"COVID Is God's Gift To The Left">

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRR...

Someone needs to tell chancho, Jane doesn't care about his posted Covid dead

Giant Trump sign appears on the hills along the Sepulveda Pass

Spot on. <Jane Fonda> simply spoke what all the libs are thinking but don't have the balls to say. Of course, we didn't need her to admit it out loud like she did because anyone can see that the libs are giddy about the coronavirus, and they get a little giddier every time the death count goes up by just one.

<Chancho> isn't fooling anyone and that includes his fellow libs as well. The idiotic thing about it is that the death count can entirely be blamed on the libs, not Trump, because the libs in charge of NY and New Jersey put all the covid positive people in the nursing homes, effectively turning them into death camps!

The liberal message at the beginning was that coronavirus wasn't that dangerous and that Trump was exaggerating it and fear mongering, using the virus to gin up xenophobia and racism. While Trump acted immediately to shut down travel with China, and then soon after with Europe, the libs were telling the nation to HUG A CHINESE and attend the Chinese Day Parade, to go see a movie, a show and live your life.

The problem is idiots like <Chancho>, who is known, blithering idiot for sure, isn't smart enough to see this simple truth for what it is. Trump is the hero in all this and the libs, once again, are responsible for all of the destruction, death and catastrophe.

It should be noted when I say the libs are responsible for <all> the death, I mean the gratuitous deaths that didn't have to happen, like the deaths in the nursing homes. A virus is going to kill people no matter what, so the libs can't be responsible for <all> the deaths, but the Elite Posters know what I mean.

If <chancho> didn't have his head all the way up his ass and wasn't a blithering idiot, he'd probably shut up about the virus and quietly hope that it would go away.

Egypt has been a peace keeper now for a few decades, Lebanon and Jordan can probably by counted to make peace and keep it (for a while at least). Syria is in Iran's area of influence so don't look there for peace anytime soon.

So the big prize is the Saudi's and the other gulf countries. You are right, getting the Palestinians out of the picture produced good results. A long lasting peace (at least 2 generations) will not be possible without regime changes in Iran and Syria. Iraq is a non starter with their own internal problems.

Have you seen this?

<NFL FUMBLES: Football Ratings ‘COLLAPSE’ in Week 4, ‘Down 70% From Last Year’>

https://hannity.com/media-room/nfl-...

Who in their right mind would want to watch a bunch of dreadlocked goons patting each other on the ass on TV for 4 hours? These privileged GOONS would likely be in jail on all kinds of crimes if they weren't given the easy way out with football.

DOL: "America’s immigration laws should put American workers first."

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-...

Trump is fully aware of the liberal strategy of importing immigrants to affect a permanent, fundamental change in American culture and politics away from Christianity and American freedoms (2nd amendment etc...) in favor of a global, communist society.

You can thank Stephen Miller for constantly whispering in his ear. My advice to the Elite Posters is to read all you can about Stephen Miller and listen to his interviews, but pay special attention to liberal publications that hate him and see what they have to say.

At this point, I want Stephen Miller to be president after Trump. He may be a little too young still. Maybe a couple terms of Pence would be OK first, but keep your eye on Miller.

<Microsoft’s $150m Diversity Initiative Is Investigated for ‘Racial Discrimination’ by Labor Department>

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...

Do you like that headline?

When's the last time you saw a headline like that?

The move expelled nearly 150,000 immigrants from the US.

Thomas and Alito were among the four justices who voted against legalizing same-sex marriage five years ago, arguing that it should have been left to the states to the decide.>

Effectively pro-abortion. Their position is, if the states decide it's okay to kill the unborn child, then we will uphold that law.

Imagine if the states decided it was okay to own black slaves again. Would those two justices wash their hands of it and say, "Hey, that's what the states decided"?

What about if they wanted to put Jews in gas chambers in California? Would these two justices say, "Well, we think the states should decide."?

When a judge takes refuge from moral issues in legalism, the justice process because just a process.

This is also the problem with libertarianism. Libertarians like Rand Paul will say, "I'm personally against abortion, but I think the states should decide", they take the immoral position right alongside the libs. The bat the ball into the legalism field and hope to play there, when all along it is a moral question, not a question of process.

The foundational problem here is the fact that America's Christian foundation as a culture, as a society, is under attack from liberals, atheists, secularists, humanists and Marxists. What's happened is the formerly unshakeable bedrock of our legal system, which is borne of Christian law, a law which clearly said that the spilling of innocent blood is illegal, is no longer our bedrock.

It has been replaced by the moral relativism of secular society, which is a nice way of saying an antiChristian society, or a godless society. By removing the <objective moral foundation> in American culture, it's only a matter of time before moral relativism is expressed by our laws and judges.

If a judge can't <judge> that killing the unborn child, spilling innocent blood, is <wrong>, then we simply have a lawless nation and the judge isn't worth a wooden nickel. A good judge must recognize what is evil and put a stop to it. That's what law is all about.

It doesn't matter if California passes a law saying they are going to put Jews in gas chambers. The federal government has a <duty> to stop that from happening. To take the libertarian stance and say, "Oh well, let the states decide" is to take the immoral, godless, liberal position.

Look at WW2. We invade other countries across the world to stop such things from happening, let alone our own states. If we don't have the right to stop a state from committing abominable acts of evil, then how much less right do we have to stop other countries?

America knew back then, during its Christian years, that evil had to be stopped. We hung the Nazis at the Nuremberg trials even though they were just following the process, following the law, following orders. We recognized an <objective moral standard> and judge those people, people from other countries, according to what was <right> and did not sweep it under the rug of legalism.

The foundational problem here is the fact that America's Christian foundation as a culture, as a society, is under attack from liberals, atheists, secularists, humanists and Marxists.>

These so-called conservative justices are no good.>

Compared to who?
Compared to what?

When perfection is your benchmark, you will never actually have a win/victory.

Conservatism already understands the evil of man, that's why it seeks to limit him and government.

When it comes to people like Reagan, Trump, Clarence Thomas, it isn't about perfection. It's about being several thousand orders of magnitude better than what's there, or the alternative.

Compared to who?
Compared to what? >

When perfection is your benchmark, you will never actually have a win/victory.>

Compared to a judge that is not a legalist who understands what law is really about and how our culture is based on Christian law.

<perfection> - my argument wasn't for perfection. Pyrrhic victories are all we have and they don't count.

And Libertarians.>