chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Fusilli
Member since Aug-09-04 · Last seen Jan-17-26
Mariano Sana, Argentinian by birth, in the US since 1995. Naturalized US citizen. I hold a PhD in Demography from the University of Pennsylvania, and I am an associate professor of Sociology at Vanderbilt University: https://as.vanderbilt.edu/sociology.... Previously, I was at Louisiana State University (2003-2009).

My published academic work can be seen here: https://vanderbilt.academia.edu/Mar.... My review of Gary Alan Fine's "Players and Pawns" is here: https://www.academia.edu/69647923/P....

My avatar comes from a cartoon of mine drawn by a friend. My username, besides the pasta, is my late cat's name (he died in March 2021, age 19), inspired by this cartoon: https://condenaststore.com/featured....

My first tournament was at age 12 in 1979. I finished 8th in the Argentine junior championship in 1985. So, I was good enough, but not great. (That same evaluation might still be apt today, on a good day.) Unfortunately, no game scores survived from those years. I started to play again after grad school. I play between 0 and 4 tournaments per year.

I won the Louisiana State Championship in 2007. I lost the first game and then won six in a row. This was my last round win, where I got lucky after playing the opening pretty terribly: J Rousselle vs M Sana, 2007.

I also won the under 2200 section of the US Open in 2014. Again, Swiss gambit. Lost the first one, then won five in a row, lost game 7 (M Sana vs J Sheng, 2014, a rather atypical game), and won games 8 and 9. My last round win was featured as a Tuesday puzzle: K Gulamali vs M Sana, 2014. (Try it! Black to play at move 29. But you can also do black to play at move 22 as a principled-move puzzle.)

I'd say that I am essentially a good but inconsistent player. My playing style is a mix of strategic and tactical. I'm usually very willing to sac a pawn or allow positional weaknesses in exchange for active piece play. For years I hovered around 2200, down to mid 2100s a few years ago after a disaster and a 50-point loss at the 2019 World Open. (Aging and MS fatigue had much to do with that.) On good days, I have had nice wins: T Bartell vs M Sana, 2009, R Burnett vs M Sana, 2012, M Sana vs C Blocker, 2014, M Sana vs R Burnett, 2015. But on a bad day, I can play horribly and lose against whoever is sitting in front of me.

I was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) in 2011, but it didn't cause me trouble until 2018/9. I have a weak right leg (I often use a cane now) and I fatigue easily. Medication, well-timed naps, and exercise help.

I play blitz games on chess.com under the username RealFusilli.

My participation on this website goes through ebbs and flows, and the majority of my posts are about chess. I often post on my own forum just to keep records for myself. Everyone is welcome to visit and share! (But please don't post about politics here.)

>> Click here to see Fusilli's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Fusilli has kibitzed 6341 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-12-26 Fusilli chessforum
 
Fusilli: <arek> Good to see you around here, my friend, though those are distressing news I'm sorry to hear. I have now recovered, I am back in the classroom, life has returned to normal. I still have a minor lingering cough, which I hope gets tired of me and leaves me soon. Cheers.
 
   Jan-10-26 Sax vs Karpov, 1989 (replies)
 
Fusilli: <perfidious> Well, that merits some discussion. For a while, white has been preferring d3 in move 5 or 6, but if white chooses the traditional closed set up, and doesn't go for 8.a4, the Breyer continues to be black's top preference on move 9. (I play it frequently in blitz ...
 
   Jan-09-26 Kasparov vs Nunn, 1989 (replies)
 
Fusilli: <Check It Out: I also assumed Nunn would be saved by something but if the kibitzing here is to be believed, it's Kasparov who was fortunate to make a draw.> My reaction too, though without reading any kibitzing first. I played through the game and got the feeling that Kasparov
 
   Jan-04-26 NN vs G Chandler, 1995
 
Fusilli: Or Ke7 instead of Nxc1, right? I'm happy to see Ke7 and not O-O, btw. Reminds me of the famous Ed Lasker vs G Thomas, 1912 , where many folks claim that O-O-O# would have been "cool" by comparison to the "boring" Kd2#, which Lasker played. Nonsense. The king doesn't need to rush to
 
   Jan-03-26 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
Fusilli: Suggestion: Can the Russian Championship Superfinal (2005) , which he won, be added to the list of Sergei Rublevsky notable tournaments?
 
   Jan-02-26 Petrosian vs Unzicker, 1960
 
Fusilli: That king relocation is epic. No reason to rush g4!
 
   Jan-02-26 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
Fusilli: Can Russian Championship Superfinal (2005) , which he won, be added to the list of Sergei Rublevsky notable tournaments?
 
   Jan-01-26 Portisch vs I Radulov, 1974 (replies)
 
Fusilli: This is absolutely mind-boggling.
 
   Jan-01-26 A Isanzhulov vs Ivanchuk, 2025
 
Fusilli: Poor Ivanchuk.
 
   Dec-30-25 M Miazhynski vs J Durana, 2025 (replies)
 
Fusilli: Wait, what? 6.O-O? Bc5? Surely someone messed up the score sheet!
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

My Facerook Wall

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 41 OF 114 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-05-13  Expendable Asset: <Fusilli> I got a question that relates to sociology (I think):

A lot of people with psychological abnormalities are "overtreated" with the justification to "protect the public," or otherwise the patients have to deal with being pre-judged in the real world. Wouldn't this discourage people from getting treatment or counseling? I wouldn't want to be diagnosed with anything that goes on record if it isn't severe--it'll follow you for the rest of your life and is unfair how other people treat you even after you're completely well. I certainly wouldn't want someone else to screw me over "for my own good just in case, and for the public."

Mar-11-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <EA> Of course! Stigma is a big topic of study in sociology, but also psychology, social work, and other disciplines. That's why confidentiality is so important in counseling, and reducing all sorts of stigma attached to health and mental health conditions is a goal worth pursuing.
Mar-12-13  Expendable Asset: <Fusilli> What characteristics of people are currently most respected and sought after in the United States of America?
Mar-13-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: The new pope is Argentine! His name is Diego Maradona.
Mar-13-13  hms123: <M>

Habemus <Fusilli>!

Mar-13-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <H> Habemus!
Mar-18-13  Expendable Asset: <Fusilli, hms123: Habemus!> So? We've had new popes for centuries and centuries.
Mar-18-13  hms123: <EA> Yes, but there's never been a <Pope Fusilli>.
Mar-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: I am happy with Pope <Fusilli>. It was a good choice, I think.
Mar-24-13  Expendable Asset: <Fusilli> Well, I'm not so sure. I'll have to wait several decades first before I can give you an answer.
Mar-25-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <EA> He doesn't have several decades! He is 76! You have to make a decision now!
Mar-25-13  Shams: <Expendable Asset> <I'll have to wait several decades first before I can give you an answer.>

Reminds me of Mao Tse Tung's famous comment about the French Revolution: "It's too soon to tell." I always thought that was a bit ridiculous. Mao made that comment in the 1970s, 180 years after Louis XVI got his. If you don't know after 180 years, when are you gonna know?

Mar-25-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <Shams> That's a good one. I didn't know that Mao quote.
Mar-26-13  Expendable Asset: Mao was good at guerilla warfare, where things often change very, very quickly and everything is always kept fluid. That might shed some light to his quote.

<Fusilli> Dude, you're not 76. You're like 42-48 years old. :-P

Mar-27-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <EA> lol!
Mar-30-13  scormus: Thanks for the info on dardanus. There is some very interesting background, and of course Dardanus (and Dardenelles). I think the straights are the ones that figure as "the clashing cliffs" in the epic "Jason and the Argonauts" in the quest for the Golden Fleece.

Virgil's Aeneid is, of course, Roman but rarely can a major work have been taken more directly from much older sources, in this case Homer's Illiad. The link is completely intentional, the upstart Roman empire "needed" a root in the old Grecian civilisation. Yet apparently Virgil hiself was rather unhappy with his "masterpiece."

I'll look up the opera, I never heard of it which is not surpriseing. There have been only 3 productions in the 20th century. Our nearby city has a lovely traditional opera house, but they invariably feature the very well known works, we call "potboilers." Next up for me and wife is la Traviata so I'll need a big box of tissues (for me not her).

Apr-09-13  wordfunph: Prof. <Fusilli>

Ivkov vs E Torre, 1973

Aug-08-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Prompted by the discussion on User: WCC Editing Project.

Ah... the "Dr." title... It irks me. In America, physicians have monopolized the use of the term, and paradoxically they are probably the only "doctors" out there who do not need to write a doctoral dissertation to be called so. I insist in calling them "physicians".

Furthermore, the use of "doctor" when dealing with patients puts distance between physicians and their clients. (I hate the term "patient" too, which means that you have to be passive and obedient when dealing with The Doctor.) Physicians should introduce themselves as "Hello, I am Mike/Susan/fill-in-the name, and I will try to help you feel better, if that is okay with you." That would improve communication with only positive outcomes, but "doctors" like to impose hierarchy and keep the upper hand in dealing with the "patient".

When someone calls me "doctor" I tell them that I prefer "Professor"... every PhD is a doctor, but not everyone is a professor, and also if I am called professor in public no one will assume that I am particularly qualified to rush in to help if someone suddenly needs medical help.

Aug-08-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  WCC Editing Project: My dear <Fusilli>

As always, a well reasoned and convincing argument. Both my Mom and my Sister were nurses and they couldn't stand doctors. Apparently they are even more condescending when you work with them.

Nowadays, there's an entertaining phenomenon known as "Internet-inspired Doctor Harrassment."

I did it myself not a week ago.

Here's how to play:

1. Research what might be wrong with you.

2. See your doctor.

3. When your doctor starts acting like he's "in charge" of your case, start peppering him with questions.

protip: this doesn't work unless you actually do good research and know what you're talking about.

How do you know if you've succeeded?

Every time you leave your Doctor, he/she will say "The most important thing to remember is stop reading the internet."

Finally,

QUESTION: In the context of your argument, what would you say about the cases of <Who> and <Suess>?

Aug-08-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Well, Seuss would like you to spell his name right.

I have a dentist who politely but firmly insists on being called by his first name.

As for a doctor expecting to be called doctor, there is something to be said for a title of respect to a person who you're trusting your life to.

Aug-08-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  WCC Editing Project: <OhioEditingFan>

You're actually never off duty are you?

Admirable.

Aug-23-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: <WCCEP> Awesome strategy! Gotta love the internet and its empowering capacity.

I don't know what to say about Dr Who and Dr Seuss! The Daleks are awesome, though. "Exterminate!"

<OCF> Good point... which reminds me of another one of my pet peeves.

The overwhelming majority of times that people see a doctor, they are not saving anyone's life. They are just providing some help to improve people's (strictly biological) quality of life, hopefully extending life spans, but so do potable water, good nutrition, a good job, a clean environment, low levels of stress, exercise, a supportive network of friends/family/community/church, etc.

The overwhelming majority of times doctors do not save lives in any clear way, and I would venture to say that saving a life in a clear way (emergency! here's the doctor! life saved!) is probably a rare occasion for the large majority of doctors (exception made of ER doctors, military doctors, and few others).

When this happens, when a doctor saves a life, I think it is a most respectable and noble thing. Yet, 1) with few exceptions they are paid very handsomely to do this, and 2) they run no risk whatsoever of injury to themselves.

When a fireman goes into a building on fire and saves someone, that is heroic. The fireman puts himself at risk. Same can be said for the police officer who gets into a shootout. Those people are saving lives while putting their own at risk, and they are not exaclty paid handsomely to do so.

I really have no problem calling a physician doctor, and I surely do so, but it annoys me when they downgrade me to "Mr. Sana", which seems to happen often as soon as I step in a doctor's office. And they know what I do for a living, since they know your demographic info right away. That suggests to me that they love to impose hierarchy.

My experience with the Vanderbilt Medical Center, however, has been quite nice. One of their physicians called me professor right away. My dentist does the same.

But then, what about the occasional doctor that calls me "buddy"? I guess that's why people call them "doc"... I guess that is the informal counterpart to "buddy". Is it?

Aug-23-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: BTW, a quick clarification: I don't go through life expecting people to call me professor. In fact, I prefer to just go by my name. But when someone introduces themselves by their professional title, I expect to be granted the equivalent courtesy.
Aug-31-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: GTM, just played:

Korchnoi vs Spassky, 1956.
YOU ARE PLAYING THE ROLE OF KORCHNOI.
Your score: 63 (par = 55)

It's a nice game. Positional, and Korchnoi keeps things as simple as possible.

Sep-03-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Korchnoi vs Geller, 1958.
YOU ARE PLAYING THE ROLE OF KORCHNOI.
Your score: 52 (no par)

This may have been my worst GTM ever. First time I end up "no par"... I found it quite difficult, needless to say.

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 114)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 41 OF 114 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC