chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

Phony Benoni
Member since Feb-10-06 · Last seen Jun-11-22
Greetings, O Seeker After Knowledge! You have arrived in Dearborn, Michigan (whether you like it or not), and are reading words of wisdom from a player rated 2938--plus or minus 1000 points.

However, I've retired from serious play--not that I ever took playing chess all that seriously. You only have to look at my games to see that. These days I pursue the simple pleasures of finding games that are bizarre or just plain funny. I'd rather enjoy a game than analyze it.

For the record, my name is David Moody. This probably means nothing to you unless you're a longtime player from Michigan, though it's possible that if you attended any US Opens from 1975-1999 we might have crossed paths. Lucky you.

If you know me at all, you'll realize that most of my remarks are meant to be humorous. I do this deliberately, so that if my analysis stinks to High Heaven I can always say that I was just joking.

As you can undoubtedly tell from my sparkling wit, I'm a librarian in my spare time. Even worse, I'm a cataloger, which means I keep log books for cattle. Also, I'm not one of those extroverts who sit at the Reference Desk and help you with research. Instead, I spend all day staring at a computer screen updating and maintaining information in the library's catalog. The general public thinks Reference Librarians are dull. Reference Librarians think Catalogers are dull.

My greatest achievement in chess, other than tricking you into reading this, was probably mating with king, bishop and knight against king in a tournament game. I have to admit that this happened after an adjournment, and that I booked up like crazy before resuming. By the way, the fact I have had adjourned games shows you I've been around too long.

My funniest moment occurred when I finally got a chance to pull off a smothered mate in actual play. You know, 1.Nf7+ Kg8 2.Nh6+ Kh8 3.Qg8+ Rxg8 4.Nf7#. When I played the climactic queen check my opponent looked at the board in shocked disbelief and said, "But that's not mate! I can take the queen!"

Finally, I must confess that I once played a positional move, back around 1982. I'll try not to let that happen again.

>> Click here to see Phony Benoni's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Phony Benoni has kibitzed 18635 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jun-11-22 M Blau vs Keres, 1959 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Not a good recommendation for the DERLD. Out of 59 moves, White makes only three in Black's half of the board. And two of those conist of 3.Bb5 and 6.Bxc6.
 
   Jun-11-22 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Er, it's back. Karpov vs Timman, 1988
 
   Jun-10-22 Orlo Milo Rolo
 
Phony Benoni: Marco!
 
   Jun-10-22 Lilienthal vs Bondarevsky, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Another one for you King Hunters. Black's monarch travels fron g8 to b8, then takes the Great Circle Route back to h3 before calling it a day.
 
   Jun-10-22 GrahamClayton chessforum (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> I've posted a question for you at L T Magee vs J Holland, 1948
 
   Jun-10-22 L T Magee vs E L Holland, 1948 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: <GrahamClayton> The source you cite, <Chess Review, May 1948, p. 24>, gives Black's name as <E Holland> "Chess Life" (June 5, 1948, p. 1) has a table of results giving <E L Holland>. That form also appears in USCF rating supplements for a player fro ...
 
   Jun-09-22 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: SkinnVer Here Among the Fold?
 
   Jun-09-22 Flohr vs Bondarevsky, 1947 (replies)
 
Phony Benoni: Black's bishop makes me think of Godzilla emerging from the depths of the ocean to wreak havoc. However, in the end it's his Two Little Friends who steal the show. Well, maybe not so litt.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Ritson-Morry vs G T Crown, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: it was the last round. Rison-Morry was mired in last place. These things happen.
 
   Jun-06-22 W Adams vs M Kagan, 1947
 
Phony Benoni: Some more informztion. The game was published in <Chess Review>, March 1948, p. 23. Black's name is given as "M Kagan", and the location as "Massachusetts". There is no other game data, but I think we can now safely assume Black is <Milton Kagan>. Earlier in the ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Living in the Past

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 176 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-10-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Hmmm. Obviously a couple of period pieces.
May-11-10  Jim Bartle: PB, do you remember a player for the Pistons in the 60s named Terry Dischinger?

Here's what Tom Heinsohn wrote about him in 1964, when he was still on Chicago:

"Finally, there is Detroit's Terry Dischinger. It's funny—he's not big, not strong and he is a picture-book shooter. But he has all the moves of Baylor and one thing more: absolute speed. Terry can beat any big human and probably a pack of greyhounds. If I could stop Pettit cold, if I was the greatest defender in the league against Baylor, I couldn't stop Dischinger. Our solution: send a little man out there to harry him and bark at his heels; try to keep him out of the gantlet and make him shoot from outside. It doesn't work, but that's the solution anyway."

Dischinger was good, but I'm surprised at such high praise. Maybe he was just a guy who Heinsohn couldn't handle.

Dischinger had an odd career. Dynamite shooter, around 50% when the league barely shot 40%, scored 25 a game as a rookie and 22 the next year. Then with Detroit his production kept going down. I wonder why.

May-11-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: I didn't follow basketball in the 60s. Back then, the Pistons were a distant fourth in Detroit's sports consciousness, also-rans while the Tigers, Red Wings, and even the Lions were generally in contention.

So I remember nothing of Dischinger except for the name. Looking up some background, I see he lost two seasons to military service. No combat duty, but that surely stunted his development.

Also, I note that the Pistons' problem was that they had some good individual players who couldn't co-operate as a team, plus a deadly combination of ineffective coaching and poor front office deals. Look up the Dave DeBusschre deal, for instance.

May-11-10  Travis Bickle: Hey Phony remember this one?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7vs...

May-11-10  Jim Bartle: I remember that trade. I just couldn't believe how the Knicks would give up a top-flight center like Bellamy for a good-but-not-great forward like DeBusschere. Shows what kind of GM I would make.

Maybe the Pistons thought DeBusschere was going to return to baseball. (2.90 ERA in 100 innnings with White Sox.)

Almost all the NBA teams in the mid-60s had really first-rate starting fives. There were only 9 or 10 teams, so that was to be expected. I mean, the Celtics were bringing in Havlicek off the bench.

Pistons had DeBusschere and Ray Scott at forward, Eddie Miles and Dischinger at guard--that's a first-rate lineup. Unfortunately their center was the legendary 7-footer Reggie Harding, who (after he retired) tried to rob his neighborhood liquor store wearing a ski mask.

May-13-10  Deus Ex Alekhina: What American League team has the best all-time record vs the damn yankees? I saw this question in The Sporting News in the early/mid 1960's & the answer then was, I believe, the Tigers with an all time record (then) of .460 or so.
May-13-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Still the Tigers, as of 2009:

Detroit +919 -1035 .470
Milwaukee +182 -208 .467
Anaheim +271 -322 .457
Boston +933 -1117 .455
Seattle +157 +197 .444
Cleveland +864 -1085 .443
Toronto +205 -259 .442
Chicago +823 -1043 .441
Minnesota +764 -1081 .414
Texas +244 -353 .409
Baltimore +838 -1222 .407
Oakland +758 -1112 .405
Kansas City +174 -256 .405
Tampa Bay +69 -133 .342

Boston has more wins, due to divisional play. Don't forget that the Brewers were originally an AL team.

May-13-10  Jim Bartle: I presume Baltimore's record includes their days as the Browns. Their record as the Orioles must be much better. Same with Minnesota.
May-13-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Yes, those are totals for the franchise. And the Yankees' record includes their two years as the Baltimore Orioles.
May-13-10  Jim Bartle: LeBron James nearly pulled off the quadruple double we were talking about: 27 points, 16 rebounds, 10 assists, 9 turnovers.
May-13-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: It's on to a rematch with the Magic.
Hopefully things will turn out differently this time. It will be a tough series.
May-14-10  Travis Bickle: <Phony Benoni> <Jim Bartle>, Are The Sharks any good?

Also: Lebron James wants to be a Chicago Bull!

May-14-10  Travis Bickle: Here's a picture of my drinking partner at the United Center when The Black Hawks are in town.

Bobby in a little fracas with a bastard from Montreal. ; P http://i244.photobucket.com/albums/...

May-14-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <Travis> I've also heard rumors about LeBron James going to New York, Boston, and Detroit. Sounds like a whole lot of wishful thinking going around.
May-15-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Dept. of Prophecy:

<Apr-11-10: thegoodanarchist: In any event, I predict the Nats win at least 68 games this year. No more 100+ loss seasons!!!! At least not until next decade :)>

Still early, of course, but if the playoffs started today the Nationals would be the N.L. wild card team.

May-16-10  playground player: <Phony Benoni> Neat stat! Over the course of history, the Yankees beat everybody. The whole American League is their happy hunting ground.

I know the Giants (NY and SF combined) have won the most games of any major league franchise--but I wonder if there is any NL team that has an all-time winning record against all the other teams, as the Yanks have in the AL.

I wonder how much of that .470 winning percentage against the Yankees, by the Tigers, was Frank Lary's doing.

May-16-10  Jim Bartle: I'd be interested in how the Yankees have done vs. the rest of the league since around 1967, after the draft was instituted in 1965.

I would guess their winning percentage went down once every team had an equal shot at the best players, but not that much.

However I wonder if it's a coincidence they had a poor record in the years 1967-1975, those few years between the installation of the draft and the beginning of free agency--in other words, the only years where the Yankees did not have an advantage due to their money.

Nine years isn't enough to reach any firm conclusions, but it's still interesting to see.

May-16-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <playground player> The Giants have accomplished the same feat as the Yankees, though hardly as emphatically. Here are the totals through 2007:

http://www.baseball-almanac.com/tea...

The comparable AL page is at:

http://www.baseball-almanac.com/tea...

Adding in the numbers from 2008-2009, we get these percentages against the Giants:

Los Angeles .497
Houston .485
Washington .4802
Chicago .4801
St. Louis .4796
Milwaukee .468
San Diego .466
Pittsburgh .464
New York .461
Atlanta .453
Cincinnati .451
Colorado .445
Arizona .436
Philadelphia .415
Florida .381

Remember that Washington's result includes the Montreal Expos' record.

Frank Lary was 28-13 against the Yankees lifetime. In 1958, when he was 16-15 overall for a fifth-place team, he went 7-1 against the pennant-winning Yankees.

<JB> That wouldn't be hard to calculate, but would take some time and I'm feeling lazy today. Maybe some other time.

May-16-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Here's the story of the Tigers' thrilling victory last night, and a video of the heart-stopping walk-off walk:

http://detroit.tigers.mlb.com/news/...

The hero, Ramon Santiago, nearly Merkled it. If you view the video, you'll see he had to be reminded to touch first base before joining the celebration!

Later, he admitted he didn't know that was required. Nobody teaches the fundamentals any more.

May-16-10  Jim Bartle: Hmmm. That would have been a controversy. What I saw was a mild, sort of uncomfortable celebration.

I think the Sox walked four in that last inning, though maybe started it with a single. A lot of walks on the night.

I'm really surprised the Giants have a winning record against every NL team. Without checking I can guarantee they have a solid losing record against the Dodgers since they came to California. And probably against St. Louis and Cincinnati as well.

May-16-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <JB> OK, I've done a little work on the Yankees question. From 1965-2009, the Yankees still have a winning record against every AL club. However, it's not as decisive. They are ahead of Boston by only one game (343-342).

In the period 1965-1975, four teams actually had a winning record against them: Baltimore (.632), Boston (.571), Minnesota (.565), and Detroit (.505). Even Cleveland was just one game behind (99-98 for the Yankees).

Looking at it another way, here is the Yankees' winning percentage in various periods:

1901-1964: .567
1965-1975: .502
1976-2009: .568

So maybe your thesis has some validity. Or maybe it was just one of those cycles which happen for no good reason.

I'll look at the Giants from 1958- next.

May-16-10  Jim Bartle: Thanks, PB. The numbers are interesting, but in truth I think it's mostly coincidental that the low point occurs when the Yanks' money had the least effect. Pretty hard to prove any causality there.

First, the team just fell apart after 1964, and the coming draft had nothing to do with that.

They sure did sign some big free agents starting about 1976: Hunter, Jackson, Gossage, Gullett, etc. Of course they also pulled off some good trades, such as stealing Chambliss and Tidrow from Cleveland, and making good trades for Piniella and Randolph. Rivers for Bobby Bonds, not sure how to rate that one.

I'll be real interested to see what you find for the Giants. You'll consistently good but not great teams through the 60s and until about 1973, then a bad period until 1978, and another really bad period from 83 to 85. Then the Roger Craig/Will Clark and Dusty Baker/Barry Bonds eras, which were pretty solid if not spectacular.

May-16-10  Jim Bartle: On the occasion of the Raiders cutting LaMarcus Russell, a writer listed his all-time biggest busts, and invited readers to send in their nominations. Here are the baseball players on the list, with a heavy bias toward Bay Area players:

Matt Bush, drafted #1 by Padres, washout.
Ben Grieve, A's player faded after good start.
Todd van Poppel
Trade of Orlando Cepeda (Sadecki was not named, though) Drew Henson, Yankee/Cowboy "star," long gone.
Brien Taylor, Yankee draft pick

Ken Henderson, failed to become the next Willie Mays (this is totally unfair--not a bust, formed excellent OF with Mays and Bonds)

Steve Chilcutt, Mets overall #1 choice, washout

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/artic...

Of course the Giants have had many other busts, as have most teams. I remember pitcher John D'Acquisto and a whole lot of third basemen in the 60s and 70s.

May-17-10  eightsquare: <Phony Benoni> Do you want to play a match? If yes , please email me , chandramowlid@yahoo.in
May-17-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: <eightswquare> No thanks. I've got enough games going already.
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 914)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 176 OF 914 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC