| < Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 811 OF 963 · 
	Later Kibitzing> | 
| Mar-03-12 |  | quantum.conscious: <jfq: I don't have to deal with aggressive, addle-minded half-educated boys like you > so many labels! 
 i don't know if dom is wise or good teacher but he certainly must be very patient if he friendly with you (unless he has to see this side of yours very rarely). you perhaps did present some evidence for one of your claims - dom's patience :) it looks like to me that <dom could be good mentor too becuase it appears , <jfq> that you are loyal, willing to learn and 'good at heart' but you have not got much intelligence , self-awareness (you think so highly of yourself it is funny. you have no idea how clueless you are) or education(real education,not college university degree) and you are very emotional and dom perhaps accepts you the way you are (i would like to stay miles away from you). so, may be dom's a good , giving mentor :) | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 |  | mworld: Do universities really still give out philosophy degrees? I thought we'd evolved since then... | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 
  |  | OhioChessFan: <mw: Do universities really still give out philosophy degrees?> What do you mean by that? | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 
  |  | OhioChessFan: To be fair, He That Must Not Be Named just might be visiting the site  to work on the Puzzle of the Day, etc.  So I guess I need not smirk at the daily visits. | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 
  |  | jessicafischerqueen: <Ohio> gracious of you, but I'm sure even if that's what he is doing, he's also "multitasking" with his fictional ignore list, putting any and all permutations of his name into the Search Kibbutz box to monitor fallout from his well-deserved public shame. | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 |  | frogbert: <Frogbert isn't doing anything wrong- what's your problem with him?> jessica, it's simply a classical case of stalking: after i had become thoroughly tired of and bored with angslo's (a.k.a. quantum.conscious, still.dynamic, silent.observer and who knows what else) games on this site, including numerous efforts of "fixing" slomarko, i put him on ignore. previously i had also been exchanging some emails with him. this is now, what, maybe 2-3 years ago? since then his interest for "me" ("frogbert") seemingly reached new heights, and he was posting obsessively about me (or directed to me) on the carlsen page and in his forum, and the amount of personal attacks in his forum made cg.com close it until he'd cleaned it up - but i'm not sure he ever got around to doing that. angslo's forum remained closed. he also filled his user profile with sinister attacks on me, causing further cg.com admin action. then he had some fight with rogge last year (which i only learned about in retrospect, since i ignored his presence here), and if i've understood correctly, this fight eventually lead to angslo asking cg.com to close his account and he "promised" never to return to the site. a promise he wasn't obliged to keep, of course - what he does in that respect is his business only, obviously. and he "reincarnated" for the first time after roughly a month or so. i've been extending my ignore list ever since. however, his various "incarnations" - like quantum.conscious (the seemingly longest lasting one) - were still obsessed with rogge and frogbert, and like another long-term member of this site, angslo still follows everything i do here with the stalker's relentless patience and stamina. and that's the key to understanding *his* posts here, in the kibitzer's cafe, on the carlsen page, nakamura page and anywhere else *i* might be posting - for those who bother to read what he writes. i don't - much to his frustration. i've already spent way too much of my time attempting to have meaningful communications with this person, and he becoming the side-kick of the *most* resilient stalker on this site hasn't exactly changed anything to the better. i wouldn't have cared much about anything they do here, if it weren't for their neverending "surveillance" of me. as it is, i have two shadows following my every move on cg.com, producing personal attacks on a predictable basis. and it's been going on for 4+ years, jessica. i think you probably would've been screaming at the top your lungs long ago if a similar thing would've been happening to you. :o) | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 
  |  | jessicafischerqueen: <frogbert> 
 Well yes I'm generally hysterical even when nothing bad is happening to me. I'm sorry you have to put up with this. | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 |  | quantum.conscious: a long post by , frogbert. and a lot of complaints.
 
 but if he wants the resolution of these complaints, it could be simple. he should simply ask how his persistent problem with tpstar can be over/resolved. it is very simple. tpstar has made some claims . he should acknowledge them if they are true. that is what i did. i kind of asked tpstar what his problem with me was. tpstar responded. whatever was true there i acknowledged. tpstar asked me to apologize publicly to complete the past and then move on. i did that. that was the right thing to do it was so simple.
 if anyone has any problem with me (including frogbert) , i am willing to use the same approach to complete the past and clean the slate. frogbert does not talk to me anymore (earlier he used to talk to me. he used to invite me for conversations the way he these days invites brankat and some others for conversations . things changed when irrefutable evidence emerged that he had lied about me and very actively had spread lies about me) apparently because he is not willing to acknowledge his 'wrongs' even if evidence is there - he only wants to assign the blame. i am willing to acknowledge my 'wrongs' always and clean the slate always. that is the complete picture, as i see it.
 very simple :) | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 |  | frogbert: <I'm generally hysterical even when nothing bad is happening to me> :o)
 <I'm sorry you have to put up with this.> oh, i'll manage. mostly by doing nothing. or by "putting my head in the sand", or "denying myself information" - the latter being dom's interpretation of my use of the ignore list. | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 
  |  | Domdaniel: <quant> Could you ditch the tiresome habit of quoting previous posts in their entirety when responding? This isn't some kind of 'thread' or even an emu conversation. People know how to dig up the context, if necessary. Quant suff. | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 
  |  | Domdaniel: <frogbert> Ok, you had a point. Some people generate zero information. Some may even radiate *negative* information. I'm a lousy teacher, btw. No patience with crap, repetition, or slow learners (apart from Pynchon). | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 
  |  | jessicafischerqueen: <generate zero information> heh that's pretty funny. 
 <frogbert> I remember <Angslo>- didn't many think he was slomarko? He wasn't though. Also, didn't he have a pattern? He'd follow around <Carlsen page> members starting inane arguments about nothing- but every so often he'd start whining about how terrible his life was, and how mentally ill he was, and beg all of you for forgiveness? This was a few years ago so maybe I've got it all mixed up. | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 |  | quantum.conscious: <Domdaniel: <quant> Could you ditch the tiresome habit of .....> certainly - in your forum atleast.
 :) | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 
  |  | Annie K.: <Jess: <...and try to figure out why his potboilers kept getting made into epic movies.>> Can't help with that - read the book, but never saw the movie. :D <Dom> some random link @cheezburger directed me to this YouChoob gem recently: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oiL...
 Recalling your interest in the mysterious subject of <marmosets - the craunching thereof>, I thought this might provide a handle on the solution... ;) | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 
  |  | jessicafischerqueen: <frogbert> I'm remembering more now- Didn't <tpstar> make an extraordinary effort to convince <anglso> to calm down, and also encourage him to seek psychiatric help? Apologies if I've got the details wrong on this as well. | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 
  |  | jessicafischerqueen: <Annie> what put you on to <Boulle> in the first place? | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 |  | quantum.conscious: <jfq : he'd start whining about how terrible his life was, and how mentally ill > not true. he never said that.  but it is not important to him if it was true. he was always interested in individual evolution no matter how messy (or great) his past was.  years ago , he indeed was 'neurotic' (not nearly as much as frogbert was a few years ago. since then frogbert has evolved a lot, at least for appearance sake) but that was way before he ever joined cg.com. he has been working on himself for many years. in cg.com he did post in an apparent 'obessive'/'compulsive' manner at a time(just the way frogbert was 'obsessive/compulsive' ). | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 
  |  | Annie K.: <Jess>, ah, I saw Planet referenced in all sorts of other SF works, so I figured I'd have to see what it was about. This, of course, means reading the book. ;) | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 |  | hms123: <Annie>  <The Marmoset Song>  double heh | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 |  | quantum.conscious: <jessicafischerqueen: Didn't <tpstar> , also encourage him to seek psychiatric help? > that is true. tpstar did that. i had a lot of problem with tpstar - way more than frogbert has. i could resolve that and i have a perfectly ok relation with him now. but the way you keep remembering about the past, you may soon start remembering what your friend at that time , <brankat>, used to think about frogbert and a lot of such details about frogbert. you may not want to remember all that, i have a feeling :) however, if you insist, i could help you remember all those details both about angslo as well as frogbert :) and i can also tell you who will be able to embrace the past details freely - angslo or the other person who told you in your forum that he emphasized on honesty and ... :) | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 |  | hms123: <Annie> 
 <reading the book>
 What a quaint concept that is these days.  Very refreshing to hear that it is still done in some parts of the world.  It is a lost art here. | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 |  | frogbert: <Didn't <tpstar> make an extraordinary effort to convince <anglso> to calm down, and also encourage him to seek psychiatric help?> jessica, it seems their relationship has evolved since then, but i never followed that exchange you refer to - i only (accidentally) observed a reference to it by quantum.conscious quite recently. hence, the above was new information for me. as i said, i've pretty successfully ignored angslo's (= quantum.conscious') presence on cg.com for the past 2-3 years. he pops up in quotes now and then, which i guess is unavoidable. but i'm mostly unaware of the final chapters of the "angslo files" on cg.com. and i'll do quite fine without a summary. :o) | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 |  | cro777: <Dom> Tom Randle investigated recent developments in  the Armenian Variation. http://www.chesspublishing.com/cont... | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 
  |  | Annie K.: <hms> well, I was younger in those days, too. ;s <Jess> also, <Boulle> is usually fairly easily recognizable... :) | 
	|  | 
| Mar-03-12 |  | frogbert: i've never "allowed" the winawer as white (when 1.e4 was my main opening), and for the same reason i don't allow the most typical kid variations these days (i opt for the fianchetto variation as white, even if it possibly gives up most/all of white's advantage - at least engines seem to think so). similarly i never fancied going for the all-out attacks with opposite castling when people played the sicilian dragon - instead i used to prefer a maroczy-like setup against the dragon. does the above make me a wuss - or simply a player who prefers slightly unbalanced over extremely unbalanced positions? | 
	|  | 
												|  | 
|  | 
	| < Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 811 OF 963 · 
	Later Kibitzing> |