Libs are scum..Period.

Meanwhile..
Look at that. TDS as it highest:

https://twitter.com/tedwheeler/stat...

They are giving Trump the reelection on a plate. And they are not even noticing that.

The cops need to get off their backsides and do a whole lot more shooting to make American safe again. >

I’ll check it out>

You're that open minded??

https://twitter.com/tedwheeler/stat... >

No thanks, he says? To public safety?

https://offensivetruth.com/welcome-...

Okay. I registered and posted there on the article The Shooting Begins. I used a different but similar username.

[Event "Live Chess"]
[Site "Chess.com"]
[Date "2020.08.29"]
[Round "?"]
[White "jlkinglion"]
[Black "TakeNoChances"]
[Result "0-1"]
[TimeControl "180"]
[WhiteElo "2243"]
[BlackElo "2238"]
[Termination "TakeNoChances won by checkmate"]

1. g4 h5 2. gxh5 e5 3. e3 d5 4. c4 Nf6 5. cxd5 Qxd5 6. Qf3 Bg4 7. Qxd5 Nxd5 8. Nc3 Nb4 9. Bb5+ c6 10. Ba4 Nd3+ 11. Kf1 Rxh5 12. Nge2 Bh3+ 13. Kg1 Rg5+ 14. Ng3 f5 15. f4 exf4 16. exf4 Bc5# 0-1

He trolled me by playing 1. g4 but I counter-trolled by playing ...h5. I further trolled by playing 5...Qxd5.

Long but very nice article explaining South America and Brazil pandemia. Exposing CNN and left wing abhorrent midia, and showing why we will reelect our conservative President.. No BLM lover in charge around here.

Are you sure you're even on the Left?>

I roughly agree with the right to create all that was written from point 5 through point 2.

On a small scale, libertarian thinking is fully supportive for villages/towns/counties of like-minded people to create laws and rules as they see fit. I believe the Constitution allows for this, and in fact promotes it.

Regarding the 2nd Amendment, bearing arms and all that:

“A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed“

In your opinion, Why was the phrase “well regulated Militia” included in the text of the 2nd Amendment?

In your opinion, Why was the phrase “well regulated Militia” included in the text of the 2nd Amendment?>

Well, there is no short answer that will suffice. So this will be a long post.

State militias were all the able-bodied adult (white) males of the states. We have to keep in mind that people viewed their states much differently back when the constitution was written, even all the way through the Civil War and beyond.

People were for the most part loyal to their states above all else, and this loyalty was passed on generation to generation. Which is why so many regular army officers went over to the Confederacy. Robert E Lee couldn't bear to take arms against <Virginia>, his home state. But he do so against the USA.

The 13 colonies were basically 13 independent countries after winning the Revolution, and initially were only loosley bound by the Articles of Confederation. And that was the mindset up to the Civil War.

When Lincoln got elected, the thinking at the time by many was that states had the right to leave the union. And it wasn't just people in the Confederate states. Many northerners were opposed to stopping secession.

If you contemplate this information, understand its meanings, and keep in mind that states' rights really were a BIG reason for the Civil War, you can understand that mindsets were totally different than they are today.

What really helped my understanding was a quote from the wikipedia article about President Franklin Pierce: <Like all white males in New Hampshire between the ages of 18 and 45, Pierce was a member of the state militia>.

Why? I think it was the same reason the USA historically had a tiny standing army in times of peace. (The giant peace-time military-industrial complex that you've known all your life only came about at the end of WW2.)

Firstly, the American revolutionaries were suspicious of large national standing armies, for good reason. It's why we have an amendment prohibiting quartering of soldiers in peoples' homes.

Secondly, and more importantly, no other nation was an existential threat to the young USA. So the state militias were for what? They were for protecting the several states against an oppressive federal government.

Because loyalty went like this: Home state first, federal government second. The federal government was very small to keep it from being tyrannical, and the state militias were needed in case it became tyrannical anyway.

<1 (new country, secession) is possible only if all the people in the lands are in agreement. Otherwise, how can it ethically be forced?>

Not so. There were many crown loyalists in the 13 colonies before and during the American Revolution. By some estimates, about 1/3 of the population were loyal to the king of England. Yet here we are, independent for a quarter of a millennium.

https://twitter.com/PollWatch2020/s...

Life Is Fair

Life is good>

I haven't checked the Other Page in a while. The libs stopped fighting back and gave up, so I got bored walking over the rubble that I am responsible for. They simply gave up. They literally won't engage in a serious debate anymore and resort only to trolling. That is their way of hoisting up the white flag. They don't want anymore. They admit defeat.

Not only that, but with the <chessgames.com admins> coddling <NOZZLE> and allowing him to dictate matters, there's just no appeal to posting there anymore for any reason.

Regarding Trump, I hadn't seen these poll results until you share them here. I checked his twitter and it's stuffed top to bottom with poll results. I don't trust the polls one way or the other, but it's looking incredibly good for Trump at this point as compared to 2016.

Nobody likes the libs anymore because they are killing people in the streets, attacking regular folks, going in restaurants to intimidate and <BULLY> women and children into raising their closed fist and shouting Seig Heil! And when the women and children refuse to say Seig Heil, they threaten them with violence.

Nobody likes the libs anymore because they are destroying businesses owned by the regular folks.

The liberal mayors, like Ted Wheeler in Portland, have blood on their hands. Remember the Italian ship captain that got drunk and allowed his ship to crash or sink in the Mediterranean some 10 years ago? He faced serious jail time, but look at the dereliction of duty to be pinned on the mayor of Portland!

This guy is directly responsible for all the deaths that happen during this criminal, seditious, riotous frenzy that he is shielding from the law and allowing to take place. In fact, mayor Ted Wheeler is leading the way, acting as gatekeeper for the thugs who kill Americans and commit acts of mob political violence on the streets. This guy is keeping the police from protecting the citizens.

And just think about all the gun panzy idiots out there who say, "YOU DON'T NEEEEEEEEED A GUN!!! YOU GUN NUT!!! JUST CALL THE POLICE!! THAT'S WHAT THEY ARE TRAINED TO DO!! GUN NUT!!"

Yeah, go call the police in Portland over the last 100 days. You'll be dead, just like that 17 year old kid in Kenosha who was attacked and chased by a mob of liberal criminals, who were armed and threatened his life, and he had to shoot in self defense. If he wasn't armed, he'd be dead.

Look at Rand Paul. If he wasn't lucky enough to have a cop right nearby (how often is that?) he'd be dead too and so would his wife.

Luckily our founding fathers were not feminized gun pussies brainwashed by their mothers and the other girls in charge of their pansy governments that turn gun carrying men into tea drinking <vulnerable> girly men.

The second amendment was written for times exactly like these, although we don't get our rights from the constitution. We get our rights from God and the constitution just acknowledges that and sets into law that our God given rights shall not be infringed.

Have you ever shot anyone?

Also I left a message on your new website.

What makes you think I would answer a question like that on a public forum? You should know better than to ask that in a public forum.

You're anonymous.

I'm not asking for details.

But you're here expounding the proposition that all Americans "have a gun and be ready to shoot the libs should they come to your town and threaten you".

I don't think it's inappropriate therefore to enquire as to whether you have actually shot someone.

I don't think it would be easy to shoot someone, and if you're warning people to be ready to shoot someone then it's a perfectly logical question to ask if you yourself have ever shot anyone?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRi...

[Timezone "UTC"]
[UTCDate "2020.08.31"]
[UTCTime "08:47:14"]
[WhiteElo "2207"]
[BlackElo "2249"]
[TimeControl "180"]
[Termination "TakeNoChances won by checkmate"]
[StartTime "08:47:14"]
[EndDate "2020.08.31"]
[EndTime "08:51:26"]
[Link "https://www.chess.com/live/game/537..."]

1. d4 e5 2. dxe5 d6 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. g3 Bg4 5. Bg2 dxe5 6. O-O Nf6 7. h3 Bf5 8. c3 Qd7 9. Kh2 O-O-O 10. Qa4 h5 11. Be3 Nd5 12. Bxa7 h4 13. g4 Bxg4 14. hxg4 h3 15. Bh1 e4 16. Nd4 Bd6+ 17. f4 exf3+ 18. Kg1 Qxg4+ 19. Kf2 Qg3# 0-1

This is my favorite troll opening with Black. White wouldn't go for it though, cowardly backing out of the gambit even though Black's compensation is nebulous at best. Still, I have fairly decent results with the Englund Gambit in blitz, even against 2200+ players and Fide Masters.