|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 237 OF 963 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Sep-03-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Some guy said 'A Pi DoH' to me yesterday.
So I ran home, looked it up in my Korean dictionary, saw that it means "beautiful woman," ran back to where he was and slapped him. Will I get arrested? |
|
Sep-03-07
 | | Domdaniel: <Jess> I think it's about 10.30pm here now... although I was in nocturnal mode for a few days, lurking around here at 6.00am, so my body clock is a bit awry. What time is it in Korea? Reminds me ... I knew somebody once who used "What time is it in China?" as a euphemism for "your flies are undone" / "your zipper is open". Far too genteel to refer directly to the area in question. I never saw it succeed, though. People would reply "noon" or "whaaat?" and go right on ventilating their privates. |
|
Sep-03-07
 | | Domdaniel: <A Pi Doh> Is that what Homer Simpson has been saying all these years? |
|
Sep-03-07
 | | Domdaniel: ... cos if Homer has been saying "Apu Doh" he might need gender reassignment... |
|
Sep-03-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: heh the Republic by Play Doh |
|
Sep-03-07
 | | Domdaniel: <A Pi DoH> ... is that pronounced like a French person saying "'appy dough" or a Scot saying "a paedo?" <Jess> -- <will I get arrested?> depends ... was it the chief of police you slapped? |
|
Sep-04-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: NO, but here is a true fact.
Apparently, male Koreans over 40 years old command so much respect that they can get drunk during work and kick policemen in the nuts and it's perfectly acceptable. So they say here.
I haven't seen it myself yet, but I'm certainly looking forward to it. |
|
| Sep-04-07 | | Zebra: What a pity I'm not Korean... |
|
Sep-05-07
 | | Domdaniel: <Zebra> A real conversation-stopper, that. I can only assume the silence here means that everyone is going "yeah, me too"... I wonder... does the right to play Korean cop-nut football arrive automatically on your 40th birthday? Would you *nearly* get away with it if you were, say, 39? Or is it more of a cumulative respect-the-aged thing... where 40 is good, 50 is better, 60 is better still, and <Joe Wms> is God? |
|
| Sep-05-07 | | achieve: <Yeah, me too..>
It's the irony, the sarcasm? The three dots.. The relative ignorance.. Who knew?
I guess only Jess can tell..
"Overhere" you can get away with being drunk as a premier on prime time television, because you're labeled as "father of the country". (Wim Kok - 60+ ) How the hell Sarkozy pulled it off remains a mystery to me.. In built kaste system? Bribery? Intimidation? Traditions? I wouldn't have a clue.. |
|
| Sep-05-07 | | Zebra: I always thought sarkozy was some kind of disease. |
|
Sep-05-07
 | | Domdaniel: And I always thought Wim Kok was some kind of ... no, better not go there. |
|
Sep-06-07
 | | Domdaniel: <achieve> -- <It's the irony, the sarcasm? The three dots.. > And you only use *two* dots, Niels. Modesty? Economy? Or precise understatement, with a dash of minimalism, getting the full effect with less expenditure of effort? It's quite Dutch, I think. Makes the rest of us seem florid, over-elaborate, carelessly wasteful. Ah, such style. Only the Japanese really come close, and they unfortunately spoil the effect by making a philosophy out of it. But Dutch precision out-Zens Zen.
My three dots, en passant, are otherwise known as ellipsis. They originally, in the history of printing, signified that something had been ... left out. But now they're a type of pause, with the implication that there is more to come, yet no obligation to actually provide it. I use them because I have a horror of full stops, period. While there are dots, life goes on... |
|
Sep-06-07
 | | Domdaniel: <mack> Back in the FENs, eh? All right, I shall try squirming into the ... thing ... and see what emerges. btw, have you been following any of the China-vs-England games from Liverpool? Adams, Short, Pert, Gawain Jones & Co against Ni Hua and the rest. Some good games yesterday, although Kurtz seems to have decided that a draw is a good result. Can't really blame him, given that almost all of the Chinese players are less than half his age. I can remember the name <Ni Hua> because it's almost identical to the Irish for "it is not" (a phrase which turns up with alarming frequency in any use of the Irish language whatsoever). - Is that ... ?
- It is not. |
|
| Sep-06-07 | | achieve: <Dom>--<And you only use *two* dots, Niels. Modesty? Economy?> Finally!! I was actually waiting for that piece of "awareness"... Why the 2 dots, in stead of the three? There are several subtleties that are involved when I choose the 2 over the 3.. In this case it was, partly, related to the three dots, the preceding poster had used.. What did he mean / was there a clue as for the "severity" of irony ? Und so weiter u.s.w. ... But Zebra didn't disclose, clever guy.. So the full effect of minimalism was minimized by the, again brilliant, < I always thought sarkozy was some kind of disease.> <But Dutch precision out-Zens Zen.> heh.. Maybe outwise Trice, perhaps? |
|
| Sep-06-07 | | mack: <Dom> Any chance you could zap that temporarily please? Just noticed a huge mistake that makes it not fit for consumption. Yet. |
|
| Sep-06-07 | | mack: <Dom> Sorry for flooding your forum, but -- don't zap that diagram after all. It's all clean and proper. Just going a bit mad. Now I really must be off... |
|
Sep-06-07
 | | Domdaniel: <mack> Okay, then. The computer engines won't be much use here, will they? Most subtle of you. I suspect that the idea is to play 1.a7 stalemating the black king, and then arrange for a knight to deliver mate on c7 -- before black can either draw by losing all his pawns or possibly even win by running amok with a queen. Thus e8(N) is a good place to promote, as it's mate next move. And g8 is also good because of g8(N)-f6-e8-c7#. Some examples might run:
1.a7 hxg6 2.h4 f6 3.e4 f5 4.e5 f4 5.e6 f3 6.e7 f2 7.e8(N) f1(Q) 8.Nc7# or 3.e4 g5 4.hxg5 f5 5.e5 f4 6.e6 f3 7.e7 f2 8.e8(N) f1(B) 9.Nc7# or 1.a7 f5 2.g7 f4 3.g8(N) f3 4.Nf6 fxe2 5.Nd5 e1(Q) 6.Nc7# Which is still a long way from a proof, I think. And even if it's the right idea there may be different ways of doing it, different move orders etc. But it looks like the best bet to me. |
|
Sep-06-07
 | | Domdaniel: <mack> I zapped something. I hope I zapped the right thing. My aim is rusty. <Kurtziana> I also retract anything I may have said about Mr Short. He had a brilliant win in a Najdorf against Bu Xiangzhi today. Short presses, wins a pawn or two, forces Black to launch an attack that looks unsound, and then things get a little crazy. So far I'm unable to say whether Nigel always had matters under control, or whether Bu's attack proved unexpectedly dangerous, almost winning before Short reasserted control in what looks like a time scramble -- 1-0 on move 39 in a position where White is clearly better but Black should be able to fight on for a while. Time? Excellent game anyhow. Down to the proper heavyweight theoretical duel with a novelty somewhere round move 17 or 18, I think. Despite being heavily out-rated (by, er, 2685 to 2683) and being twice his opponent's age, Kurtz proved he can still spar with the heavyweights. Which was in doubt after his recent adventures in Canada. |
|
Sep-06-07
 | | Domdaniel: My God, I'm talking about chess.
Help, somebody. |
|
Sep-06-07
 | | Domdaniel: <mack> Oops. I zapped it. But I can put it back from memory, I hope. *mack's latest surrealist chess problem*
 click for larger view"White to play and deliver mate with a KNIGHT in ten moves or less" ... hope I got that right ... |
|
| Sep-06-07 | | mack: Aw, no fair... you seemed to have more or less cracked it already. Disappointing. 1.a7 is absolutely correct, as I don't believe that the aim of mating with a knight in ten moves or under can be achieved if the old g-pawn advances in any of the three ways possible. But-- you're not *quite* there... <1.a7 hxg6 2.h4 f6 3.e4> What about 2...f5? (Or should that be 2..f5?)
Also --
<8.e8(N) f1(B)>
It's a fine man that can me chuckle with a single letter in a long string of chess notation. WIST. DRSH! |
|
| Sep-06-07 | | mack: I think I'm going to have nightmares tonight over the album cover of Robert Pollard's forthcoming album, Standard Gargoyle Decisions: http://robertpollard.net/imgs/gargo... |
|
Sep-06-07
 | | Domdaniel: <mack> Sorry, I can't possibly look at that. My boycott of google also extends to gargoyles, gargles, gurgles, and, er, Gingrich. But goglets, gingivitis and Ginger Rogers are still cool. Especially all three together. |
|
| Sep-07-07 | | twinlark: and goggly doggies? |
|
 |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 237 OF 963 ·
Later Kibitzing> |