chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Edward Lasker vs Jose Raul Capablanca
New York (1924), New York, NY USA, rd 18, Apr-10
Modern Defense: King Pawn Fianchetto (B06)  ·  0-1
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 8 times; par: 95 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 7 more Ed. Lasker/Capablanca games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The Olga viewer allows you to get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" link on the lower right.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-03-05  Caissanist: Wow. It was big enough news when Capablanca lost to Reti in this tournament, but to get blown out by Edward Lasker, of all people, would have been a major sensation. Yet after 22 Bc5 (instead of Bb4??) black's position looks hopeless. Lasker must have been in horrific time pressure to blow this one.
Apr-03-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Evidently, Lasker thought Bb4? and Bc3 would trap the rook. 22.Bc5 is good, but would say White has the advantage but not a won position. The real blunder is 44.Ke2?? when Rh6+ draws (Alekhine)
Apr-03-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: <Calli> Perhaps you are somewhat harsh with Edward Lasker? <44.Ke2> looks natural, and the draw with <44.Rh6> is not so straightforward:

<44.Rh6+!> Kf5 (alternatives listed as (i) and (ii)) 45.f3 Ng3+ 46.Kf2 Rxb2+ 47.Kg1 Rb1.

(i)44...Kf7 45.f3 Ng3+ 46.Kf2 Rxb2+ 47.Kg1 Ne2+ 48.Kf1 Nxd4 49.Bc3 Rb1+ 50.Kf2 Ne6 51.b4 = ;

(ii)44...Ke7 45.Rh7+ Ke6 46.Rh6+ Kf7 47.f3 (47.Rxa6? f3 48.Ra7+ Ke6 wins) 47...Ng3+ 48.Kf2 Rxb2+ 49.Kg1 Ne2+ 50.Kf1 Nxd4 51.Bc3 =.

Apr-03-05  RookFile: What I find humorous about this
game is Alekhine's comments
about 1. e4 g6. You would think
that 1..... g6 is a blunder, and
that Edward Lasker missed a
simple win with 2. d4 instead
of 2. Nf3.

Too funny.

Apr-03-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Calli: Ke2?? losing the piece can't be natural! Alekhine gives 44.Rh6+ Kf5! 45.f3 Ng3+ 46.Kg2! The point being a mate threat with h4, Rf6# and 46...Rxe1? 47.Rf6+ Kg5 48.h4+! Kh5 49.Rxf4
Aug-02-05  Caissanist: I fed the position after 22.Bc5 into Crafty, which evaluated it as being 1.10 pawns in white's favor. A winning advantage for white, although calling black's position "hopeless" was an exaggeration.

depth=19 1/27 +1.10 22. ... Rc6 23. b4 Bh6 24. h4 Nf4 25. Nxf4 Bxf4 26. Ra5 Rec8 27. g3 Bh6 28. Raa1 b6 29. Bd6 b5 30. Ng5 Bxg5 31. hxg5 Rc2 32. Rxa6 Rxb2 Nodes: 3020991091 NPS: 500001
Time: 01:40:41.97

Aug-02-05  who: This game is truly weird. What is the classically minded Capablanca doing playing a Robatsch?!
Aug-02-05  Caissanist: This game was played near the end of the New York 1924 tournament, when Capablanca had essentially clinched second place but needed to win every remaining game to have any chance at first. Apparently he thought that the Robatsch was a good choice when you wanted to go all out for a win with black.
Nov-22-06  RookFile: <who: This game is truly weird. What is the classically minded Capablanca doing playing a Robatsch?!>

Capa wanted to win this in the worst way. I'm sure he thought something in Edward Lasker's repetoire would be too drawish if Capa played the lines he normally does.

Oct-02-08  GrenfellHunt: Capablanca would sometimes break out of standard lines in order to catch his opponent off guard--it looks like that was his strategy for beating Ed Lasker in this crucial game.

Note that Capa clearly liked the Dragaon bishop at g7, pawn at c5, and Queen on the wing: a nice attacking formation.

The endgame combination beginning with 40...Rxe1+! is a Capablanca classic: the Rook slams down hard on the first rank, pinning the bishop against the king, and crippling Lasker's endgame.

Oct-02-08  Emma: Capablanca plays the Modern Defence in 1924, I like it!
Nov-25-11  AnalyzeThis: Well, 5.... Qb6 can't be right. Emanuel Lasker would never have made this move.
Nov-26-11  King Death: < RookFile: What I find humorous about this game is Alekhine's comments
about 1. e4 g6. You would think
that 1..... g6 is a blunder, and
that Edward Lasker missed a
simple win with 2. d4 instead
of 2. Nf3.>

Alekhine and Fred Reinfeld must have spun in their graves by 1980 or so, when there were actually whole books written about this "joke opening".

Nov-26-11  visayanbraindoctor: This is Capablanca trying to do a Morozevich. With a classical Ruy, Edward Lasker as white could have easily steered the game into drawish lines.
Nov-26-11  AnalyzeThis: Well, the Caro-Kann would be a good choice, it gives an unblanced pawn structure. That's all a guy like Capa needs to go to work.
Nov-26-11  King Death: < AnalyzeThis: Well, 5.... Qb6 can't be right. Emanuel Lasker would never have made this move.>

One of Emanuel Lasker's strengths was being able to make a concrete and original appraisal of a position. IMO, it's a stretch to say that he would "never" have played 5...Qb6.

Nov-27-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: 5...Qb6 is a reasonable enough move, inhibiting White's intended d4. Opening Explorer Incidentally, the game by that point had transposed to a weird sort of Alapin Sicilian.
Nov-11-12  BU51DAD: I like 22..Rc2
It looks so wrong, it looks dead, but just sits there and and I'm sure at some point Lasker was sitting there just wanting it to evaporate or something.
May-27-16  edubueno: Capa, a category over Ed. Lasker.
May-28-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: <edubueno> He hardly demonstrated it in this tournament: Capablanca vs Ed. Lasker, 1924. And as <Caissanist> pointed out, simply 22.Bc5 would have left Lasker a pawn up for nothing in this game.
Apr-24-18  goser: In New York 1924 Capablanca beat Lasker 3:1.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Ruylopez's favorite games
by Ruylopez
New York 1924 - Alekhine
by StoppedClock
New York 1924
by Benzol
New York 1924 - Alekhine
by vantheanh
estraviz's reviewed games
by estraviz
Rook-7 lasting action 30.Kf1to 31.re2 was better
from Delicatessen by Gottschalk
hot rats
by IMlday
capablanca best games
by brager
G6 to e4
from BU51DAD's favorite games by BU51DAD
New York 1924
by JoseTigranTalFischer
d6 g6 Robatsch Rats & Modern Snipers & Misfits
by fredthebear


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC