chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Domdaniel
Member since Aug-11-06 · Last seen Jan-10-19
no bio
>> Click here to see Domdaniel's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Domdaniel has kibitzed 30777 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-08-19 Domdaniel chessforum (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Blank Reg: "They said there was no future - well, this is it."
 
   Jan-06-19 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Haaarry Neeeeds a Brutish Empire... https://youtu.be/ZioiHctAnac
 
   Jan-06-19 G McCarthy vs M Kennefick, 1977 (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Maurice Kennefick died over the new year, 2018-2019. RIP. It was many years since I spoke to him. He gave up chess, I reckon, towards the end of the 80s, though even after that he was sometimes lured out for club games. I still regard this game, even after so many years, as the ...
 
   Jan-06-19 Maurice Kennefick (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Kennefick died over the 2018-19 New Year. Formerly one of the strongest players in Ireland, he was the first winner of the Mulcahy tournament, held in honour of E.N. Mulcahy, a former Irish champion who died in a plane crash. I played Kennefick just once, and had a freakish win, ...
 
   Jan-06-19 Anand vs J Fedorowicz, 1990 (replies)
 
Domdaniel: <NBZ> -- Thanks, NBZ. Enjoy your chortle. Apropos nothing in particular, did you know that the word 'chortle' was coined by Lewis Carroll, author of 'Alice in Wonderland'? I once edited a magazine called Alice, so I can claim a connection. 'Chortle' requires the jamming ...
 
   Jan-06-19 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
Domdaniel: <al wazir> - It's not easy to go back through past Holiday Present Hunts and discover useful information. Very few people have played regularly over the years -- even the players who are acknowledged as best, <SwitchingQuylthulg> and <MostlyAverageJoe> have now ...
 
   Jan-05-19 Wesley So (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Wesley is a man of his word. Once again, I am impressed by his willingness to stick to commitments.
 
   Jan-04-19 G Neave vs B Sadiku, 2013 (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Moral: if you haven't encountered it before, take it seriously. Remember Miles beating Karpov with 1...a6 at Skara. Many so-called 'irregular' openings are quite playable.
 
   Dec-30-18 Robert Enders vs S H Langer, 1968
 
Domdaniel: <HMM> - Heh, well, yes. I also remembered that Chuck Berry had a hit with 'My Ding-a-ling' in the 1970s. I'm not sure which is saddest -- that the author of Johnny B. Goode and Memphis Tennessee and Teenage Wedding - among other short masterpieces - should sink to such ...
 
   Dec-30-18 T Gelashvili vs T Khmiadashvili, 2001 (replies)
 
Domdaniel: This is the game I mean: Bogoljubov vs Alekhine, 1922
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Frogspawn: Levity's Rainbow

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 225 OF 963 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-11-07  achieve: <Dom> Dude, I found the solucian!!

It is purely semantic

Aarde = earth, sounds like dirt, then the Germans ran off with it and made it Erde, out of vanity, which basically sounds like "Ert"! See?

There is always some "Dialectic confusion" that has to be factored in.. (As we have proven now to considerable extent).

Aug-11-07  achieve: <Dom> you are right, I wish you and all the other "kikkerspionnen" a good night.
Aug-11-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: As do I. We have advanced the cause of calembourics, Korean-Germanic philology and perpetual motion machines by several notches. Or not.

There are drunken idiot "students" singing outside my window. I wish I had a gun with a silencer. Or even a silencer on its own would be nice.

G'night, all.

Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Is <vaccumimg> REALLY a <Korean word>?
Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <Jess> Er. No. It is not. I was being economical with the actuality.
Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Dom> I was forced to give your <autobiography and resume> in my forum.

I'm pretty sure I got the chronology and facts correct, but don't forget I'm <bonkers>.

Ad astra!

DIVE, DIVE!

I need accurate damage reports, dammit

AHWHOOGA, AWHOOGA Periscope Down!

Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: <Um. I thought you *were* a musician?>

Aaaah I'm a <rock> guitarist.. most of the time I used to be <stoned> ;-p

Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Hi <Deffi>! How the Hell are you?
Aug-12-07  mack: Dom - I've had a good long look at myself and decided that the 'patch' for many of my chess deficiencies is some endgame study. Do you still wholeheartedly recommend Dvoretsky?
Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Mack>

<Eyal> told me that <Dvoretsky> is the "dog's nuts" of endgame books.

He swears by it, and he is a VERY strong player.

I've never seen the volume myself, I'm just passing along a recommendation.

Amazing that this <Dvorjak> fellow composed music AND became an <end game expert>.

Aug-12-07  Eyal: Well, originally it was Dom's recommendation (Domdaniel chessforum) I was going by when I bought the book - and I think everything he says there is true.
Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <Deffi> -- <Aaaah I'm a <rock> guitarist.. most of the time I used to be <stoned> >

Me too, but I don't think any sounds ever came out. See, that requires musical talent, and I can't tell an up-note from a down-note or a quaver from a quaker.

Was Richard M Nixon ("I'll make the @#$%suckers *glad* to mutate!") a hemidemisemiquaker? And did he ever get his hemidemisemiquaker oats?

No relation to Titus, John, or Weetabix.

Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Big animals, some of the dinosaurs. If there'd been humans around in the age of terrible lizards, they'd have been the prey more often than the predator.

You don't knock down a brontosaurus with a spear. And it's practically impossible to fell a trice... oops.

Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <mack> Yeah, I think so. It's an extremely good book in its own write, and if anything better exists on general endgames, I haven't seen it.

On the other hand, I've put much less time into actually studying it than I should have. I also packed it and brung it, despite its being a weighty tome, to a certain 9-round open tournament last month -- forgetting that endgame books are no use at tournaments in the post-adjournment era.

Typical. Back when adjournments were the norm, the only nontrivial endgame book I possessed was 'Rook Endings' by Levenfish & Smyslov. So of course I kept winding up in minor piece endings: sometimes screwing them up, sometimes playing surprisingly well, all pretty random, rilly.

Queen endings seem to happen to me too, and I'm convinced that they're beyond human understanding, like Hinton and the fourth dimension. Sir Henry knew the score:

"Y'see, the Natives had it in their noodles that if a chap's soul was pure then the snakebite wouldn't harm him. Poor old Hargreaves died instantly, horrible agony."

Ist Klar?

Aug-12-07  Eyal: <I'm convinced that [Queen endings] are beyond human understanding> I sometimes feel like that as well - especially when going over the simplest kind of such an ending, Q+p vs. Q, which you can actually check with a tablebase. You might see then at a certain point 3 possible queen moves which look very similar - only one is a win in, say, 73 moves, another is a win in 25 moves, and another is a draw. And there doesn't seem to be any general "rule" operating here - just some random and very complex configuration of checks. No wonder even the top players make a lot of mistakes in such endings (e.g., Topalov vs Anand, 2005).
Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: Here's a new, um, song. I originally posted it in the forum of <A. Friend> but you don't get far in life if you use your pals as lightning shields. Every true Zapkinder is willing to be zapped, person to person, straight into the brainstem or cortex to cortex, either by an angry deity or a passing alien with a Zat.

So here it is, Zapkinder:

<Dom's Calvinistic Predestination Rag & Rap >

"When the mud sticks
You'll be inspissated
You'll want a fix
You'll be self-hated.
On the pagan Styx
Nude bathers. X-rated.
But the Lord's team picks
Are already fated.
You in the book? The appendix?
You'll wish you'd waited
Before turning those tricks.
You felt elated
With a bunch of chicks,
Could not be sated
In your quest for kicks,
So you, freelance, mated?
And the red-tops have pix?
G-d had you created
And you gave him cricks
In the neck. Air-freighted,
You travel with the Micks
To Ryanair Hell. An industrial suburb of Bratislava or Bordeaux, where God, like a Giant Euro-Cheese, is Grated."

Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Open Defence: <To Ryanair Hell. An industrial suburb of Bratislava or Bordeaux, where God, like a Giant Euro-Cheese, is Grated."> sounds like <I'm in hot plate heaven at the Green Hotel>
Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <Eyal> Yes, precisely. You know those occasional OTB queen endings where a couple of 2700 players drift in and out of 'white win', 'draw', 'black win', several times while giving every appearance of deep thought?

I'm not sure whether this is depressing ("Our human limits! Woe!") or magnificent ("The irreducible complexity of everything strikes again").

Some very complex deep tactical positions are broadly similar, but the thing about Queen endings is they *look* straightforward -- and some have been solved by brute force calculation -- and they look as though general principles should apply. But even Dvoretsky tends to find more exceptions than laws, and insists that calculation and analysis of each specific position is paramount.

Maybe this is a little like parts of Physics. We expect principles, we expect formulas, grand unified theories of everything ... and they don't necessarily exist. Or they don't exist in a form comprehensible to humans.

Aug-12-07  Ed Trice: <Eyal> You should try Queen + Pawn endgames on the 80-square board for Gothic Chess. The longest win I computed was 268 moves:

http://www.gothicchess.com/javascri...

Give that one a whirl

:)

Aug-12-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <Deffi>... Maybe great minds think alike, although.... Zappa und Ich are not often on the same wavelength. (And I'm not *really* a Great Mind... just close enough to fool those who deserve to be fooled. Somebody has to see that gullibility gets punished -- no religion will ever do it, cos they depend on it too.)

Like Pynchon, I love the mixture of slapstick and cutting-edge science. Or like Viv Stanshall, the blend of clowning, satire, erudition and real danger.

Zappa -- circa We're Only In It For The Money -- Brown Shoes Don't Make It -- Bow-Tie Daddy -- Let's Make the Water Turn Black -- was brilliant. First rate satire, new and different music, plus that 'punk' willingness to bite the hand that feeds it (vital, this).

But he lost it, somehow, and I don't pretend to understand why. Drew back until only schoolboy smuttiness and precision musicianship were left... like a bizarre mutant mix of Varese and 'dirty' postcards, or Stockhausen with a strap-on (note: NOT a type of guitar).

A type of *organ*, obviously. Oh, Gawd.

There was a 2nd Zappa moment, but it passed too quickly -- us old guys have slower reflexes -- and then he died.

Maybe, I dunno, he should have tried to get his *cancer* elected president. If Reagan, Bush and Clinton can be Prez, why not a cancer?

<"Cancer is the answer. Why take a risk on an unknown homeless person who can't afford TV spots, or deviate from our ancient traditions by voting for a woman, an African-American, or a raccoon?

Cancer is the Answer you seek. Yet it's also a kind, soft traditional remedy, nature's way of saying 'nighty-night'. Many cancers have held public office. Reagan ran the USA from his Polyp Bureau. Nixon had a rectum transplant, but the rectum rejected him.

And the case of Grover Cleveland, his 2nd term, his cancer of the jawbone, and his attractive young wife Frances... is a secret. See my *next* book for details.

Cancer -- the star-sign that emulates the American Way. Cancer -- the Answer.

What's the question, again?

Aug-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: welcome to <Castle Arghhhhhh....>
Aug-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <"Around 63,000 feet above the Earth, our body fluids begin to boil.">

This is Post # 6500. An interesting number: the product of 65 (itself the product of the smallest primes of form 4n+1, and the sum of two squares in 2 ways) and 100 (which is both 'round' and 'square' and a ton or century or centurion).

To mark the 6500th, a brief regression into numbermania -- but not numerology, which is superstitious junk -- plus some rare Ballard material on the subject of chess, and a dash of Virgil. The old ill-assorted gang of gangers taking the doggerel for walkies. Literary types can ignore the equations, and vice versa. You stare into the abyss, and you find it ignoring you. Life's abyss.

"Forsan et haec olim meminisse juvabit."
- Virgil, Aeneid, 1203

'One day, perhaps, we shall like to remember even these things.'

"People who talk about three-dimensional chess obviously know nothing about the present form." - JG Ballard, End-Game.

(a,b) = [a^2] + [b^2]

6500 = 2.2.5.5.5.13 = 125 x 52
52 = 4 x 13 = (2,0)*(3,2) = (6,4)
125 = (11,2) = (10,5)
(11,2)*(6,4) = ([11 x 6] ± [2 x 4], [11 x 4] ± [2 x 6]) = (66 ± 8, 44 ± 12)
= (74, 32) = (58, 56)

(10,5)*(6,4) = ([10 x 6] ± [5 x 4], [10 x 4] ± [5 x 6]) = (60 ± 20, 40 ± 30)
= (80, 10) = (40, 70)

6500 = (80,10) = 6400 + 100
6500 = (70,40) = 4900 + 1699
6500 = (74,32) = 5776 + 1024
6500 = (58,56) = 3364 + 3136

"Men of a phlegmatic or philosophical temperament, resigned to the inevitability of their fate, would choose to read the novels. On the other hand, men of a more volatile and extrovert disposition would obviously prefer to play chess, unable to resist the opportunity to exercise their Machiavellian talents for positional manoeuvre to the last. The games of chess would help to maintain their unconscious optimism, and, more subtly, sublimate or divert any attempts at escape."

- JG Ballard, End-Game, The Terminal Beach.

Fibonacci: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 1597, 2584, 4181, 6765 ...

F5 = 5 = (2, 1) = 2^2 + 1^2
F11 = 89 = (8, 5) = 8^2 + 5^2
F13 = 233 = (13, 8) = 13^2 + 8^2
= [F6]^2 + [F7]^2
F19 = 4181 = (50, 41) = 50^2 + 41^2

F[2n+1] = [Fn]^2 + [F(n+1)]^2

x² - x - 1 = 0

Tribonacci Sequence: 1, 1, 1, 3, 5, 9, 17, 31, 57, 105...

The ratio between successive terms of the Tribonacci sequence gradually approaches the positive real root of the cubic equation: x³ - x² - x – 1 = 0

Basta. Normal service will be resumed as soon as possible...

Aug-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <Jess> -- <Well what did you expect to see out of a <Torquay Hotel room window>?>

Torbay? With an ithyphallic ichthyosaurus swimming in ellipses, looking for his long-lost cadborosaurus?

Just a guess, mind.

Is your self-proclaimed <bonkersness> a steady-burning flame, or does it oscillate like mine? Why, one day we might even be 'in phase'...

Good, ah, morning, yer maj.

Aug-13-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: GOOD LORD <DOMINUS>

What are you doing up in the middle of the night?

That's one hell of a caculation there.

Math is Greek to me, but then so is Greek, for that matter.

Ahoy!

Aug-13-07  Ed Trice: Darn, I had this extra ticket for Iceland Air that I can't use now that one of my friends can't make it. I thought someone might want to use it. I can see that is not the case.
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 963)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 225 OF 963 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC