WannaBe Member since Oct-20-04 · Last seen May-01-26 Thank you Daniel Freeman and Alberto A Artidiello Not enough words can describe what you created and what we lost.

Current net-worth: 980 chessbucks [what is this?]

WannaBe has kibitzed 49964 times to chessgames   [more...]

May-01-26 Chessgames - Sports    WannaBe: Had the wrong YT link in my prev post (hence deleted). Here's the right link on the discovery of measurement left field line of Fenway: https://www.nbcsportsboston.com/mlb... Where did <perfidious> get his fake news from?      Apr-28-26 Chessgames - Politics    WannaBe: < areknames: <<areknames>, do you like the book of Romans?>> No. I failed Latin and got my knuckles spanked.      Apr-26-26 J Carleton vs G Pyrich, 1994    WannaBe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrrh...      Apr-14-26 chessgames.com chessforum    WannaBe: <MissScarlett> How would we the members do that? Isn't that better done with internal email message/list? I volunteer, just let me know how.      Apr-14-26 World Championship Candidates (2026)    WannaBe: < perfidious: At least the username User: Bishoprick is displayed in full, unlike that of User: farticchio, whose content is automatically blocked from the kibitzing page cos of someone's fixation on the first four letters of the name. Perhaps the user should have been informed ...      Apr-11-26 Karpov vs J Bellon Lopez, 1973   WannaBe: Computer analysis on this game is now available.      Apr-11-26 Chessgames - Guys and Dolls    WannaBe: Anna Cramling Bellon, she covers chess on YT: https://www.youtube.com/@AnnaCramling      Apr-11-26 Anna Cramling Bellon   WannaBe: Cross posting (spam) from Lopez's page, same YT link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhX...      Apr-11-26 Juan Bellon Lopez   WannaBe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhX...      Apr-06-26 Fusilli chessforum    WannaBe: You too <Fusilli>

indicates a reply to the comment.

于士明

< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 36 OF 754 ·  Later Kibitzing> Jan-30-06    WannaBe: Oh that's nothing, remember when I said we can't play Bg6 or something like that? My brain was in the deep deep freezer... You can always add whiskey and/or bailey to coffee. =) Jan-30-06    RonB52734: Ok, while you guys are off making martinis (which would look like this: ~~~Y~~~), I'm voting for NxN, which would look like this: click for larger view Jan-30-06    WannaBe: Ah, what the hay... NxN is the one for me too. Jan-30-06    Robin01: Yes, Nxe5 is my vote also. I am going to finish my drink and then fall into my bed. Jan-30-06    RonB52734: Actually, 23...Nxe5 24.Qg3, it looks like 24...Bf6 is the move, not 24...Bd6, because of the threat of 25.Qxg7. Pour me one of those, barkeep! Jan-31-06    sitzkrieg: Nxe5 kinda amazed me, but now I am convinced the idea behind it is, indeed, Qe4, with double attack. (If we had played our rook to c8 this wouldnt have worked!) This was quite a brilliant find of them, and i fear we are now a little bit worse then before. Still it is easy to keep material equality in several lines. After Qe4 i have analysed Rc8, Rd8 and Bc5 chess and all seem playable, with most times equality. But first we need to play Nxe5 of course, and that is my vote. Jan-31-06    sitzkrieg: Damnit, I also missed Ron,s Qg3 wich is good too. Lets first see what they play, Nxe5 is sort of forced anyway. Jan-31-06    Robin01: I believe we have to post early this morning. Jan-31-06    sitzkrieg: Hmm We have 4 out of 5 votes, so we can post if we need to. Jan-31-06    RonB52734: We don't have to post until 9 tonight. I woke up at 6:30 this morning thinking "Do we have to move this morning?" And I double-checked it. Jan-31-06    sitzkrieg: Hehe. I have no clue what time it is at your home, but i ll leave it to you boss:) Jan-31-06    RonB52734: I'll post our move later this afternoon. Clearly, white knows what its next move is and they will post it quickly after we do. I don't want to be in a position where we have to move again by sometime tomorrow morning. Jan-31-06    RonB52734: Oops, another brain cramp. 23...Nxe5 24.Qg3 Bf6 (or Bd6) 25.Bf4 is trouble. I don't know yet what to do here. Jan-31-06    RonB52734: Maybe 23...Nxe5 24.Qg3 Bc5+ 25.Kh1 Bd4 and 26...g5 Jan-31-06    Robin01: <I don't want to be in a position where we have to move again by sometime tomorrow morning> Good idea. Post later this afternoon. I'm not going to get to analyze this anymore until this evening. Jan-31-06    RonB52734: One last idea for a bit. 23...Nxe5 24.Qg3 Bc5+ 25.Kh1 Bd4 26 Nd1 (dangerous because it prepares 27.Bb2) 26...Qg6 Jan-31-06    RonB52734: Any final thoughts, team? I'd like to post the move at about 4:30, and then I'm off to play what will seem, by comparison, to be a lightning game of chess, at game/2 hours! Jan-31-06    WannaBe: Oh sure, I think there something 'trappy' about this, but NxN is what I'll go for. =) Jan-31-06    RonB52734: Another thought: 23...Nxe5 24.Qg3 and now if 24...Bc5+ I think white's response could be 25.Be3. Here, I think 25...Qf6, but I'm not at a board and haven't got much time to look at it. Anyway, some challenges after 24.Qg3, but I do think it's possible to hold the position. Jan-31-06    RonB52734: I meant 25...Qg5, not 25...Qf6 Jan-31-06    WannaBe: Worst case scenario, we let them get the N back, (and the pawn that they took earlier.) And regroup/reforumate a plan. Jan-31-06    RonB52734: Ok, let me rewrite that 23...Nxe5 24.Qg3 and now if 24...Bc5+ I think white's response could be 25.Be3. Then 25...Be7 and probably something like 26.Bf4. It's at this point that we might play 26...Qg6 or be cute and play 26...Bc5+ again. Jan-31-06    Robin01: <RonB52734> Good luck in your G/120! Jan-31-06    RonB52734: <Robin01> Thanks, but we had 3 players call in sick, so as a "house" player, I was able to sit out this round. Fine with me: with the work I did this weekend and the end-of-month paperwork that surrounds me, I needed some rest. Jan-31-06    RonB52734: And now, before the talking shrub invades my living room, for some more analysis of 24.Qg3 Bc5+ If 25. Be3, then 25...Qd6. Now, if 26.Bxc5, then 26...Qxc5 with a double attack. In this position, white's light-squared bishop is pinned so it can't get into the attack on e5. If 26.Rd1, then 26...Qc7, still protecting the B and N. So I don't think we'll see 25.Be3. Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 754) search thread:    < Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 36 OF 754 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members. Nothing in violation of United States law. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members. No trolling. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times. See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator. NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com. If you need an account, register now; it's quick, anonymous, and free! If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.