012
Last FIDE rating: 2455
Highest rating achieved in database: 2510
Overall record: +1018 -180 =665 (72.5%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games in the database. 46 exhibition games, blitz/rapid, odds games, etc. are excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Reti System (148) 
    A04 A05 A06
 King's Indian (119) 
    E62 E80 E63 E69 E94
 English (73) 
    A15 A13 A14 A16 A12
 Nimzo Indian (72) 
    E30 E41 E42 E49 E26
 Grunfeld (53) 
    D91 D85 D79 D74 D76
 Queen's Gambit Declined (49) 
    D31 D35 D37 D30 D06
With the Black pieces:
 Robatsch (121) 
    B06
 Sicilian (113) 
    B32 B22 B25 B30 B78
 Pirc (99) 
    B09 B08 B07
 King's Indian (69) 
    E83 E73 E94 E62 E92
 French Defense (58) 
    C18 C05 C00 C02 C09
 Queen's Pawn Game (56) 
    A45 A40 A41 A50 D02
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Keene vs Miles, 1976 1-0
   S J Hutchings vs Keene, 1973 0-1
   Keene vs V Kovacevic, 1973 1-0
   Keene vs Robatsch, 1971 1-0
   Keene vs E Fielder, 1964 1-0
   Keene vs Briant, 1988 1-0
   M Basman vs Keene, 1981 0-1
   Keene vs S Kerr, 1979 1-0
   E Jimenez Zerquera vs Keene, 1974 0-1
   Keene vs J N Sugden, 1961 1-0

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   Strasbourg Open (1973)
   British Championship (1971)
   Lugano Olympiad qual-1 (1968)
   Slater Young Masters (1968)
   5th Lloyds Bank Masters Open (1981)
   Capablanca Memorial-B (1974)
   Alicante (1977)
   Sydney IM (1979)
   Hanover (1976)
   Hastings 1968/69 (1968)
   Esbjerg (1981)
   Commonwealth Championship (1983)
   Stevenson Memorial (1965)
   British Championship (1982)
   Reykjavik (1976)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   0ZeR0's collected games volume 46 by 0ZeR0
   0ZeR0's collected games volume 45 by 0ZeR0
   50 K Players of Yesteryear by fredthebear
   ANNOTATED HUMAN GAMES by rpn4
   ANNOTATED+ GAMES by Patca63
   ANNOTATED HUMAN GAMES by gambitfan
   ANNOTATED+ GAMES by kafkafan
   ANNOTATED HUMAN GAMES by Rickdudester
   franskfranz's 1. Nf3 by franskfranz

GAMES ANNOTATED BY KEENE: [what is this?]
   Leko vs Kramnik, 2004
   Leko vs Kramnik, 2004
   Leko vs Kramnik, 2004
   Kramnik vs Leko, 2004
   Topalov vs Kramnik, 2006
   >> 406 GAMES ANNOTATED BY KEENE

RECENT GAMES:
   🏆 Simultaneous exhibition
   Keene vs A Pleasants (Aug-??-12) 0-1, exhibition

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Raymond Keene
Search Google for Raymond Keene
FIDE player card for Raymond Keene

RAYMOND KEENE
(born Jan-29-1948, 77 years old) United Kingdom

[what is this?]

Raymond Denis Keene won the British Chess Championship in 1971, and was the first player from England to earn a Grandmaster norm, in 1974. In 1976 he became the second Englishman (following Tony Miles) to be awarded the Grandmaster title, and he was the second British chess player to beat an incumbent World Chess Champion (following Jonathan Penrose's defeat of Mikhail Tal in 1960). He represented England in eight Chess Olympiads.

Keene retired from competitive play in 1986 at the age of thirty-eight, and is now better known as a chess organiser, columnist and author. He was involved in organising the 1986, 1993 and 2000 World Chess Championships; and the 1997, 1998 and 1999 Mind Sports Olympiads; all held in London. Keene was the chess correspondent of The Times from 1985 to November 2019, and is a prolific author, having written over 100 books on chess. He was appointed an Officer of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) for services to chess in 1985.

Keene is a controversial figure in the chess world. He has been accused of plagiarism, and his business dealings and the quality of his chess books, columns and articles have also been criticised.

Chess career
Keene won the London and British Under 18 Championships (shared with Brian Denman) in 1964, and represented England at the 1965 and 1967 World Junior Chess Championships, held in Barcelona and Jerusalem respectively. At the latter event he took the silver medal, finishing behind Julio Kaplan. He was educated at Dulwich College and Trinity College, Cambridge (where he studied modern languages and graduated with an MA). Keene wrote his first chess book whilst studying at Cambridge, and won the British Chess Championship at Blackpool 1971. As a result, he was awarded the International Master title in 1972, the first English player to achieve this since Jonathan Penrose in 1961. In 1974, Keene married Annette, the sister of International Master David S. Goodman. They have one son, Alexander, born in 1991.

Keene was the second British player to meet the necessary requirements to become a Grandmaster. He was pipped to the post by a few months by Tony Miles, the first British Grandmaster in 1976. Both he and Miles won financial prizes for this feat.

Miles and Keene were at the forefront of the English chess explosion of the next 20 years, and they were followed by other British grandmasters such as Michael Stean, John Nunn, Jon Speelman and Jonathan Mestel.

Keene represented England for nearly two decades in international team events, beginning with the 1966 Chess Olympiad in Havana at age 18. He followed with the next seven straight Olympiads: Lugano 1968, Siegen 1970, Skopje 1972, Nice 1974, Haifa 1976, Buenos Aires 1978, and La Valletta 1980. His individual performances at Lugano and Haifa merited bronze medals (although individual medals were not, in fact, awarded at Haifa) and he was undefeated in three Olympiads – these two and Siegen. His later performances, though, were less impressive, with just two draws from four games at Buenos Aires and losses in both his games at La Valletta.

He represented England four times at the Students' Olympiad (Örebro 1966, Harrachov 1967, Ybbs 1968 and Dresden 1969) and four times at the European Team Championships (Bath 1973, Moscow 1977, Skara 1980 and Plovdiv 1983). At Skara he won both a bronze medal with the team and the individual gold medal for the best score on his board.

Keene won the 1971 British championship and shared second place on three occasions, in 1968, 1970 and 1972. His tournament victories include Hastings Challengers 1966, Slater Challenge Southend 1968, Johannesburg 1973, Woolacombe 1973, Capablanca Memorial (Master Group) 1974, Alicante 1977, Sydney 1979, Dortmund 1980, Barcelona 1980, Lloyds Bank Masters 1981, Adelaide 1983 and La Valletta 1985.

Playing style
Keene's playing style tended toward the strategically original and positional. Strongly influenced by Aron Nimzowitsch and Richard Réti, he accordingly preferred hypermodern openings such as the Modern Defence, Nimzo-Indian Defence and King's Indian Defence.

Chess-related work

Organiser
Keene worked as a chess event organiser. He was the originator and organiser of the annual Staunton memorial chess tournaments, one of the few regular events for masters held in London. The Oxford Companion comments: "By a combination of ability and shrewdness, Keene has attracted considerable sponsorship and has proved himself capable of efficient and rapid organisation of chess events".p196

Keene brought Victor Korchnoi and Garry Kasparov together for their 1983 Candidates' semi-final match in London as part of the 1984 World Championship cycle; the semi-final match between Vasily Smyslov and Zoltán Ribli was also played at the same site. He organised the 1984 Russia (USSR) vs Rest of the World match in London within two weeks, enabling the event to go ahead on time after the previous plans had fallen through, described by John Nunn as "a magnificent organisational achievement at such short notice."

Keene has also been involved in organising several World Championship finals matches. He arranged for the first half of the World Chess Championship 1986 return match between Kasparov and Karpov in London. The match, however, made a loss for the British Chess Federation (BCF) and, for reasons never clarified, he resigned from his position in the BCF shortly afterwards. He organised the 1993 PCA World Championship match between Kasparov and Nigel Short in London, for which he was one of the official commentators along with Grandmasters Jonathan Speelman and Daniel King. He was the instrumental force behind 'Brain Games', which organized the World Championship match in 2000 between Kasparov and Vladimir Kramnik. Following the match, however, he retained the trophy in lieu of money he believed he was owed by the collapse of Brain Games: Kramnik did not receive it until 2008. Brain Games later collapsed in controversial circumstances.

Columnist
Keene became the chess columnist of The Spectator in March 1977. His column was terminated in September 2019, when he was replaced by Luke McShane. Following the retirement of Harry Golombek, Keene was appointed the chess correspondent of The Times in 1985. In November 2019 he was replaced by David Howell. In December 1996 he became the chess columnist of the Sunday Times. In August 2017 he was replaced by David Howell.

Television personality
Keene has appeared on television. He covered the world championships of 1981, 1985, 1986, 1990, 1993, and 1995 for BBC 2, CHANNEL 4, and Thames TV. In the "Duels of the Mind" series which aired on the UK ITV network, Keene, along with South African author and civil rights campaigner Donald Woods, discussed and analysed what Keene regarded as the twelve best chess games ever played.

Magazine editor
From 1978 to 1982, Keene was the editor of Modern Chess Theory, a magazine on openings which included contributions from the Soviet world champions Mikhail Botvinnik, Vasily Smyslov, and Mikhail Tal.

Author
Keene claims to be "the author of 140 books on chess". He was the Chess Advisor to Batsford. His early books such as Howard Staunton (1975, with R. N. Coles) often dealt with players with styles similar to his own. Aron Nimzowitsch: a Reappraisal (1974) is much admired and was revised and translated into Russian in 1986,1 with an algebraic edition published in English in 1999. In 1989, he and Nathan Divinsky wrote Warriors of the Mind, an attempt to determine the 64 best chess players of all time. The statistical methods used have not met with wide approval, but the player biographies and games were regarded by one book as providing a good overviewbut also incurred criticism for inaccuracy. Much of Keene's later work has attracted criticism for sloppiness, plagiarism and the habit of copying passages, including errors, from one book to another.

Controversies
Allegations of plagiarism
Keene has on several occasions been accused of plagiarism. In 1993 John Donaldson accused Keene of committing plagiarism in The Complete Book of Gambits (Batsford, 1992). Donaldson wrote "Just how blatant was the plagiarism? Virtually every word and variation in the four and a half pages devoted to Lisitsin's Gambit in Keene's book was stolen." After Keene refused to pay Donaldson a requested $200 for the use of his material, Keene's American publisher Henry Holt and Company ended up paying Donaldson $3,000.

In 2008, Keene was accused of plagiarising a column by Edward Winter for a piece published in The Spectator and subsequently on the website Chessville and on page 129 of his book The Official Biography of Tony Buzan. More than a third of the article was taken directly from Winter's column.

In 2013, Winter reflected on plagiarism in chess: "a particularly sordid corner of the chess world which will never be eradicated without maximum public exposure". He went on: "The latest instance is the discovery by Justin Horton that material from the first volume of Kasparov's My Great Predecessors series has been misappropriated by Raymond Keene in The Spectator."

Private Eye describes the plagiarism as involving "substantial amounts of text lifted from chess books, mainly Kasparov's but also other authors". One case involves Keene's notes to a game between Garry Kasparov and Anatoly Karpov, which he annotated for The Times on 8 December 2011 and The Spectator on 5 January 2013.

These alleged plagiarisms, which Edward Winter calls "eye-popping" are catalogued at "a convenient 'plagiarism index' which is being kept updated".

Tony Miles
In 1985, Keene received £1,178 from the BCF for being Tony Miles' second at the Interzonal in Tunis; however, he had not actually been Miles' second but accepted the money and shared it with Miles. Miles had initially agreed to this plan but eventually told the BCF about it in 1987. Two months later, Keene resigned his posts as BCF Publicity Director and FIDE delegate. Keene said that his resignation was for different reasons, and that he was "furious" at his treatment after organising numerous events from 1983 to 1987.

Brain Games Network
In 2000, Keene's former brother-in-law David Levy accused him of deceiving the directors of their company Mind Sports Olympiad Ltd (MSO) by setting up a rival company, Brain Games Network plc (BGN), without their knowledge and using £50,000 of MSO Ltd money to do so. Levy further alleged that Keene changed his story several times as to the purpose of the payment and the reasons why the new company had been set up. He complained that shares in the new company were held by Keene and an associate (Don Morris) but not by the company for which they had been supposed to be working, nor any of its directors other than themselves. Levy wrote:

As one would expect, our original investors were equally astounded at the news and extremely angry at Keene. They had by now invested £1.5 million (approximately $2.25 million at that time) partly or largely on the basis of their faith in Keene and myself. Now they had learned that one of their two key consultants, the one with money-raising skills, had been working to set up a rival company.

Nothing, however, was proven against Keene (who had swiftly paid an identical sum, i.e. £50,000 to MSO, making the subsequent explanation that this constituted a personal loan from himself) and his new company went on to organise the world championship match later that same year. (It was at this time that Private Eye started referring to him as "The Penguin", a nickname he had first acquired in 1966.)

Levy further criticised Keene for selling three of his own companies to BGN for £220,000 despite their being "virtually worthless". The three companies had between them "a total capital and reserves of only £2,300". At much the same time, according to Levy, BGN purchased a web site and two domain names from Chess and Bridge Limited. However, they made the purchase in two stages. The first of these stages was its sale to Giloberg Finance Limited, owned by Keene's associate Alan Lubin: the second was the immediate sale of the same items, by Giloberg, to BGN. The first sale was for approximately £60,000 (in fact $100,000) and the second was for £290,000, hence making Giloberg "an instant profit of approximately £230,000" and raising the question of why BGN should have paid a sum much greater than the original vendors considered the items were worth.

BGN collapsed in controversial circumstances. Shareholders were unhappy that sums amounting to at least £675,000 had been paid to directors in "fees and payments" despite the company swiftly becoming insolvent. Investors were also unhappy that Keene and Lubin had acquired 88% of the company "for a song" even though the remaining 12% had been sold for around £3 million.

During the course of the 2000 Braingames World Championship Keene was accused of heavy-handed behaviour in having journalist John Henderson removed from the press room with the assistance of bouncers.

Korchnoi
Viktor Korchnoi alleged that when acting as his second in the 1978 World Championship match, Keene broke his contract by writing a book about the match (which appeared three days after the match finished) having specifically signed an agreement "not to write, compile or help to write or compile any book during the course of the match". Korchnoi commented: "Mr Keene betrayed me. He violated the contract. It was clear that while Mr Keene was writing one book and then another, Mr Stean was doing his work for him."

Attempts to defend Keene were rebutted by Michael Stean's mother, who stated that she was in a position to know what was in Keene's contract since she herself had typed it. Keene, she claimed, had signed this despite having already negotiated a contract with Batsford to write a book about the match. She described "a premeditated and deliberate plan to deceive" and noted that Keene's conduct had come under suspicion during the match.

Articles by Raymond Keene
https://www.chessgames.com/RaymondK...

User: ray keene Wikipedia article: Raymond Keene

Last updated: 2024-09-06 02:36:52

Try our new games table.

 page 1 of 77; games 1-25 of 1,909  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. N Totton vs Keene 0-1381960Bromley tourneyE00 Queen's Pawn Game
2. Keene vs J N Sugden  1-0241960Match game 8B90 Sicilian, Najdorf
3. Keene vs J N Sugden 1-0261960Dulwich CollegeA12 English with b3
4. H T Jones vs Keene  0-1241960Exhibition gameC55 Two Knights Defense
5. Keene vs J N Sugden 1-0191960Dulwich CollegeB98 Sicilian, Najdorf
6. J N Sugden vs Keene 0-1481960MatchD22 Queen's Gambit Accepted
7. J N Sugden vs Keene 0-1341960MatchD22 Queen's Gambit Accepted
8. J N Sugden vs Keene 0-1311960MatchC16 French, Winawer
9. Keene vs J N Sugden 1-0261960Match game, ClaphamA12 English with b3
10. Keene vs J N Sugden 1-0281960Match game 1, ClaphamB23 Sicilian, Closed
11. Keene vs J N Sugden 1-0261961MatchD47 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
12. Keene vs L Bauer  1-0271961Clapham Common CCA70 Benoni, Classical with 7.Nf3
13. S Leff vs Keene 0-1361961Clapham Common CCA20 English
14. J N Sugden vs Keene 1-0261961MatchA55 Old Indian, Main line
15. Keene vs J N Sugden 1-0341961Match game 21, Dulwich CollegeA17 English
16. J Regruto vs Keene  0-1331961Clapham Common CC ChampsA47 Queen's Indian
17. T D Baldwin vs Keene  0-1351961Olympia ExhibitionC17 French, Winawer, Advance
18. G K Sandiford vs Keene 0-1271961Dulwich CollegeB00 Uncommon King's Pawn Opening
19. A Ogus vs Keene  ½-½371961School matchC18 French, Winawer
20. G K Sandiford vs Keene  0-1521961Match, game 5B16 Caro-Kann, Bronstein-Larsen Variation
21. Keene vs J N Sugden 1-0351961OlympiaA67 Benoni, Taimanov Variation
22. J N Sugden vs Keene 0-1301961Match game 6, BeckenhamE40 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3
23. Keene vs J N Sugden 1-0251961Match game 6, Bognor RegisD43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
24. Keene vs Orly 1-0101961Clapham Common CCB02 Alekhine's Defense
25. J N Sugden vs Keene 0-1291961MatchE40 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3
 page 1 of 77; games 1-25 of 1,909  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Keene wins | Keene loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 231 OF 402 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: Ray, why blame Toplaov and Danailov? You didn't blame Kasparov for the same complaint in 2000. It is the arbiter's fault entirely.
Oct-01-06  Uzi: <ray, have you ever thought to be fide president?>

<The greatest gulp and guffaw provided by the book comes on page 125, when Kasparov comments regarding the Termination:

‘The final truth about this match, I believe, is as Grandmaster Keene reported it.’

Having said something nice about Grandmaster Keene, he proceeds (as on many occasions in the book) to quote Grandmaster Keene saying something nice about him. Naturally, there is not a word about Grandmaster Keene’s telex to Campomanes advocating termination, or all the concomitant falsehoods and inconsistencies (such as those which have been documented in Chess Notes). That is the other side of Kasparov’s technique: no sense of obligation to mention, let alone try to refute, awkward facts. To give just one more example: during the 1986 FIDE presidential campaign, the FIDE Facts sheets played a vital role in destroying the credibility of the challengers Keene/Lucena, by accurate and fair quotation of their own words.>

http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...

Oct-01-06  danielpi: <Eric Schiller> Two questions of blame: one is sporting conduct, the other is legal conduct. Topalov's camp isn't really legally blameworthy, since they only made requests. So, legally, the onus of wrongdoing goes to the AC, which acquiesced to those requests (at least partially). As for conduct, requesting the rest area videos, threatening to quit, demanding a modification in the playing conditions, and implicitly accusing Kramnik of cheating are all blameworthy actions.
Oct-01-06  Uzi: <The opening sentence of a report by Raymond Keene on page 2 of The Times of 21 December 1987 claimed that Kasparov is 'the first player in more than 75 years to come from behind to win the world chess championship'.

What about the title matches played in 1927, 1935, 1937, 1951, 1954, 1957, 1963, 1969, 1972 and 1985? > (C.N. 1582 reprinted in Winter's Chess Explorations.)

ROFLMAO!

Oct-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: <uzi> i fear you are in violation of the code of this website regarding personal attacks-this will be copied to chessgames admin. you are quoting mr edward winter who is notorious -shall we say-for putting his own slant on the truth and making highly selective quotations. in that respect pls provide the full quote and context for the snippet you have chosen from the times of 1987.

regarding the question of standing for fide president-i did stand in 1986 as fide general secretary without success-however i doubt i cd have made a worse mess of thngs than those who did win!

Oct-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: eric i agree-gijssen is beyond the pale-i have my own suspicions about what was happening there but they are doubtless libellous. the whole fide crew-their champion, their managers and their officials are just a bunch of ***** as far as i am concerned -i briefly thought kirsan had the best interests of the match, chess and his own nation at heart but this midnight press release shatters that illusion as well. i truly hope vlad walks now from this nest of vipers-he cannot win against such odds.
Oct-01-06  Uzi: <ray keene>, if you care to seek redress from Mr. Winter in the law courts, feel free to do so. In the meantime, I will see fit to post what I believe to be within the guidelines. Let's see which way the 'appeals committee' is biased.
Oct-01-06  veigaman: ray, i wrote in the page kramnik- topalov discussion that it was extremely strange to me that the fide president was no there when this match is the most important chess event in the last years and i gave the example of the football world club or olimpic games where the presidents of both are always in the place. I dont know why all this mess is a well prepared campaing for fide to favour his champion and also to try to sell his president as a tremendous mediator and the heroe of the story
Oct-01-06  acirce: <Ray, why blame Toplaov and Danailov? You didn't blame Kasparov for the same complaint in 2000. It is the arbiter's fault entirely.>

What did Kasparov do that resembles Topa-Danailov's behaviour? Of course, I wasn't there and don't know anything.

Did he find out about Kramnik's bathroom visits by spying? Did he say they were "suspicious"? Did he say so openly, making his "suspicions" known to the whole world to make chess fans everywhere start discussing whether Kramnik was cheating? Did he make utterly unreasonable demands like Danailov demanding that the players should be stopped from using their relaxation rooms? Did he threaten to withdraw? Did he say he'd refuse to shake hands? Did he say he'd refuse to be on the joint press conferences?

Also, would he have been happy to collect his free point if Kramnik had forfeited - of course this is purely speculative and hypothetical since you did a good job unlike the Elista weasels.

Oct-01-06  Uzi: <regarding the question of standing for fide president-i did stand in 1986 as fide general secretary without success-however i doubt i cd have made a worse mess of thngs than those who did win!>

But, <ray keene>, you supported the PCA breakaway in 1993, which destroyed the FIDE world championship cycle and caused a split in the chess world, the damaging effects of which are still being felt. Gee, thanks for that.

Oct-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: fide was and is corrupt -as such i am proud of breaking away from them in 1993 and my advice to kramnik now is walk away from this nest of vipers and offer a chance to anand outside fides jurisdiction. by the way-if we are going to trade insults i believe you shd announce your identity as i have done. <uzi> jonathan manley perhaps?
Oct-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: <acirce> eric schiller handled the whole thing so well in 2000 that i dont even recall knowing it happened until it had been solved!
Oct-01-06  Uzi: <fide was and is corrupt> Agreed, but it's been that way since the Europeans/Americans lost overall control. One can witness the same pattern with other international governing bodies, sporting or otherwise.

<my advice to kramnik now is walk away from this nest of vipers and offer a chance to anand outside fides jurisdiction>

And what then? Kasparov was the only chess player with a big enough ego to carry the title as his own personal property. Like it or not, FIDE is the world body and they should control the world title.

<if we are going to trade insults i believe you shd announce your identity as i have done.>

Trading insults would violate the posting guidelines. I'm not personally attacking anyone.

Oct-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: <uzi> ah i must have misunderstood-since you seem to be quite a newcomer welcome to the site!
Oct-01-06  Larsker: <ray keene: my advice to kramnik now is walk away from this nest of vipers>

What a reunification match this is turning out to be. Feels like a party going all wrong

Oct-01-06  Uzi: Thanking you kindly, sir, but I still reserve my right to buzz around as the mood takes me.

<A fly may sting a stately horse and make him wince; but one is but an insect, and the other is a horse still.> Samuel Johnson

Oct-01-06  babywizard: After some thoughts, I disagree that Kramnik should simply walk away and give Topalov the free match, hence the unified title. It just gives FIDE and Topalov a stronger claim than in 1993. While FIDE has plans and no problems with their organization of a decent cycle, Kramnik has nothing. So if Kramnik does walk away now then how is he going to start his own cycle/match? Without reasonable sponsors or even a worthy opponent, Kramnik might end up exactly like Shirov in 1998 when he refused to play Kasparov for $600 000.
Oct-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eric Schiller: <acirce> the exact term Kasparov used was "scandalous". He was put off by the fact that Kramnik frequently went to the toilet during the opening phase of the game. He didn't make any accusations of cheating at all simply that he found the behavior inappropriate. I instituted a policy where the arbiter accompanied players to the toilet, which had been carefully searched before the start of the game, as was each player, and the arbiter stood by the sinks while the player use the toilet. While not going into the gory details, I can say that from the sinks there was auditory evidence of the toilets being used. I recalled that this solution came quickly and was agreed to by both sides without reservation. It didn't even rise to the level where Ray was made aware of it, though I'm sure I must've mentioned at some point because it involves a change in procedure. The important thing here is that there is a clear precedent for the situation and an acceptable solution. The incident in 2000 was so quiet that I don't recall any mention of it in the press, but the matter was not kept a particular secret. These sorts of issues are why a competent arbiter is an essential. It is very easy to let a small thing mushroom into a major dispute is not handled correctly.
Oct-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: <babywizard> i dont think so-if kramnik walks then the titles remain un-unified-in fact vlad is in a stronger position than before having won the bit of the match that was played-i think most people -myself included-thought before the match that he wd lose!

frankly if 1m dollars is the going price for a prize fund i think vlad will encounter quite a few outraged chess fans who wd support for ex a kramnik v anand match-its topalov who wd have lost credibility.

i can assure you that i certainly wd have been unable to carry on playing at full strength after such an orchestrated ordeal -however- vlad may be made of sterner stuff--it all reminds me of the 1984/85 fiasco when campomanes stopped the first kasparov v karpov match-i feel i have been fighting the same battle against the same corrupt and incompetent fide for the past 21 years.

Oct-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  ray keene: <uzi> thank you for the compliment-i think!
Oct-01-06  babywizard: <ray keene><i dont think so-if kramnik walks then the titles remain un-unified-in fact vlad is in a stronger position than before having won the bit of the match that was played-i think most people -myself included-thought before the match that he wd lose!>

But what about the contract to unify the title? If he illegally abandons the match, then wouldn't it count as a forfeit of the match and the unified title goes to Topalov?

Oct-01-06  Uzi: One final thing, for the moment.

Is a nest of vipers the same thing as a brood of vipers?

<‘Brood of Vipers’ (Matthew 3.7; 12.34; 23.33) Craig S. Keener

Palmer Theological Seminary, 6 E. Lancaster Ave., Wynnewood, PA 19096, USA, ckeener@eastern.edu

According to a widespread tradition in the ancient Mediterranean world (attested in Herodotus, Aelian, Pliny and other writers), vipers killed their mother during their birth, hence were associated with parent-murder. Ancient writers sometimes used parent-murder as an example of one of the worst conceivable crimes, one that invited divine vengeance. Whereas Matthew’s source may apply the image of vipers’ offspring generally to the crowds listening to John the Baptist, Matthew applies it specifically to the Pharisees in all three of the passages where he recounts the image. In two of these instances the Pharisees claim honorable descent; Matthew ironically inverts the value of this claim through this image of vipers’ parent-murder. Matthew utilizes the image for his intra-Jewish polemic, contending that his Jewish-Christian hearers are truer heirs of the patriarchs and prophets than the Pharisees are.>

http://jnt.sagepub.com/cgi/content/...

Oct-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <uzi> - <FIDE is the world body and they should control the world title>

Administer, perhaps. Control, no. That way lies corruption and cronyism, as we have seen. There have been world champions before and after FIDE.

<Eric Schiller> - <These sorts of issues are why a competent arbiter is an essential. > Exactly. I noted an interesting word in Bessel Kok's statement - 'outsourcing'. As in hiring somebody competent to get the essentials right. I can think of some good candidates, quite close at hand.

Oct-01-06  Wild Bill: <uzi:<Kasparov was the only chess player with a big enough ego to carry the title as his own personal property. Like it or not, FIDE is the world body and they should control the world title.>>

If I may injuect my views into this, FIDE is now totally worthless. With Kirsan's 2700 rule, FIDE has actually abrogated its own raison d'etre. The idea was that they were going to control the title and arrange for a qualified official challenger every three years so that the champion cannot play lesser oppoents as Alekhine did or insist on financial backing as Lasker did.

Now, with the 2700 rule, we're getting back to a time when any remotely plausible contender can buy his way into a championship match. I thought FIDE existed to put an end to that kind of thing.

<Mr. Keene>, I would like your views on that, if you would be so kind.

Oct-01-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Eeeurgh. What's that <viper> stuff for? Is it a case of my-wiki-is-bigger-than-yours or just good old-fashioned English-was-good-enough-for-Jesus?

I'll have to quote the Bard:

To Moro, and To Morphy, and To Tal
And Champions all, dead or alive
Or - like a Fischer - somewhere twixt
the two. How must it seem?
Chess is a harsh mistress.
She'll mate no more.

[enter Silicon]
I'll mate, my Lord.
And Kram and Topa will be soon forgot.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 402)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 231 OF 402 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific player only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC