chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing


register now - it's free!
Robert James Fischer vs Boris Spassky
"Best by Protest" (game of the day Feb-20-07)
Fischer - Spassky World Championship Match (1972)  ·  Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense. Exchange Variation (D59)  ·  1-0
To move:
Last move:

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 109 times; par: 61 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 55 more Fischer/Spassky games
sac: 38.Rxf6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have photographs. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with the default chess viewer, please see the Pgn4web Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 24 OF 24 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-22-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Zhbugnoimt: I said Petrosian?! Holy moly I was off.
Aug-23-14  coldsweat: In playing through this game, the most impressive thing was the inexorable advancement of white's e pawn. Much has been made of 20.e4, but as I played through, 22.e5 and 31.e6 were equally thrilling.

This feature, combined with the already-mentioned seeming simplicity on the surface, underneath which were layers of raging complexity, plus the shifting focus of white's attacks, make this game what has become in chess history.

A few notes -- I have no problem with Boris wanting to play tennis as the match drew near. In one of the interview links given earlier in this kibitz, he was talking about his heart rate going up to around 160 during tough match conditions. While his advisors' focus was on analysis, Spassky's was on staying alive!

I also enjoyed the comment given by Karpov that Spassky told his handlers, when taking off to play tennis, that he would figure out the rest "over the board".

It's refreshing to see not such an emphasis on memorization in a Soviet player. I have a gut feeling, does anyone agree, that Both Spassky and Fischer would have been better Chess960 players that Kasparov, because so much of Garry's enormous intelligence had to do with his ability to memorize.

And finally, in response to DrMal, I would just say that Bobby was indeed, and remains, an American super-hero. He's the kid next door who shot into outer space through his own talent and tenacity. He's the individual beating the omnipotent bureaucracy. He's the fool who tries to do the impossible, and succeeds. And it seems an objective thing to say that his 6-0 / 6-0 against Taimanov and Larsen may never be equaled.

Sep-12-14  SpiritedReposte: This is the pun for the 2nd game of the match <Chessgames.com>
Sep-19-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: <Both Spassky and Fischer would have been better Chess960 players that Kasparov, because so much of Garry's enormous intelligence had to do with his ability to memorize.>

Garry was the top player in the world for 20 years. I'd say that this is a good description of late-period Garry, but not early. Kasparov in the late 1980s was without a doubt the best tactical/middlegame player in the world. I'm sure others have studied this more than I, but to me he was on the same level at least as prime Fischer/Spassky.

Sep-19-14  Petrosianic: Yeah, but Fischer himself was one of the most booked players of his day, which accounted for a lot (although not all) of his edge.
Sep-19-14  RookFile: Fischer was also the best middlegame and endgame player in the world.
Sep-19-14  Petrosianic: And the most advanced political thinker, I know. But I wasn't trying to gush about him, I was making the serious point that eliminating book knowledge wouldn't help him as much as it would help many p layers. (Particularly someone like, say Reshevsky, who had so little of it to lose). If you want gushing, harrylime does it better.
Sep-19-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  SteinitzLives: GM Dzhindzhihaschvilli (sp?) in a lecture about two years ago claimed to have played Fischer in some secret speed chess games in the early-mid 1980s one night.

His opinion is that until the late 70's Fischer was probably unbeatable in a match, (despite not playing any real tournament chess since 1972).

He also opined, that by the early-mid 80's when Dzhinzhi claims to have defeated Fischer in about half of the speed games they played, Fischer could have been beaten by more than just Karpov or Kasparov in a match by then.

Dzhindzhi claimed that Fischer seemed really shocked and somewhat angered by his speed chess score with him.

An interesting tidbit, sadly impossible to prove or disprove.

Sep-21-14  SpiritedReposte: Lol "the most advanced political thinker"?
Sep-22-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <SteinitzLives: GM Dzhindzhihaschvilli (sp?) in a lecture about two years ago claimed to have played Fischer in some secret speed chess games in the early-mid 1980s one night. His opinion is that until the late 70's Fischer was probably unbeatable in a match, (despite not playing any real tournament chess since 1972).

He also opined, that by the early-mid 80's when Dzhinzhi claims to have defeated Fischer in about half of the speed games they played, Fischer could have been beaten by more than just Karpov or Kasparov in a match by then.

Dzhindzhi claimed that Fischer seemed really shocked and somewhat angered by his speed chess score with him.

An interesting tidbit, sadly impossible to prove or disprove.>

That's very interesting. Fischer probably thought it was possible to keep one's chess talent preserved in a little glass case.

When he came out of retirement for that yawnfest versus whatsisname in 1992 it was only so as to play the most passť and tedious chess imaginable.

Sep-22-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <RookFile: Fischer was also the best middlegame and endgame player in the world.>

Isaac Kashdan (a very strong player) had some serious criticism of Fischer.

He said,

<"In Fischer's hands, a slight theoretical advantage is as good as being a queen ahead.">

He meant that in many games Fischer was unable to beat weaker players <even though Fischer was the equivalent of being a queen ahead.> That's a major criticism.

Sep-22-14  SpiritedReposte: Actually, he meant Fischer was so good if he got a slight edge he would win. And win he did.
Sep-22-14  SpiritedReposte: "What's his name" is Boris Spassky. A former world champion maybe you've heard of him?

Hardly the best player in 1992, but he deserves more respect than that.

Sep-22-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi Spirit.

Obviously a 'joke'. You say Fischer and Spassky automatically follows. It's like Lennon & McCartney, Morcambe & Wise, Tal & Brilliancy.

He is also fully entitled to opinion that the 1992 between whats-his-name and Spassky was a yawn fest. I was just glad that they both got some good money out of it in return for '72 match and of course chess was back in the headlines.

And (IMHO) there was some good chess played. There is that game...

Fischer vs Spassky, 1992

...which just dipped out by a few votes for being the best game of Infomator Vol 55 (it came second.....political voting? Who knows?).

Sep-22-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: And of course I forgot all about what I was originally going to post.

I was one of those - and there must have been 100's who had this position on their boards when looking at the game from a newspaper.


click for larger view

5.Bg5 (EH!)

Because I/we were automatically playing or mis-reading 1.c4 as 1.e4.

What happened to 1.e4 'Best by Test'. (did it need a rest).

Sep-22-14  Petrosianic: <What happened to 1.e4 'Best by Test'.>

It was a meaningless comment. It makes no sense to say that one move tested better than others, when you've only tested the one. "Best by Test" was another "ad homonym" argument (a fallacy name that I coined the other day, not to be confused with ad hominem, in which one argues that a statement must be true because it rhymes).

Sep-23-14  SpiritedReposte: <Sally> I realize people can think whatever they want, and I can see why people dislike Fischer, but relegating Boris freaking Spassky to "what's his name" is absurd!

Maybe the sarcasm was a bit strong for me to see through text.

Sep-23-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <SpiritedReposte: Actually, he meant Fischer was so good if he got a slight edge he would win. And win he did.>

According to Kashdan in Fischer vs E Peinado, 1970, against an amateur, Fischer is rather more than a whole queen ahead. Yet he only draws!

Drawing while a whole queen ahead is not the sign of a good player.

Sep-23-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: I should add that I think Fischer was an all-time great. I don't agree with Kashdan's criticism.
Sep-23-14  Petrosianic: Yes, but it looks like Kashdan didn't say that, you did.

In your first paragraph, you report a factual statement (Kashdan says that Fischer didn't win the game, though a queen ahead). In your second statement, you paraphrase the factual statement to mean "Fischer is not a good player". Kashdan would not have said that, least of all over a simul game (!). It looks like your paraphrase is inaccurate.

Furthermore, are you sure you have the right game? Fischer is a couple of pawns ahead, but never a whole queen.

Sep-23-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Kashdan said that for Fischer a <slight advantage> was as good so being a queen ahead. It is so annoying to have to repeat that. Has reading comprehension gone so far down?

Fischer had much more than a slight advantage. So by Kashdan's logic Fischer was more than a queen ahead. But he only drew.

Sep-23-14  Petrosianic: You didn't have to repeat it, as that wasn't the question I asked. I'm not trying to embarrass you here, but them's the facts.

Reading comprehension is important, but being able to write coherently is important too. Referring to Kashdan's comment as a "criticism" is where you muddied the waters. Perhaps you should have said "critique".

Sep-25-14  SpiritedReposte: I believe Serwain said Kasparov was like a "1000 eyed monster who can see everything at the chessboard" or something to that effect.

But there was that game that one time Kasparov lost (Gasp!) So even though he had 1000 eyes he couldn't win. He should win every game with 1000 eyes. What a criticism from Seirwan!

Sep-25-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: "Best by test" was perhaps worked out by Fischer in his head, by analyzing a few thousand games. I'd say he did his homework.
Sep-25-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: black seems to be strategically lost by move 30, his pieces are all tied down.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 24)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 24 OF 24 ·  Later Kibitzing>

from the Chessgames Store
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
TheOutsider's favorite games/BEST KEPT SECRETS
by TheOutsider
Rated 14
from 150 Best Chess Games billkimbro collection by billkimbro
Good games ought to know
by EvgeniyZh
World Championship Match QGD Tartakower Def. Exchange Var.
from RPaterno1's favorite games Champions' "Notables" by RPaterno1
Fischer all the way
from Chess Pearls By Shailesh J.Nanal by shaileshnanal
An Opening Repertoire for Black -- Marovic/Parma
by keypusher
21 Classic Games
by stravinsky
Bobby Fischer wins !
from One has to have at least two plans .... by arielbekarov
Volume 14 - 3rd Place - 31 pts.
from Chess Informant: 640 Best Games - Part 2 by TheAlchemist
#2-Reykjavik (game6) Queen's Gambit Declined, Tartako(64/356)
from World's Greatest Chess Games by DanBoyle
An instructive game!
from gulliver's favorite games by gulliver
Game #6
from Fischer-Spassky '72 by GPawn
barb's favorite games 2
by barb
Reykjavik (m/6): Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defence
from World Championship Matches by atropos
Elegant.
from spasskey69's favorite games by spasskey69
World Championship Winner
from SJP's Top Ten by SJP
put the kat out
by adhitthana
amazing games from amazing players
by MIFoguelman
Digest Games
by npchess
Spassky repite el mov de la dama 3 veces!!
from Fischer Games by titoramia
plus 233 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies