chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Fusilli
Member since Aug-09-04 · Last seen Oct-07-25
Mariano Sana, Argentinian by birth, in the US since 1995. Naturalized US citizen. I hold a PhD in Demography from the University of Pennsylvania, and I am an associate professor of Sociology at Vanderbilt University: https://as.vanderbilt.edu/sociology.... Previously, I was at Louisiana State University (2003-2009).

My published academic work can be seen here: https://vanderbilt.academia.edu/Mar.... My review of Gary Alan Fine's "Players and Pawns" is here: https://www.academia.edu/69647923/P....

My avatar comes from a cartoon of mine drawn by a friend. My username, besides the pasta, is my late cat's name (he died in March 2021, age 19), inspired by this cartoon: https://condenaststore.com/featured....

My first tournament was at age 12 in 1979. I finished 8th in the Argentine junior championship in 1985. So, I was good enough, but not great. (That same evaluation might still be apt today, on a good day.) Unfortunately, no game scores survived from those years. I started to play again after grad school. I play between 0 and 4 tournaments per year.

I won the Louisiana State Championship in 2007. I lost the first game and then won six in a row. This was my last round win, where I got lucky after playing the opening pretty terribly: J Rousselle vs M Sana, 2007.

I also won the under 2200 section of the US Open in 2014. Again, Swiss gambit. Lost the first one, then won five in a row, lost game 7 (M Sana vs J Sheng, 2014, a rather atypical game), and won games 8 and 9. My last round win was featured as a Tuesday puzzle: K Gulamali vs M Sana, 2014. (Try it! Black to play at move 29. But you can also do black to play at move 22 as a principled-move puzzle.)

I'd say that I am essentially a good but inconsistent player. My playing style is a mix of strategic and tactical. I'm usually very willing to sac a pawn or allow positional weaknesses in exchange for active piece play. For years I hovered around 2200, down to mid 2100s a few years ago after a disaster and a 50-point loss at the 2019 World Open. (Aging and MS fatigue had much to do with that.) On good days, I have had nice wins: T Bartell vs M Sana, 2009, R Burnett vs M Sana, 2012, M Sana vs C Blocker, 2014, M Sana vs R Burnett, 2015. But on a bad day, I can play horribly and lose against whoever is sitting in front of me.

I was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) in 2011, but it didn't cause me trouble until 2018/9. I have a weak right leg (I often use a cane now) and I fatigue easily. Medication, well-timed naps, and exercise help.

I play blitz games on chess.com under the username RealFusilli.

My participation on this website goes through ebbs and flows, and the majority of my posts are about chess. I often post on my own forum just to keep records for myself. Everyone is welcome to visit and share! (But please don't post about politics here.)

>> Click here to see Fusilli's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Fusilli has kibitzed 6255 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Oct-07-25 Hikaru Nakamura (replies)
 
Fusilli: Back in the day, I would sometimes resign by picking up my king and placing it in front of my opponent. And one day I read that a GM (I think Sosonko) did the same thing, while saying, "here's, it's yours." So, sure, one for the crowd, why not.
 
   Sep-15-25 L Mendonca vs M Yilmaz, 2024 (replies)
 
Fusilli: <perfidious> <There have been POTDs presented by <cg> which have featured positions which were analogous to practical games rather than guess the move> Not sure I follow. To me, Guess-the-Move games do reflect practical play, since you have to make every move, ...
 
   Sep-12-25 Leon Mendonca
 
Fusilli: Mendonca, no doubt originally spelled with a c-cedilla instead of a c, is a Portuguese surname, a reminder that Portugal colonized parts of India since as early as the 16th century.
 
   Sep-12-25 A Mittal vs Y K Erdogmus, 2025 (replies)
 
Fusilli: <FSR: Insane! The kid is a genius! I say he's a future world champion.> I share your enthusiasm but not your evaluation. The combination is absolutely beautiful but not hard to see for a strong player. It's a straight set of forced moves. I think it would be a Friday puzzle ...
 
   Sep-10-25 Fusilli chessforum (replies)
 
Fusilli: <OCF> I'm kind of proud of myself I got it. The word puzzle was apt! Where did you source it from?
 
   Sep-07-25 Karpov vs K Rogoff, 1971
 
Fusilli: Vintage Karpov gives a lesson on superior positional play. Every piece going to the right square at the right time. Or pretty close to that.
 
   Sep-07-25 S Marangunic vs K Rogoff, 1971 (replies)
 
Fusilli: <FTB> OK, here we go. I thought 16.Bxf6 was dubious. Why give up the bishop pair in a fairly open position? 16.Ne3 looks better to me. I was wondering what could be wrong with 23.Nb5. It turns out that after 23...Bf8 24.Rxd7 Rxd7 25.Nxa7 meets ...Bc5 followed by ...Rd2, which ...
 
   Sep-07-25 Fridrik Olafsson (replies)
 
Fusilli: <perf> oh, right, I see
 
   Sep-06-25 Peter Enders (replies)
 
Fusilli: <He died on his birthday :( > Very sad. It reminded me of this demographic research article I saw decades ago: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/143... Abstract: <This study of deaths from natural causes examined adult mortality around the birthday for two samples, ...
 
   Sep-03-25 So vs D Gukesh, 2025
 
Fusilli: <beatgiant> Because I didn't see it? Or I like complicating things, especially my life? Who knows!
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

My Facerook Wall

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 33 OF 112 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <K> Thanks! I'll be posting positions from my games in that tournament soon!

Did you start the semester already? Vandy started Monday... I wouldn't have mind another week of break! I guess the idea here is to maximize the summer, especially considering that there is a "Maymester", very intensive, in, well... May!

What courses are you taking this spring?

Jan-13-12  Knight13: <Fusilli> Yup, I started the semester already on the same day as Vandy. I'm excited to go back to class again---and learn! I am taking Calculus-Based Physics I: Mechanics, Calculus II, and English Composition II this semester, with a total of 12 credits (full-time). I wish I could take more, but.... Anyway, I will be playing in a tournament this weekend (so, yes, another week of break would've been pretty fitting, but life does not grant sunny days without rainy ones).

You earned the title of Associate Professor at Vanderbilt---tell me why you wouldn't have minded another week of break! It seems to me like you love what you do. Wouldn't you want to go back to teaching (and maybe even researching)?

Jan-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <K> Good luck at the tournament! Kick some butt!

About the break... it's just that I had a very tough year last year, for a variety of personal rather than work reasons... so I was extremely tired when the previous semester ended, and darn! I am still tired!

I actually like research better than teaching, but teaching is okay. ;-)

Jan-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Nashville City Championship 2012

FM Todd Andrews (2325) v. Mariano Sana (2158)

Position after 14...Qa5-d8:


click for larger view

So far it is similar to V Startsev vs R Swinkels, 2007. Here he deviated by playing 15.e4, and the computer says Black has a very comfortable game after 15...Nxd4 16.Qxd4 Ng4 followed by ...b5. Instead, I played the dubious 15...Kf8. And after 16.Nd5, according to the computer, the best move for Black is... 16...Kg8 (!)

The game continued 16...Nxd5 17.exd5 Nxd4 18.Bxd4 Bxd4 19.Qxd4 f6 20.b4:


click for larger view

White is better.

However, the advantage faded away. Either it was difficult to make progress or I played accurately, not sure. Position after 33...Qd8:


click for larger view

Now it is even.

... but I blew it.

Position after 37.Qc3+:


click for larger view

Here 37...Kh6 is an immediate draw, and against 37...Kg8 White has nothing better than 38.Qc8+ Kg7 39.Qc3+ and draw (if 38. Rc7 Qb5 and White is in trouble). But I played 37...Kf8? and after 38.Rc7! White is winning.

1-0 in 43.

Jan-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Nashville City Championship 2012

Mariano Sana (2158) v. Girgis Tanas (1894)

Position after 31.Nc5-e4:


click for larger view

This is an interesting position. Black has two central passers! (And the bishop pair.) But the white knights block everything just right. He has choices, but played 31...Bxe4, which has to be positionally wrong, at the very least because White's play from here on is very straightforward and comfortable. There was no need for this trade.

Position after 34.a3:


click for larger view

34...a4? Now this is weak. That pawn will be a target later.

Position after 41.Rc1-e1:


click for larger view

White has a big advantage. The e-pawn is falling, which means the d-pawn will fall too.

But accidents happen. Position after 73.Qe2-c4:


click for larger view

Black to play and draw! Any takers?

He actually played 73...Qf6 74.Rd2 and White is still winning.

1-0 in 81.

Jan-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Nashville City Championship 2012

Mariano Sana (2158) v. Jeff Tobin (1709)

Position after 28...Qd7-c7:


click for larger view

Black threatens 29...Qb6+, of course.

29.c5! and Black has too many problems.

1-0 in 34.

Jan-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Nashville City Championship 2012

IM Ronald Burnett (2414) v. Mariano Sana (2158)

Position after 12.Nh3:


click for larger view

White's king is still in the center and his king's bishop undeveloped. I decided I had to play active: 12...Nh5 13.Be3 Ne5 14.Nf2:


click for larger view

14...e6. After 15.g4 White kept an edge.

Position after 20.O-O-O:


click for larger view

Here I played 20...Qxa5 and the computer doesn't like it. I just thought I'd get too cramped if I tried to keep the d6 pawn.

Position after 23...Qa5-c7:


click for larger view

I expected 24.Ra6 and White is better. He played 24.e5, which is weaker. After 24...Nd7 25.f4 Nb6 Black begins to have counterplay:


click for larger view

The computer recommends 26.Rhd1 and White keeps an edge, but he played 26.Bc1 and after 26...Qb7 it is very much even.

He needed to win to have a shot at the championship, and began to play inaccurately. After 30...Rf8-f6, Black was better:


click for larger view

Well, actually, we both played inaccurately. After 33.Re1-e7:


click for larger view

...I should have played 33...Qf5 and Black is better, but went for 33...Qd1 and it would have been even after 34.Rxa7. Instead, he played 34.f5? and Black is winning after 34...Nc4:


click for larger view

Because of the mate threat (35...Nd2+ and 36...Qa4#), White loses a piece.

0-1 in 45.

Jan-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Conclusion: overall, I did pretty well at the city championship. I ended up second (FM Todd Andrews won), and gained 12 rating points. I am at 2170 now. I want to get back to 2200! I regret I blew my game against Todd, but I got lucky against Ron, so I can't complain.
Jan-14-12  WinKing: Hi <Fusilli>. Congratulations on a fine performance!!! I looked over your games quickly as it is late here now. I will be back tomorrow(Saturday) though to look at them more closely. I see you had a big victory over IM Burnett. How sweet was that?!!! Cha-ching Bada la bing! ;)
Jan-14-12  crawfb5: <M> A bit of luck against Tanas too, but overall, well done! I was still sleepy, so I let Houdini chew on it for me. It's amazing how sometimes one move will just barely hold everything in an otherwise lost position.
Jan-16-12  Knight13: <Fusilli> What was the IM's and observers' reactions when you defeated him?
Jan-16-12  Shams: <Fusilli> I certainly hope you will upload that win against IM Burnett!
Jan-17-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <K> There were three or four people watching. No particular reactions, but you know how it is in tournaments. Spectators like blood, and in most games it is pretty clear that the end is coming, so it was an attraction. I guess the end made FM Todd Andrews happy, as it basically meant he would be the new city champion by defeating a player more than 500 rating points below him (which he did).

IM Burnett was very professional. I am sure he was upset, but he didn't show it. He moved to another table to play his last game right away. Etiquette indicates that you do not make comments when you beat a much higher rated player (unless they initiate dialogue), so I just kept quiet.

He didn't have a good weekend. The day before, while playing, his parked car got smashed as a side effect of a crash on Belmont Ave, where the club is located.

Jan-17-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <Shams>, thanks for your interest! I do plan to upload a lot of games of mine, finally. I have not done it so far out of self-consciousness... many of my games have crass mistakes. But I am over that now. I will select a bunch of my games since I came back to play in 2003 and upload them. I will have to learn how (I am not chess-tech savvy) but I got some time now, as I am recovering from surgery yesterday. Got the week off.

BTW, my record with IM Burnett is 1.5 - 1.5. Not bad! :-) With FM Andrews (the other local titled player) it is 0.5 - 2.5... When I was young in Argentina I beat some players of my generation who went on to become titled players, but we were all very young back then. For example I beat Pablo Zarnicki, who went on to become World U-20 champion and GM, when he was about 10-12 and I was 15-17 (just checked his bio... I am five years his senior), which of course means absolutely nothing! I never had much prospects when I was a youngster... of the Argentine players of my generation, it was clear who the best ones were, and of those, those who stayed playing did become GMs or IMs. By the time I was 18 it was clear to me that I was a second-tier player, but at least I could be a dangerous second-tier player! I fathom I still can if I am well rested and inspired.

Unfortunately, when I became bitter about chess and quit (in my early 20s, to come back to play a decade later, now in the US) I threw away all my game scores. I wish I had them now!

Jan-17-12  Shams: <I threw away all my game scores. I wish I had them now!> Be Zen about it. That's apprentice work anyway-- your brilliancies are all in your future.
Jan-17-12  WinKing: Sorry it took me awhile to get back to you <Fusilli>. I have been looking at your games.

Nashville City Championship 2012

Mariano Sana (2158) v. Girgis Tanas (1894)

<Position after 73.Qe2-c4:<Diagram Below>

Black to play and draw! Any takers?>

Well to be honest <Fusilli> it took me awhile to find one of the correct moves(...Qd1) without an engine. I kept getting hung up when white throws in the move c7 after bxc6.


click for larger view

73...Qd1 74.bxc6 Qf3 75.c7 (Rybka gives 75.Qf4 also = ). I just wanted to try 75.c7 but it makes no difference. For some reason my mind just had trouble grasping that.

After 73...Qd1 74.bxc6 Qf3 75.c7 Rybka 3 gives:

[+0.00] d=27 75...Qf5 76.Kg2 Rb1 77.Qf4 Rb2 78.Kg1 Rb1 79.Kg2 Rb2 80.Kg1 Rb1 81.Kg2 Rb2 82.Kg1 Rb1 83.Kg2 Rb2 84.Kg1 Rb1 85.Kg2 Rb2 86.Kg1 Rb1 87.Kg2 Rb2 88.Kg1 Rb1 89.Kg2 Rb2 90.Kg1 Rb1

Rybka also evaluates 73...Re6 & 73...Re3 as equal [+0.00] allowing black to draw. The move 73...Re6 (Diagram Below) looks strange but I guess it works. I did not see that either of these rook moves would hold for black.


click for larger view

After 73...Re6 Rybka 3 gives:

[+0.00] d=24 74.Qd3 Re3 75.Qd7 Kh6 76.Qf7 Qd1 77.Qf4 Kg7 78.bxc6 Re6 79.Qc7 Kh6 80.Qf7 Re4 81.Qf8 Kh7 82.Kg2 Re2 83.Kh3 Re4 84.Kg2 Re2 85.Kh3 Re4 86.Kg2 Re2 87.Kh3 Re4 88.Kg2 Re2 89.Kh3

[+0.00] d=24 74.bxc6 Qd1 75.Qf4 Kg7 76.Qc7 Kh6 77.Qf7 Re4 78.Qf8 Kh7 79.Kg2 Re2 80.Kh3 Re4 81.Kg2 Re2 82.Kh3 Re4 83.Kg2 Re2 84.Kh3 Re4 85.Kg2 Re2 86.Kh3 Re4 87.Kg2 Re2 88.Kh3 Re4 89.Kg2

[+0.00] d=24 74.a5 Qd1 75.bxc6 Kg7 76.Qxe6 Qf1 77.Rg2 Qh1 78.Rh2 Qf1 79.Rg2 Qh1 80.Rh2 Qf1 81.Rg2 Qh1 82.Rh2 Qf1 83.Rg2 Qh1 84.Rh2 Qf1 85.Rg2 Qh1 86.Rh2 Qf1 87.Rg2 Qh1 88.Rh2 Qf1 89.Rg2

Of course if white plays 74.Qxe6 then 74...Qf1+ with a repetition .

So it appears there were a few ways black could have held the position.

Jan-17-12  WinKing: Nashville City Championship 2012

IM Ronald Burnett (2414) v. Mariano Sana (2158)

Position below is after 12.Nh3:(Looking at moves besides ...Nh5 in response)


click for larger view

Analysis is Rybka 3:

[+0.26] d=25 12...b5 13.axb6 Nxb6 14.Nf2 Qc7 15.Be2 a5 16.O–O Nxc4 17.Bxc4 Ba6 18.Bxa6 Rxa6 19.Qe2 Rb6 20.Nd1 Rfb8 21.Bc1 Qa7 22.Ne3 a4

[+0.26] d=25 12...b6 13.axb6 Nxb6 14.Nf2 Qc7 15.Be2 a5 16.O–O Nxc4 17.Bxc4 Ba6 18.Bxa6 Rxa6 19.Qe2 Rb6 20.Nd1 Rfb8 21.Bc1 Qa7 22.Ne3 a4

[+0.26] d=25 12...Qc7 13.Nf2 b5 14.axb6 Nxb6 15.Be2 a5 16.O–O Nxc4 17.Bxc4 Ba6 18.Bxa6 Rxa6 19.Qe2 Rb6 20.Nd1 Rfb8 21.Bc1 Qa7 22.Ne3

[+0.35] d=25 12...a6 13.Nf2 b5 14.axb6 Nxb6 15.Na5

I found this position interesting <Fusilli>. Looks like white holds a very slight edge in all variations. I'm not sure what I woud have played here. Your idea of playing actively wth 12...Nh5 looks good to me(below). Curious that Rybka had three of the moves(12...b5, 12...b6 & 12...Qc7) all transposing into the same line.

*****

Position below is after 12.Nh3 <Nh5>:<Actual move played in game>


click for larger view

[+0.33] d=23 13.Bg5 Ne5 14.Nf2 Bd7 15.Nxe5 Bxe5 16.g4 Ng7 17.Qd2 Bf6 18.Bf4 Bh4 19.Bg3 e5 20.dxe6 fxe6 21.Be2 Ne8 22.O–O

[+0.26] d=23 13.Be3 Ne5 14.Nf4 Nxf4 15.Bxf4 Bd7 16.Nxe5 Bxe5 17.Bxe5 dxe5 18.h4 h5 19.Qd2 Kg7 20.Be2 Qc7 21.O–O Qd6 22.Qe3 Rad8 23.Rfb1

You played a nice game here IMO <Fusilli>. Sure there might be a few inaccuracies but almost all master class games have them. Just remember the one who makes the next to last mistake usually wins. IM Burnett made the last one sorry about his luck. You seem to be pretty hard on yourself to me. Savor & enjoy your sweet successes. :) I enjoyed looking at your games Mariano. Looks like your playing some pretty good chess to me.

Jan-17-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <Shams> Thanks! That's a nice thought!

<WinKing> Wow, I had only seen Qd1... True, Re6 draws too! Thanks for the analysis! We were down to the last few minutes by then. It was a G/2hr game. I miss the good old times with adjournments, when the endgame was given more careful consideration...

Jan-19-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <WinKing> I just realized I hadn't noticed your post on my game with Burnett with the Rybka comments! You chose what I thought was a critical moment in the game. I thought about Nh5 for a while. I was afraid of falling into a defensive, cramped position without counterplay chances. I am glad Rybka doesn't think my move choice was inferior!

As my friend Alex Steger says, "I don't care if I am in a worse position as long as I have something to do". To me, the worst situation is to be unable to come up with a more or less workable plan.

BTW, I submitted a bunch of games of mine since 2003 to Daniel Freeman. I decided to go public! :-)

Jan-20-12  Knight13: <Fusilli> I look forward to your complete games.
Jan-20-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <K> My games are up!
Jan-21-12  hms123: <Famous> Congratulations!
Jan-21-12  technical draw: <Fusilli> If you want to know my whereabouts you must break this code:

..<Blessent mon cœur d'une langeur monotone>..

You have up to June 6 to figure it out.

Jan-21-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <TD> You mean, D-day is imminent? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chanso...). You sent me on a wild goose chase to learn a lot about World War II resistance! Thank you Jesus for Wikipedia. It was fun. For example, I "discovered" Polish resistance hero Witold Pilecki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witold...). The man let himself be captured to enter Auschwitz and organize resistance there!
Jan-22-12  Albertan: Mariano thank you for your kind words on my page about the current match I am playing. This match has been a great deal of fun and I have learned a great deal about chess and myself by playing the match!It is amazing that I chose an opening I have never played over-the-board to win game 2 (Petroff's defense). If that game is not my "Evergreen game" then no game is.I haven't had time to put the game through an engine yet, I am sure the engine will find moves which are "better" than the one played. However it was interesting to turn a pin into a won pawn, and then find some positional features of the position to win the game.

I am sure your club manager could arrange such a tournament as the game a week format you desire, if you desire such a tournament (and tournament schedule) you can be sure there are others at your club who would enjoy the same type of schedule for a weekly event! Our club is open at least 3 days a week, On Monday is active chess (g-30 touch move rule inforced) , Thursday is the CFC-rated tournaments and Saturday we have another active chess tournament. However people are starting to take advantage of this 3 days of the club being opened by scheduling matches like I am having right now. The club can be divided into two sections for this situation because we can separate the people who are playing a match from those playing in a fun tournament (Mon,or Saturday),, by a wall.This gives the match player the quite they need to play. Mariano, I hope the rest of your weekend goes well,thanks as always for sharing your thoughts on my match and chess in general! How goes your research into Sociology?

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 112)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 33 OF 112 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC