chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

WannaBe
Member since Oct-20-04 · Last seen Jan-24-26
Thank you Daniel Freeman and Alberto A Artidiello

Not enough words can describe what you created and what we lost.

>> Click here to see WannaBe's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member
   Current net-worth: 980 chessbucks
[what is this?]

   WannaBe has kibitzed 49768 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-23-26 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
WannaBe: See, if you defund the police, this would not have happened... https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles...
 
   Jan-23-26 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
WannaBe: I remember when so-and-so (e.g. Troy Aikman) transfers from one school to another (different conference), you sit out a year. If you transfer within conference, it's two years. And none of this 10th year of eligiblity because you were hurt or gone a religion mission to Pluto or ...
 
   Jan-22-26 Memorable Quotes chessforum (replies)
 
WannaBe: <sfod> It's ignore list...
 
   Jan-20-26 WannaBe chessforum
 
WannaBe: Re: Star Trek Academy <WannaBe: 12m in. Not impressed> So, I did not finish episode one, it's still in my queue, but I did manage to read some of the reviews... And the reviews have not been kind. Some even compared episodes 1 and 2 (released the same day) to the very much ...
 
   Jan-20-26 Hort vs de Firmian, 1986
 
WannaBe: <Breunor> Good question, I ran this game through the computer game analysis and: 31...Kg6 32.Bxa7 Bc4 33.Nd5 Nc6 34.Bc5 Ne5 35.Ke3 Bf1 36.Bd4 ⩱ +0.87 (41 ply) Possibly white was low on time and don't want to risk the chance to reaching move 40
 
   Jan-19-26 R Toran vs M Valls Tona, 1948 (replies)
 
WannaBe: Well, if you play f4, there is mate in 250...
 
   Jan-14-26 Chessgames - Odd Lie (replies)
 
WannaBe: This one is from Henry Cho: "I'm changing the caller ID of my wife's phone number to Potential Spam" If you have not seen or heard of Henry, he is worth some of your time on YouTube.
 
   Jan-14-26 Dickson (replies)
 
WannaBe: Apparently, it was a "far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever known"
 
   Jan-12-26 Fischer vs V Pupols, 1955 (replies)
 
WannaBe: I was thinking baseball bat, tire iron, or brass knuckles.
 
   Jan-11-26 Tata Steel Masters (2026) (replies)
 
WannaBe: So, the Tata Steel blitz were held in India, and players have 6 days to fly to NED for the next (or 2026 first) major event... What is the flight path? Here are some ideas: https://www.flightroutes.com/CCU-AMS
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

于士明

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 56 OF 750 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-17-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <RonB52734> Right, correct you are.
Feb-17-06  sitzkrieg: I hope I am right, but after Qd3check, Bd6;

Ne4 would be bad because of Bc4! winning.

Feb-17-06  RonB52734: <sitzkrieg> good point!
Feb-17-06  sitzkrieg: So we still have to choose between the two positions, OR some other idea.:)
Feb-17-06  RonB52734: <sitzkrieg> right
Feb-17-06  Cogano: Hi again <RonB52734> & I sincerely hope this finds you well. I've been offline for the past several hours (I needed to get some sleep after nearly 2 days' worth of sleep deprivation!). So I've missed quite a bit of the action.

1)Is <wannabe>'s post <Qd3+ played> an announcement of White's move. So now we are in check? Just to confirm. Also, not to bother you or appear arrogant, but my analysis covered this line. Actually White missed Qd4+, which would cover a1 after the exchange of pawns on the a & b files, thus preventing our rook from going to a1. So far, White is continuing as I predicted. If you have the time, I would appreciate it if you would consider my analysis in more detail, if you haven't already done so. I just would feel better if I were to receive well thought out & thorough feedback to what I proposed. Thank you ever most kindly for your anticipated & continued patience, tolerance, understanding, consideration & assistance. Take very good care & have yourself a great day, & a great weekend too! Cheers mate! :)

Feb-17-06  Robin01: I have been looking at this for a while now, and I think 36...Bd6 is our best move.
Feb-17-06  Robin01: One line is:
36...Bd6; 37.Nxb5, Rf8+; 38.Ke2, axb5; 39.Qxb5+, Ke7.

Another is:
36...Bd6; 37.Nxb5, axb5; 38.Qxb5+, Kc7; 39.Qxb3, Rf8+; 40.Ke2, Re8+.

Feb-17-06  Cogano: <Dark Horses> members you seem to have also overlooked the line 1...K c7. 2.axb5 axb5, 3.Nxb5+. But, I've already discussed this in my original input before we were to post our move! I welcome all feedback. I will re-analyze & see if I come up with anything.

There's something else you need to remember, so long as our rook remains on the back rank our winning chances are slim. That is ONE reason, but NOT the ONLY reason, why I favour going to a1 with check, after the exchange of pawns on the a & b files.

Just thought I'd point these out. Forgive me if you find what I said to be insulting to your intelligence, as that was not my intenion in the least. Thanks much to all for including me on the team, for your anticipated feedback, & for your anticipated understanding & consideration. Take very good care all & have a great day & a great weekend too. Cheers to all! :)

Feb-17-06  Cogano: Hello <sitzkrieg> & I sincerely hope this finds you well. I mean you no disrespect & I'm sure you know far more (read more about it) & have more experience than I do. But I must question the sensibility of a move like Nxb5 for White. We are in the endgame. &, to my knowledge, in that situation, every piece & pawn counts. Giving up a piece is a great sacrifice, & good players do so ONLY if they are reasonably sure & confident it will lead to mate or at least paralyze White's or Black's chances or do so long enough to queen a pawn. But, that is what I've found from the games I'm famaliar with. You & everyone else is more than welcome to re-educate & enlighten me on this & other chess related issues. Thank you most kindly for your anticipated understanding & consideration. Take very good care & have a great day & a great weekend too. Cheers mate! :)
Feb-17-06  Robin01: <Cogano> <36...Kc7; 37.axb5, axb5; 38.Nxb5+> We drop a piece with this variation, no matter where we put our king.
Feb-17-06  Robin01: <RonB52734> <The more I look at it, the more I like ...Kc7 and then ...Rd8> 36...Kc7; 37.axb5, Rd8; and 38.b6+ is not good for us.
Feb-17-06  Robin01: I cannot find anything better than 36...Bd6. So I vote for 36...Bd6, unless someone can convince me otherwise.
Feb-17-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: I will have to agree with <Robin01>. <Robin01> has presented the worst case scenario, and I, too will cast my vote on Bd6.
Feb-17-06  Robin01: This is a tough position to play. Hopefully, we can get some help from white!
Feb-18-06  Robin01: Well, off to bed I go. Long day again tomorrow. I will not be back on until tomorrow evening.
Feb-18-06  Cogano: <Robin01> Thank you for taking the time to point that out. But that was my point. I don't like Kc7 because if the knight captures & checks we lose the bishop because we have to move the King first. I will help the team as best I can. But, for now, in my opinion, the position is not winnable. The moves I keep choosing have a two-folded person. For one, they allow us to force White into a draw, if they choose to continue to exercise the Queen's force, especially check-wise. If White doesn't exercise that power, then later we have an opportunity to achieve a Queen vs. Bishop & Rook endgame. If we get a scenario like the one I pointed out in my analysis, then having the King near b5 & c5 would be useful. But, if both pawns fall, then it's a different scenario. & I'd have to analyze that further before I comment on it.

Whatever the case, I think it's prudent to remember Steinitz' words "The King is a fighting piece." Even in an endgame, I think it's dangerous to keep one's King confined to the first or last two ranks. There's no reason to make the other player's Queen's job easier!

As always, I welcome all feedback. I offered to join the team not only to do my best to help but also perchance I might learn something & improve & strengthen my understanding -- in this case of endgames & endgame studies.

Thank you all for your anticipated & continued patience, tolerance, understanding, consideration & assistance. Take very good care & have a great day & a great weekend too. Cheers to all! :)

Feb-18-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <Cogano> We did anticipate in an Q vs R+B ending, (or I did... in one of the lines given/posted).

But I, personally will fight on until I 'see' a game that is truly hopelessly lost. The game is not quite over yet... (I'm still breathing...)

Feb-18-06  Cogano: <WannaBe> I agree & I will fight too so long as I continue to breathe. I just meant to break White's pattern & disrupt their game. I meant to play moves that, if White insists on continuing to check, then he'll draw by perpetual check or repeated check. And if White doesn't go with that line, then we have a fighting chance. So double purpose moves. They force White to draw in one line or force them to play differently which gives us fighting chances. I still welcome all feedback, as I'll also learn from that. Thanks you & our fellow members. Take very good care all & have a great day & a great weekend too. Cheers to all! :)
Feb-18-06  RonB52734: Ok, I've read the posts and here's what I think. I'm convinced that ...Bd6 is better to escape check. As things now stand, we have good mobility and we control any possible queening square for white's pawn. Also, <Robin>'s point about <36...Kc7; 37.axb5, Rd8; and 38.b6+ is not good for us> is correct. It would continue 38...Kc8 39.Qxa6+ and the rest is ugly. After ...Bd6, if white plays Nxb5, I agree we have to take the Knight. If white does not, but instead plays axb5, then I think other moves should be considered including pulling back the light squared bishop, perhaps to e6.

So, I vote for ...Bd6.

Also, <cogano>, the only sure way to know whether a move has been played by either team is to go to User: me to play and read the recent postings. Generally, <EmperorAtahualpa> posts the moves for the White team, and I post them for the good guys.

Ok, <team>, let me have your votes. Our move is due at 3:00 this afternoon, roughly 5 hours from now.

Feb-18-06  sitzkrieg: I vote Bd6.

<cogano>

Nxb5 is no sac, after it Bb3 is attacked too, so they get back the piece + pawn b5.

Feb-18-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: I think pretty much everyone agrees on the move. :-)

Have to leave and run a 9-ball tournament, be back home later.

Feb-18-06  Cogano: <RonB52734> I've got to be quick here. Unfortunately I didn't have enough time to analyze the whole line. However, I analyzed the move 1...Bd6, with the White moves being what I assumed to be the most logical for them. & it doesn't look good for us. But you decide. You may think that they'll react differently. In any case, here is what I came up with. As for my vote, I choose Kc8, for better or worse. Take care all & have a great day & a great weekend too. Cheers to all! :)

My Bd6 line: 1.Qd3+ Bd6, 2.Nxb5 Rf8+, 3.Ke1 Re8+, 4.Kd2 axb5,5.Qxb5+ Ke7, 6.Qb7+ Kf6, 7.Qf3+ Ke7, 8.Qxb3 Bf4+, 9.Kd3 Rd8+, 10.Ke4 g5, 11.g3 Bd6, 12.a5 Bc5, 13.a6 Rd4+, 14.Kf5 Rd7, 15.Qe6+ Kd8, 16.Qxh6 Kc7, 17.Qf6 Bd4

I'll try my best to get back online soon to read your feedback. In any case, you have my vote.

Feb-18-06  RonB52734: Well, for good or ill, Bd6 has won the vote. I'm posting it in 10 minutes. In other words, dissenters have 10 minutes to prove it wrong.
Feb-18-06  sitzkrieg: Cogano, I have no board at hand so i cant see it 15 moves deep:P but is it wise to move Re8 check or can we better take immediately at b5? Anyway-
and i hope this finds you well and does not offend you in any way-Kc8 looks very bad because of Qf3 with double attack.
Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 750)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 56 OF 750 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC