ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 404 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Jun-28-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: hoot! |
|
Jun-28-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Hi <trig>!!
I got the owl special postal order.
It only cost fity pee!!
hoot |
|
Jun-28-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: <Niel Young's Harvest featuring Old Man and Out on the Weekend> Thanks for dropping by!
Hoot |
|
| Jun-28-08 | | ravel5184: Congratulations on your new avatar!
Wish I could have one ... |
|
| Jun-28-08 | | ravel5184: Hoot! |
|
Jun-28-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Hi <ravel5184>!!
Try to save up the 20 bucks man.
My Moms bought me my membership for my last two birthdays. Hoot!
(also, once you get a premium membership-- you can find any picture you like- email it to CG.com-- and then you can use it as your personalized avatar) |
|
| Jun-28-08 | | ravel5184: I have 20 bucks but not on credit card! I'm just a kid, you know. P.S. You've got me on your "hoot" path.
Hoot! |
|
Jun-28-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Heh there's a member here who'se name is <just a kid>. I cant' remember what his avatar is though.
I think it might be a Brindled Gnu. |
|
Jun-28-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: Here is a new game in our database from our own famous <Domdaniel>: Heh his real name is <GERRY MCARTHY> Now that I know his real name, I've already sold his email to several right wing Christian Evangelical spam mailing lists. This is a great game it has four (count em- four) queens in it: G McCarthy vs M Kennefick, 1977 |
|
| Jun-28-08 | | ravel5184: Well that's why I couldn't use that as my username!
Hoot! |
|
Jun-28-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: I'm going to change my user name to <Just an Owl> then. Hoot! |
|
| Jun-28-08 | | ravel5184: Hoot!
I love your posts!
That is why IF I get my premium membership you will go straight to my favorites list, <jessicafischerqueen>. It's not everyone who has the same wacky sense of humor as we do. |
|
Jun-28-08
 | | Domdaniel: <Gravel> oh, all right then, <Gravel 5184>. I don't have a credit card either, and I stopped being a kid -- well, at least in the sense that banks and governments and such measure these things -- a long, long time ago. Let's just say I was "around" in the 1960s. I haven't been round much since, though -- more kinda stretched and angular. Sorry, that's hangular. As in 'Howl'. You know, Allan Ginsberg's great beat poem about Jessica ... I saw the best mind of my
Or nearby proximate generation
Addled by chess
Starving, hysterical, clothed in pawns
Walking backwards thru
Northern Lunch
And False Creek
Looking for a cigarette shop
That sold Bishops.
[or something like that ...]
IMO, the just-a-kid defense should be used sparingly, if at all. Most of us here are either (a) former prodigies, (b) former morons, (c) chess engines practising humanoid boogie etiquette, or (d) child molesters. Use the just-a-kid defense in such company and you might find yourself being groomed by a nine-year-old who wants a quasi-adult to 'front' for her. A beardless beard, in fact. Or else what I believe what Kurt Vonnegut called a Chrono-Synclastic Infundibulum. Dangerous, any road. But, believe me, the opposite -- "Leave me alone, you cad, I'm just a harmless senile old codger" -- is even worse. Cos they *do*. Remember: the universe isn't expanding: it's escaping. And what is it escaping from? Its central point? Which is *you*, right? Why is the Universe running away from you, <Rabble 5184>? There are ways round the credit card thing that don't involve crime. A parent or relative is useful, if you have one. Failing that, email CG and discuss an alternative one-off payment by bank draft or whatever. No business turns down money, even from kids. Many exist solely to take kid money, though this isn't one of them. Are we cool on that, <Ravel5184.001>? |
|
| Jun-28-08 | | hms123: Dear <doyenne>,
You are the senior owlette of hoot<DOM>. Sometimes we borrow words from the francophones and keep them for owlselves.
--h<oot>ms |
|
Jun-28-08
 | | Domdaniel: I have invented (yet another) form of chess - and this one turns out to have some intriguing properties. Taking its cue from the aforementioned Elvis Costello song, it is called <King Horse Chess>. The rules are simple. Everything is as normal, but the King moves like a Knight. It is checked etc in the normal way, but it must make knight-type moves in reply. Thus, for example, the move
1.Kd3
is a legal way to begin the game; though maybe not a very good one. One thing that emerges is that a King on the edge, or even worse, the corner, is in real trouble. Here's a sort of 'back rank mate':  click for larger viewWhite plays 1.Ra8#
The black king's flight squares, f7 and g6, are blocked by its own pawns - so it's both a smothered mate and a back rank mate, in a way. This related position is interesting:
 click for larger viewWhite to play, plays
1.Ng6+
Which is mate. But note that if there was no pawn at f5, black could reply with 1...Kxg6 -- it's OK for kings to occupy adjacent squares in this game, as long as they're never a knight-move apart. Finally, look at this similar position, where we change the black rook on f7 for a queen, and remove the f-pawn:  click for larger viewBlack has just played 1...Qf7+
Now white can, and should, move his king away. But he thinks that the knight interposition will at least force black to give up his queen ... 2.Ng6+
In fact black can now play either 2...Kxg6(!) or 2...Qxg6+. I haven't analysed further, so I don't have a forced win in either line. But I do in a similar position, as follows:  click for larger viewBlack to play:
1...Qe5#
The queen checks in the normal way, while covering the escape squares g7, f6, f4 and g3. A king on the rim, his chances are slim.
|
|
| Jun-28-08 | | notyetagm: <jessicafischerqueen: <Coach> Thanks so much for dropping the very beautiful <in between move> example in my forum. i had fun with it-- didn't see the logic at first. Then when I did, the beauty of the move was staggering.> Indeed. That was an -INCREDIBLE- <ZWISCHENZUG> played by Reshevsky in that game against Mieses. Black won a pawn from a position which appeared to be completely bereft of tactical complications! <ZWISCHENZUG> is my favorite tactic because you have to be unbelievably tactically alert to spot them. :-) |
|
| Jun-29-08 | | Trigonometrist: Hey <jess>..
I'am a premiere member now!!; only for three months though.. I took a survey with CG and they gifted this free trial.. Do visit my forum..
I am most eager to see your unpredictable humour at my house.. Cheers!!...:) |
|
| Jun-29-08 | | notyetagm: A tremendous example of a <DISCOVERED DEFLECTION> by <smallville (Nakamura)>, from an ICC 1 0 bullet(!!!) game: Black to play: 20 ... ?
 click for larger viewPosition after 20 ... ♘g4-f2+! 0-1
 click for larger viewNakamura plays <TACTICS> in 1 0 bullet games that you would be thrilled to see in your slow OTB games! [Event "ICC 1 0"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2008.06.29"]
[Round "-"]
[White "Iturrizaga"]
[Black "Smallville"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ICCResult "White resigns"]
[WhiteElo "2559"]
[BlackElo "2896"]
[Opening "Queen's Pawn"]
[ECO "A41"]
[NIC "QO.17"]
[Time "02:37:33"]
[TimeControl "60+0"]
1. d4 d6 2. Nf3 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 Nc6 5. g3 Bg4 6. d5 Nb8 7. Bg2 Qc8 8.
O-O Bh3 9. e4 h5 10. Ng5 Bxg2 11. Kxg2 h4 12. f4 Bf6 13. Nf3 hxg3 14. hxg3
Qh3+ 15. Kf2 Bxc3 16. bxc3 Nf6 17. Ng5 Qh2+ 18. Kf3 Qh5+ 19. Ke3 Ng4+ 20.
Kd3 Nf2+ 0-1
|
|
Jun-29-08
 | | Domdaniel: <notyetagm> Yep, 20...Nf2+ is impressive at Bullet. But I find *anything* impressive at bullet, including the ability to make 20 moves inside a minute. Blitz is bad enough: I never mastered the slam-bang technique of moving piece and hitting clock in a single fluid movement. But the ...Nf2+ tactic itself isn't *that* impressive. It's not the kind of move you suddenly see, sitting there waiting to be played. It's the kind of thing you prepare, ideally teeing up another threat at the same time, and - at speed chess anyway - hope your opponent misses one of them. In a very vague way - more to do with black's sudden kingside assault and the white king walk - I was reminded of a (standard OTB) game I played once - against a kid who later went on to be rated about 2380. He walked his king out to d3, where I mated it with a couple of knights. The other, more illustrious game that comes to mind is the short and famous Larsen vs Spassky, 1970. Ouch. This was a Soviets versus World match, where Fischer had (graciously? weirdly?) consented to letting Larsen play on Board #1 against Spassky. Maybe he knew that Boris was on fire that day ... one of my favorite games, though it hurts to see the Nimzo-Larsen torn apart so rabidly. And yet delicately. Fantastic stuff: a reminder of how great Spassky was at his best. |
|
| Jun-29-08 | | Ziggurat: <jess> I´m sorry if I made you feel bad with my comments about your opponents´ "stinkers". You should interpret the comment like this: I feel you have become too good to play against those guys, and should seek tougher opposition to improve even further. And every player - even Kasparov, I bet - becomes disheartened when they go through their games with a strong engine. In some sense, all wins are "lucky", because the opponent did not play optimally, but as <Eyal> said in his forum, it´s enough to play better than your opponent. |
|
| Jun-29-08 | | Red October: off chasing shrews and voles are we ? |
|
| Jun-29-08 | | twinlark: It could be she's engaging in <The Taming of the Vole>. |
|
| Jun-30-08 | | BishopofBlunder: Personally, I think she's gone owling mad!
Hey <Jess>, what's Gnu? <Looking for a cigarette shop
That sold Bishops. >
Whatzis?? I can't be bought at any price! Rented or leased, perhaps... <jessicafischerqueen: I'm going to change my user name to <Just an Owl> then.> And I will be changing my user name to <UnRavel5184> |
|
Jun-30-08
 | | jessicafischerqueen: arghhhhhh
hoot |
|
| Jun-30-08 | | ravel5184: Hoot! |
|
 |
 |
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 404 OF 801 ·
Later Kibitzing> |