ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 277 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Aug-13-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: That's a beautiful historical eulogy Tim.
Thanks! |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | JoeWms: My post was a p.p.p.p., a piff poor pun play: a segue from your <car> to <cara mio>, a Segway. BTW, Jess, I did not know about this wonderful way to use a Segway: http://www.citysegwaytours.com/
|
|
| Aug-13-07 | | Ed Trice: The Civil War was as much about warring economies rather than just the moral issue surrounding slavery. The broken backs of the highly underpaid Irish factory workers and assembly lines up North were threatening the rural economy of the free labor that was a product of purchasing an expensive slave. If an northern worker died of exhaustion or exposure or poor factory working conditions, there was a multitude in the overpopulated city ready to take his place to earn a meager wage and keep the factories churning profits. If an expensive slave would have "down time", the replacement would rarely occur because of the up-front cost. I believe Jackson treated his slaves in a morally respectably way, and he fought for the right to keep the southern economy moving, not to keep slaves from being free. |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | JoeWms: I hate to have to tell you this: If it's crap, that's not chess you're playing. |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | Boomie: <That's a beautiful historical eulogy Tim. Thanks!>
Anything for my liege. Coinkidinkally, last night I was replaying Gettysburg for the zillionth time. The chess connection of the Civil War, of course, is understanding Morphy. The years leading up to the CW are known in art and music as the Romantic era. Ivanhoe was the most popular book and young men and women actually spoke in the language of that book. We can only guess at the nature of this romantic attitude. Perhaps the naive, uncompromising nature of romance hastened the onset of war. The war brutally ended this sleep of dreams. Many who survived were unable to make the transition to the new, cold reality. Custer exemplified these romantic holdovers. Unable to live without the gallantry of military action, he sleep walked into suicide. Perhaps Morphy was also unable to make the transition. |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | Boomie: <Ed Trice: I believe Jackson treated his slaves in a morally respectably way, and he fought for the right to keep the southern economy moving, not to keep slaves from being free.> Thank you for your insights.
Jackson was such a complicated personality that we will probably never know his motivations. His religion came first with him so his direction probably came from the Bible. How he was able to reconcile his religion with his murderous efficiency on the battlefield would make for an interesting study. |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | Ed Trice: <Boomie> Morphy, remember, was among a group of secessionists, and his desire to remain a part of the USA were very, very unpopular in New Orleans. He was in Europe during a portion of the Civil War, and we are ever grateful for that as chess aficionados. Upon his return, it is oft-cited that people felt he was a chess champion and not a lawyer, so they did not give him "work", and he eventually developed a persecution complex that lead to his early death. There may be more to the story than that. He did constantly believe that his brother-in-law who married his sister arranged to take over his inheritance. There was, perhaps, some provision in the family will to bequeath a vast majority of the belongings to an heir who was married at the time of the division of property. This would insure it would "remain in the family" and possibly continue to be passed on. Paul was unmarried, of course, so the will left him out for the most part. Morphy then used his knowledge of the law, and all of his subsequent energies, to spawn law suits against the brother in law. THIS was also not looked on favorably by the local townspeople, and may have contributed more to his lack of clients than any attachment to his chess prowess. Furthermore, Morphy was pursuing the hand of one fair maiden who called him "merely a chess player." This was a "checkmate" to his psyche, and may have been the straw that broke the camel's back. |
|
Aug-13-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Ed>, I don't know where you have any success selling your <crap>, as <Joe> put it, but I don't require it in my forum. Sorry, I don't believe in "free speech."
So no more <pseudo-creationist gauche uninformed philistinic money grubbing boasting slavery-apologizing arrogant condescending obtuse prevaricating mendicant peurile CRAP> from you in here anymore, OK? You can attempt to organize your own cult in your new <forum>. I've niether the interest nor the time to host your very sad confusion any longer. "A little learning is a dangerous thing"?
Maybe.
But it's sure an <annoying thing> so CUT IT OUT BUDDY. Is that clear enough for you? |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | Ed Trice: <jessicafischerqueen> Which post of mine do you find so upsetting? |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | Dr. Siggy: <jessicafischerqueen>: <Ah <Tarrasch>. Was he really a <doctor>?> A very interesting question! In 2004, a certain Wolfgang Kamm published "Siegbert Tarrasch: Leben und Werk", a big "brick" in which he (among many other things) disputes that fact. Grant you, Kamm is a German; but I must say I find his arguments quite implausible. To begin with, Germans in general were always (and still are) very scrupulous about such legal matters as academical degrees, medical practice and so on. Besides, Tarrasch gathered many enemies all along his life: it was virtually impossible that there was not one (not a single one) aware of such thing - at least to smear him... So, until further evidence, Siegbert Tarrasch was really a general practitioner at Nuremberg and afterwards at Munich. |
|
Aug-13-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: LOLOL <Ed>
You're not really a "listener", per se, are you?
Good grief. |
|
Aug-13-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Dr. Siggy> thanks for that rather full and interesting reply. Contrast your informed response to my question with <Ed's> terse, and, as it turns out, woefully inaccurate response to my question. Which I asked you, not him, of course.
LOLOLOL
Go <Dr. Tarrasch>!! |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | Ed Trice: <jessicafischerqueen> Can you cite a specific example? That's all I am asking for. If you can't, then your posts are rather perplexing. |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | Ragh: <Jess> Just fyi. I think <JoeWms>'s post was in reply to your post above, where you mentioned your rating was crap thesedays.
<jessicafischerqueen: Well you'll all be pleased to know my AUGUST <Yahoo Official Chess Ratings> just arrived in the mail: <August 12 Yahoo CHESS RATINGS UPDATE With the White pieces <<ABSOLUTE CRAP>> With the Black pieces <<ABSOLUTE CRAP>>> > |
|
Aug-13-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Yes <Ragh>, you are correct as usual. BTW, are we playing tonight?
I can't play tonight. Can we play Wednesday Thursday or Friday? I am free all three of those evenings.
AWHOOGA |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | Ragh: <Jess> Sure, that works. Congrats on your Korean visa by the way. |
|
Aug-13-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Well I haven't got it yet RAH! But thanks in advance. I have to show up at the Consulate downtown at 8 AM normal time. I get the VISA five bidness days later, just in time before my flight. I'm flying out a week Friday.
So we can play on Wednesday, 8 o clock in <Sea horse>? Can I expect another <Petrov>? |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | Ed Trice: Bobby Fischer apparently did bowl in Iceland after game 5 of the match with Spassky. As is commonly cited "There are no bowling alleys in Iceland", what is apparently not well known, is that there were (and are) bowling alleys at the American Air Base that was there in 1972. Bobby Fischer bowled after midnight for like 10 games, which was sent to me by the only email contact I have with Fischer. Apparently he was full of energy after being excited about beating Spassky for the second time, so he was only averaging 137 while throwing his arm out (practically). So, apparently, Fischer did bowl during the 1972 World Championship. I had no idea about this, I had no idea about Fischer really liking bowling to begin with. If this is the source of your anger, I don't understand why. |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | Ragh: <Jess> OK, thats fine. Remember, no more Petrov. I know you are weak in Petrov defence.. hehe.. <I get the VISA five bidness days later, just in time before my flight.> I was confused after reading all these posts at once, but I guess you should be able to get it in time. |
|
Aug-13-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Ed> I'm not angry at you. It's only the Internet, for Cripe sake. Try to focus. Maybe some deep breathing. |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | Ed Trice: Well, I am listed as your new mortal enemy, so that is usually not bestowed out of friendship. I respectfully submit appropriate levels of apologies, and part amicably. |
|
Aug-13-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Rah! only positive vibes here please!
I just talked to them on the phone today and they assured me my VISA would be ready before my flight. So Wednesday, 8 o clock my time in Seahorse?
ROUND SEVEN in the World Championship match, <Tal-Anand>. |
|
Aug-13-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Ed> there's no need to get dramatic. I just read your emails, very intriguing I have to say. Don't worry about what I say. Who cares about me?
I have dozens of <mortal enemies> at this site but you are more fun to make sport of than all of them. If you're tired of being a figure of fun to me, no problem. I'm not out to crucify you, I don't even know you. I will never delete your posts or put you on <ignore>. When I said I "don't believe in free speech" I was in fact lying. If I become irritating to you, simply put me on Ignore or something. Trust me, I have no emotional investment in this whatsoever. I can't believe this is the first time in your life you've gotten this kind of reaction out of a group of people? |
|
| Aug-13-07 | | Ragh: <Jess> Yep, optimism is the way to go. I see you removed Deffy from your fake mortal enemies list, so customarily she will now find a place in the fav kibbutzers list? :) |
|
Aug-13-07
 | | jessicafischerqueen: OMIGOD I thought she was there already?
<Deffi> and <Wilson> were "fake" mortal enemies anyways. They were the only two of my friends who responded when I asked people for <resumes> who were interested in becoming my <mortal enemy>. |
|
 |
 |
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 277 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |