|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 87 OF 129 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
| May-13-07 | | chessmoron: <Marco65> I doubt he could. It's near 3:00 a.m. in Shanghai, China. What do you counter for Rf1 after 29...Rc8?
|
|
| May-13-07 | | Marco65: <chessmoron> 29...Rc8 30.Rf1 Bg6 |
|
| May-13-07 | | Marco65: Although 29...Rc8 30.Rf1 Bg6 31.Bf4 is dificult to meet, not 31...Qe4?? 32.Re1 - but 31...Kh8 32.Qd4 Ne5 should defend |
|
| May-13-07 | | Marco65: <chessmoron> Notice however the difference between 29...Rc8 and 29...a5. After 29...a5 30.Rf1/g1 Bg6? is not an option because of 31.Ba4 |
|
| May-13-07 | | Marco65: Where is <TheAlchemist>? Almost time to wrap up votes and post the move. My vote is 29...Rc8 and I have to disconnect now and do some work (cleaning kitchen etc.) before I go to sleep! |
|
| May-13-07 | | chessmoron: <Marco> 29...Rc8 30.Rf1 Bg6 31.Qxb4 gxh6 32.Qg4 click for larger view32...Rb8 33.Ne7+ Bxe7 34.Bxf7+
 click for larger viewand this is when I'm troubled by 29...Rc8. Is it a good idea to trade our queen for their rook?  click for larger view ?? |
|
| May-13-07 | | Marco65: Of course not, but 31...gxh6? is not forced at all |
|
| May-13-07 | | chessmoron: Then what do you suggest? Qb7 is their strongest response. |
|
| May-13-07 | | Marco65: What about 29...Rc8 30.Rf1 Bg6 31.Qxb4 Qc6 ? |
|
May-13-07
 | | TheAlchemist: I'm so very sorry, I had a lot of schoolwork. So what do we do? Still Rc8? I'll post it in a few minutes if no one objects. <chessmoron>? |
|
| May-13-07 | | chessmoron: 32.Qd4 gxh6 33.Rxf7 Bxf7 and we are losing bad! |
|
| May-13-07 | | Marco65: Also 31...Qe5 should work, if 32.Bd4/f4 Qe2, if 32.Qb7 Bf5 33.Bf4 Qe4 34.Qxf7+ Kxf7 35.Nc3+ d5 36.Nxe4 Bxe4 |
|
May-13-07
 | | TheAlchemist: How about 30.Rf1 gxh6? I can see 31.Bxh6 Qe5 32.Rxf7 Kxf7 33.Nb6+ d5 34.Nxc8 Bf6. Or 32.Re1 Bh4 |
|
May-13-07
 | | TheAlchemist: I'm sorry I put you all in a situation like this, but we have to make a decision soon. I'm going to apologize like crazy for being late |
|
| May-13-07 | | chessmoron: <TheAlchemist> 31.Nxb4. We can't lose two pawns here. |
|
| May-13-07 | | chessmoron: <TheAlchemist> Who cares? They did this twice. |
|
| May-13-07 | | Marco65: <TheAlchemist> I think we haven't reached an agreement yet, so your vote can be relevant |
|
May-13-07
 | | TheAlchemist: <chessmoron> You're right. 31.Nxb4 is a winner. So, what do we do now? |
|
| May-13-07 | | chessmoron: Marco-Rc8 me-a5 |
|
| May-13-07 | | Marco65: Why not what I proposed? 29...Rc8 30.Rf1 Bg6 31.Qxb4 Qe5 |
|
May-13-07
 | | TheAlchemist: <Marco> I'm not sure. I still think Rc8 is the least bad, but I didn't have much time to analyze in the last two days. <zebra> didn't clarify himself either, he said a5 and then "you're right" to Marco. If I understand it, <chessmoron> also favors a5. <chessmoron> I know they did it too, but I'm just that kind of person that will still feel guilty |
|
| May-13-07 | | Marco65: Well also what I propose loses 2 pawns after Qb7. So I agree with ...a5. |
|
| May-13-07 | | chessmoron: Maybe they can open the king up by 32.hxg7 kxg7 |
|
| May-13-07 | | Marco65: At this point ...a5 is the best analysed, it shouldn't go worse than the diagram I posted with our queen in f8, while chessmoron made me doubt about ...Rc8 and I don't have time to find improvements |
|
May-13-07
 | | TheAlchemist: Ok, a5 it is. |
|
 |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 87 OF 129 ·
Later Kibitzing> |