chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Domdaniel
Member since Aug-11-06 · Last seen Jan-10-19
no bio
>> Click here to see Domdaniel's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Domdaniel has kibitzed 30777 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-08-19 Domdaniel chessforum (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Blank Reg: "They said there was no future - well, this is it."
 
   Jan-06-19 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Haaarry Neeeeds a Brutish Empire... https://youtu.be/ZioiHctAnac
 
   Jan-06-19 G McCarthy vs M Kennefick, 1977 (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Maurice Kennefick died over the new year, 2018-2019. RIP. It was many years since I spoke to him. He gave up chess, I reckon, towards the end of the 80s, though even after that he was sometimes lured out for club games. I still regard this game, even after so many years, as the ...
 
   Jan-06-19 Maurice Kennefick (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Kennefick died over the 2018-19 New Year. Formerly one of the strongest players in Ireland, he was the first winner of the Mulcahy tournament, held in honour of E.N. Mulcahy, a former Irish champion who died in a plane crash. I played Kennefick just once, and had a freakish win, ...
 
   Jan-06-19 Anand vs J Fedorowicz, 1990 (replies)
 
Domdaniel: <NBZ> -- Thanks, NBZ. Enjoy your chortle. Apropos nothing in particular, did you know that the word 'chortle' was coined by Lewis Carroll, author of 'Alice in Wonderland'? I once edited a magazine called Alice, so I can claim a connection. 'Chortle' requires the jamming ...
 
   Jan-06-19 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
Domdaniel: <al wazir> - It's not easy to go back through past Holiday Present Hunts and discover useful information. Very few people have played regularly over the years -- even the players who are acknowledged as best, <SwitchingQuylthulg> and <MostlyAverageJoe> have now ...
 
   Jan-05-19 Wesley So (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Wesley is a man of his word. Once again, I am impressed by his willingness to stick to commitments.
 
   Jan-04-19 G Neave vs B Sadiku, 2013 (replies)
 
Domdaniel: Moral: if you haven't encountered it before, take it seriously. Remember Miles beating Karpov with 1...a6 at Skara. Many so-called 'irregular' openings are quite playable.
 
   Dec-30-18 Robert Enders vs S H Langer, 1968
 
Domdaniel: <HMM> - Heh, well, yes. I also remembered that Chuck Berry had a hit with 'My Ding-a-ling' in the 1970s. I'm not sure which is saddest -- that the author of Johnny B. Goode and Memphis Tennessee and Teenage Wedding - among other short masterpieces - should sink to such ...
 
   Dec-30-18 T Gelashvili vs T Khmiadashvili, 2001 (replies)
 
Domdaniel: This is the game I mean: Bogoljubov vs Alekhine, 1922
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Frogspawn: Levity's Rainbow

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 811 OF 963 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-03-12  quantum.conscious: <jfq: I don't have to deal with aggressive, addle-minded half-educated boys like you >

so many labels!

i don't know if dom is wise or good teacher but he certainly must be very patient if he friendly with you (unless he has to see this side of yours very rarely).

you perhaps did present some evidence for one of your claims - dom's patience :)

it looks like to me that <dom could be good mentor too becuase it appears , <jfq> that you are loyal, willing to learn and 'good at heart' but you have not got much intelligence , self-awareness (you think so highly of yourself it is funny. you have no idea how clueless you are) or education(real education,not college university degree) and you are very emotional and dom perhaps accepts you the way you are (i would like to stay miles away from you). so, may be dom's a good , giving mentor :)

Mar-03-12  mworld: Do universities really still give out philosophy degrees?

I thought we'd evolved since then...

Mar-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <mw: Do universities really still give out philosophy degrees?>

What do you mean by that?

Mar-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: To be fair, He That Must Not Be Named just might be visiting the site to work on the Puzzle of the Day, etc. So I guess I need not smirk at the daily visits.
Mar-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Ohio> gracious of you, but I'm sure even if that's what he is doing, he's also "multitasking" with his fictional ignore list, putting any and all permutations of his name into the Search Kibbutz box to monitor fallout from his well-deserved public shame.
Mar-03-12  frogbert: <Frogbert isn't doing anything wrong- what's your problem with him?>

jessica, it's simply a classical case of stalking: after i had become thoroughly tired of and bored with angslo's (a.k.a. quantum.conscious, still.dynamic, silent.observer and who knows what else) games on this site, including numerous efforts of "fixing" slomarko, i put him on ignore. previously i had also been exchanging some emails with him. this is now, what, maybe 2-3 years ago?

since then his interest for "me" ("frogbert") seemingly reached new heights, and he was posting obsessively about me (or directed to me) on the carlsen page and in his forum, and the amount of personal attacks in his forum made cg.com close it until he'd cleaned it up - but i'm not sure he ever got around to doing that. angslo's forum remained closed. he also filled his user profile with sinister attacks on me, causing further cg.com admin action.

then he had some fight with rogge last year (which i only learned about in retrospect, since i ignored his presence here), and if i've understood correctly, this fight eventually lead to angslo asking cg.com to close his account and he "promised" never to return to the site. a promise he wasn't obliged to keep, of course - what he does in that respect is his business only, obviously. and he "reincarnated" for the first time after roughly a month or so. i've been extending my ignore list ever since.

however, his various "incarnations" - like quantum.conscious (the seemingly longest lasting one) - were still obsessed with rogge and frogbert, and like another long-term member of this site, angslo still follows everything i do here with the stalker's relentless patience and stamina. and that's the key to understanding *his* posts here, in the kibitzer's cafe, on the carlsen page, nakamura page and anywhere else *i* might be posting - for those who bother to read what he writes. i don't - much to his frustration.

i've already spent way too much of my time attempting to have meaningful communications with this person, and he becoming the side-kick of the *most* resilient stalker on this site hasn't exactly changed anything to the better. i wouldn't have cared much about anything they do here, if it weren't for their neverending "surveillance" of me. as it is, i have two shadows following my every move on cg.com, producing personal attacks on a predictable basis. and it's been going on for 4+ years, jessica.

i think you probably would've been screaming at the top your lungs long ago if a similar thing would've been happening to you. :o)

Mar-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <frogbert>

Well yes I'm generally hysterical even when nothing bad is happening to me.

I'm sorry you have to put up with this.

Mar-03-12  quantum.conscious: a long post by , frogbert.
and a lot of complaints.

but if he wants the resolution of these complaints, it could be simple. he should simply ask how his persistent problem with tpstar can be over/resolved. it is very simple. tpstar has made some claims . he should acknowledge them if they are true. that is what i did.

i kind of asked tpstar what his problem with me was. tpstar responded. whatever was true there i acknowledged. tpstar asked me to apologize publicly to complete the past and then move on. i did that. that was the right thing to do

it was so simple.

if anyone has any problem with me (including frogbert) , i am willing to use the same approach to complete the past and clean the slate. frogbert does not talk to me anymore (earlier he used to talk to me. he used to invite me for conversations the way he these days invites brankat and some others for conversations . things changed when irrefutable evidence emerged that he had lied about me and very actively had spread lies about me) apparently because he is not willing to acknowledge his 'wrongs' even if evidence is there - he only wants to assign the blame. i am willing to acknowledge my 'wrongs' always and clean the slate always.

that is the complete picture, as i see it.

very simple :)

Mar-03-12  frogbert: <I'm generally hysterical even when nothing bad is happening to me>

:o)

<I'm sorry you have to put up with this.>

oh, i'll manage. mostly by doing nothing. or by "putting my head in the sand", or "denying myself information" - the latter being dom's interpretation of my use of the ignore list.

Mar-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <quant> Could you ditch the tiresome habit of quoting previous posts in their entirety when responding? This isn't some kind of 'thread' or even an emu conversation. People know how to dig up the context, if necessary.

Quant suff.

Mar-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <frogbert> Ok, you had a point. Some people generate zero information. Some may even radiate *negative* information.

I'm a lousy teacher, btw. No patience with crap, repetition, or slow learners (apart from Pynchon).

Mar-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <generate zero information>

heh that's pretty funny.

<frogbert> I remember <Angslo>- didn't many think he was slomarko? He wasn't though.

Also, didn't he have a pattern? He'd follow around <Carlsen page> members starting inane arguments about nothing- but every so often he'd start whining about how terrible his life was, and how mentally ill he was, and beg all of you for forgiveness?

This was a few years ago so maybe I've got it all mixed up.

Mar-03-12  quantum.conscious: <Domdaniel: <quant> Could you ditch the tiresome habit of .....>

certainly - in your forum atleast.

:)

Mar-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: <Jess: <...and try to figure out why his potboilers kept getting made into epic movies.>>

Can't help with that - read the book, but never saw the movie. :D

<Dom> some random link @cheezburger directed me to this YouChoob gem recently:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oiL...

Recalling your interest in the mysterious subject of <marmosets - the craunching thereof>, I thought this might provide a handle on the solution... ;)

Mar-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <frogbert> I'm remembering more now- Didn't <tpstar> make an extraordinary effort to convince <anglso> to calm down, and also encourage him to seek psychiatric help?

Apologies if I've got the details wrong on this as well.

Mar-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Annie> what put you on to <Boulle> in the first place?
Mar-03-12  quantum.conscious: <jfq : he'd start whining about how terrible his life was, and how mentally ill >

not true. he never said that. but it is not important to him if it was true. he was always interested in individual evolution no matter how messy (or great) his past was.

years ago , he indeed was 'neurotic' (not nearly as much as frogbert was a few years ago. since then frogbert has evolved a lot, at least for appearance sake) but that was way before he ever joined cg.com. he has been working on himself for many years. in cg.com he did post in an apparent 'obessive'/'compulsive' manner at a time(just the way frogbert was 'obsessive/compulsive' ).

Mar-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: <Jess>, ah, I saw Planet referenced in all sorts of other SF works, so I figured I'd have to see what it was about. This, of course, means reading the book. ;)
Mar-03-12  hms123: <Annie> <The Marmoset Song> double heh
Mar-03-12  quantum.conscious: <jessicafischerqueen: Didn't <tpstar> , also encourage him to seek psychiatric help? >

that is true. tpstar did that. i had a lot of problem with tpstar - way more than frogbert has. i could resolve that and i have a perfectly ok relation with him now.

but the way you keep remembering about the past, you may soon start remembering what your friend at that time , <brankat>, used to think about frogbert and a lot of such details about frogbert. you may not want to remember all that, i have a feeling :)

however, if you insist, i could help you remember all those details both about angslo as well as frogbert :)

and i can also tell you who will be able to embrace the past details freely - angslo or the other person who told you in your forum that he emphasized on honesty and ... :)

Mar-03-12  hms123: <Annie>

<reading the book>

What a quaint concept that is these days. Very refreshing to hear that it is still done in some parts of the world. It is a lost art here.

Mar-03-12  frogbert: <Didn't <tpstar> make an extraordinary effort to convince <anglso> to calm down, and also encourage him to seek psychiatric help?>

jessica, it seems their relationship has evolved since then, but i never followed that exchange you refer to - i only (accidentally) observed a reference to it by quantum.conscious quite recently. hence, the above was new information for me. as i said, i've pretty successfully ignored angslo's (= quantum.conscious') presence on cg.com for the past 2-3 years. he pops up in quotes now and then, which i guess is unavoidable. but i'm mostly unaware of the final chapters of the "angslo files" on cg.com. and i'll do quite fine without a summary. :o)

Mar-03-12  cro777: <Dom> Tom Randle investigated recent developments in the Armenian Variation.

http://www.chesspublishing.com/cont...

Mar-03-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Annie K.: <hms> well, I was younger in those days, too. ;s

<Jess> also, <Boulle> is usually fairly easily recognizable... :)

Mar-03-12  frogbert: i've never "allowed" the winawer as white (when 1.e4 was my main opening), and for the same reason i don't allow the most typical kid variations these days (i opt for the fianchetto variation as white, even if it possibly gives up most/all of white's advantage - at least engines seem to think so).

similarly i never fancied going for the all-out attacks with opposite castling when people played the sicilian dragon - instead i used to prefer a maroczy-like setup against the dragon.

does the above make me a wuss - or simply a player who prefers slightly unbalanced over extremely unbalanced positions?

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 963)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 811 OF 963 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC