chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

WannaBe
Member since Oct-20-04 · Last seen Jan-25-26
Thank you Daniel Freeman and Alberto A Artidiello

Not enough words can describe what you created and what we lost.

>> Click here to see WannaBe's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member
   Current net-worth: 980 chessbucks
[what is this?]

   WannaBe has kibitzed 49769 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-24-26 Tata Steel Challengers (2026) (replies)
 
WannaBe: Personally I am surprised (or shocked) that L'Ami and Ivanchuk are playing in this section of the tournament.
 
   Jan-23-26 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
WannaBe: See, if you defund the police, this would not have happened... https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles...
 
   Jan-23-26 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
WannaBe: I remember when so-and-so (e.g. Troy Aikman) transfers from one school to another (different conference), you sit out a year. If you transfer within conference, it's two years. And none of this 10th year of eligiblity because you were hurt or gone a religion mission to Pluto or ...
 
   Jan-22-26 Memorable Quotes chessforum (replies)
 
WannaBe: <sfod> It's ignore list...
 
   Jan-20-26 WannaBe chessforum
 
WannaBe: Re: Star Trek Academy <WannaBe: 12m in. Not impressed> So, I did not finish episode one, it's still in my queue, but I did manage to read some of the reviews... And the reviews have not been kind. Some even compared episodes 1 and 2 (released the same day) to the very much ...
 
   Jan-20-26 Hort vs de Firmian, 1986
 
WannaBe: <Breunor> Good question, I ran this game through the computer game analysis and: 31...Kg6 32.Bxa7 Bc4 33.Nd5 Nc6 34.Bc5 Ne5 35.Ke3 Bf1 36.Bd4 ⩱ +0.87 (41 ply) Possibly white was low on time and don't want to risk the chance to reaching move 40
 
   Jan-19-26 R Toran vs M Valls Tona, 1948 (replies)
 
WannaBe: Well, if you play f4, there is mate in 250...
 
   Jan-14-26 Chessgames - Odd Lie (replies)
 
WannaBe: This one is from Henry Cho: "I'm changing the caller ID of my wife's phone number to Potential Spam" If you have not seen or heard of Henry, he is worth some of your time on YouTube.
 
   Jan-14-26 Dickson (replies)
 
WannaBe: Apparently, it was a "far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever known"
 
   Jan-12-26 Fischer vs V Pupols, 1955 (replies)
 
WannaBe: I was thinking baseball bat, tire iron, or brass knuckles.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

于士明

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 29 OF 750 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-24-06  Averageguy: <Wannabe> So, would you be interested?
Jan-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <Averageguy> I left a post on your forum. =)
Jan-24-06  Averageguy: <Wannabe> Whoops, I hadn't noticed. I've made my first move. May the best man win :-)
Jan-24-06  RonB52734: 18...Nb4 doesn't work because of 19.Qe4.

18...Bf6 doesn't look too good because of 19.Nb5

18...Rd8 doesn't look good because of 19.Nb5 also.

For <Nako> and <sitzkrieg> then, a summary of where we are: 18.Be3 was played. Now they win a pawn unless we play 18...Qe6. Note that 18...Qe6 doesn't give them time to add pressure to the position with moves like 19.Nb5 or 19.Rd1 because of the immediate threat of 19...e4!

Some follow-up lines we've discussed are:

(a)18...Qe6 19.Nd2 d5. Now, taking on d5 will cost them a piece for a pawn. So 20.f5 Qd7 (not ...Qd6 because of Nb5) and this looks ok.

(b)18...Qe6 19.f5 Qf6 does not work because 20.Ne4. So if 18...Qe6 19.f5 Qc4

(c)18...Qe6, 19.fxe5,19...dxe5 looks good for us. If white tries 19.Nb5 we can just play 19...Rc8 and perhaps later chase the knight with a6.

(d)18...Qe6, and now if they simply played 19.fxe5 dxe5 20.Nxe5, then 20...Nxe5 gains a tempo and seems to hold as in 21.Qe4 Nc4.

<WannaBe>, <Robin01> and <I> have voted for 18...Qe6.

It should now not be necessary for the other two teammates to read every post that's been made since white moved.

Here's an example of what happens without 18...Qe6: 18...a6 19.fxe5 dxe5 20.Qxd7 Kxd7 21.Nxe5+ Nxe5 22.Bd4! Now, once the e5 Knight is captured (even if we recapture), or once the e5 Knight moves away, the f7 Bishop falls.

Jan-24-06  sitzkrieg: Thanks for the summary Captain! I miss a diagram;)

But i go along with your move Qe6, it looks oke

Jan-24-06  sitzkrieg: Wait. Why does black loose a pawn if no Qe6?
Jan-24-06  RonB52734:


click for larger view

Re-thinking one issue here:

18...Qe6 19.Nb5 and we do have to cover c7 because even after 19...e4, 20.Nc7+ is, well, check, and forks the Q, K and R.

We don't want to cover c7 by moving Rc8, because then Nxa7 wins at least a pawn. There are two other choices to cover c7: 20...Bd8 and 20...Kd8.

Jan-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <sitzkrieg> See <RonB52734>'s post yesterday, back on page 28? or maybe 27.
Jan-24-06  sitzkrieg: <ron> So why should we move the queen that is covering c7?

Sorry if this is already been said somewhere before, i didnt see it and have no premium search gadgets (yet)

Jan-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: I currently like Kd8 in that scenario.
Jan-24-06  sitzkrieg: For the record I dont mind Qe6 at all and there is a majority so post it as our vote when you want.
Jan-24-06  sitzkrieg: When Qe6 Nb5 the knight doesnt prevent e4 no more so it looks like we can play Rc8 (imo the natural move) easily as Nxa7 is countered by Nxa7 Bxa7 and pawn e4 forks and Bxa7 by p e4 directly.
Jan-24-06  RonB52734: <sitzkrieg: Wait. Why does black loose a pawn if no Qe6?>

Here's an example of what happens without 18...Qe6: 18...a6 19.fxe5 dxe5 20.Qxd7 Kxd7 21.Nxe5+ Nxe5 22.Bd4! Now, once the e5 Knight is captured (even if we recapture), or once the e5 Knight moves away, the f7 Bishop falls.

We looked at other options (Be6, Bf6, Rd8 and Nb4) and refuted them.

Jan-24-06  RonB52734: Ok, we have not heard from <Nako> yet.

I'm satisfied. <WannaBe> are you available to post our move? I am pretty much out of time.

Jan-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Aye aye Capt'n.
Jan-24-06  sitzkrieg: <Here's an example of what happens without 18...Qe6: 18...a6 19.fxe5 dxe5 20.Qxd7 Kxd7 21.Nxe5+ Nxe5 22.Bd4! Now, once the e5 Knight is captured (even if we recapture), or once the e5 Knight moves away, the f7 Bishop falls>

If the knight moves away to c6 it is directly attacking the bishop at d4. We will win a piece for the pawn on g7.

Jan-24-06  RonB52734: <If the knight moves away to c6 it is directly attacking the bishop at d4. We will win a piece for the pawn on g7.>

22...Nc6 23.Bxg7 Rg8 or Rh7 24.Rxf7 and aren't we now down 2 pawns?

Jan-24-06  sitzkrieg: Hmm, I must admit i forgot white goes Bxg7 first. But rh7 and after Rxf7 Rg8 should be very ok.
Jan-24-06  sitzkrieg: Anyway; Qe6 has been played already so it doesnt matter. What about Rc8 after Nb5, is it sound?
Jan-24-06  NakoSonorense: Sorry for not being around much. Been very busy with school this week. Hopefully I'll have more time starting tomorrow. I noticed that Qe6 was played. I believe it's a good move.

See you laterrrrr!

Jan-24-06  Robin01: <What about Rc8 after Nb5, is it sound?> Yes, it is. However, I do not believe they are going to play 19.Nb5.
Jan-24-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: I currently like the King move if white plays Nb5.
Jan-24-06  Robin01: I think the king move might lose a piece. 19.Nb5, 19...Kd8, 20.fxe5 and now we cannot take back with the pawn because it is pinned. So if 20...Nxe5, 21.Nxe5, 21...Qxe5, then white has 22.Rxf7 and we lose a piece.
Jan-24-06  Robin01: I wonder what type of game <RonB52734> had at the club tonight. I believe he had fried liver last time.
Jan-25-06  RonB52734: I didn't play tonight, just acted as apprentice TD. Next week, though, I'll play a guy rated in the mid-1200's.
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 750)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 29 OF 750 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC