WannaBe Member since Oct-20-04 · Last seen Apr-30-26 Thank you Daniel Freeman and Alberto A Artidiello Not enough words can describe what you created and what we lost.

Current net-worth: 980 chessbucks [what is this?]

WannaBe has kibitzed 49962 times to chessgames   [more...]

Apr-28-26 Chessgames - Politics    WannaBe: < areknames: <<areknames>, do you like the book of Romans?>> No. I failed Latin and got my knuckles spanked.      Apr-28-26 Chessgames - Sports    WannaBe: Not sure why the LAA@CSOX game got played today, as of now, it is 12:13AM in Central Time, and they are bottom 8th. The game could very easily scheduled for DH Tuesday or Wednesday, as this is game one of 3 game series. (Not like it's the only trip LAA to Chicago and it's the last ...      Apr-26-26 J Carleton vs G Pyrich, 1994    WannaBe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrrh...      Apr-14-26 chessgames.com chessforum    WannaBe: <MissScarlett> How would we the members do that? Isn't that better done with internal email message/list? I volunteer, just let me know how.      Apr-14-26 World Championship Candidates (2026)    WannaBe: < perfidious: At least the username User: Bishoprick is displayed in full, unlike that of User: farticchio, whose content is automatically blocked from the kibitzing page cos of someone's fixation on the first four letters of the name. Perhaps the user should have been informed ...      Apr-11-26 Karpov vs J Bellon Lopez, 1973   WannaBe: Computer analysis on this game is now available.      Apr-11-26 Chessgames - Guys and Dolls    WannaBe: Anna Cramling Bellon, she covers chess on YT: https://www.youtube.com/@AnnaCramling      Apr-11-26 Anna Cramling Bellon   WannaBe: Cross posting (spam) from Lopez's page, same YT link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhX...      Apr-11-26 Juan Bellon Lopez   WannaBe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhX...      Apr-06-26 Fusilli chessforum    WannaBe: You too <Fusilli>

indicates a reply to the comment.

于士明

< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 48 OF 754 ·  Later Kibitzing> Feb-07-06    Robin01: I wonder how much kibizing we are getting on our game here. I'm sure everybody is pointing out all our mistakes. Feb-07-06    Robin01: <our superior skill and talent will help us overcome> Yes!! Feb-07-06    WannaBe: <Robin01> I'm sure... We'll find out once this game is over. Have to and read all the pages of kibitzing on <EmperorAtahualpa> and <who> pages. Gonna get my self a nice cup of coffee and spend hour(s) reading those. And chuckle to myself. =) Feb-07-06    Robin01: We should maybe ask <EmperorAtahualpa> not to delete them until we have a chance to read them, just in case he has plans to delete them. Feb-07-06    Robin01: Well, they have not answered immediately, so that is good news. Feb-07-06    WannaBe: Alright, they took the rook... click for larger view Feb-07-06    WannaBe: We can do 29...Kxf8 30. Qf2+ (Rf1+) Kg8 which is kinda like castling, by moving our king behind the pawns for protection. And g8 is a light colored square, which their bishop can't threaten. Also, Kxf8 takes away Qxf7. But however, if we play 29...Kxf8 followed by 30.Bxe5 our Q has to move, then white will play 31. Qxg7+ so looks like Kxf8 is not a good move. Never mind Kxf8... Feb-07-06    WannaBe: Now, 29...Bxf8... um.... Feb-07-06    Robin01: I believe of the three lines I analyzed, 29.Rxf8 was their strongest reply. Feb-07-06    Robin01: Where is our fear-less Captain?! Feb-07-06    RonB52734: I'm here, but no time to analyze. I'll be home by about 10 p.m. EST and I'll check it out. I'm relieved at the straightforward exchange here (although, again, I haven't analyzed it at all). Feb-07-06    WannaBe: Okay, this is from the earlier post by <Robin01> I've edited it somewhat for easier reading, but nothing else was changed, <29.Rxf8+ Bxf8 30.Rxe5 Qd6 OR 29.Rxf8+ Bxf8 30.Bxe5 Qa7+> I think we can agree that of the 2 possible choice Kx or Bx; the Bxf8 is better. Feb-07-06    Robin01: I do believe 29...Bxf8 is better. However, let us not move too fast. We have until tomorrow afternoon, which will give us longer to analyze the position here and beyond. Feb-07-06    Robin01: <29...Bxf8 30.Rxe5 Qd6> I've been looking at this line. If white continues 31.Bc5, we may have to trade our queen for a bishop and the rook by playing 31...Qxc5. It looks bad, but maybe we can hold the position with good play. Good news is still have the bishop pair; bad news is our king can be battered around with many checks. Feb-07-06    Robin01: I do not see many alternatives here. Maybe white will play 30.Bxe5, which might be better for us. I'm still analyzing this line. Feb-07-06    Robin01: Maybe we have a better move than 30...Qd6 also. Feb-07-06    WannaBe: if 29...Bxf8 30. Bxe5 Qb6+ (Qa7+) I do not believe they'll play Qf2 to block and trade Qs. Qb6+ puts a protector for the bishop, while Qa7+ does not. 30. Bxe5 Bc5+!? 31 Qe3 Bxe3 32. Bxb8 Rxb8 33. Rxe5 this leave the game with B + R vs N + R vs equal pawns. Feb-07-06    WannaBe: I'll try and look some more... Feb-07-06    RonB52734: Well, Kxf8 really looks bad because of all the pressure on g7. So I think Bxf8 is the best move available here. Feb-07-06    RonB52734: And I'd want to look at their response of Qe3, adding pressure on the e file Feb-08-06    Robin01: <Well, Kxf8 really looks bad because of all the pressure on g7> I agree with that. So I vote here for 29...Bxf8. Feb-08-06    RonB52734: Ok, looks like three of us are in for BxR Feb-08-06    sitzkrieg: four that is. Feb-08-06    RonB52734: Ok, I'll post it. We're running out of time again. Feb-08-06    RonB52734: Current position, white to play: click for larger view Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 754) search thread:    < Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 48 OF 754 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members. Nothing in violation of United States law. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members. No trolling. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times. See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator. NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com. If you need an account, register now; it's quick, anonymous, and free! If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.