Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Garry Kasparov vs A Sheransky
Simul, 25b (1996), Jerusalem, Oct-15
French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01)  ·  0-1


explore this opening
find similar games 2,384 more games of Kasparov
sac: 14...Nxf2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Jun-07-04  mack: Fair play, Sheransky.
Sep-20-05  hayton3: Interesting - even Kasparov can't bend the principle of piece development - too many pawn moves seal his fate.
Sep-20-05  MrSifter: Kasparov's play here is horrendous.
Could he have been Black instead?
Sep-20-05  who: Really Kaspy was fine till he stopped his bishop from covering e3 with Nbd2. A typical simul mistake missing - a tactical shot.
Sep-20-05  who: and no, Kasparov was definitely white; this game made the headlines when it was played.
Sep-20-05  MrSifter: Upon further thought, (and after taking into account the history, personality and status of these two men), I'll assert that this game was fixed in favor of Sharansky for his reputation's sake.

Kasparov's supposed fit following the game seems to be a bit of acting wih the purpose of leading one away from coming to this conclusion.

Feel free to chew me out for all this :)

Sep-20-05  BadTemper: why did he resign after moving?
Sep-20-05  Titicamara: Probably because

29. Kg3 Ree1 (winning another bishop)

Sep-20-05  who: <MrSifter> Sharansky is no Patzer. I think he was a Candidate of Master in the USSR - and that's no small title. At that level it shouldn't be shocking if he could beat Kasparov in a simul
May-05-06  DP12: This game is absurd and Kasparov could never play like this. It is absolutely horrible.
May-05-06  asip87: 14...Nxf2, nice sac for sheransky..
oppose to mate if..16 Kf3.. force kasparov to nailed its rooks.. this game..far2 to easy...howd...why..wat..happen to kaspa..!??
Jun-08-06  Everett: Perhaps Kasparov threw the game and decided to throw the fit to make it convincing that he wanted to win.
Jun-09-06  Catfriend: The simul was played against Israeli Parliament Members, so Kasparov didn't expect any particular fight. However, Sheransky, then the Minister of Absorption IIRC, is a master.
Jun-09-06  Everett: "Minister of Absorption"? Did he monitor sponge use?
Jun-10-06  Catfriend: In Israel, the title means being responsible for the different aspects of repatriation.

In general, absorption has many meaning, and the chemical one you used is but one. See for more, including <assimilation: the social process of absorbing one cultural group into harmony with another>.

Jun-10-06  technical draw: In Israel the Minister of Absorption difers from other countries immigration ministers since his or her duties are mainly to those Jews making "Aliyah" or return to Erets Israel.

Either that or it's the nickname of Chaim Cohen owner of Tel Aviv Sponge Co. Ltd.

Hi, Catfriend....

Jun-12-06  Catfriend: Hi, <TD>:) What's up?

Good understanding of Israeli life, BTW;)

Jul-22-06  waddayaplay: ''Concentration is the key to my game,'' he [Kasparov] said, ''and if it's lost I can make a stupid mistake. And with players with high ratings, every mistake costs you a game. And this has a snowball effect -- I make one mistake, I get angry, then I make another mistake and really lose control. With Sharansky, I made a bad mistake, and he punished me.''

N.Y. Times

Jul-22-06  euripides: You wouldn't think Gazza's hand would allow him to play 14 Nbd2 even in a simul. But the one true law of chess is that any blunder can be made by any player.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Kasparov's play looks so horrible because he had no other choice, after his blunder with Nbd2 (as <who> said, a type of mistake not unseen in simuls), than playing passive trying not to lose more material.

Kasparov is not and has never been someone suspected of throwing games. Too big of an ego to allow for that.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please submit a correction slip and help us eliminate database mistakes!
<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>
This game is type: EXHIBITION (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
French Defense: Exchange Var (C01) 0-1 Simul exhibition
from Exchange In a Hurry to Exchange by fredthebear
even Kasparov can't bend the principle of piece development
from extras by fredthebear
French games
by chessboyhaha
Formula7's favorite games
by Formula7
by Gottschalk

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC