chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

WannaBe
Member since Oct-20-04 · Last seen Jan-24-26
Thank you Daniel Freeman and Alberto A Artidiello

Not enough words can describe what you created and what we lost.

>> Click here to see WannaBe's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member
   Current net-worth: 980 chessbucks
[what is this?]

   WannaBe has kibitzed 49769 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-24-26 Tata Steel Challengers (2026) (replies)
 
WannaBe: Personally I am surprised (or shocked) that L'Ami and Ivanchuk are playing in this section of the tournament.
 
   Jan-23-26 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
WannaBe: See, if you defund the police, this would not have happened... https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles...
 
   Jan-23-26 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
WannaBe: I remember when so-and-so (e.g. Troy Aikman) transfers from one school to another (different conference), you sit out a year. If you transfer within conference, it's two years. And none of this 10th year of eligiblity because you were hurt or gone a religion mission to Pluto or ...
 
   Jan-22-26 Memorable Quotes chessforum (replies)
 
WannaBe: <sfod> It's ignore list...
 
   Jan-20-26 WannaBe chessforum
 
WannaBe: Re: Star Trek Academy <WannaBe: 12m in. Not impressed> So, I did not finish episode one, it's still in my queue, but I did manage to read some of the reviews... And the reviews have not been kind. Some even compared episodes 1 and 2 (released the same day) to the very much ...
 
   Jan-20-26 Hort vs de Firmian, 1986
 
WannaBe: <Breunor> Good question, I ran this game through the computer game analysis and: 31...Kg6 32.Bxa7 Bc4 33.Nd5 Nc6 34.Bc5 Ne5 35.Ke3 Bf1 36.Bd4 ⩱ +0.87 (41 ply) Possibly white was low on time and don't want to risk the chance to reaching move 40
 
   Jan-19-26 R Toran vs M Valls Tona, 1948 (replies)
 
WannaBe: Well, if you play f4, there is mate in 250...
 
   Jan-14-26 Chessgames - Odd Lie (replies)
 
WannaBe: This one is from Henry Cho: "I'm changing the caller ID of my wife's phone number to Potential Spam" If you have not seen or heard of Henry, he is worth some of your time on YouTube.
 
   Jan-14-26 Dickson (replies)
 
WannaBe: Apparently, it was a "far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever known"
 
   Jan-12-26 Fischer vs V Pupols, 1955 (replies)
 
WannaBe: I was thinking baseball bat, tire iron, or brass knuckles.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

于士明

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 436 OF 750 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-09-12  wordfunph: Avatar: <Travis Bickle> Post: <nanobrain>
Jan-09-12  Pyke: I vote for:

<Best Avatar: <Wannabe>>

<Best Written Post: <Once>>

Jan-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: Avatar: <twinlark>

Post: <Hedgeh0g>

Jan-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Avatar: twinlark

Post: sfm, based on this Sept. 21 post to V Mikenas vs Bronstein, 1965:

<There are times where we all make a move like -,Rxa3. Rating 1300 or 2300 - does not matter. It's the killing move that our opponent didn't see coming. The game is over. The moment of victory has come.

Finding that move is always great. But nothing beats the drama and excitement of having found that move one move earlier, and see if your opponent will spot the danger.

23.-,Qe5. He is thinking. I can see, feel, that he looks at his back rank. Of course the first thing he sees is the threat of 24.-,Qe1+, winning the h4 rook. And that the b2-pawn is up for grabs as well. I have already seen the few acceptable moves he has.

But will he? I try to look like this moment is just about the most boring and average in my life. I may even move a hand to my mouth, faking a suppressed yawn. A professional poker player would spot it all right away. Then I look up, like if I felt like relaxing a bit and look at the other players in the tournament hall. But I see absolutely nothing. If if a witch would have turned all the other players into being nude chessplaying women, I just wouldn't react on it. My mind is 100.00% on the game.

An eternity passes by before he starts moving his right hand towards the board. This is truly the moment of life and death. If somebody would show him a print-out of my pulse and blood pressure he'd take his hand back as if somebody had struck it with a stick, saying "What the hell is going on here???".

When his hand grabs the h4-root, a pessimistic reaction sets in. "He will put it on d4. Relax. Of course he will put it on d4." It's the minds defense against overheating even more.

This last for about 0.2 seconds, then I see him move the hand further.

He dropped the rook at b4!! My mind screams in triumph, shutting down all analytic brain activity for about another two seconds.

Then doubt strikes for a split second. Could I really have been wrong? Has happened so many times before. I look again and again on the few variations, testing any absurd reply. Even the most obvious move can take several minutes.

I briefly look at him. He still does not have a clue. Then I play the move, my hand singing with joy. Now I can freely look at him. For about two seconds he looks surprised, then he frowns. Then the heavy sigh and a light shaking of the head. Then his attempt to find an escape, something that we both know is just not there. I feel like laughing, but I am not allowed to. Au contraire, I put on a solemn face, not to kick a the man when he is lying down (something I don't like).

After 25 seconds he stops the clock, then we shake hands. A brief analysis follows. Usually he thinks he had a slightly superior position at some point. Some psychological defense, I suppose. Maybe his is right, how would I know?

Then I fly out of the tournament hall, on the strongest drug I could ever imagine. I am the king of the world, I love everybody and everything.>

Jan-09-12  frogbert: it would be great if more ppl did like fsr, quote and/or link the <post> you're voting for.

in practice this makes sfm's post the only candidate for me, as the others are posters/kibitzers, not posts.

Jan-09-12  rogge: Post: <Colonel Mortimer>

<rogge: The author is nominated for this (best post):

<<Colonel Mortimer>: ...but the purpose of my posts is to turn the fallacy and inherent illogicality of their arguments against them. Their views may not change, but at least their hypocrisy is laid bare for all to see.

If God's word was so clear cut and morally consistent as taken from the Bible - there wouldn't be so many Christian denominations.

The fact that there is so much disagreement of emphasis on a wide range of doctrinal issues clearly and logically suggests the word of God is but an interpretation by mere mortals.

When a Christian invokes God's morality, he is merely interpreting God's morality to suit his own personal belief system.

So when these religious fanatics politically grandstand on issues of 'moral import' such as homosexuality and abortion, by invoking God they are merely and disingenuously attempting to bang their political drum louder than others on issues that are not central to society, but central to their 'faith'. The moral equivalence of this is a corporation campaigning for legislation that is favourable to their bottom line, via the battle cry of deregulation being good for the marketplace.

It won't be long before the religious right are completely discredited and consigned to the historical dustbin of religious intolerance. In that respect it is ironic that the United States of America is way behind Europe.>>

Jan-09-12  frogbert: thx, rogge! some span in topics so far.
Jan-09-12  crawfb5: avatar <WannaBe>

post <Domdaniel>

Jan-09-12  Golden Executive:

<it would be great if more ppl did like.....>

It would be great if.........

<in practice this makes sfm's post the only candidate for me....>

The only candidate for me.....for me....for me.....me....me....

Jan-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Best avatar <Sularus>

Best Written Post <Keypusher>

BTW <WannaBe>, Didn't hms123 nominate me in the category of <best written Post>? My name isn't on the list provided for voting.

Jan-09-12  rogge: <frogbert: thx, rogge! some span in topics so far.>

You're welcome, frog. Some span, indeed!

Jan-09-12  Golden Executive: +++++ FLASH BACK ++++++

<Jan-05-12
OhioChessFan: <frogbert> I appreciate your thoughts, but I think it's time to move on to the nomination and voting process. <wannabe> basically pleaded for input for several weeks and there's more input now than then. I have a post on my forum page giving my thoughts on the matter.>

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

<frogbert> Do you have <OCF> on ignore? I do not think so.

Your opinion is welcome, but please do it at the right time.

Jan-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: Best avatar: <WannaBe>

Best written post: <Domdaniel>

Jan-09-12  talisman: best written post...ivote for wannabe and domdaniel. best avatar...number 6 on the charts but number 1 in your hearts...the LifeMeister!
Jan-09-12  frogbert: <Your opinion is welcome, but please do it at the right time.>

golden executive, who made you the executive officer here?

your opinion is welcome, but please mind your own business and we'll get along just splendidly.

Jan-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: Unofficial vote count so far:

<Avatar>

6 WannaBe

2 Domdaniel, twinlark

1 hugin, OhioChessFan, Patriot, Travis Bickle, Sularus, Life Master AJ

<Post>

6 Once

3.5 Domdaniel

2 sfm

1 tpstar nanobrain, Hedgeh0g, Colonel Mortimer, keypusher

.5 WannaBe

I have not counted BraveUlysses, since his comment was styled as a nomination. If it counts as a vote, one more vote for Once for Best Post.

Jan-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: <BraveUlysses> <Wannabe> Than The Galaxy Awaits Me go line ty

laud in art ooh ive.

<once> best written post

Era in more select it is right in mire call hawk in sense

smoke cleared if any I see double bind sob lug one in it MC

Gifted <wannabe> best avatar!

Jan-09-12  hms123: <WannaBe>

Best Avatar: <hugin>

Best Post: <Once> (btw, I didn't nominate <HeMateMe> in this category--no reason other than I nominated <Once> and am voting for him. He may have been confused by the list I made of all the nominees for all the categories.)

Jan-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Diademas: Best Avatar: <WannaBe>

Best Post: <Domdaniel> and <Once>

Jan-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Votes

Best avatar <FSR, AnnieK>

Best post <Domdaniel>

for his "no doubt some tedious person will disagree."

Jan-09-12  NewLine: I don't feel like voting, actually. But just to express my gratitude I would like to deliver my vote for best post award to <Once>.
Jan-09-12  Golden Executive:

<frogbert> my friend, have you ever heard the word "timing"?

I will try this:

It is voting time!

Jan-09-12  frogbert: and those who provide an actual post they're voting for have a bigger chance to get additional "support" from those who haven't seen (all) the brilliancies of the various nominees.

<It is voting time!>

"i'm voting for X due to this post" <is> voting. i fail to see any problem.

Jan-09-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: My votes are:

Avatar: <twinlark>

Best written post: split between <tpstar> and <OhioChessFan>

/ends/

Thanks, <Knight of the Lepus>.

G/D.

Jan-09-12  Robin01: I vote:
Best Avatar: Wannabe
Best Written Post: Once
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 750)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 436 OF 750 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC