http://encodedblog.blogspot.com/

<rookhouse> -- <Claims he (Trice) was never married to cover some other lie that he told, but then turned around on another site and is quoted as saying "I was there with my wife Ellie" when referring to a trip to Paris.>

From a forum about checkers:

<Alex vs Ed Trice, 2004, Phili>

<Post by Alex_Moiseyev on Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:37 pm It is true that I played Ed Trice at his house in 2004 in Philadelphia when I visited my old son. Indeed - it was not a formal match. We did not even have checkers and played with black and white pawns on a chess board :D .>

<Ed played my son some chess and gothic chess, for a couple of hours>

<Actually, we discussed many things about checkers and programs, we ate dinner, drank beers, and only played 3 blitz games at the end of the night.>

<Ed was in no condition to play a normal game seriously, having some problems with back, it was late, we each had beers, and it was just for fun. I enjoyed my time with him and his family (daughter and wife), and wished him a speedly recovery.>

<Ed graciously gave one gothic chess set to Michael, and Michael is still caring it and play occasionly with his friends.><

<Regards,>

<Alex>

http://www.usacheckers.com/forum/vi...

Alex Moiseyev:

http://s542.photobucket.com/albums/...

Like the other websites, Photobucket also has a form for copyright infringement cases:

http://photobucket.com/copyright

Ed's scoping out another demograph to terrorize. He wore out his welcome with the Checkers community, then with the chess variant community, and now with the mainstream chess community.

Feb-06-08

Robert James Fischer page:

<Ed Trice: <Riverbeast>: ...how do we really know for sure?>

<There is a big difference between "doubt" and "uncertainty." If a person has doubt, that is much more difficult to overcome. If a person is uncertain, facts are more readily acknowledged.>

<Evans knows a great deal about chess. For starters, we can say he has no bias or attachment to the issue. Next, he has intimate knowledge of the subject and would be difficult to "trick" so to speak.>

<Looking at Bobby's "My 60" book, it is safe to say that it has been praised for being a very accurate tome over the years. Yet, the person contacting Evans pointed out a glaring error regarding the Korchnoi game mentioned in the Evans article. The colors were wrong, and the game did not exist, yet it is cited in the original book. That would be an incredible thing to go unnoticed for nearly 40 years, yet apparently it has, and Evans was able to answer this "difficult question" posed by the liason acting on behalf of Bobby.>

<Who else could have posed such a question to Evans as a litmus test to verify Evans' authenticity?>

<Next, the person that Evans was in contact with predicted Fischer's death. Who else but someone one level of indirection away could have done that? Recall the whole point of the "mystery question" was so that Bobby could get a cryptic message to Evans, and know it was delivered. Bobby was the one who wanted to make sure Evans knew he was forgiven, yet Bobby was being Bobby and didn't come right out and say it, did he? He mentioned "just enough" information for Evans to understand it was from Fischer, and the remark would mean something only to Evans.>

<And look how urgently the message was looking to be delivered. Who else but someone watching their own flag fall would insist on such urgency?>

<Others may doubt the veracity of this situation, as in accord with their own right to do so, but I don't think anyone can disagree with the fact that the person Larry was in contact with would need the world's only functioning crystal ball if they were not who they said they were.>

When Trice wrote this part:

<Who else but someone one level of indirection away could have done that?>

Who can forget Nov 9, 2007 where Trice posted this hidden message: Bobby keep your kidneys healthy?

You said you contacted the newspaper that Larry Day wrote the article for and they said he never wrote it. You had Larry's word that he did write it. You kept saying the newspaper said he didn't. I posted a scan of it. Do you admit you were wrong robmtchl?

You said you got some website shut down about Mars because the FBI did it. Can you prove that? Who did you contact? Care to show the emails you sent? And do you still say the FBI shut it down? Because Trice forwarded his domain renewal notice to a bunch of people here on chessgames.com and one of them forwarded it to me.

And if you did get the FBI involved, why don't you shut down this site too?

http://www.lunarregistry.com/land/

They are selling pieces of land on the moon. I'd like to see robmtchl shut down that site.

Speaking of Vegas Odds, I bet $1000 he can't do it. I will give him 1 year to prove me wrong.

Only 1 out of 5 say the book is a hoax.

75% of the world says it is not.

So their opinions aren't valid!

robmtchl will you take this bet?>

Hackmutt, The reason his mars site was taken down was because of how he was using it and the how he did other illegal, fraudulent things with it.

Why don't you write the editor of the paper and ask him what I asked him. "Did Mr. Day write an article about 'My 61 memorable games' by Fischer?"

<Another robmtchl exaggeration.>

Another robmtchl exaggeration.>

So prove it. post his contact information? LOL
Can't because there isn't one.

http://www.thestar.com/searchresult...