chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

gezafan
Member since Jul-19-09 · Last seen Jan-10-26
White Genocide is happening right now! Learn about it starting with this post.

gezafan chessforum (kibitz #164)

Chessgames.com Full Member

   gezafan has kibitzed 6067 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jan-10-26 Chessgames - Politics (replies)
 
gezafan: It's sad how some white people will sacrifice for people who don't care two cents for them.
 
   Jan-09-26 Chessgames - Sports (replies)
 
gezafan: Here are my predictions for the first round of the NFL playoffs. Buff over Jack, NE over LAC, Hou over Pitt, LAR over Car, GB over Chi, Phi over SF.
 
   Jan-02-26 Karpov vs A Yusupov, 1993 (replies)
 
gezafan: I think this is one of Karpov's best games.
 
   Jan-02-26 Chessgames - Music (replies)
 
gezafan: The Lost Patrol with Orbit. https://youtu.be/24toZwdFsr0?list=P...
 
   Jan-01-26 Korchnoi - Huebner Candidates Final (1980/81)
 
gezafan: Here's a video about the match. https://youtu.be/DqL3dhw9wdA
 
   Dec-31-25 gezafan chessforum (replies)
 
gezafan: Happy New Year to my chess playing comrades on Chessgames.com! Chessgames.com is as American as it comes, allowing free speech. Kudos to Susan Freeman and the others who run this site
 
   Dec-30-25 Bogoljubov vs Capablanca, 1924
 
gezafan: Why do people keep losing pawns to Capablanca? Don't they realize that could cause them to lose?
 
   Dec-30-25 Smyslov vs Korchnoi, 1952
 
gezafan: Korchnoi analyzes this game. https://youtu.be/ZgGu71t1igo
 
   Dec-30-25 Korchnoi vs Karpov, 1978
 
gezafan: Viktor the Terrible himself analyzes this game. https://youtu.be/n1O7_7RrpKg
 
   Dec-30-25 Maroczy vs Capablanca, 1924
 
gezafan: Capablanca scored 73% on the black side of the Ruy Lopez. A tremendous result!
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

gezafan's Conservative Forum

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 22 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-25-21  diceman: <optimal play:

<The Tragedy of Utopian Thinking>>

Just ask John Lennon.
(Well technically, you'd need to ask Yoko)

He found out the hard way: <Give Peace a Chance/War is Over! If You Want it> was wrong.

War is only over if your enemy wants it.

Jun-25-21  technical draw: Well, I found a forum where I can discuss serious matters. Serious like the USA is on a downward spiral and civil unrest is looming. (civil unrest comes before civil war). Can't happen in the USA? It already did. The pretty boy Floyds of TV land are content to fan the fires since the have the wherewithal to escape the burning cities. Biden's final year is going to be a doozie.
Jun-25-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: I posted this on the Rogoff page.

"So, liberals, why did Derek Chauvin get 22 1/2 years and Mohamed Noor only got 12 1/2 years? What could possibly be the reason for the discrepancy?"

The answer, of course, is that Noor is black and killed a white person while Chauvin is white and was held responsible for killing a black. It's a racist double standard.

If the liberals on the Rogoff page even answer my question, it will be some ridiculous rationalization for the anti-white double standard, why it's somehow "different" when a black kills a white.

Jun-25-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Willber G: Well, you got that wrong. As I said on Rogoff, in Chauvin's case there were four aggravating factors cited as part of the conviction. Apparently any one of those would give the judge cause to set an above-norm sentence.
Jun-26-21  optimal play: <gezafan: ... why did Derek Chauvin get 22 1/2 years and Mohamed Noor only got 12 1/2 years? What could possibly be the reason for the discrepancy?" The answer, of course, is that Noor is black and killed a white person while Chauvin is white and was held responsible for killing a black.>

Noor is also a Mohammedan, another mitigating factor for a reduced sentence.

The double-standard is so blatant.

Also, compare the two individuals who died; the white woman, a law abiding person; the black man, a career criminal.

Furthermore, how each died; the law abiding white woman, shot at point-blank range by a black mohammedan; the black man, after struggling and fighting, expired due to the overdose of drugs in his body.

Is this typical of American justice?

Jun-28-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Willber G: Here is a quote from someone who will no doubt be disappointed at Chauvin's sentence being too lenient:

<The cop that aborted Floyd, if found innocent, should be awarded megabucks, which would be taken from the welfare fund. If the cop is found guilty, he hangs.>

Kenneth Rogoff (kibitz #433201)

Jun-28-21  George Wallace: <The cop that aborted Floyd, if found innocent, should be awarded megabucks, which would be taken from the welfare fund. If the cop is found guilty, he hangs.>

If guilty of murder they need to hang and hang that very day.

If guilty of unintentional killing, then <Big Pawn> did not advocate for the death penalty.

Jun-28-21  George Wallace: What <Big Pawn> must like about us progressive liberals is that we secretly read and save up his posts for a later time. What I mean is, us libs pretend that we ignore <Big Pawn's> posts, but we actually read them and remember them when something relevant comes up in the future.

Just look at <Wilber>. How and for what reason would he even remember one of the many posts <BP> posted? Yet, there it is!

Jun-28-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Willber G: <George Wallace:

If guilty of unintentional killing, then <Big Pawn> did not advocate for the death penalty.>

There's nothing in your original quote to suggest that.

Jun-28-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Willber G: <George Wallace:

Just look at <Wilber>. How and for what reason would he even remember one of the many posts <BP> posted? Yet, there it is!>

Don't get excited, <BP>. Somebody reposted your quote on Rogoff a few days ago. Even I can remember that far back.

Jun-28-21  George Wallace: <Willber G: <George Wallace: If guilty of unintentional killing, then <Big Pawn> did not advocate for the death penalty.>

There's nothing in your original quote to suggest that.>

First of all, it's <Big Pawn's> post.

Secondly, the entire conversation about Chauvin and Floyd was about murder, not second degree murder, so the context made it clear.

<Big Pawn> assures me that he is quite satisfied knowing that the Libs are studying his writings.

Jun-28-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: <Willber G: Well, you got that wrong. As I said on Rogoff, in Chauvin's case there were four aggravating factors cited as part of the conviction. Apparently any one of those would give the judge cause to set an above-norm sentence.>

So some liberal judge makes up some fake justification for the sentence he gave Chauvin.

The facts are that a black police officer in Minneapolis shot and killed a white woman for no reason whatsoever in Minneapolis. He got 12 1/2 year.

A white police officer is held responsible for killing a black male while restraining him after he violently resisted arrest. He got 22 1/2 years.

It's a racist and blatant anti-white double standard. Liberals refuse to acknowledge this obvious fact because they're so badly brainwashed.

And as I said, they'll immediately start making up sham excuses why the racist, anti-white double standard is okay.

If it's anti-white liberals support it.

Jun-28-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  Willber G: <gezafan: <Willber G: Well, you got that wrong. As I said on Rogoff, in Chauvin's case there were four aggravating factors cited as part of the conviction. Apparently any one of those would give the judge cause to set an above-norm sentence.>

So some liberal judge makes up some fake justification for the sentence he gave Chauvin.>

You obviously didn't watch the trial, read the judge's 22-page sentencing report or know anything about the law. You're just ranting in support of your narrow-minded shtick. I'll leave you to it until you get some perspective.

Jun-29-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: Forget about legalities. Anyone who can't see the injustice of the difference in the sentences is biased.

I don't need a judge to tell me what is right and wrong.

Jul-06-21  diceman: Launched July 4th:

<GETTR is a brand new social media platform founded on the principles of free speech, independent thought and rejecting political censorship and "cancel culture." With best in class technology, our goal is to create a marketplace of ideas in order to share freedom and democracy around the world.>

<Launched July 4th:>

I don't think it was an accident. :)

https://gettr.com/

Jul-10-21  optimal play: <gezafan> Back in April you made this comment:

<One of the places where white men are heavily discriminated against is in sports.>

You then gave an example from American football.

Anyway, somebody on the Kibitzer's Cafe brought to the forum's attention an article about some guy in charge of Irish basketball making a comment about a black player for the England soccer team taking a dive to milk a penalty in their game against Denmark.

He made the joke <Black Dives Matter>

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/...

Well, of course he was forced to apologise profusely but is neverthelss suffering egregiously at the merciless hands of the leftist cultural elite, but anyway, his comment gave rise to the thought that black players are favoured in sporting competitions against white players.

You see, in this instance, the black England player clearly flopped to the ground without being touched by the white Denmark player, but was given a penalty anyway. But even more extraordinary, the incident was reviewed by the video assistant referees (VAR) who confirmed the penalty, even after viewing the video which positively showed there was no contact from any of the Danish defenders.

The conclusion being that the referees were afraid to not award a penalty for fear of being accused of racism.

A black player claimed to have been tripped by a white player, even though he clearly wasn't, but he has to be believed, even in the face of contradictory evidence.

If it had been the other way around, and a white player was actually tripped by a black player, then presumably no penalty would be given.

Hence the pun <Black Dives Matter>.

I just wonder how prevalent this reverse discrimination in sport has become and how much more of it we will see.

Jul-11-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: <optimal play: I just wonder how prevalent this reverse discrimination in sport has become and how much more of it we will see.>

It's extremely prevalent and it is going to keep getting worse until white people start standing up to it. Unfortunately the crazy white liberals always take the side of non-whites no matter what.

A few years ago, in a playoff game, in American football a black scrub player speared a starting wide receiver in his injured ribs, while the receiver was out of bounds.

Spearing is when you hit the player you are tackling with the crown of your helmet striking first. It's illegal.

It was on video and it was blatant. It was obviously an attempt to take the white star player, Jordy Nelson of the Green Bay Packers, out of the game. He succeeded.

The announcers said nothing about it. The referees called no penalty. The league didn't fine the black scrub and nobody in the mainstream media said anything about it.

By the way, if you're interested in anti-white racism in sports there's a website you can visit that covers this topic. It's called Caste Football. It's been on for years but it's activity has gone way down since the internet tyrants made it hard to find on search engines.

Why not register and post your story there?

http://castefootball.us/index.php

Jul-12-21  optimal play: <gezafan: A few years ago, in a playoff game, in American football a black scrub player speared a starting wide receiver in his injured ribs, while the receiver was out of bounds.>

If that sort of thing was happening with impunity a few years ago, it must be even worse now.

Perhaps the intent is to make professional sports the exclusive domain of non-whites?

We're to be reduced to spectators only.

Jul-12-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: <optimal play: Perhaps the intent is to make professional sports the exclusive domain of non-whites?>

They want white people replaced everywhere, not just in sports. They want 100% of us to be replaced.

They even have a name for it. The Great Replacement.

Jul-14-21  optimal play: Further to the Euro Final, there has been quite a bit of speculation regarding the late substitution of three white players for three black players in the England team.

These late substitutions were obviously made with the penalty shootout in mind, and there have been unsubstantiated accusations that the England team bosses wanted to set up a scenario whereby England's black players had the honour of kicking the penalty goals and winning the championship, thereby being the national heroes.

Since the England team had been "taking the knee" in honour of Black Lives Matter right throughout the competition, the England bosses saw the penalty shootout as the perfect opportunity to highlight England's black players and make them the heroes of the England team.

Well, of course we all saw what happened.

It was those three black players who missed their goals resulting in England losing.

So instead of being national heroes and held up as exemplar models of England soccer and British diversity, they have now been subject to vitriol and abuse, all because of some misguided attempt by England bosses to manufacture some "diversity heroics" and thus further promote diversity in England.

I feel sorry for those lads being used in this way.

They were thrown into a situation they weren't up to and now are having to unfairly suffer for it.

It seems everybody loses when it comes to promoting diversity.

Jul-14-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <opt: These late substitutions were obviously made with the penalty shootout in mind, and there have been unsubstantiated accusations that the England team bosses wanted to set up a scenario whereby England's black players had the honour of kicking the penalty goals and winning the championship, thereby being the national heroes.>

First thing I thought. Remnants of the Seahawks blowing a Super Bowl trying to make a Black quarterback the hero.

Jul-15-21  optimal play: <The Sportsball Scam>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rmc...

(comments)

Using black players to take the last 3 penalties was a political message, to try and get a black person to score the winner. And it backfired.

The Italians preferred victory over virtue signaling.

Since they are arguing for more diversity in sports. Does that mean they will have more Whites, Hispanics and Asians in the NFL.

Wait, the whitest team won the Euro championship?

How poetic that BLM, which was advertised the whole divegrass tournament, ended up being one of the finalist's own undoing against a team of homogenous natives. Black Lads Missing.

Diversity isn't your strength, it lowers your wages, marginalises your culture, increases your crime, fills your hospitals, fills your housing, fills your schools, consumes your taxes, tightens your laws, stops your freedom, endangers your kids & calls you racist.

The Left's fetishization of black people is one of the creepiest things I've ever seen.

At least Italy had actual Italians playing for them.

The media is just furious that they can't parrot "diversity is our strength" and indulge in their fetishism for blacks after this football fiasco.

I stopped caring about black folks and their issues. At some point, their problems are their responsibility and I'm tired of the assertion that the opposite should be the case.

If three white players botched their penalty shots, then they would have been lynched by the media and everyone knows it.

Take a knee, BLM ... RESPECT Armbands ... Electronic Billboards screaming at you "sign up for an equal game".... it's all "FELL ON IT'S FACE" .... human behaviour specialists have a theory "shout at Humans too hard and in the end they won't want to listen".

Jul-15-21  diceman: <Black Players Are Targets of Racist Harassment After England Soccer Loss>

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/202...

Jul-19-21  Gregor Samsa Mendel: <gezafan: They want white people replaced everywhere, not just in sports. They want 100% of us to be replaced.

They even have a name for it. The Great Replacement.>

Who are "they?"

Jul-20-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  gezafan: <Gregor Samsa Mendel: <gezafan: They want white people replaced everywhere, not just in sports. They want 100% of us to be replaced. They even have a name for it. The Great Replacement.>

Who are "they?">

The radical left has long advocated the genocide of the white race. Here's an example. Read radical leftist Tom Hayden's comments at his son's wedding to a black woman. Many other leftists say the same thing. He says he wants the white race eliminated. They (leftists) say it all the time.

https://ozconservative.blogspot.com...

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 22)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 22 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC