chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Julian Hodgson vs Michael Adams
Hoogovens (1993), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 1, Jan-16
Trompowsky Attack: Raptor Variation (A45)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 12 times; par: 68 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 19 more Hodgson/Adams games
sac: 43.Rh8+ PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jan-01-21  morfishine: Monday on a Friday, I'll take it
Jan-01-21  Brenin: At the end, if 48 ... Ke7 then 49 Rg8, 50 Rg7+ and 51 Nxf6+ wins. If 48 ... Rb8 then 49 Rxa7+ R2b7 50 Rxb7+ Rxb7 51 Nd8+ wins the R. If 48 ... Rd7 then 49 Nh6+ Ke7 50 Ng8+ Kf7 51 Rf8 is a rather pretty mate.

Happy 43 x 47 to you all!

Jan-01-21  AlicesKnight: The break-in with 43.Rh8+ Bxh8; 44.Rxh8+ etc. was not too difficult, the conclusive win demonstration was a little more so. <Everett> is right about the N v B situation; fascinating.
Jan-01-21  awfulhangover: 43.Nh6+ my choice. Cant see what is wrong.
Jan-01-21  goodevans: <FSR> First to solve but were you still celebrating the passing of 2020 when you wrote that?

We can overlook <43...Kf7 44.Nh6+> even though <43...Kf7 44.Rh7> is quicker but <44...Kf7 45.Rf8+?> is definitely suboptimal since <44...Kf7 45.Rh7+> is mate next move.

Not your usual standard for sure.

Jan-01-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  steinitzfan: I didn't get it but it but it seems like it should have been easier than it was when you see that White starts out by winning material instead of sacrificing. I was still surprised to see Black's game cave in so quickly. Those two strongly placed knights against a passive took should have been a clue.
Jan-01-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  steinitzfan: That was "passive rook" - not "passive took."
Jan-01-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  chrisowen: Us in favor rh8+ gently axiom jewel ah goody wrong favor iv with photon beam juvenile jumpy rook i vant binary bulldog deckz its faery foots i vant band come with iv goalpost totup flung mack hobble each it wits doler favor rh8+ over?
Jan-01-21  Brenin: After the appropriately-named <awfulhangover>'s 43 Nh6+ Bxh6 44 Rxh6 Rh7 45 Rxh7 Rxh7 46 Rxh7 Kxh7 47 Ne7 White has a clear advantage, e.g. 47 ... Bxa4 48 Nc8 and 49 Nxd6, with a protected passed pawn, but he still has work to do. The line played, retaining most of White's better-placed pieces, is much more decisive.
Jan-01-21  Who is me: QUESTION why did black quit ??
A BEGINNER WANTS 2 KNOW!
Jan-01-21  King.Arthur.Brazil: Even though I found the little forced sequence 44.♖h8+ ♗xh8 45.♖x8+ ♔g7 (What else can both sides play? White must go into this and Black cannot avoid it.) However, I was a little sleepy too, that's why I suppose get more time to see the disaster to Black comming from 48...♖d7 49. ♘h6+ ♔e7 50. ♘g8+ ♔f7 51. ♖f8#. It is a unusual and beautiful check-mate net, with the ♘g8 and ♖f8. Nice game!
Jan-01-21  thegoodanarchist: At first I thought this was too easy for Friday, but then I realized my solution was wrong.
Jan-01-21  Cheapo by the Dozen: The first couple of moves were obviously advantageous. I didn't see Nf8 at all, but the the thinks the more straightforward Re6 wins big too.
Jan-01-21  Cellist: I thought both 43. Rh8+ and 43. Nh6+ win and opted for Nh6+, which is not as strong as the game line. It does also win because the B on d8 (after a pretty much forced exchange of Rs) is not able to protect most of Black's pawns.
Jan-01-21  agb2002: White has both knights for the bishop pair.

Black threatens Bxa4.

White can win some material with 43.Rh8+ Bxh8 (43... Kf7 44.R1h7 and 45.Rf8#) 44.Rxh8+ Kf7 45.Rf8+ Kg7 46.Rxe8:

A) 46... Rxb2 47.Nf8 (47.Rf8 Rf7) looks very good for White. For example, 47... Rf7 48.Ne6+ Kh7 49.Rc8 followed by Rxc4.

B) 46... Kf7 47.Rf8+ Kg7 48.Nxf6 wins decisive material (48... Rf7 49.Ne8+ Kh6 -49... Kh7 50.Rh8#- 50.Rxf7 Rxf7 51.Nxd6).

Jan-01-21  agb2002: I missed a mate in two after 44... Kf7: 45.Rh7+ Kg8 46.Nxf6(h6)#.
Jan-01-21  goodevans: <Who is me: QUESTION why did black quit ?? A BEGINNER WANTS 2 KNOW!>

No need to shout. Some of us are still a bit fragile.

Material may be roughly equal but black's K is in mortal danger whilst white's is perfectly safe.

The main threat is 49.Nh6+ Ke7 50.Ng8+ Kf7 51.Rf8#. Black has a couple of ways to avoid that but they both end up losing quite quickly:

48...Rb8 49.Rxa7+ R2b7 50.Rxb7+ Rxb7 51.Nd8+ and 52.Nxb7 is overwhelming;

48...Ke7 49.Rg8 Kd7 50.Nxf6+ Ke7 51.Ng4 followed by f6 and Rd8# (black can only delay this with 'spite checks' but can't stop it).

Jan-01-21  Diana Fernanda: playing carballo h6 also wins, white has more than one option to succeed, I think, finally, happy new year friends 64 crazy boxes.
Jan-01-21  goodevans: l forgot to mention that after 48...Ke7 49.Rg8 black has to play 49...Kd7 to avoid 50.Rg7+ Ke8 51.Nxf6#.
Jan-01-21  Brenin: <Who is me>: It's sometimes useful to check earlier postings. It's not obvious, but my first one today gave an answer to your question.
Jan-01-21  Who is me: thank you goodevans !
Jan-01-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <<Brenin> After the appropriately-named <awfulhangover>'s 43 Nh6+ Bxh6 44 Rxh6 Rh7 45 Rxh7 Rxh7 46 Rxh7 Kxh7 47 Ne7 White has a clear advantage>

You're right, although I think it was <Walter Glattke> who suggested 43.Nh6+ first. I originally also thought of 43.Rh8+ first but couldn't see a forced win. I then tried 43.Nh6+ and thought that this was much quicker after 43...Bxh6 44.Rxh6 and then if <Walter Glattke>'s 44...Bxg6 not 45.Rxg6+ but 45.fxg6 and mate in 2 will seemingly occur. But Black can still play 45...Re7 and delay the inevitable mate much longer.


click for larger view

But I overlooked your 44...Rh7 when there is no forced mate. So the given solution, 43.Rh8+ is still probably still the best.

Then, out of curiosity and because I'm a chess engine geek, I had Stockfish 12 analyze the initial position with (eventually) MPV=30. It seems that almost anything that White plays will win, at least according to Stockfish. At d=44 all the top 24 moves by White had theoretically winning evaluations; i.e. evaluations higher than [+2.00] with the lowest evaluation in Stockfish's top 24 moves being [+4.36] (!)

And even the next top 4 moves had evaluations ~ [0.00], with the 26th best move, 43.Rh6, having an evaluation of [+0.25] and the other 3 an evaluation of [0.00].. So you had to play either Stockfish's "top" 29th and 30th moves, 43.Nf4 ([-2.25]) and 23.Nh4 ([-3.17]) respectively, until Stockfish evaluated the position as theoretically winning for Black.

Perhaps it's just me but I don't consider a POTD as "Difficult" if there were 24 theoretically winning moves and 4 moves that theoretically provided even chances for both sides, at least according to Stockfish. You can almost choose a move at random and White would win, although of course some wins would be faster than others.

So I think it would be more proper to elevate this puzzle's difficulty from "Difficult" to "Insane" and label it "White to play and NOT win". ;-)

Jan-01-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <<Diana Fernanda> playing carballo h6 also wins>

Would you call that "Juantorena h6"? Because Alberto Juantorena, the Cuban 400/800 meter winner in the Montreal 1976 Olympics, was known as "El Caballo".

Jan-01-21  waustad: I rejected the correct line because I was looking for something more in the mate now realm. In a real game I might have gone for it, there is no guarantee. Truth be told, I’m a lot better at seeing a future position than I am at evaluating it.
Jan-02-21  waustad: He got to the mating net a few ply beyond what I saw.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC