chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Gyula Breyer vs Siegbert Tarrasch
"So Good, It Must be Breyer's" (game of the day Dec-29-2015)
Mannheim (1914), Mannheim GER, rd 7, Jul-28
Spanish Game: Open Variations. Classical Defense (C83)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 3 more Breyer/Tarrasch games
sac: 21.Rxe7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can learn a lot about this site (and chess in general) by reading the Chessgames Help Page. If you need help with premium features, please see the Premium Membership Help Page.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-06-03  refutor: a fabulous performance by breyer...my favorite move was Nd4 inducing ...c5. very nice finish as well...this definitely wasn't tarrasch at his best...kinda ironic to see 1.e4 from the man who said "after 1.e4, white's game is in it's last throes" ;)
Feb-06-03  drukenknight: wouldn't 26 Bg4 be better?
Feb-06-03  refutor: it's hard to say...i like 26.Re1 because it gets his last piece developed and takes control of the only open file
Feb-06-03  drukenknight: Bg4 sets up a discovered attack via the check on h6, where does black put his Rook?
Feb-06-03  refutor: 26.Bg4 Rdd8 maybe
Feb-06-03  drukenknight: after 27 Nh6+ I think it looks ugly.
Oct-05-06  ToTheDeath: Interesting that both of Breyer the hypermodernist's wins against the great classical player Tarrasch are with the same move he derided as an error (1. e4).

Do as I say, not as I do, eh?

Jul-01-15  Kramsalov: It depends when Breyer Said that.. Manheim 1914 is early tournement for him. I think that Tarrasch simpy did not see 23.Qh3 and no possibility to take a bishop. Otherwise he would never play c6-c5-c4 which totally destroy position. 20.Qg4 then Qg6, Kh8, Rg8 looks not bad for black.
Jul-01-15  cunctatorg: Yeah, Gyula (Julius) Breyer conducted a real masterpiece starting with 1. P-K4 and I wonder if that very game is his very best; however he did play the Ruy Lopez and furthermore the main line, he didn't capture the Nc6 ... which proves that he was a theorist but not a dogmatic one. Aron Nimzowitsch was playing 1. P-k4 on (at) several occasions but, alas, he did play a lot of (2. N-KB3) 3. N-QB3 also games also... which proves that he was also an ardent, dedicated and even borderline researcher...
Dec-29-15  Sularus: Breyer showed Tarrasch a thing or two on how to use the knight. :)
Dec-29-15  indomega: Rxe8 Qxe8 mate. I get it
Dec-29-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: White forces a quick back rank mate.
Dec-29-15  Angsthyrkh: What am I missing on 18 ...gxf6? I can't seem to find what's wrong with 18 ...rxf6.
Dec-29-15  dusk: <Angst> how about 19. Bxd5+
Dec-29-15  Angsthyrkh: I see. I missed that with a continuation of 19. Bxd5+ nxd5 20. Qxd5+ black loses a rook.
Dec-30-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: 27...Bg7 was a grave mistake. 27...b4 28.Qxf6 bxc3 29.bxc3 Bg7 30.Nxg7 Rxg7 keeps the play near equality.
Jul-08-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  PawnSac: < indomega: Rxe8 Qxe8 mate. I get it

kevin86: White forces a quick back rank mate. >

No. After 41.Re8+ Rxe8 42.Qxe8+ (winning a piece) Bf8 43. Qxf8+ (forcing the queen trade) Qg8 44.Qxg8+ Kxg8 45.Bc8 (creating a passed pawn) a5 46.Ba6 b4 47.Bxc4+ Kf8 48.cxb4 axb4 49.a4 game over

Jul-08-16  rainingpieces: <PawnSac> nitpicking, but 44.Qxh6+ wins faster in your given line
Jul-08-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <rainingpieces: <PawnSac> nitpicking, but 44.Qxh6+ wins faster in your given line>

It cannot possibly be that <PawnSac> erred; his every thought, deed and post define perfection and woe be unto the incautious poster who suggests that he is capable of the slightest mistake, for they shall be cast into the outer darkness and deemed unworthy of existence in his universe.

As for me: any day I will take a human being who is capable of making a mistake and owning up over the likes of someone who comes it over and simply says 'you are wrong', when the evidence clearly contradicts him. No reasoning with such a poster, which is why I sent him away a time ago; I've less than no time for such flotsam and jetsam.

Jul-08-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Well the lad is correct.

Here:


click for larger view

44.Qxh6+ mates next move. But Pawn Sac is not wrong. His line also wins...eventually.

There is a trick hidden in here, far too outrageous for Tarrasch to attempt, but me...I've no shame.

Due to White's weak back rank Black's best chance is not to play 41...Re8 but 41...Bf8.


click for larger view

42 Qxg5 Rxe8.


click for larger view

White now has to play 43.Qd2 or 43.Qc1 if White plays the hasty check 43.Qf6+ saving the attacked Queen and intending luft then after 43...Bg7.


click for larger view

White discovers he has to give up the Queen with 44.Qe6.

White still has all the winning chances due to the extra pawns but if they fell for 43.Qf6+ then you never know.

Aug-05-16  rainingpieces: <perfidious> If I understood you correctly, I did wrong by pointing out a neat mate? I thought it looked nice.
Aug-05-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <rainingpieces> Not at all; my comment was directed towards <PawnSac>, who believes every word emanating from him is holy writ and was presumptuous to lecture me on something when he was wrong, then start with insults when proved incorrect.
Aug-06-16  rainingpieces: <perfidious> Ah okay. I got a bit confused because I did not know the story.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Junge and Breyer: Great Talents Cut Short
by Runemaster
12/29
from Games of the day for 2015. by truepacifism
98_C80-C83_Ruy Lopez, Open
by webbing1947
Game 74
from Guinness Book - Chess Grandmasters (Hartston) by Qindarka
Las Mil y Una Partidas (1001 Chess Games)
by K9Empress
40
from Winning With the Hypermodern (Keene, Schiller) by Chessdreamer
G74:The Guinness Book of Chess Grandmasters by William Hartston
from -ER Others by fredthebear
G40: Winning w/the Hypermodern by Raymond Keene & Eric Schiller
from g-pawn/file demolition after Fredthebear's ECO B by fredthebear
Mannheim 1914 - the unfinished tournament
by sneaky pete
Great games that seem to be virtually unknown
by backrank
ESTRATEGIAS DE KOBLENTS
by LESTRADAR
December 29: So Good, It Must be Breyer's
from Game of the Day 2015 by Phony Benoni
Game 74
from Guinness Book - Chess Grandmasters (Hartston) by maple227
Instructive
by webbing1947
98_C80-C83_Ruy Lopez, Open
by whiteshark
sapientdust's favorite games
by sapientdust


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC