She is an Elite Poster.>

You mentioned on these pages in the past that you are a bachelor. If they time ever came for you to settle down and get married, would you get down on one knee, look up into the woman's eyes, and ask her to marry you?

My great grandmother was born in the late 1890s and she lived almost 100 years. I enjoyed many interesting conversations with her about times long past. She was born in the old country, Italy, and her marriage did not begin with a man getting down on his knees to plead for her hand in marriage. Her marriage was arranged, more or less, by her parents.

I'm not sure when that stopped happening exactly, but my uneducated guess would be when Hollywood started romanticizing women's fantasies. From ancient times until relatively recently, marriages were arranged, so exactly who's standard is it that we are supposedly living up to, by kneeling in front of a woman to ask for her hand in marriage?

The bible instructs women to love their husbands. Why? Nowadays people read that and they think, "Duh, of course I will love my husband because I will choose to marry the man I love!" what good is this advice?

But remember the times! In ancient times your marriages were arranged, so you had to learn to love your husband <after> you were married to him!

Where's the knee groveling man in that scenario?

By getting down on one knee, as if before a king, isn't the man signifying complete submission to the woman?

savage sanctuary
Bobby Spassky
Larryfyffe
saffuna
Ybr
posoo
Nisjesram
Carrots and Pizza
al wazir
WorstPlayerEver
chancho

<Ybr> is <NOZZLE> and the <chessgames.com> admins should know that, so they can suspend his new sock.

Yes, <Carrots and Pizza> is on the list. He's pretending to be my pretending to not be me, or something like that. Just another idiot with BPDS.

<saffuna>

Truth Rape is when you debate a liar, could be a lib, an atheist or both, and you force them to confront their false assumptions over and over again. It reaches down into the worldview level of identity in the person and causes what some call cognitive dissonance, but only much acute.

You see, with <Perfy Boy>, I took the truth and I thrust it in him, over and over and over again, against his will and left him a shattered, quivering mess of an unmanly man.

Truth Raped.

Unlike physical rape, Truth Rape is a good thing. If you consider the lies that atheist libs hold as true assumptions in their worldview to be like the demons that live in possessed people (Think Jesus and the possessed man and the pigs), then you can think of Truth Rape as a sort of worldview exorcism.

Indeed.

The President looks pretty good in this short video:

https://www.9news.com.au/world/dona...

Even with a full recovery, at his age, there will undoubtedly be ongoing after-effects.

This makes the upcoming vice-presidential debate that much more significant.

Regardless of who wins in November, I think there is a significant probability he will not complete a full term.

It's common knowlegde that Sleepy Joe will be pushed aside soon after the election should he win so the Dems can have their prefered president in Kamala Harris.

And it seems now that should Donald Trump be re-elected, that Mike Pence will inevitably have to take over sometime during the next four years.

Between Joe's dementia and Donald's after-effects of the Chinese virus, there will almost certainly be a change of president before 2024.

He used to be a good bloke, but upon my return earlier this year I noticed a distinct change about him.

I don't know what happened during my 15 month absence but he has changed into an indecent, spiteful, nasty, disgusting troll.

He began an unprovoked attack upon me before I had even conversed with him!?

Something is obviously wrong with him and I hope he can overcome whatever it is.

Anyway, there is no comparison between Jim and those trolls Jiffy & Nozzle.

I don't know Posoo. I don't think I've dealt with him.

Jim can be very stubborn and impervious to facts, but he's okay, otherwise I wouldn't talk to him.

This is why the Marxists have turned to so-called race relation issues, because the fact that blacks and whites both live in this country isn't going to change anytime soon or go away, therefore it's a perpetual issue.

That is an example of seeing inside a situation, which is called insight, and that's what we aim for here in the Free Speech Zone.

If you want to say, "Orange Man Bad" then you need to head on over to the Other Page where there is zero insight and roll around with the bums and half-baked intellectuals.

On this page, we aim to get inside the issues, not stay on the top layer of them, commenting endlessly on the obvious. That is so boring. Yawn.

He's been Truth Raped.

<He used to be a good bloke, but upon my return earlier this year I noticed a distinct change about him.>

He hasn't changed a bit in that time. I think you're just noticing how he really is now.

<Anyway, there is no comparison between Jim and those trolls Jiffy & Nozzle.>

I don't like the term "Truth Raped".

It's offensive.

And I'm not being politically correct.

<Truth Rape is when you debate a liar, could be a lib, an atheist or both, and you force them to confront their false assumptions over and over again. It reaches down into the worldview level of identity in the person and causes what some call cognitive dissonance, but only much acute. You see, with <Perfy Boy>, I took the truth and I thrust it in him, over and over and over again, against his will and left him a shattered, quivering mess of an unmanly man.>

I must have missed this because I've never seen Alan engage in debate with anybody.

All I've ever seen from him are vitriolic insults hurled from the sideline.

While most other people are engaging in a debate about this or that issue, Alan never contributes anything other than to make puerile snide remarks at those whom he has taken a dislike to.

<<He used to be a good bloke, but upon my return earlier this year I noticed a distinct change about him.> He hasn't changed a bit in that time. I think you're just noticing how he really is now.>

He has certainly changed his attitude towards me.

Perhaps I made a politically incorrect comment which he took umbrage at or insulted one of his boyfriends on this website?

<<Anyway, there is no comparison between Jim and those trolls Jiffy & Nozzle.> I disagree, but I wanted yours and anyone else's opinion, so I asked. Thanks for your input.>

Jiffy and Nozzle are bona fide retards.

Jim is nothing like them.

Anyway, thanks for seeking input and I'm pleased to provide some.

And I'm not being politically correct.>

LOL!

Congrats, you actually made me laugh out loud.

I agree. To not like this phrase that I coined does not make you politically correct. However, the phrase is perfect in every way. Think of it as being a bit avant garde, if you will.

<I must have missed this because I've never seen Alan engage in debate with anybody.>

He's edged around it before, but rarely engages. His main frustration lies in the fact that I got away with the moral argument, despite all of his favorite liberal eggheads giving it their best go. I called him out back then to debate me and wouldn't let it go, but he had to cower and run, like the atheist coward he is.

His issue is about atheist vs theism. It's about God.

<He has certainly changed his attitude towards me.

Perhaps I made a politically incorrect comment which he took umbrage at or insulted one of his boyfriends on this website?>

These atheists are dishonesty manifest in the human form. They are walking, talking lies. Atheists are always found to be bullying weak Christians, pushing them around, making a scene at their expense, using cliche arguments to embarrass the faithful and basically intimidating Christians into silence.

That is, unless you stand up to them.

But just pay attention to atheists debating Christians elsewhere, like on FB or YT, where the Christians aren't educated enough to fight back intellectually. See how the atheists behave, as they do their work.

What is their work? They are like Jehova's Witnesses, except instead of going door to door to tell people about God (or the JW version of God), they tell them about atheism. They try to do all of the eternal damage they can.

In this forum it wasn't like that. I clobbered the atheists so badly, taking them all on, every single one of them, numbering their points, refuting their arguments, forcing them to respond to those refutations and not letting them go, that the lurking reader might feel bad for them, not realizing what's actually happening. The bullies were getting their comeuppance.

If you debate the atheist with logic and hold them to account, they begin to crumble and beg for a way out. If you don't give them that way out, it can sometimes end in a psychological crisis for the atheist. In other words, if you attack the lie with the truth for a long period of time, the lie has a meltdown.

That is Truth Rape.

Like when <Zanzibar> cracked in our debate on the moral argument. He claimed that there is no such things as objective moral values, but when I finally made him see the truth he cracked. How did I do that? I painted a scenario where his family was raped and killed by intruders and asked if that would be objective wrong, or would it merely be his opinion that it was wrong?

He cracked, had a total meltdown, started throwing a fit all over the site talking about me, and going completely nuts. That's because he was Truth Raped.

It happens when the truth goes inside a liar against their will. They are finally forced to see it, but they see it in them. They have to come to grips with it.

Attacking someone on the worldview level is very serious. It reaches way down inside into the core, the essence of their very identity. If you bring the truth way down there, where there's usually nothing but lies, hiding out, safely, in their safe space and comfort zone, it can cause a meltdown.

What happens after that?

Sometimes, it can cause the one who was Truth Raped to doubt their false worldview, which is the beginning of life for them and a chance at eternal life even.

Other times they can summon their pride and refuse to be corrected, and in this case, they lash out at you, shivering, quivering and broken, like <Perf> does. Their egos have been crushed by the truth.

Atheists think they're smart and they have enormous egos. They are unbearably smug and arrogant. It's an enormous blow to their ego to be utterly defeated publicly on the God debate. I don't think this can be overstated.

In my debates, instead of moving on, I would call them out right where we left off for years and years, never letting it go, forcing them to pick up where they left off even if only for a little while, to administer a merciless beating once again.

The bullies are bullied by the truth.

This is the root cause of Big Pawn Derangement Syndrome.

BPDS is all about the God debate. Atheists aren't used to getting any real pushback.

So his main gripe against you is that he's an atheist and nobody can debunk the moral argument?

I thought it was more personal than that?

What I've noticed with him is that he won't get involved in a debate himself but will shoot off his mouth from the sideline if you're debating somebody else. But if you turn to him and challenge him about anything he said, for example Ty Cobb, then he quickly scurries away like a scared little rabbit down a burrow.

<<He has certainly changed his attitude towards me. Perhaps I made a politically incorrect comment which he took umbrage at or insulted one of his boyfriends on this website?> Like a liberal woman, he gets butthurt and holds a grudge. A man never holds a grudge. That is not manly. Men that hold grudges had domineering mothers and either an absent father or a weak father. <Perfy> is just such a weak man. Just as COVID turns people's lungs into swiss cheese, so does liberalism turn a man's spirit into a woman's.>

Yes, my view is that if you don't like someone for some reason then just don't bother with them. What I can't understand about Alan is that he's constantly throwing rocks from the sideline but won't get into the game. He should either engage with someone in debate or just ignore them.

I thought it was more personal than that? >

That's all it is, and it's been that way right from the start. There was no time to get personal, but the God debate reaches to the core of a person, so in that sense it can feel personal.

I embarrassed him by calling him out publicly to debate me on the God debate. I made a scene. He couldn't escape me and was forced to retreat in full view, so he resents me for that.

What else could it be?

He's been this way since 2013 when I challenged him and he never returned back to normal.

Plus, he's a maladjusted nerd. He's bubbling over with nerd rage. He goes around using that fake Shakespeare talk to try to make himself look educated and royal like. It's overcompensating. It's like short-mans-syndrome but for nerds. So when he is challenged intellectually and a big scene is made, and he is exposed as a pretender, it really hurts.

I mean, look at him. All he can do in return is say, "Your mutha..." and he's a grown man. That's pretty pathetic, is it not?

<Optimal>, I've embarrassed him time and again. You're right, he usually avoids directly debating me, but one time he piped up and called me a MORON for saying that Clinton was impeached, because he served out his term. He threw down the gauntlet that one time, but what he didn't realize was that impeachment doesn't mean you get thrown out of office. It's only an indictment!

Evidence was soon shown that Clinton was impeached and even the Rogoff libs had to break the news to him. I went and found a meme with a guy who had egg on his face and I used that meme to humble <Perf> for a while - so he's never stepping into the ring again. It's WAY TOO PAINFUL!

If he wins reelection, I would like to see him take the gloves off and really do some good work. We've got to clean up antifa, BLM and the commies stirring up civil war here in America. Time to clean this up. Put them down like the feral dogs they are.

7 years!?

And he's still hating on you?

<He goes around using that fake Shakespeare talk to try to make himself look educated and royal like.>

And he constantly has a thesaurus in front of him so he can use the most obscure word rather than just speaking like a normal person.

But what's worse is when he uses that stupid Southern accent.

And also when he uses French terms rather than just the normal English words.

He's so pretentious!

<All he can do in return is say, "Your mutha...">

Yes, he can also be rather vile and disgusting.

<I went and found a meme with a guy who had egg on his face and I used that meme to humble <Perf> for a while>

Yes I recall that.

<BP: He hasn't changed a bit in that time. I think you're just noticing how he really is now.>

Who is that guy? Is he famous?>

What I've noticed with him is that he won't get involved in a debate himself but will shoot off his mouth from the sideline if you're debating somebody else.>

That's why I dubbed him: the remora/suckerfish.

He can ride the underbelly of a shark, but doesn't have the ability to be a shark.

<He can ride the underbelly of a shark>

You mentioned on these pages in the past that you are a bachelor. If they time ever came for you to settle down and get married, would you get down on one knee, look up into the woman's eyes, and ask her to marry you? >

No, I would not.

However, I cannot foresee any scenario in which I would get married. The institution has been thoroughly corrupted by liberalism and feminism, as has every other institution of Western Civilization. For men, the marriage contract is nothing but a trap, a bad bargain.

So what's holding up Western Civ, at this point? The silent minority, I guess. It's not a majority anymore, judging by the popular vote in the last election. Trump got fewer votes than HRC. But somewhere between 45 and 48% of the population are still "heritage" Americans.

I don't know what happened during my 15 month absence but he has changed into an indecent, spiteful, nasty, >

A rare occasion on this site whereby I read something interesting and possibly enlightening. I've got to think about this.>

I want to ask the Elite Posters, is there anyone on this list that doesn't belong there?>