Why is British Chess Magazine in quotation marks? I thought only articles from a magazine got the quotes. If underlining isn't an option, I guess that's the next best option.

Game Collection: WCC: Lasker-Capablanca 1921

<After that, he was considered a worthy contender for the title of world champion,<1> and reigning champion Emanuel Lasker commented "Capablanca has shown himself to be a great player."<4>>

<<On January 23, 1920 Lasker and Capablanca agreed to a title match for 1921.>

<OhioSomethingDifferentFan: I don't care for "for" there. "to be held in" or "scheduled in" or "scheduled for" would be better IMO.>>

<JessicaForQueen: I'm going to vote for the original "for" here, because it is grammatically correct, and it's concise, and it flows better than your suggested improvements, I think.

But this is <Karpova's> draft so that's who will make final decision on this edit.>

WCC Editing Project chessforum

<On January 23, 1920 Lasker and Capablanca agreed to a title match for 1921.>

In that case, this would need a comma?

<On January 23, 1920 Lasker and Capablanca agreed to a title match, scheduled for 1921.>

What about <On January 23, 1920 Lasker and Capablanca agreed to a title match to be played in 1921>.

Or your original:

<On January 23, 1920 Lasker and Capablanca agreed to a title match to be held in 1921>.

If we add to "for" or replace "for" I think we need a comma after match in all cases? Maybe not eh?

At any rate, feel free to come up with alternatives and lobby for your favorite.

Sorry, but I don't see any compelling reason for that last proposal as it is another question of style and not a spelling/grammar mistake. The work on that draft has to stop eventually. The header of the WCC profile says that it will be submitted on February 24th, so let's submit it now.

<Jess: Which draft do you think we should prepare for our third submission?>

<<On January 23, 1920 Lasker and Capablanca agreed to a title match for 1921.> I don't care for "for" there. "to be held in" or "scheduled in" or "scheduled for" would be better IMO.>

<WCC: I'm going to vote for the original "for" here, because it is grammatically correct, and it's concise, and it flows better than your suggested improvements, I think.>

<OCF: I think it implies that there is a yearly title match and that they arranged for the match that happened to be "for" the year 1921.>

<WCC: Hmm I hadn't thought of that, but it does seem like it could be interpreted that way.

So you want more precision here.

This is the last change, after that it is finished and shall be submitted:

<Sorry, but I don't see any compelling reason for that last proposal as it is another question of style and not a spelling/grammar mistake.>

I hope we don't have to work on something until it's perfect.

Game Collection: WCC: Lasker-Capablanca 1921

Ok I put in the last change, and I'll send off this fine draft for promotion.

Sorry I hadn't seen that part of your post about which draft to promote next.

Let's go for this one here:

"Keres indeed lost <the game> <insert game link>- Botvinnik vs Keres, 1948, allowing Botvinnik to carry a 1.5 point tournament lead into the Moscow leg."

"tournament lead" seems unnecessary. I removed the game link refs as the link has been included.

Is "The tournament" clearly referring to the proposed round robin?

<The Soviets were now members,<7> and under official FIDE aegis all parties agreed to most of the conditions proposed at Winterthur 1946, except now the tournament would be split between The Hague and Moscow and begin in spring 1948.>

That's a long sentence. "except now" is a little jarring. Two points I'm mentioning now for future examination.

<In addition, no extra player would be added>

I don't think you can have "except _________" and then add another exception.

<Although Miguel Najdorf won at Prague 1946, he wasn't invited to join the championship due to the new agreement.>

That's redundant if we've already affirmed no extra player would be added. And it's lacking if we don't mention who won Groningen.

< Botvinnik never relinquished his lead, clinching the title by round 22 to become the sixth world chess champion. >

I think we must mention the winning margin.

"At the July 1946 Winterthur congress, FIDE proposed the vacant title be contested in June 1947 in the Netherlands."

I drew a blank on "Winterthur". I had to look it up to find out who or what it was. Perhaps the first mention of it should include Switzerland.