chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Svetozar Gligoric vs Robert James Fischer
Leipzig ol (Men) fin-A (1960), Leipzig GDR, rd 4, Oct-31
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Ragozin Defense (E46)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 18 more Gligoric/Fischer games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-17-04  drukenknight: November/Nimzoindian month. Wow! In the old days, Bobby was really bad at these. 24...a5 would have been really interesting; it was insane to open up the game with the R stuck like that, 26...Qh4 seems best right there.

It's all hideous: 29...Qxe3+ "Hello, Bobby. Anybody in there?"

Look up the Petrosian game for more of this. He is definitely raw the way he refuses to exchange the B in both games.

Nov-19-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <drukenknight>:
I think we have to go back a bit farther to find improvements for Black. For example, instead of 13...♗d6? he might try 13...♘b4 14. ♗b1 c5 .

<24...a5 would have been really interesting>

25. ♗b2 ♖f8 26. ♖dc1 looks like a powerful threat, which is probably why Black tries the desperate counterattack with 24...♘f7 and 25...♖g6 .

<it was insane to open up the game with the R stuck like that, 26...Qh4 seems best right there.>

Then White might play 27. ♖c7 ♖b8 28. ♗d4 ♗a8 29. ♔h1 . Black's counterplay still fizzles out after 29...♖g3 30. ♕xa6 or 29...♕g3 30. ♖d2 .

<It's all hideous: 29...Qxe3+ "Hello, Bobby. Anybody in there?">

Bobby probably saw something like 29...♕xe3+ 30. ♔h2 ♖xf5 31. ♕xg6 ♖f7 32. ♖f1 ♖e7 33. ♖cf4 ♘h7 34. ♖f7 . What did you see?

Nov-19-04  maoam: <beatgiant>

29...Qxe3 30.Kh1 winning the exchange would be an improvement over 29...Qxe3 30.Kh2 when 30...Nf3! 31.Qxf3 (31.Kh1? Qe2 32.Qxf3 Qxc4) 32.gxf3 Rxf5 leaves White with the choice of losing either the pawn on f3 or the pawn on d5.

Nov-19-04  drukenknight: 29...Qxe3+ was bestI could come up with for a last chance effort, I dont know if it saves the game but it seemed worthy enuf to make comment, the last several moves seemed like Bobby had lost the thread there are probably other moves later but it looks bad.

24...a5 produced a different line w/ chesslab computer, which starts with 25 b5 or something, I think it should hold.

I'll get back to you (have a new PC to deal with) all. It will be interesting to see if the Qxe3 line can hold...

Nov-20-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <maoam>
Sorry I missed your 30...♘f3!} ♗ut simply 29...♕xe3+ 30. ♔h1 ♖xf5 31. ♕xg6 ♖f7 32. ♖dc1 ♕e8 and only now 33. ♔h2! , it's hard to prevent White from breaking through with ♖f1 or ♖c7 . I really doubt Black can last very long.

<drukenknight>
24...a5 threatens ...♗a6 , which explains why your computer plays 25. b5 . I'd be interested in seeing the saving line you discovered with your computer.

Another attempted improvement is 25...♘e5 . If White replies 26. ♗xe5 ♕xe5 27. ♖c7 ♖f7 28. ♖xf7 ♔xf7 29. ♖c1 ♗xd5 I don't see an immediate win for White, and Black has a pawn for his troubles.

Mar-16-05  InspiredByMorphy: <beatgiant> <13. ... Nb4 14. Bb1 c5> is an improvement. White can continue with 15. a3 cxd4 16. Nxd4 Nbd5 17. e4 with an almost equal position. I say almost because of whites isolated pawns, and more mobility from the black pieces.
Mar-16-05  InspiredByMorphy: <beatgiant> An improvement for white would have been 13.a3
Jul-07-09  parisattack: In I Play Against Pieces Gligoric annotates this game, #64.

After 9 ...Bd6 he gives 9. ...a6 as better, then 10. h3! After 25. ...Rg6(?) Gligoric suggests 25. ...Ne5 with equal chances.

11. ...b5 was Fischer's improvement on his game earlier in the year against Taimanov where he played 11. ... Bd6. Gligo rarely avoided a prepared line. If he liked a variation he put his trust into it until proven otherwise.

Gligoric was 4-6-6 against Fischer and notes that he played him mostly when Fischer was quite young. He says the only time he outplayed Fischer in the opening was Monte Carlo 1967 - and he lost.

Feb-27-12  drukenknight: Hello BG: with the help of chesslab pc we attempt to continue our save with 29...Qxe3+ and come up with this crazy line:

30. Kh1 Rxf5
31. Qxg6 Rf7
32. Rdc1 Qe8
33. Qxd6 Qe2
34. Bd4 Nxh3
35. Qg6 Nf2+
36. Bxf2 Qxf2
37. Re4 Re7
38. Kh2 Rxe4
39. Qxe4 Qf7
40. Rc5 Qh5+
41. Kg3

OK? So at least we meet the time control and Fischer needs to seal his move...

Mar-15-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: The setup with 6..Nc6 (the Taimanov variation) was used by Fischer several times early in his career. Gligoric considered 25..Rg6? to be the losing move; better was 24..Ne5 with equality. Fischer may have overlooked 32 Re4! counting on 32 Qe6+..Qxe6 37 dxe..Nf2 38 Rg1..Ng4+ with a likely draw.

This variation is interesting leading to sharp, double-edged positions but is rarely played nowadays.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Game 124
from Svetozar Gligoric Collected Games (Leach) by Chessdreamer
Game 64
from I Play Against Pieces (Gligoric) by Qindarka
64 - Nimzo-Indian Defence
from I Play Against Pieces by jakaiden
Book of Samurai's favorite games
by Book of Samurai
64 - Nimzo-Indian Defence
from I Play Against Pieces by nakul1964
Schachmeisterpartien 1960 - 1965
by Benzol
Game 124
from Svetozar Gligoric Collected Games (Leach) by JoseTigranTalFischer
Nimzo Indian
from Openings by jgrob12
634
from Yugoslav Chess Triumphs, Part 2 by Chessdreamer
Game 30
from How to Beat Bobby Fischer (Mednis) by Qindarka
64 - Nimzo-Indian Defence
from I Play Against Pieces by nakul1964
98_D38-D39 / E46-E48 The RAGOZIN Complex QGD/NID
by whiteshark


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC