https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x25...

So why is Biden so far ahead in the polls?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Mx...

If Biden manages to steal the election, do you think BLM & Antifa will operate from a position of power, and how will they use their increased influence to transform American society?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fL...

What we have now are pro-abortion judges who are called conservative by the sheep and when they win, the sheep think they've won a victory>

As far as I can remember Scalia, Thomas, and Rehnquist, voted against Roe vs Wade when given the chance.

<Pyrrhic victories are all we have and they don't count.>

Welcome to planet Earth.

<my argument wasn't for perfection.>

When Scalia/Thomas are "Pyrrhic victories" you'd need an electron scanning microscope to thread your needle.

<Pyrrhic victories are all we have and they don't count.>

What is the likelihood that in the event of Biden & Harris stealing the election, the whole of the USA will be transformed into San Francisco?>

<Biden and Harris Hold a Rally, No One Shows Up>>

No one showed up for Hillary, she still won the popular vote.

What is your opinion of Trump's current nominee to the Supreme Court, Amy Coney Barrett?>

Unfortunately, she is just like Scalia, and he was a defacto pro-abortion judge because, as I explained above, he was wrapped in legalism and defended the process rather than actually judge the morality of the law based on our common Christian heritage.

Scalia was the kind of judge that they would have hung in Nuremberg because he would have upheld the <law> regarding whatever heinous acts were protected as laws. For instance, if they changed the German constitution to say that killing Jews in ovens was now legal, and if it came up before the court and Scalia was on that court, he would vote in favor of killing the Jews, simply because it was the law. His position, as a legalist (as all legalists) would be to say if you don't like the law, then create a movement to change the law, and then I will uphold <that> law.

The <central point> in all of this is the problem of legalism and how it turns justice into a mere process, rather than making sure real justice is done.

In that <central point>, we see how moral issues, such as abortion, are avoided entirely by scurrying to the legalistic view and asking if x fits into some established process.

This is linked to Marxism, atheism, satanism, humanism and all of those evil systems and is an expression of their mission creep in our society because of this: they have undermined the Christian foundation that has provided the framework for <moral> laws and now, in place of that we have a new godless (secular) foundation of moral relativism, so instead of working with <right and wrong> based on objective values, we are forced to parse the minutia of processes in the legal system.

Trump's appointee is just this way, but most of the brainwashed <conservative> Christians will seal-clap her nomination and consider it a pro-life victory because of her so-called <personal stance> on abortion and some of the things she's said about it before. She has 7 children and speaks in some ways against abortion, but where the rubber meets the road, she's is effectively pro-abortion by way of legalism. In other words, she will <NOT> be a part of this pipe dream that many Christians have about this new, conservative court overturning RvW (1973) and outlawing abortion. She will never ever be a part of that and neither will the other <conservative> judges that Trump appointed.

Could it be that the polls are fake but are part of the groundwork being laid by the Left to enable them to steal the election, and subsequently point to these fabricated polls as "evidence" Biden really had the support of the majority of the people?>

Will they change their modus operandi from rioting and violence to a more sophisticated method of operation with support from the Democrat government?>

I think BLM and ANTIFA will only get worse no matter who wins the election. They are not satisfied at all with Biden. These are the same people who <protested> outside the mayor's house in Portland, even after he tried to lick their boots by showing up at their stupid <CHAZ> zone and joining them in protest, to show how hip and revolutionary he was. Nope, that wasn't good enough. They showed up on his front lawn and caused him to have to leave the city.

Same in other areas.

The plan for ANTIFA and BLM, along with any other communist groups, is to entirely spoil the peace and make America so miserable for so long that we will accept <ANYTHING> that appeases them and quiets things down - and of course <ANYTHING> means communism.

This is indeed the result of Marxism, atheism, satanism, humanism and all of those evil systems.

BLM and ANTIFA will indeed only get worse no matter who wins the election. They have become emboldened with the tacit, or even open support, of the mainstream media, corporate bosses, leftist politicians, and even some religious leaders.

Perhaps the end result will not just be all of America becoming like San Francisco, but the whole of western civilisation?

Then what?

The leftists envisage they will all be living in some kind of Utopia, only to discover they have created a Hell-on-Earth.

If Biden manages to steal this election, they will all be celebrating their own demise.

Likewise, in an equal state of blindness, the libs will fight tooth and nail to keep her from being appointed because of her <stance> on abortion.

The Democrats and Republicans (I'm neither) will put on a great partisan show for their constituents! They'll make a huge spectacle out of this, but they know it's just a big show. They have to appear to be fighting for the people they represent in order to enjoy their power status a little bit longer, but they, being at the top, know full well that the libs should be happy about this nomination and the Christians should be terribly disappointed. They know that with this nominee, nothing major is going to change and that's how they want it.

I don't know why I'm sharing this valuable insight here when I should be posting it on offensivetruth.com. Where else can conservatives and Christians go to get real insight?

Virtually all of the conservatives and Christians in this country, and probably around the world, will tune into Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh to hear them praising Trump's "very conservative" "pro-life" nominee and that will the end of it for those sheep. If Hannity or Rush say she's a good nominee, the Right will Bah like sheep and say, "Good nominee" just like the libs do with all things <orange man bad> on their side of the equation.

Let the Elite Posters understand that conservatives want a <win> so bad, that they'll just go along with the leaders and consider this nominee of Trump's <a win>. They want to win more than they want to know the truth. It's extremely difficult for most conservatives to criticize Trump's pick because of political bias.

I hear ya. But methinks you would have loved America from 200 years ago.>

Then what? >

Then that paves the way for global governance. San Fransisco is full of libs who are more or less against borders at all. Borders are racist and such.

Since we need to post insightfully on the Free Speech Zone I think it would be helpful to tie this particular point to a broader and more foundational conception. We don't want this page to be like the Other Page. We want this page to be like a symposium.

Borders define property. This is my property on this side of the border and that is your property on the other side. The libs are against borders because they are against property. They now say that property is itself a crime and that's why the government should own everything and distribute the resources among the people <fairly>. Many on the left aren't in this place yet, philosophically, but many are. There are even posters on the Other Page who view property itself as a problem, even a whiteness problem.

How does this relate to Christianity vs atheism/secularism?

The bible clearly tells us that stealing is bad. It's a crime. Stealing implies the right to own things, or <property>. If these things are yours, then that is your private property. If you buy this land, then it is yours and the next guy can't just show up there, build a house, drink from your well and cut down your trees.

Private property is supported biblically.

But the libs reject God and everything that stems from God's existence and all the logical consequences contained therein. Therefore, property is bad because Christianity is bad, and Christianity is a white religion of privilege. Therefore, it's white, it's Christian - it's bad. Property is bad.

Once again we see that the left's stance on property is actually a logical consequence of their most fundamental position, which is godlessness.

People like Rush and Hannity are on the right side of things, mostly, but they don't have the background to offer <real> insight on the political and philosophical situation we currently face. They can't bring real insight into any of this.

But let's examine this for inconsistencies.

If we get our rights not from God but from the constitution, then the slave owners of early America acted entirely morally and cannot be judged for having slaves, because it was allowed in the constitution!

When libs judge the founding fathers and early Americans for owning slaves, it's merely an exercise in both arrogance and anachronism to judge them by today's constitution.

You see, we can always keep changing the constitution. We can make slavery legal again, and then, since we get our rights from the constitution, we act entirely morally if we own slaves!

But what do we <really> see from the libs? They exhibit moral outrage at early Americans for owning slaves, almost as if we really <don't> get our rights from the constitution, as though early Americans were acting immorally by owning slaves, even though they were acting in lawful accordance with the constitution.

What moral authority are they appealing to? The current constitution? That's what the early Americans were appealing to! The same source!

If we really did get our rights from that piece of paper called the constitution, then no one would be justified in exhibiting moral outrage at the early Americans.

There will undoubtedly ensue a great deal of chaos and upheaval, but the Leftists will consider this acceptable as part of the process of establishing a one-world Marxist government.

Of course a new one-world constitution will need to be written, incorporating all the Leftist pet principles and excluding God.

If the Dems can actually pull off the theft of this election the damage world wide may be irreversible for generations.

Certainly the Leftists don't understand the consequences of their worldview.

It's certain the vast majority of Americans voting Democrat have no idea what they're doing.

We should think about Trump, his policies and nominees logically, not emotionally.>

What's on the other side of this logic process?

If Hannity or Rush say she's a good nominee, the Right will Bah like sheep and say, "Good nominee">

Mark Levin knows who the actual conservatives are for the court. He was disappointed with Kavanaugh.

(He actually told the folks who "Bah")

She said:
"Woman will lose their coverage, and will be charged more, simply because they are woman."

Id love to respond to her:

"So your lifetime in government, Pelosi's
lifetime in government, Schumer's lifetime in government, Biden's lifetime in government was for naught?

When do you plan on doing something beside selling out to our enemies?"

So why is Biden so far ahead in the polls?>

Start the podcast at minute 32 to find out: