chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Victor Liublinsky vs Mikhail Botvinnik
"Urra!" (game of the day Jun-08-2017)
Russia (1943), Tournament, Moscow
Spanish Game: Morphy Defense. Bayreuth Variation (C77)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 8 times; par: 84 [what's this?]

NOTE: You are using our new chess viewer, "Olga." For more info see the Olga Quickstart Guide. You can switch back to the old viewer (pgn4web) from the pulldown menu below. If you have questions or suggestions see our Olga chessforum.

explore this opening
find similar games 1,183 more games of Botvinnik
sac: 26...Bc8 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: As you play through the game, you can get the FEN code for any position by right-clicking on the board and choosing "Copy Position (EPD)". Copy and paste the FEN into a post to display a diagram.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jul-06-06  Ulhumbrus: After 9...Bd6, Black's weaknesses are on the Queen side, not on the King side. This suggests, instead of 10 Ne2, playing to attack the King side, Nd2 playing to attack the Queen side by Nc4 and Na5 or else Nb3 and Na5. 10 Be3 gets the QB out, after which Nd2 may follow.
Jul-06-06  Ulhumbrus: 52 ..d3 prevents White from offering his bishop for the e5 and d4 pawns by Bxe5. After 53...h3 the threat of Be4+ followed ...h2+ has no answer.
Jul-06-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <After 9...Bd6, Black's weaknesses are on the Queen side, not on the King side. This suggests, instead of 10 Ne2, playing to attack the King side, Nd2 playing to attack the Queen side by Nc4 and Na5 or else Nb3 and Na5. 10 Be3 gets the QB out, after which Nd2 may follow.>

Well, Black's position is quite bad at move 24, so perhaps 10. Ne2 is alright.

Jul-09-06  Ulhumbrus: <keypusher> At move 24 White seems unable to prevent the exchange sacrifice ..Rd4 removing his play against Black's doubled pawns. However it is true that Nc3 is not exact, for after 24 Qc2! Bc7 25 Rxd8+! Rxd8 26 Rd1 the exchange sacrifice is not so good with a pair of Rooks exchanged. On the other hand, Black's game may not be as bad as all that, and before the exchange ascrifice it does have its assets : The bishop pair, a f pawn that is freer to advance than White's f pawn, and a c6 pawn keeping White's N out of d5.
Jul-09-06  Ulhumbrus: 18...Nf4 may be not the best. 18...c5 creates the threat of ...c4 and 19 c4 allows ..Nd4. The justification for playing for a Queen side attack is that White has neglected Black's pawn weaknesses on the Queen side by 10 Ne2 playing for a King side attack instead of 10 Nd2 playing for a Queen side attack. If we believe Nimzovich, the penalty for this will consist of Black becoming strong on the Queen side.This suggests that Black is advised to play for a Queen side attack instead of a King side attack, and that suggests 18...c5 instead of 18..Nf4.
Dec-31-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Well, I'm sorry, 5 Bc6 just seems odd to me. Botvinnik's explanation was that after 4..Nf6 black could no longer support his e pawn with f6 which he often does in the exchange variation. Nowadays there are several lines in the exchange variation where f6 is not played so this strategy by white seems antiquated. 5..bc seems pretty passive to me; it is not even mentioned in the books I have on the Ruy Lopez. I agree that taking the exchange with the bishop is more logical; then the knight can be used to blockade at d3.
Aug-12-07  sanyas: 42.Be3 guarantees a draw, at least.
Jul-03-08  Ulhumbrus: 31 Rad1 allows ...f4. Instead of this 31 f4 devalues Black's centre.
Jul-03-08  Ulhumbrus: 53...h3 threatens 54..Be4+ 55 Kg1 h2+ 56 Kf1 h2-h1(Q) mate as well as 54...h2 followed by 55...Be4 mate. White appears to have no satisfactory answer to either threat.
Jun-02-09  marknierras: Amazing move 25... Rd4; This sacrifice was intended to create a positional advantage. Space advantage was created due to this and a strong pawn formation was created and eventually penetrated through the kingside! Enjoy the moves from # 25! Classic instructional game!
Jun-02-09  marknierras: Nice instructional ending as well! You can see that the rook limits the movement of the king to the 2nd rank and the bishop is in the same color diagonal as the queening square!
Aug-11-09  Dredge Rivers: Nice to see they had nothing better to do with the Germans invading their country!
Jun-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: In White's shoes, would have captured the Rook with the Bishop and blockaded with the Knight at d3. Perhaps not objectively better, but Knights are built to stop pawns, esp. with the pawns at c4 and e4 preventing attacks on the horse. Just more my style, perhaps.
Jun-08-17  Amarande: <dbquintillion> It's more about the eventual fate of the Black pawn at e5. In most lines with Bxc6 White will play d4 eventually. Often Black can avoid the exchange of the e-pawn by answering d4 with f6, reinforcing the center and generally producing a rather solid formation (it is difficult for White to capitalize on the weakening effects of ... f6 as he cannot place a Knight on g5, and no longer has his LSB).

If White plays first 4 Ba4, however, Black's best move is generally accepted to be 4 ... Nf6; at this point, White is much more in a position to force Black to exchange the e-pawn after Bxc6 (which is usually played either on move 5 as in this game, or after first 5 O-O Be7 i.e. the Doubly Deferred Exchange) and a later d4, as f6 is no longer readily feasible. Attempting to do so would require Black to not only cede time but severely cramp his pieces; this is likely to result in early grief.

For example, 4 Ba4 Nf6 5 O-O Be7 6 Bxc6+ dxc6 7 Nc3 (as is common in the Lopez, once White has covered e4 Black must actually cover e5 for real) Nd7?! (this doesn't actually serve the function, he might as well play Bd6 with a fine diagonal for the DSB after the expected 8 d4 exd4) 8 d4 f6? (an illusion - he should still play exd4) 9 dxe5 fxe5 10 Be3 O-O 11 Qd3, and Black is about as trussed up as trussed can be: developing the LSB is virtually impossible, as the Knight cannot move now without losing the e-pawn, nor can it move later as White's next logical developing move is 12 Rad1 after which it will be pinned against d8, nor can Black move the b-pawn as the unguarded c-pawn would then be lost after Qc4+. Nor can Black easily untangle himself to free the Knight from guarding d5 (a quick fatality results from 11 ... Re8 12 Rad1 Bf8?? 13 Ng5). His cause is virtually lost. I'd say it was worth the tempo on move four, wouldn't you?

Jun-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: I would've played <47.Bxa5> opening the line to <d2> & <e1>. Black's c-pawn isn't going anywhere
Jun-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Breunor: I don't get why white played 43 Be3? This allowed Qxf3 which seemed to allow a critical breakthrough. Why not just 43 Be1? If black can't force a breakthrough he can keep moving the bishop back and forth.
Jun-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <Breunor: I don't get why white played 43 Be3? This allowed Qxf3 which seemed to allow a critical breakthrough. Why not just 43 Be1? If black can't force a breakthrough he can keep moving the bishop back and forth.>

43.Be1 allows ...g4. If 44.fxg4 Bxg4 and 45.Rxg4 is forced. 45....Qxg4 46.Qxg4 Rxg4 and e4 falls next.

Jun-08-17  Strelets: A timely pun.
Jun-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Breunor: Thanks Keypusher.
Jun-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: The 2 puns decide this one!
Jun-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: I don't get the pun. Could somebody elaborate on it for me?
Jun-08-17  Strelets: <eternaloptimist> It's a Russian interjection used to express enthusiasm about something or as a battle cry. This game was played during World War II.
Jun-08-17  Howard: Given that this is the only game from 1943 that White played--according to the Chessgames website--this raises the palpable question....what was the occasion for this game?

Was it, by some chance, just a casual game a la Fischer-Fine, 1963?

Jun-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: <Strelets> Thank you very much for the explanation! That makes sense that it's a Russian interjection since the game was played between 2 Russians in Russia (Soviet Union).
Jun-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChessHigherCat: It's the Russian equivalent of "Hurrah!", so I'm surprised they don't say "Gurrah!" (they usually change English H to G). There was a guy in one of my Russian classes who had the misfortune of being named Hank, so everybody called him Gonk!
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Moscow Championship 1943
from Favorite Games from (1917-1943) by wanabe2000
Botvinnik's best games
by HOTDOG
Positional Sacrifices
from Positional Chess Handbook II by monopole2313
GOOD STILL TODAY Compiled by Imohthep
by fredthebear
good Russian chess during WW2
from champs vs champs by kevin86
Nodreads' favorite games
by Nodreads
Game 82
from Selected Games (Botvinnik) by Qindarka
Botvinnik "100 Selected Games"
by uglybird
Chapter 4: The Exchange
from The Middlegame by Max Euwe by eternalloss
June 8: Urra!
from Game of the Day 2017 by Phony Benoni
World Champions
by clifton
Rd4! Russian Exchange
from andrzejkrzywda's favorite games by andrzejkrzywda
The Exchange Sacrifice
by Benzol
how are these games to be played? - only see comments
from ChessDiva's favorite games by ChessDiva
BOTVINNIK'S BEST GAMES: VOL 2,1943-1956
by Malacha
simonepierini's study games
by simonepierini
Game 45
from Half a Century of Chess (Botvinnik) by Qindarka
Think Like A Grandmaster
by StuporMoundi
The chessschool
from A history of chess by lostemperor
Exchange sacs - 1
by obrit
plus 16 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC