chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

(If you register a free account you won't see all these ads!)
Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian vs Anatoly Karpov
Moscow (1971), Moscow URS, rd 10, Dec-07
Queen's Indian Defense: Opocensky Variation (E17)  ·  1/2-1/2
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 14 more Petrosian/Karpov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-05-04  white pawn: Draw already? Why?
Aug-05-04  sneaky pete: <white pawn> <Why?> Because these are the chessical ancestors of Kramnik and Leko. These guys of course couldn't help not reaching 21st century level of play, but for 1971 it's not so bad. Watch out for the match between the Young Giants K&L to see this position drawn in 6 or 7 moves.
Aug-05-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Zenchess: Petrosian and Andersson were the forerunners of the 1/2-1/2,15 crowd that dominates the field today. I feel like taking a draw in a position like this with plenty of play left in the position cheats yourself out of a chance to improve your chess skills. I feel like Petrosian's failure against Korchnoi in Candidates matches was a direct result of this repeated willingness to take draws this early in positions like this. This meant we was frequently worn down by move 35-40, which Korchnoi was used to playing. For instance in 1980, Petrosian kept getting the better game against Korchnoi but then would wear down between move 35-50 and have to concede a draw.
Aug-05-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: Even in the so-slandered Linares -04 tournament, NO draw was as short as this. Zero. That was out of 42 games.
Aug-05-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Zenchess: Well, 79% of the games in Linares and Dortmund were draws. And ALL the slow games in Kramnik's section were drawn. To Petrosian's credit if he were around today, he'd be tearing things up with +2 to +4 and we'd be writing about how good he was.
Aug-05-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: Yes, but contrary to myth, few of those draws were sub-20 ones like this. Most were interesting fighting draws. (Not to say that a draw under 20 moves can't be interesting, it can.)
Aug-06-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  Zenchess: I looked at the games in Linares; of 42 games in that tournament, 14 were draws under 25 moves or less. Of those 14, 7 were by Kramnik. I looked at the final position in each of these draws; in all but one of them, Kramnik could have played on:

Round 1 vs. Vallejo Pons: Playable; Kramnik could have tried the pawn break 18...f5!?

Round 2 vs. Shirov: Kramnik may very well have tossed away a point here. With 22. Nc6!, White has all sorts of compensation for the e-pawn Black is about to take. His pieces are much more active than Black's counterparts. Knowing how Shirov hates defending, he may have worn down here.

Round 3 vs. Rajabov: Kramnik may have had an isolated double, but if anyone was better in this position, it was him. With 24...Qd3!?, Black temporarily sacrifices his c4-pawn to gain Rook penetration to b3; he will soon regain the pawn with more active play.

Round 4 vs. Leko: This is the one game where he was right to take the draw; Leko was about to create a central pawn roller. Had Kramnik played d4 himself, Leko captures twice on d4 and plays...d5, creating a dangerous passer.

Round 8 vs. Vallejo Pons: Playable; 21. Bd3 was possible to target the e5 pawn.

Round 10 vs. Topalov: Kramnik came under some pressure against his K; however, ...Rb8 preparing ...a6, ...b5, and ...c4 counterplay was possible.

Round 12 vs. Kasparov: Playable; Kramnik had play against the isolated c6 pawn. Even Kasparov screws up the ending sometimes; once, he lost a drawn R+4 vs. R+3 ending. You can never beat the World #1 unless you set out to do so.

In these games, Kramnik showed a clear lack of fighting spirit here. I'm not saying he was better in these positions; however, there was plenty of reason to play on. So not all the GM's in Linares showed a lack of fighting spirit; however, Kramnik did.

If you want to study someone with fighting spirit, only a little over 10% of Korchnoi's games were quick draws. Only 5% of Bobby Fischer's games were quick draws. By contrast, almost one third of Petrosian's games are draws of 25 moves or less.

Aug-06-04
Premium Chessgames Member
  acirce: <I looked at the games in Linares; of 42 games in that tournament, 14 were draws under 25 moves or less.> Good research! Meaning most were not, by a big margin.

<Kramnik showed a clear lack of fighting spirit here.> He admitted as much after the tournament, saying there would have been more of that kind if he had been better prepared. As it was he repeatedly felt he didn't get enough out of the opening. But - as it turned out, he won the tournament, so it was obviously a successful strategy.

Dec-28-04  Jaymthegenius: Aha! here it is! but of course I had to use a search! This game turned out fully how I expected it to! An exiting hypermodern confrontation! But I prefer the Gruenfeld to the queens indian, but that's me. Nonetheless. Petrosian is an excellent dragoneer, and Karpov, who is the St. George of chess, has MANY anti-dragon weapons at his disposal! So even I would be afraid to play the dragon against him! (that is why I would use my secondary sicilian 1.e4,c5 2.Nf3,d6 3.d4,Nxd4 4.e5,Nf3 against him (learned from La Bourdonais) (and still loose VERY BADLY!)
Dec-06-07  xeroxmachine: <Karpov, who is the St. George of chess, has MANY anti-dragon weapons at his disposal! So <even I> would be afraid to play the dragon against him! >Thats the spirt of a true Bush lover!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections [what is this?]
Queen's Indian
by Chessdreamer
Karpov Tournament Champion - I
by chessgain
Moscow 1971
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Moscow 1971
by suenteus po 147
Karpov Tournament Champion - I
by amadeus


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC