Yes I can actually write a cogent sentence- you may have been fooled by the fact that over half of my posts are actually written by <technical draw>.

Those would be the "Canadianese" posts.

To answer your intriguing, even enigmatic, question:

Daniel very kindly reconstructed my Profile- by hand- from a GOOGLE cache which he himself located.

What a mensch, eh?

He saved me hours and hours of "manual work."

Now it won't take me long at all to prune and reformat the <> thingies since all the URLs are in plain text again.

So I'm certain he's taking steps to get rid of it.

Possibly RAID or some other FDA-approved product should do the trick.

<NN: I may admire a lot Karjak or Aronian, But after this declare myself a giriman. >

2011 GB* (-2.5) vs. Pittsburgh ?

2010 Indy (-4) vs. NO (Final score, 17-31 favourite lost the game, and against the spread.)

2009 Pittsburgh (-7) vs. Arizona, (Final score, 27-23, thanks to a final second touch down, favourite won the game, lost against the spread.)

2008 New England (-12) vs. NY Giants, (Final score, 14-17, Lost the game, and against the spread.)

2007 Indy (-7) vs. Chicago, (Final score, 29-17, won the game, and covered the spread.)

2006 Pittsburgh* (-4) vs. Seattle, (Final score 21-10, won the game, and covered.)

2005 New England (-7) vs. Philadelphia, (Final score 24-21, won the game, did not cover the spread.)

2004 New England (-7) vs. Carolina, (Final score 32-29, won the game, did not cover the spread.)

2003 Oakland (-4) vs. Tampa Bay, (Final score 21-48, lost the game, and the spread.)

2002 Rams (-14) vs. New England, (Final score 17-20, lost the game, and the spread.)

2001 Ravens (-3) vs. NY Giants, (Final score 34-7, won and covered.)

2000 Rams (-7) vs. Tennessee, (Final score 23-16, won the game, and no bet, push on the spread.)

1999 Denver (-7.5) vs. Atlanta, (Final score 34-19, won the game, and covered.)

1998 Green Bay (-14) vs. Denver, (Final score 24-31, lost the game, and the spread.)

1997 Green Bay (-14) vs. New England, (Final score 35-21, won the game, and pushed on the spread.)

1996 Dallas (-13.5) vs. Pittsburgh, (Final score 27-17, won the game, lost the spread.)

1995 49ers (-18.5) vs. San Diego, (Final score 49-26, won, and won.)

1994 Cowboys (-10.5) vs. Buffalo (Final score 30-13, won and won.)

1993 Cowboys (-6.5) vs. Buffalo (Final score 52-17, won and won.)

1992 Washington (-7) vs. Buffalo (Final score 37-24, won and won.)

1991 Buffalo (-7) vs. NY Giants (Final score 20-19, lost and lost)

*Pittsburgh was the 6th (lowest seed) that year, Seattle was the number 1 seed from NFC.

And this year, Green Bay is the 6th seed, and Pittsburgh is the number 2 seed from AFC, but yet, both times, the lower seeded team is favoured!!

Well, I can tell you this, one of the <BIGGEST> reason, why no new stadiums are being built in California, is the environmental studies...

And dealing with the bureaucracy that is California. We are a state, where the coastal metropolis cities always vote democratic, while inland cities always vote republican.

Plus the fact that NoCal and SoCal are so 'different' (I personally, have always been in favour of splitting the state in two, create a N. Cal. and a S. Cal.)

Oh, yeah, I am all over the Steelers, (+2.5) with distractions and team members 'fighting' each other, this team will struggle to stay focused.

http://espn.go.com/espn/page2/index...

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bc4 e6 4. Bb5+ Bd7 5. Bxd7+ Qxd7 6. d4 cxd4 7. Nxd4 Nf6 8. Nc3 Be7 9. Nf3 Nc6 10. a3 O-O 11. O-O Rad8 12. b3 d5 13. exd5 exd5 14. Bb2 Rfe8 15. Re1 d4 16. Ne4 Nxe4 17. Rxe4 f5 18. Ne5 Nxe5 19. Rxe5 Bf6 20. Rxe8+ Rxe8 21. c4 d3 22. Bxf6 gxf6 23. Qd2 Re2 24. Qd1 Qd4 25. Qf1 Qc3 26. Re1 Rxe1 0-1

Moving the bishop twice within the opening wasn't too good, and then 9. Nf3, I wasn't too sure what that was about.

I think 21. c4 was a bit of a mistake, thinking I was going to capture the c-pawn, but instead it allowed me to have a passed pawn.

Dear <wannabe> xin nian kuai le!

People born in the Year of the Rabbit are articulate, talented, and ambitious. They are virtuous, reserved, and have excellent taste. Rabbit people are admired, trusted, and are often financially lucky. They are fond of gossip but are tactful and generally kind. Rabbit people seldom lose their temper. They are clever at business and being conscientious, never back out of a contract. They would make good gamblers for they have the uncanny gift of choosing the right thing. However, they seldom gamble, as they are conservative and wise.

(source: http://www.c-c-c.org/chineseculture...)