|Feb-06-04|| ||Lawrence: How many of us would have dared to play Capa's 20...gxf6 rather than the much safer-looking 20...Bxf6? |
|Feb-06-04|| ||Benjamin Lau: It's a good move but not all that unexpected. The attack down the g file after doubling your castle pawns is pretty common. Of course, it still takes a lot of courage to do it against Maroczy of all people. |
|Feb-06-04|| ||Calli: Is 34...Rxg3 good? Is 35.Kxg3 Rg8+ 36.Kh3 Rg4 37.Kh2 Qxh4+ 38.Qh3 Qf6 and a draw by repetition? |
|Feb-06-04|| ||Benjamin Lau: I haven't checked your analysis yet but why would Capa want a draw? It looks like he was playing for a win earlier. |
|Feb-06-04|| ||Calli: "Why would Capa want a draw?" Right, so why did he play 34...Rxg3? Apparently, both he and Maroczy thought 35.Kxg3 is lost. Or my variation is wrong. |
|Feb-06-04|| ||Benjamin Lau: Ooops, sorry, I didn't notice 34...Rxg3 was the game continuation, I thought you were suggesting a new move. |
|Feb-06-04|| ||Benjamin Lau: Your line looks pretty good to me, but couldn't Capablanca decline the draw and play for a win with 38...Qf6 39. Qd3 Rh4+ 40. Kg3 Rg4+ 41. Kf3 (avoiding mate on h file) Qh4 42. Ke3 Rg3+ 43. Kd2 (don't want the discovery, right?) Rxd3 44. Kxd3 Qxf4 with a difficult but possibly winning endgame? 40. Kg2 may allow Maroczy out though, haven't checked it. 41. Kf2 seems to lose to 41...Qh4+ 42. Ke3 Rg3+ and white is down a queen with a hard endgame similar to the first move order. In conclusion, I think 40. Kg2 is Maroczy's best shot if Capablanca decides to avoid the three fold repetition of Kxg3 as you suggest. This is a complicated game and I'm not too sure my analysis is completely correct though. |
|Feb-06-04|| ||Benjamin Lau: After looking at the game some more, I wonder what would happen if Maroczy played 39. Qf3 in my line instead of 39. Qd3, he might have interesting chances after that. |
|Feb-06-04|| ||Calli: I think Black has to take the draw with Qh4+ in this line. Because on Rxh4+, white can drop back with Kg1 and then he has Rg2 to stop the checks. At that point, Black is just a rook down. |
|Feb-06-04|| ||Benjamin Lau: I agree that black should take the draw, but I was hoping that Capablanca had a way to play for the win and that it wouldn't fizzle away to a draw. I guess that means Capa was secretly playing for the draw, but made it so that Maroczy thought he made a winning combination? |
|Feb-06-04|| ||Calli: It very well could have been a draw combo by Capa that became a win when Maroczy misplayed it. |
|Feb-07-04|| ||Lawrence: Calli and Ben, Junior 8 follows your line until move 38 and suggests 38...Qd8 followed by 39.Qf3 Qh4+ with an eval of 0.00 i.e. presumably a draw. It says Black would have had a slight edge with 34...Rcg8. |
|May-04-06|| ||sneaky pete: "It seems however, that 34... Rcg8! 35.Rg2 Rgd8 would have given black better chances." Maroczy in Kagan's Neuesten Schachnachrichten, 1927.|
Maroczy gives the drawing line analysed by <Calli> ("39.Qf3 .. etc and black has no better than a draw by perpetual check") and blames 35.Qxg3? .. on time trouble. "In gröszter Zeitnot fand ich natürlich den Verlustzug."
|Dec-21-06|| ||blndrdrnk: Reinfeld also says time trouble was the reason geza took the rook wiht the queen. Does anyone have a Capablanca Caro-Kann collection? Again, according to Reinfeld it was one of his favorite openings. To those interested check out Capa vs Atkins... and the fight for the queen bishop file|
|Nov-14-14|| ||MissScarlett: <Hopatcong Capa-Ge>|
Spot an error? Please
submit a correction slip
and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous,
and 100% free--plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
- No personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No posting personal information of members.
See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.|
This game is type: CLASSICAL (Disagree? Please submit a correction slip.)
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC