Without a vaccination, what replaced Christianity in Europe may well do the same in America.>

https://amgreatness.com/2020/08/11/...

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXD...

"Thank you for this information. It would not, and will not, be reported in the mainstream, leftist media."

"Biden & the Dem Party have picked a token "black" woman to round out their ticket of hypocrisy. She will appeal to the elite deep pockets, but who else? How does it feel to be a token, Kamala, obviously above your pay grade, with boatloads of baggage to boot? I hope Trump & his campaign are creatively merciless in pointing out her menu of shortcomings, and enough people are NOT stupid enough to fall for this disastrous combo. Imagine her in the White House, should Biden fade out."

"Make no mistake, Biden was not the one to choose her!"

"Biden didn’t pick anyone that day. Biden picked oat meal cookies and cartoons ... He already has tapioca for brains."

"So we had a fake American Indian in Elizabeth Warren and now we have a fake African American in Kamala Harris?"

"Gaga Joe couldn't pick a pair of matching socks. The DNC picked the palest "women of color" it could find., someone with no connection with African Americans."

https://scontent-bos3-1.xx.fbcdn.ne...

If you harass the libs about this long enough, eventually one of them will squeak out something like, "that was terrible" but it's like pulling teeth, so you know they don't really care.

This is an innocent victim, whereas George Floyd, who the libs expressed outrage over, was a career criminal and drug addict who pointed a gun at a pregnant woman's belly after breaking into her house.

Take a good look at the picture in the link above and explain this to me.

Let me ask, do we need to respect the libs when these are the people that express zero outrage over this?

Here's a word to the wise: if you ever find yourself seeking the approval of the libs for any reason, it indicates that your thinking isn't just a little off. No. It means that you are entirely wrongheaded about everything at a foundational level.

https://scontent-bos3-1.xx.fbcdn.ne...

What follows are comments in the thread from the link in my previous post. If you scrolled by it, go back up, click the link and see the image. Then come and read the following:

"If you want actual justice for this little boy then stop comparing it to the BLM movement, stop saying white lives matter, and stop doing everything in your power to take away from the BLM movement. "

"Stop use the death of this young boy for your own good and be an opportunist to become a racist."

"what about white on white crime?"

"The white lives matter hashtag is bullsheeet tho."

"For all of the @#$%*@!s that used this poor baby’s death as some sort of field day to fit your bs racist narratives, FUUUCK YALL"

"White lives matter? What about white on white crime? Stop killing each other if you want America to take your ”WLM” seriously!"

"Amerikkka has one of the best justice system in the world, yet some crimes on blacks people go unsolved"

This, dear Elite Posters, <THIS> is what is in the liberal's heart. Let that <sink in>.

Half the country (or so) thinks this way, and these people vote. This is why democracy is destined to fail. Democracy can only work for a moral, Christian nation. The enemy figured out long ago that the only way to defeat a mighty nation like America is to use democracy against it. Democracy is the weapon.

First corrupt the culture with an anti-Christian propaganda campaign that is carried out from all media platforms including newspapers, tv sitcoms, commercials, movies, music, celebrities and so on. Put the anti-Christian people in the universities to corrupt the minds of the young.

Then just wait.

Just wait, and democracy will do the rest.

No, a representative republic does not keep democracy from being tyranny of the majority. A corrupt and immoral populace simply votes in people who are also godless, corrupt and immoral, because they are like minded and anti-christian.

Read those comments one more time and realize that these people's vote is equal to yours. Read them once more and understand that there are more fools than there are wise people and that democracy allows the fools, the wicked, the perverse to take over.

Sure, listen to the wicked, the perverse, the godless when they tell you, "democracy is terrible, you're right. It just happens that it's still better than any other form of government."

Philosophical questions arise.

Is it better to have freedom or justice?

Is it better to have peace or justice?

Is a free society better than a just society?

Is a free society better than a moral society?

All of these brainwashed conservative sheep out there think democracy was handed down to America from God Himself. As though the constitution is another book in the bible. As though the founding fathers were new apostles appointed to America in 1776.

What's the use? No one here is ready for this rhetoric of mine, that much I know. They think "<Big Pawn> sometimes goes too far." I wonder if the Good People ever consider their own biases? Do they ever perceive with objective eyes the box that their minds are stuck in? Could it even be possible that the Good People are stuck in a box and don't know it, just like the libs (but a different box)?

Is a free society better than a moral society>

1- ) Freedom always..Truth in the end prevails no matter how bad things are going. . I understand your frustration of you country (actually the world) getting robbed and twisted by liberalism and its agenda with great help from MSM, fueling the people with Marxist values and so forth.

It is quite common for voters to consider gender and ethnicity, this is hardly anything new. One must assume Biden and the Democrats have had this in mind when choosing Harris indeed.

<"Is it possible for anyone to give an unbiased opinion?"> Alas, I noticed my logical fallacy only after posting and decided to leave it there...I was mainly after if she was known to have particular fields of interest, strong/weak sides etc.

Awful. Just awful.>>

Awful. Just awful.>>

AWFULs:

Hey, Black Crimes Matter!>

There should be lawsuits against stores for keeping merchandise less than 6 feet apart.

It has nothing to do with one's opinion or oneself. That would be like if I wanted to ban basketball because I don't like it, and I hate democracy because democracy allows basketball. That would be arrogant and selfish. That would be tyrannical.

This is not about that sort of thing. This is about moral decay and how democracy, in the hands of immoral people, is a bad thing.>

What's the difference between these two statements:

1) That would be like if I wanted to ban basketball because I don't like it, and I hate democracy because democracy allows basketball.

A thought provoking article.>

I've been thinking about those very things since early June.

What I find off-putting is his continual use of the phrase "Judeo-Christian values."

Let me ask, do we need to respect the libs when these are the people that express zero outrage over this? >

This is great! Let's spread it! AWFLs. Lol.>

I gotta give credit where it's due - I read that on The Z Man blog.

I set them straight, here:

Kenneth S Rogoff (kibitz #441491)

LOL!

They stopped fighting back a long time ago. None of the libs fight back, which is one of the reasons I'm posting here instead. I need disagreement and for that I need someone to fight back.

Have you seen <Troller>? He is a lib but he fights back by engaging the <central points> of whatever I argue. He has philosophical awareness and is knowledgeable enough to comment relevantly on my posts. Therefore, I welcome his posting here. He's not boring precisely because he engages with the <central points> of my arguments.

There were some others here that did that as well, but I forget who they are. My forum has been relatively inactive over the last year or two so they kind of went away.

My point is that the <rogoff> libs are boring because they don't fight back, but the libs that come to this forum are interesting because the <do fight back>.

Please understand this one very important point: avoiding the <central points> in favor of trolling, misdirection, fallacy, irrelevancy or saying <YOUR MOTHER> is not fighting back. The libs on the other page might mistake this for fighting back. If that's the case, the it's Dunning-Kruger all the way.

Rogoff libs gave up. They quit. They don't even try to engage in the <central points> anymore.

AntiChrist white hood?

Your mother?

Free voter ID is not free?

Kindergarten kids?

Idiot?

I don't use twitter nor go to their website, but found some of the thread posted on americandigest.org.

Have you seen <Troller>?>

Yes, I actually used him as an example when I was refuting <Diademas>' claim that your forum is an "echo chamber":

Kenneth S Rogoff (kibitz #440830)