chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

jessicafischerqueen
Member since Sep-23-06
no bio
>> Click here to see jessicafischerqueen's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   jessicafischerqueen has kibitzed 46689 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Nov-01-22 jessicafischerqueen chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: Thanks <Fred,> and give my regards to <Mrs Bear> as well!
 
   Sep-07-22 playground player chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <Ohio> lol and the inevitable "defund the police" thrown in there towards the end, almost as if it's so "de rigeur" that he almost forgot to mention it. Interestingly, the informal "street bosses" who step up to occupy the positions of defunded police street ...
 
   Sep-07-22 Susan Freeman chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <z> I remember that, unless there was more than one "that" and I missed a few. I recall him flooding the forum with passages from Goethe in order to enrage <Travis Bickle> or; and/or; <Hozza>. Mephistopholes was the work in question. He posted a new ...
 
   Aug-30-22 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <OhioMissScarlettFan> I agree with your sentiment here: <OhioChessFan: <Missy> I appreciate your measured tone throughout this. And I agree a very high % of the time with what you're saying. Really, you're mostly saying what I am already thinking.>
 
   Aug-28-22 perfidious chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: Your over there regimen sounds salubrious! Interestingly, in Canada we save time by spelling "music and poker" as "moker." Initially we spelled it "poomus" but that sounded a little too declasse, even for us...
 
   Aug-24-22 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: So the Pacific Ocean can play a boat at chess! Nice one
 
   Aug-24-22 Charles Kalme (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <wwall: Kalme did not win the 1954 US Junior championship. Ross Siemms won in 1954. scoring 7.5. Kalme and Saul Yarmak tied for 2nd-3rd, scoring 7.> According to Imre Konig in "CHESS LIFE (Volume 8, Number 23, August 5, 1954)" The top 4 finishers were: 1. Siemms ...
 
   Aug-22-22 Carel van den Berg (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: hmm... or the Furman Wikipedia photo is wrong...
 
   Aug-13-22 Biographer Bistro (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: Game Collection: Charousek - Maroczy Game Collection Voting
 
   Aug-10-22 WannaBe chessforum (replies)
 
jessicafischerqueen: <MannBee> sneak preview: TIE ME KANGAROO DOWN, MATE, TIE ME KANGAROO DOWN
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Glory, Glory Tottenham Hotspur

Kibitzer's Corner
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 464 OF 801 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-12-08  hms123: <RO> Good question. Wikipedia claims there is another kind of platypus--sort of--<the term was quickly discovered to already belong to the wood-boring ambrosia beetle (genus Platypus).>

Even more important: < The name "Platypus" is often prefixed with the adjective "duck-billed" to form Duck-billed Platypus, despite there being only one species of Platypus.>

Also, according to wikipedia, <There is no universally agreed upon plural of "platypus" in the English language. Scientists generally use "platypuses" or simply "platypus". Colloquially, "platypi" is also used for the plural, although this is pseudo-Latin;[3] the Greek plural would be "platypodes". Early British settlers called it by many names, such as watermole, duckbill, and duckmole.[3]>

Or as I like to say, first you have one platypus, and then another, and then there's lots of them.

Nov-12-08  Woody Wood Pusher: Today's puzzle is good for even more Bishop interference practice.

Kiril Georgiev vs Shirov, 1992

(and before anybody asks, yes I saw it but I did not see the best continuations, and it took me just over 10 minutes. Also, I am absolutely not surprised it was found in the game.)

Nov-12-08  malthrope: Jess -

It's time to prepare yourself... :) The ultimate collection of 'Bobby Fischer' photographs! I've never seen one so complete. <grin>

Credit goes to <kamalakanta> who posted on Bobby's page (the pic of Tal & Bobby at the hospital - Curacao 1962) which gave the source and led me to this wonderful link of 'Fabrice Wantiez' page here: http://www.echecs-photos.be/BobbyFi...

One word only: massive! :^)

My Best, - Mal

PS: <Eyal> - yes that was a great combo! From the Blitz game 'Amin-Tkachiev' which would have ended in a blaze of glory with 47...g5+ and 48...Bb7!! and it's all over! :)

PPS: <achieve: HELP!! I just posted at the Carlsen page!!> Take two of these and call me in the morning! ;)

Nov-13-08  brankat: <jessica> The link to an article pertaining to FBI's shadowing Bobby during the 1960s. You may find it interesting.

http://nycitynewsservice.com/2008/1...

Nov-13-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Branko>
THANKS!!! Great article, and I'll be adding it to my treasure trove of <Fischerabiliamemorabilialiiabia>

Stupid FBI...

After all Bobby did for the USA.

They won the Cold War becasue of him!!

(don't tell <Red October> though-- I mentioned it once already, but I think I got away with it)

Nov-13-08  Woody Wood Pusher: <JFQ>

Your enthusiasm for online play is rubbing off on me.

Here is an interesting position from a recent rapid game of mine.

My plan was black square dominance, and it worked hehe


click for larger view

White to play

Not exactly difficult, but picturesque with all my pieces (except a pawn) on black squares.

Nov-13-08  Open Defence: <happy magic potion day>!!!!!
Nov-13-08  Eyal: Here's another <stinking puzzle>...


click for larger view

White to play and win.

Not sure if it's difficult at all, really (at least when presented as a puzzle etc.), but it's quite elegant.

Nov-13-08  Woody Wood Pusher: <Eyal> that is quite elegant, I agree! I would have liked it more if it wasn't right after my own sorry attempt at chess entertainment though! hehe
Nov-13-08  malthrope: Nice one <Eyal> and quite elegant! :) <Woody Wood Pusher> - I dare say that you are the Master of the dark squares! And, a few white squares too. <grin> Anyway, Jess will be here soon and she'll have fun with these two. "MuM" is always the word with me... :^) - Mal
Nov-14-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Woodarsky>

heh- you KRUSHED HIM GOOD.

I find your final move here very elegant--

Your threat is to mate on the <g7> square, which you can accomplish by

<Nf3!> Queen check and Black must resign.

He either loses his Queen or gets mated, since he cannot both move his Queen and defend the <g7> square or block the <a1-h8> diagonal.

Brilliant!!

Plus it also keeps up the theme of <DOING TWO THINGS AT ONCE> including <VACATING THE SQUARE> while attacking the Queen. By <VACATING> the Knight square, you free up your <MATE THREAT> with tempo and win.

Nov-14-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <kraba>

<Ng5!!> wins instantly- and elegantly.

Again, this move does <TWO THINGS AT ONCE>, including <VACATING THE SQUARE> to make room for the Rook to slide over to <h3> and create multiple unstoppable mate threats.

After <Ng5!!!!!!!!>

There is no way that Black can defend both the immediate mate threat on the <h7> square AND ALSO defend the ensuing mate threat on the <h8> square after the White Rook swings over to <h3>.

Viz-- Black <can> defend the <h7> square after <Ng5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!>, but any such defence cannot hold after White moves again <Rh3!!!!!!!!>.

I got this one in less than a second!!

I sure hope it's the right answer.

heh

I get to play chess again tomorrow.

Nov-14-08  achieve: <Jess> I thought I'd solved it too in less than 15 secs, but for...

... the <bloody Bishop> on the <C8-SQUARE>...

And I will try and write the emu I promised you and <Howard> now, coz the puzzle will take some more effort.

Hi <Mal>!!

Good to see you up and about, witty and sharp! :)

Nov-14-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Doh!

OK back to the drawing board <elephanto>....

BRB

Nov-14-08  malthrope: Jess & Niels -

Just happened to be here... :) In Woody's game exercise there are two moves with the knight that attack the Queen! So, include the other one as well. It's always good to see <everything> :)

In <Eyal>'s clever combo remember the word 'elegant' is used (also by me). Note also the defending LSB controls the square h3. So... Rethink this one as the actual solution is just breathtaking! <grin> :^) - Mal

Nov-14-08  malthrope: Hehehe... Posted too fast this line should have read...

<Note also the defending LSB controls the square h3 (as Niels pointed out).>

OK - that's it! ~lol~ <sheepish grin> Baaaaaaaaaaa ;)

Nov-14-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Rg3+> is the winning move.

after pawn takes Rook <forced>, then White recaptures <hxf3> and NOW Black cannot defend both the h7 and h8 mating squares.

Because the h3 square no longer exists!

The White Rook and Queen are now connected on the h-file.

If the c8 Bishop takes Night on h3, then Rxh3 and Black cannot defend both the h7 and h8 square from Mate.

If Black tries a move besides BxKnight on h3, then <Ng5> is again lethal-

So the solution is

<Rg3+>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i WANT A BUN FOR THIS ONE

Nov-14-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Ok my line is still winning--

1.Rg3+ fxg3
2.hxg3

BUT-

Stronger and clearer is the stinking DELAYED RECAPUTURE.

First,

1.Rg3+ fxg3
2.Qg6+! Kh8

AND THEN

3.hxf3

OK that's the clearest win. It's lots better than my first line because the Black Queen can't do anything to defend the King now.

If this solution is wrong I want one of you to shoot me.

Nov-14-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Heh JINX <Mal>...

In my revised line Black has no <Qf6> now...

Thanks to my <IN BETWEEN MOVE>

<2.Qg6+> and THEN the recapture

<3.hxf3>!!

Nov-14-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: malthrope: <jessicafischerqueen: <Rg3+> is the winning move. after pawn takes Rook <forced>, then White recaptures <hxf3> and NOW Black cannot defend both the h7 and h8 mating squares.>

You are beginning to understand some of the important features of this combo. However, now you need to explain what happens in this line after 1. Rg3+ fxg 2, hxg3 Qf6 does White still win elegantly? Or, is it back to the drawing board! <grin>

PS: I suspect the latter! ;)

Nov-14-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Jinx <Mal>!

I've moved your post so the <chronology> of posts fairly represents what actually happened.

I discovered the <Best line> BEFORE your last post there-- But after I posted my revised line I saw your hint. So I moved your post so it comes after the solution which I DID find on my own before your last post there.

And I read it only after I posted my REVISED WINNING LINE.

heh...

I worked too hard on this not to take credit for it.

Nov-14-08  malthrope: <jessicafischerqueen: Ok my line is still winning--

1.Rg3+ fxg3
2.hxg3

BUT-

Stronger and clearer is the stinking DELAYED RECAPUTURE.

First,

1.Rg3+ fxg3
2.Qg6+! Kh8

AND THEN

3.hxf3>

Now you need to explain how White wins (if there is a win) after 3... Qh4!

I'm a PITA or what! ~lol~

Remember the key word is <elegant> :^)

Nov-14-08  achieve: You guys are too fast for me, BUT, I'd play Qg6+ first, foll. by Rg3 etc... But now Mal rightly pointed at ...Qh4 as a resource, and back to the drawing board... ("drawing" um, board? ;)
Nov-14-08
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: After

<3...Qh4>

<4.gxh4> wins- but not instantly.

But it wins for sure-Black loses Queen for a Rook in this line and his King is still naked.

So yes there is a win in my line for sure 100 per cent.

It's a "won game" for White--

But the solution to quicker more elegant win seems to be escaping me.

Ok I'm going to look again now.

Nov-14-08  Eyal: <Jess> OK, you nailed it... note that 2.hxg3?? Qf6/e7/c7 etc. is actually losing - the king has top be drawn to the h-file first.

What strikes me as especially elegant here is the way that White gives up the "active" rook on d3, in order to deliver the final blow with the other rook on h1, which is apparently completely out of the action. Btw, when I said that I'm not sure if it's difficult it wasn't just to tease you - it's because the number of forcing moves is very limited, so the moment you realize that Qg6+ leads to no more than perpetual and Ng5 doesn't work (in fact, it loses to Bf5), besides both being too straightforward for a puzzle, there aren't many options left.

Oll vs Ulibin, 1989

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 801)
search thread:   
ARCHIVED POSTS
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 464 OF 801 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific user only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Participating Grandmasters are Not Allowed Here!

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
   
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC