Looks like Canada is grooming a generation of cucks.>

That is so evil. How can these people bring in the homos to brainwash their little kindergartners!?

This makes them one of the more challenging and dynamic news sources, in my view.>

We agree and that's what I like to do most of the time, but not this time.

<CHC> has the same spirit as ANTIFA, the same spirit as a Gay Pride Parade, the same spirit as a pro Abortion monster who also has the gall to lecture the regular folks on decency, all while trying to silence them.

You did see he was trying to suck up to who he <thinks> is Daniels' mom (don't know what to think about that account yet - no evidence and kinda fishy) and get me banned?

<Ohio>, it's time to stand up against these kinds of people lest they take over everything everywhere. The time of always walking away has led us to where we are today in American and in the world.

Let the (spiritually) dead bury the (physically) dead.

Compare 1 Kings 19:19-21

<OhioChessFan: You really need to let it go with <CHC>. You made your point. Now, just let it go. I get it and all, but it's way past time to let it go.>

Imagine you're holding a pen...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lT0...

I agree that it is quite distasteful for other posters to exploit his death scoring points against you, also using his player page trying to get you disciplined and punished. Some onlookers find it distasteful when you perpetuate any arguments on his player page, and even responding to those attempts trying to get you disciplined and punished. Now is a good time to be the better man and turn the other cheek.

Lots of people have wanted me gone over the years: The World getting nuked in 2004, the Ray Keene Crowd showdown in 2005, Kramnik supporters, Carlsen Fanboys, the Barangay Wesley, social justice warriors, unrepentant rulebreakers, privilege-abusing Editors. Certain kibitzers have Blown the Whistle on my every post for attention and sympathy, trying anything and everything to drive me away, even reporting me in the Member Support Forum many times, which is breaking the rules to complain about somebody else allegedly breaking the rules. How about that.

The gay men keep saying that you and I have the biggest wankas on this site. OK, I don't know how they know that, but we should accept the compliment. Clearly they are insanely jealous of your, ahem, attributes, and desperate to be relevant, which are both very common themes over time.

I remain mystified why so many people accuse you of using alternate identities, as you have such an easily distinctive persona, although that has been one of the most underhanded tactics ever used here. At the moment, you represent the big bad deplorable Trump supporter which has melted snowflakes all around the country. Note that one of the worst rulebreakers in site history keeps trying to copy your style, just like he tries to copy my style, so he is acting like you under a sockpuppet to test you but also gain your acceptance. Think about it.

thegoodanarchist chessforum (kibitz #1036)

He gained some respect for that, IMO.

I can see <OCF>'s point about your witness, <BP>. Your questioning of the identity of <ss> wasn't done very tactfully, IMO.

That said, your comment <<CHC> has the same spirit as ANTIFA,> is spot on. That guy would have joined Lenin's Bolsheviks in a heartbeat, protestations to the contrary notwithstanding.

That's really what it all boils down to for me. And I think it's bs that <SS> is Daniel's mom. I think it's a sick joke.

<I've been here for 15 years. I am not about to stand by while some newby tries to exploit Daniel's passing to insinuate himself into the circles of power where he thinks he can play god.>

The guy seriously has some issues. He's like <Abdel>. I've said that already and no one seemed to want to agree, openly, but just think about it. Same kind of self importance, same kind of wannabe polymath persona. You know what I mean?

And yes, <Bureaucrat> took a manly stance on the censorship issue and he deserves to be commended for that. We must commend proper statements and attitudes and not withhold our approval due to resentment from other issues, and in this case I commend <Bureaucrat>.

But I won't let him off the hook on the other stuff!

And you should be commended too for standing up to that <Bolshevik BullY> AKA <Chess Homo Cuck>.

Well, Pilgrim, only after you...

The guy seriously has some issues. He's like <Abdel>. I've said that already and no one seemed to want to agree, openly, but just think about it. Same kind of self importance, same kind of wannabe polymath persona. You know what I mean?>

Actually, I haven't read that many <CHC> posts.

First time I interacted with him, he got full-on nasty in criticizing some of my edgy stuff (where I was close to the line but not crossing it), and then proceeded to post some dubious humor himself that was close to, or over, the line.

So I pegged him for a hypocrite right away and pretty much haven't paid any attention to him since then. Until he tried to get you banned...

<"Scared News" and pushback in Canada>

There is a disturbing trend in the Canadian media to self-censor itself in cases involving multiple shooting incidents.

The media focuses entirely on testimonials about the victims' characters. This is meaningless "information."

Media consumers want to know answers to the questions that used to be taught in reputable journalism classes.

<What happened.

Where.

When.

Who was responsible for what happened, and why did they do it.>

In these cases, Canadian media never, ever report the last- and most important item.

Why?

They are terrified to insult Muslim people. They are terrified to go on record, they are terrified to even think about investigating the increasingly likely possibility that this was another Muslim terrorist attack.

The first thing an average Canadian thinks on these occasions is, naturally, "Is this yet another Muslim terrorist attack in Canada."

I guarantee you that is the FIRST THING people think in my country.

But, because of the climate of pandering, sickening political correctness in Canada, it is the LAST THING the media are willing to even entertain.

No hard hitting questions. No reports on investigations into what *actually* happened.

This information comes out, if at all, only days or more commonly weeks after the incidents. Or never.

Instead, we get weepy, fake-emotion hand wringing over the "stories of the victims."

NOBODY GIVES A RAT'S ASS ABOUT THE VICTIMS except for their immediate families.

Nobody will admit this fact, because people are terrified to be seen as "insensitive."

Instead, they lie to themselves and others that what they really care about is the story of the victims.

They don't. They care about what actually happened, and why.

###############

One piece of good news- there is pushback in Canada against this deplorable state of affairs.

Just this morning I read an op-ed piece in my local newspaper saying exactly what I just typed here (but much more politely) about the latest mass shooting in Canada, which occurred yesterday.

"Just the Facts Please" was the title of the piece.

They are terrified to insult Muslim people. They are terrified to go on record, they are terrified to even think about investigating the increasingly likely possibility that this was another Muslim terrorist attack.>

Get your burqa now, before demand leads to a price increase.

They come in two different colors now.>

Why? >

So I think the man was thinking about earthly matters first and spiritual matters "later". This is true today where a lot of people say they are too busy to go to church and that after they retire they will dedicate more time to church or synagogue visits. (which they probably won't do anyway)