Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

register now - it's free!
Robert James Fischer vs Mark Taimanov
"Fischer Scientific" (game of the day Feb-12-07)
Fischer - Taimanov Candidates Match (1971)  ·  Sicilian Defense: Paulsen. Bastrikov Variation (B47)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 134 times; par: 128 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more Fischer/Taimanov games
sac: 62.Bxg6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Premium members can suggest a game for Guess-the-Move with the Guess-the-Move Suggestion Queue.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8 OF 8 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-22-10  birthtimes: This looks like it was the first time Fischer played against the 8...Nxd4 line, as previously he had only played one game in 1970 against 8...d6 and one game in 1962 against 8...Be7. Taimanov, on the other hand, had played 8...Nxd4 twice in 1961, winning one and drawing one...
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: My annotations of this game.

Apr-26-11  SimonWebbsTiger: AJ says:

"I worked many, many, many hours on that web page. (I also used chess engines and consulted a variety of books in my library.) "

I don't doubt it. Were is the original, analytical work, though? I see none. Because there is none, I don't see why AJ would use the possessive pronoun...."My annotations". Oh, please. An amalgam of written commentary and analysis by others, perhaps; is it a bad thing, not really since it is interesting to see how others looked at the game and compare. But to say they are one's annoatations?

Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <SimonWebbsTiger> Let me give another of <AJ>'s faulty statements.

On the following page:

Fischer vs Geller, 1967

<AJ> made the pronouncement that he had examined Fischer's Qf4!! and claimed that after days and days of analyzing he had found no forced win.

I followed his link, and lo and behold, there was no, I repeat, NO analysis given at all to back up his pronouncement.

Not a single line of analysis, just that he had consulted his computers and decided there was no forced win.

I am certainly glad this man has not produced any books.

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <TheFocus: Fischer vs Geller, 1967

<AJ> made the pronouncement that he had examined Fischer's Qf4!! and claimed that after days and days of analyzing he had found no forced win.

I followed his link, and lo and behold, there was no, I repeat, NO analysis given at all to back up his pronouncement.>

That we mortals even have the right to read his pearls of wisdom from on high is truly remarkable. We should be properly grateful for this.

<Not a single line of analysis, just that he had consulted his computers and decided there was no forced win.>

The paranoiac maunders on in his fantasy world, with an attitude acceptable in a six year-old: 'If I wish it, it must be so'.

What I find hard to comprehend, in all of us here, is that we don't accept these fruits of genius, instead questioning them, along with Our Boy's motives, at every turn. I suppose it's what would be known as 'progress'.

Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <He also went on to note that it had been several years since I had cranked out web pages on a regular basis ... he urged me to go back to that (positive) pursuit.>

More drek on the way. We have been warned.

Vanity - thy name is <AJ>!!

Apr-30-11  kamalakanta: I have to conclude that those who are mercilessly criticizing AJ are full of it; I have examined his site and find the annotations both instructive and refreshing.

AJ is doing good work.

Credit where credit is due.

Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: <Apr-30-11 kamalakanta:>

Thanks! Read the header for my forum ... and you'll get more links!!!

(Just posted a new game collection - you might like it - I stayed up all night creating it.)

Jun-28-11  thejack: Fischer at his endgame best, of course.

Still, to this day I find it rather ridiculous to claim him to be "the greatest endgame player ever"!

I rather tend to agree with Reshevsky (and others!) who stated this part of the game was his "relative weakness".

There is ample proof of it, even in MSMG:
Consider his draws against Botvinnik and Keres for example, both from 1962.

In both games Fischer obtained a winning position but subsequently drew the game.. the conclusion obviously being that both Keres and Botvinnik were able to look deeper into this kind of endgame positions!

Another case in point is the 2nd game from the Taimanov Match, where he again obtained a won game but mishandled it with 50.c5?, allowing Taimanov an easy draw.. which as we all know the guy blundered away on move 81.

And I believe Fischers relative endgame weakness also made itself felt in the 1992 return match:

If I remember correctly it was game 19 where he again completely misplayed an easily won endgame.

I suppose players like Alekhine and Capablanca would not have mishandled a position like this even if they hadnīt played any chess for 30 (even more) years..

Jun-28-11  fab4: Hey come on ! The 'draw' against old Bovinnik was played against the entire Soviet pantheon lol.. I just love adjournments.

And please don't the 92' match. The Fischer who indeed is considered the 'greatest' left the chess world in 1972.

Kotov amongst others remarked in 62' after Stockholm how accurate and capa like was Bobby's endgame .. at only 21. I think Fischer's endgame play by 1970 was approaching perfection.

Jun-28-11  thejack: Yes..of course youīre right about the ī92 match.

I was just wondering if one might be able to see some general tendencies in oneīs play..even if it has (indeed!) deteriorated over the years..

And by no means did I imply that Fischers endgame play was "weak".. even Reshevsky on calling it "his relative weakness" hastened to add it was "strong enough"!

And I too like many of Fischers endgames..especially the one which impressed Kotov so much, by the way (vs. Barcza in Stockholm 1962).

Still I donīt consider him to be quite as strong in this area as players like Botvinnik, Karpov, Capablanca, Alekhine, Lasker.

Just my two cents, however.

Premium Chessgames Member
  scormus: Appropriate pun, a coumputer-like logic in the Fischer's endgame play. As cold and unbendable as steel

After the Qs went off, nearly 50 moves of misery for B. He was probably glad to resign, I would have been.

Jun-28-11  fab4: <thejack>

And a most welcome two cents too !

There's a fantastic rook endgame re Smyslov and the young Fischer.. from 59' candidates i think , but don't quote me on that. Anyway, it's worth checking out !

Premium Chessgames Member
  Garech: I think this is my favourite endgame of all time; absolutely clinical by Fischer and a pleasure to watch.



Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ:
Sep-20-12  Soinne: Look at the "Be8" moves at move 46, 49 and 61. What an immense progress has been made. Fischer, you were above human...
Sep-22-12  Tigranny: Probably my favorite Fischer game other than his Game 6 win against Spassky.
Sep-22-12  SChesshevsky: This was an excellent game by Fischer.

I would have thought that Taimanov would've been ready for g3 & Bf4 attacking the Qc7 given Fischer vs Tal, 1961

Also Fischer's endgame skill was probably a lot better than believed. While most likely not better than Karpov technically Fischer was maybe the best at seeing a small advantage and exploiting it for the win. This game and Fischer vs Tal, 1962 are good examples I think.

Premium Chessgames Member
  hoodrobin: As usual, awful bishop and ending experience.
Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: GAME OVER 1-0
You scored a total of 139 points
(par is 127 points)
I'm happy w/ how I did!
Jul-18-14  solskytz: 152 points, for what it's worth...
Jul-19-14  e4 resigns: I scored 126. So close!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Marmot PFL: Got 144 I think (score got removed). Lost several points late by not finding the best finishing moves, a problem I have in online games as well recently.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ke2: great instructive endgame
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ke2: also the sac takes a while for the engine to appreciate
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 8)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 8 OF 8 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Now on DVD
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Vancouver m 1971 Rd.4
from Fischer vs The Russians by wanabe2000
Game 124
from 150 Chess Endings by suenteus po 147
Reasses Your Chess; pg 325
from Silmans Reassess Book by howardb86
Incredible B vs. N ending.
from Robert James Fischer by Hootey
Too easy Bobby
from M.D. Wilson's favorite games by M.D. Wilson
Game 97
from Russians versus Fischer by Anatoly21
from endings by gmlisowitz
from lazintata's_semi_open-french&sicilian by lazintata
Move 43 on, Fischer ' Educational Endgame Masterwork of B v. N
from Educational Endgames by Alpinemaster
C6 "The typical 'good' bishop" F
from "Learn from the Legends" - Mihail Marin by Karpova
Fischer - Taimanov 1971
by egilarne
Lesson on Bishop vs Knight ending (2)
from ENDING PRINCIPLES by marknierras
Candidates quarterfinals Game #4
from Road to the Championship - Bobby Fischer by Fischer of Men
The fischer ending
from Greatest endgames ever by timothee3331
dondiegodelavega's favorite games
by dondiegodelavega
Mikhail Shereshevsky's Endgame Strategy
by Inlandmoon
B vs N
from Toliman's favorite games by Toliman
from Faves-Bobby Fischer by c95s011
The greatest master of minor pieces ending!
from endgame madness by tacticalmonster
February 12: Fischer Scientific
from Game of the Day 2007 by Phony Benoni
plus 82 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies