|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 12 OF 120 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
Mar-11-12
 | | SwitchingQuylthulg: When you're standing on the edge of a precipice, be sure you have a tight hold of your opponent's arm :-) |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | moronovich: <SwitchingQuylthulg: The difference is that <moronovich> would sweep IM Mortensen off the board :-)> Well,well,well .. + thanks for your confidence.But the only time we met I made the blunder of playing 1.e4(I allways played 1.d4 or c4or Nf3 or g3) and duly lost but got an eternal lesson about a knightoutpost on f4.
Kasparov was(is) absolutely right about this issue. |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | moronovich: Musictip of the day : I just revisited
"Changing of the Guards" (B.Dylan) performed by Patti Smith.A very good song. |
|
| Mar-11-12 | | brankat: <moronovich> After <1.e4> how does Black Knight get to <f4>? Nf6-->Nh5-->Nf4? Or Nf6-->later Nd5(exchanged pawns on <d5>?)-->Nf4? Petrov? Ruy Lopez? Or, perhaps, the Alekhine.
Maybe G.Breyer was right about <1.e4> after which White's game is over :-) Could the solution be <1.e3>? That should take care of <f4> square :-) |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | SwitchingQuylthulg: As <Domdaniel> said, the problem with that is <1...g6> :-) |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | moronovich: <brankat> Night on f4 usually arrives from h5,g6,e6,d5 as you mentioned too.d3,h3 are also entrysquares. I actually studied 1.e3 a lot and it is much better than its reputation.Sometimes leading to known territory with white a tempo up. And is is important not to underestimate an opponent who underestimates your handling of the opening ;) I hope I got the last one right :) |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | SwitchingQuylthulg: <moronovich: <brankat> Night on f4 usually arrives from h5,g6,e6,d5 as you mentioned too.d3,h3 are also entrysquares.> Also, more rarely, e2 and g2 :) |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | moronovich: <SwitchingQuylthulg: As <Domdaniel> said, the problem with that is <1...g6> :-)> You are (unfortunately;)right.
But transposing to a reversed hedgehog or dutch a tempo up should not be bad..but black can gor for a setup with d6(in dutch reversed) and then it all may be
in vain.
But there was 2-3 years ago this benoni Moro played with e3 !? The aforementioned Miles asked me about the strongest first move and I said 1.g3 (1993) and his choice was 1.d4.
Chesswise he was a clever guy.
Brilliant may be a better word. |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | moronovich: <SwitchingQuylthulg: <moronovich: <brankat> Night on f4 usually arrives from h5,g6,e6,d5 as you mentioned too.d3,h3 are also entrysquares.>
Also, more rarely, e2 and g2 :)>
Nothing escapes your eyes ;)
But I once was in a horrible timescramble and suddenly my horse went from h5 to f2 check !
When the willpower surpasses reality:) |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | moronovich: <But there was 2-3 years ago this benoni Moro played with e3 !?> The real Moro it was.His opponent was V.Kramnik. |
|
| Mar-11-12 | | brankat: After <1.e3> one can always follow up with <d4>, <c4> etc. Essentially, more or less anything goes. Which is good. Otherwise Chess would have exhausted itself already. As Dr.Tartakower remarked: if a line (variation) is dubious, it is playable :-) |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | moronovich: <brankat: After <1.e3> one can always follow up with <d4>, <c4> etc.
Essentially, more or less anything goes. Which is good. Otherwise Chess would have exhausted itself already. As Dr.Tartakower remarked: if a line (variation) is dubious, it is playable :-)> Shure.
To my recollection:There are 9 million(!) different positions after each have made 3 moves. |
|
| Mar-11-12 | | brankat: Apparently, someone calculated that there is more possible positions (potentially) on a chessboard, than atoms in the Universe! |
|
| Mar-11-12 | | brankat: It may have been <Switch> ;-) |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | SwitchingQuylthulg: <brankat: Apparently, someone calculated that there is more possible positions (potentially) on a chessboard, than atoms in the Universe!> Not true... the number of possible games should be much higher than the number of atoms, though :) |
|
| Mar-11-12 | | brankat: So, it was <Switch>! |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | moronovich: <brankat: Apparently, someone calculated that there is more possible positions (potentially) on a chessboard, than atoms in the Universe!> I have heard the same several times.
And when <Switch> says so it must be true ;) But how do they calculate this ??? |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | SwitchingQuylthulg: If I deny something, it must be true? Surely that can't be right! ;-) |
|
| Mar-11-12 | | brankat: Just like: Yes, it's not true. Or, no, it's true. That's the way chess players think. In conclusion, when something is true, deny it :-) |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | SwitchingQuylthulg: What if I deny it on the Odd Lie page? :-) |
|
| Mar-11-12 | | brankat: No one will believe You. |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | SwitchingQuylthulg: I'm not the greatest genius in the history of mankind! |
|
Mar-11-12
 | | moronovich: No,you are not ): |
|
| Mar-11-12 | | brankat: On occasion, a denial is not necessary :-) |
|
| Mar-11-12 | | brankat: Yes, You are not :-) |
|
 |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 12 OF 120 ·
Later Kibitzing> |