|Feb-06-09|| ||Eyal: Position after 36.Bd3:
click for larger view
Here Fischer missed a win by 36...Ng3+! (a logical consequence of the attacking formation created in the previous moves by Nh5-Bf4-Qg5-Rh8) 37.hxg3 hxg3+ 38.Kg1 Qh4; or 37.Nxg3 hxg3 38.h3 Rxh3+! 39.Kg1 (39.gxh3 g2+ 40.Kg1 Qg3 with quick mate) 39...Rh2 and Qh4; or 37...Nxf1 38.Bxf1 (38.Rxf1 Be3+; 38.Kxf1 Bxh2) 38...h3 39.g3 (39.Re2 Bxh2+!) 39...Bxg3! 40.hxg3 Qxg3+ 41.Kh1 Qxf3+ 42.Kh2 Qf4+ 43.Kh1 g5 and the mass of the connected passed pawns should prove decisive.
Fischer also missed two good opportunities later on: 55...h3! 56.g3 Ng2 winning the exchange, since 57.Re2 Bd8! followed by Bb6 is crushing; as well as 68...Qa6! (with the threat of 69...Rxc1 70.Rxc1 Qf1 or Nf1+) 69.Rxc7+ (or 69.b5 Rxc1 70.Rxc1 Qa3! 71.Ra1 Bd4 72.Rb1 Be3! 73.Nxe3 fxe3 and the queen can't keep defending the bishop on a2) 69...Rxc7 70.b5 Qxb5! (71.Rxb5 Nf1+).
Another example of Fischer's bad - or sloppy - form in the first half of the Santa Monica tournament, which he finished with a disastrous score of 3.5/9, one place before the last, before his fantastic finish in the second half, scoring 7.5/9. In round 2 he missed a relatively simple win against Portisch (with 50.Ne3 in Fischer vs Portisch, 1966), in round 4 he missed good wining chances against Donner by a careless move (30.Bd3?? in Fischer vs J H Donner, 1966), this game was played in round 5, and next he suffered three consecutive losses in rounds 6-8.
|Nov-06-09|| ||SugarRaySam: After 63.c4 e4! I believe is a better move for black|
(64.Bf1 f4 65.Ng4 e5! and black is blocking white to a very small area, eventually switching rooks to the e file)
so: 64.fxe4 f4! is the main idea
65.Ng4 f3! and White can't prevent f2 and queening square is controlled by the Knight
|Oct-07-11|| ||Chessfugitive: Ok Someone said Fischer missed a win with 36 ... Ng3+ What about 37 Kg1?|
|Oct-07-11|| ||nescio: <Chessfugitive: Ok Someone said Fischer missed a win with 36 ... Ng3+ What about 37 Kg1?>|
See <Eyal>'s message of Feb-06-09: 37.Kg1 Nxf1 38.Bxf1 h3 39.g3 Bxg3 etc.
|Oct-16-11|| ||Chessfugitive: Sorry but that's not very convincing as you lose your knight and bishop for a knight and 3 pawns. Yeah the king is exposed but mate won't happen with a queen and 2 rooks. Fischer wasn't looking for a draw and chess is never "that simple".|
|May-07-14|| ||Methodist: Good work by Eyal there, today when looking at this game I found out that Fischer missed 36... Ng3! 37. Kg1 (during the game both GM's saw this idea but didn't see the follow-up which is...) Nf1 38. Bf1 h3! (this is the move they didn't see) 39. g3 Bg3! and black will have four connected pawns vs. bishop with a position close to win and wanted to post this information here, but Eyal did this already 4 years ago! Posting anyway, great tactics there, missed even by great player who, yes, was in a bad form during the first round of this tournament.|
|May-07-14|| ||perfidious: <Methodist: Good work by Eyal....>|
If in no way out of the ordinary; for he has been one of our finest contributors.
|Dec-14-14|| ||zydeco: This game is actually pretty far below both players' playing strength. |
Unzicker plays the opening very timidly, forgoing a break with 16.f4, and then just kind of moving his pieces around. Fischer has a big advantage but misses his chances to break through: not only with 36....Ng3+ but also with 41.....h3 42.g3 Ng2 43.Re2 e4 44.f4 g5.
Fischer also could have won with 69.....Rxc1 70.Qxc1 Ne2 71.Qe1 Nc3.
Now on DVD
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC