chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wolfgang Uhlmann vs Vasily Smyslov
07, Hastings (1973), Hastings ENG, rd 7
English Opening: King's English. Four Knights Variation Fianchetto Lines (A29)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 11 times; par: 41 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 12 more Uhlmann/Smyslov games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Nov-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: A sweet little revenge of Uhlmann for Uhlmann vs Smyslov, 1956, Uhlmann vs Smyslov, 1971 and Smyslov vs Uhlmann, 1970.
Nov-23-15  bam68: What's wrong with Black playing 29...Qd5? It averts the mate threat by pinning the white queen and forces a queen trade with 30.Qxd5 cxd5.
Nov-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <bam68: What's wrong with Black playing 29...Qd5? It averts the mate threat by pinning the white queen and forces a queen trade with 30.Qxd5 cxd5.> The only problem with 29...Qd5 is that it doesn't save black from defeat. More or less forced continuation 30.Qxd5+ cxd5 31.e6 Nxd4 32.e7 Ne6 33.Re1 Nc7 34.Bf4 is absolutely hopeless for black.
Nov-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Oxspawn: Yes, very easy. But getting your rooks and queen to play so nicely together is not very easy.
Nov-23-15  CHESSTTCAMPS: Tripled majors on a completely open file is generally a pleasant scenario for an attacker. Alekhine's gun reversed? Black's threat of Nxf3 should encourage white to force mate-in-3 starting with 30.Qf8+
Nov-23-15  dfcx: mate in 3, more than the average Monday's.

Black's game went downhill after 20.hxg5, destroying his own pawn structure, 20...Bxh5 followed by hxg5 would be better. Then he had a last chance to save game with 29.Qd5 forcing trading of queens.

Nov-23-15  mikrohaus: I would play 9...e3 with complications, because I'm not happy with Smyslov's position in a few moves at all after 9...ef.

After running 9...e3 through an engine [Fruit 2.1, because my other engines don't show up now after "upgrading" to W10], Black seems okay -- a little worse with best White moves, but okay, according to Fruit analysis.

My analysis: Black has to get compensation for the 2 bishops and 9...e3 is the only way to essentially force doubled-isolated c-pawns and clumsier White bishops than results after 9...ef. [French Defense/Nimzo-Indian players will know White will generally end up, at best, +0.5 from their experience in these types of positions if Black stays calm.] I equate Black as half-a-pawn down before 9...e3 anyway; so, why not complicate things?

Maybe somebody will analyze this try by Black w/ a better engine.

Nov-23-15  Chess Dad: Even on Monday, I normally expect at least a little bit of subtlety.

But not today. Today it is 100% brute force.

So although a mate-in-3 is perhaps a little longer than a typical Monday problem, as mentioned above, it is a rather obvious mate-in-3.

Nov-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Too easy, even for a Monday, IMO.
Nov-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: Mate on back row...and around the corner. Note how coy the previous king advance was!
Nov-23-15  Marmot PFL: The point of 29 Kg2 seems clear. Hard to believe that Smyslov would overlook that.
Nov-23-15  PivotalAnorak: mikrohaus on 9...e3: Kasparov vs Karpov, 1987
Nov-23-15  ASchultz: I remember seeing Uhlmann on the wrong side of a lot of great games. While I know he was a strong grandmaster, it's good to see him get a win with a cool PotD-worthy combination!
Nov-23-15  saturn2: I also think something went wrong in the opening for black and I dont like 11...Nd5 because it helps white to establish the pawnstructure c3,d4,e5.

Vaguely I am reminded of the Botvinnik-Capablance game where also white had a strong pawn center and finally attacked on the king side, whilst black was invanely trying some tricks with queen and knight on the queen side.

Nov-23-15  goodevans: <Honza Cervenka: ... 31.Bxe3 can be a slight improvement of this line for white.>

Bishops can take backwards as well? :o)

Nov-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Honza Cervenka: <goodevans: <Honza Cervenka: ... 31.Bxe3 can be a slight improvement of this line for white.>

Bishops can take backwards as well? :o)>

Unfortunately, yes. Tricky bastards...:-)

Nov-23-15  mikrohaus: <PivotalAnorak>Thanks. Now I have to spend hours looking through opening materials to see how book compares to my initial thoughts. I didn't know 9...e3 was a known line, from a WCC no less.

I don't play the English and play a different system against it. However, it will be interesting to see how good players approach 9...e3 with White. Fruit 2.1 gives 10.de as best, but White never achieves better than +0.65 in any logical Black line.

Nov-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Great Queen sacrifice!

Did this Smyslov guy ever accomplish much in chess?

Nov-23-15  mikrohaus: <TheFocus> Smyslov was WCC for about a year. He was also one of Kasparov's last hurdles before he finally won the WCC, although Smyslov (age 62) was past his prime at the time.

When you see the phrase "first among equals", supposedly uttered by Botvinnik referring to himself and other WCC contenders of the time, Smyslov was one of the equals.

Look in the database and you will find lots of great games by Smyslov. A good one is Smyslov-Botvinnik, 1954 WCC, Game 9.

He was especially good in the 1950s to early 1960s. He could probably take apart any lesser GM when he was 70 years old.

Nov-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <mikrohaus> Oh! That Smyslov.
Nov-23-15  zb2cr: Definitely very easy. 30. Qxf8+, Rxf8; 31. Rxf8+, Kh7; 32. Rh1#.
Nov-23-15  mikrohaus: <TheFocus> Sorry, I missed your sarcasm earlier, but you might have been a noob to this particular master. Many are.
Nov-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: <mikrohaus> I think Smyslov was one of the greatest in history.
Nov-24-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: I agree, he played against and equalled or won against another of the greatest, Botvinnik. Let's face it, Botters was champ on and off for a long time. He was disciplined yet played some beautiful games. In his 50s he drew with Fischer. Now Smyslov played both some great attacking and combinative games as well as wonderful "positional" games and endings. He is up there. It is significant that Fischer got on quite well with him. They were both quite big men also, when Smyslov was young he was reminiscent* (in appearance) to Fischer, and his style was also. His weak games, well we all play those, especially as he got older.

* reminiscent? (right word here, resembled? as in: "I resemble that remark.") But hats off to Uhlmann for this nice game!

Jan-07-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  PhilFeeley: Apparently, Uhlmann had an earlier queen sac that never happened:

From this position:


click for larger view

white could have played 22. Qa4! If black takes, then 23. Bxd5+ Kh8 (or g7) 24. Rf3 and mate cannot be stopped.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
K's English. 4 Knts Fianchetto (A29) 1-0 Triple G was a twinkle
from Spearheads A (Batteries involving the Queen) by fredthebear
K's English. 4 Knts Fianchetto (A29) 1-0 Triple G was a twinkle
from 4 Kts English suites Fredthebear by fredthebear
King's English. Four Knights Variation Fianchetto Lines
from FAVORITE PLAYERS by gambitfan
58c_middelgames - BB vs NN
by Jaredfchess
30.? (Monday, November 23)
from Puzzle of the Day 2015 by Phony Benoni
Queen Sacs, Part II
by Ron
Qf3/Rf2/Rf1
from 55d_Middlegame motifs - Alekhine's gun by Jaredfchess
King's English. Four Knights Variation Fianchetto Lines
from ENGLISH OPENING by gambitfan
Round 7 (January 3)
from Hastings 1972/73 by Chessdreamer
"Blackened Pancake"
from games of brilliant attack and sacrifice by tacticalmonster
English Opening: King's English : Four Knights V
by ISeth
Qf3/Rf2/Rf1
from 55d_Middlegame motifs - Alekhine's gun by whiteshark
58c_middelgames - BB vs NN
by whiteshark
Alekhine's Gun Backwards, But It Works
from K-Dog's Favorite Games by kdogphs
Uhlmann
from The English According to... by parisattack
30.? (November 23, 2015)
from Monday Puzzles, 2011-2017 by Phony Benoni


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC