chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Wilhelm Steinitz vs Curt von Bardeleben
"The Battle of Hastings" (game of the day Feb-23-2016)
Hastings (1895), Hastings ENG, rd 10, Aug-17
Italian Game: Classical Variation. Greco Gambit Traditional Line (C54)  ·  1-0
ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 140 times; par: 38 [what's this?]

explore this opening
find similar games 899 more games of Steinitz
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Feb-23-16  WorstPlayerEver: I guess after 25. Rh7 Qh7 Von didn't want go through the torture of: 26. Rc8 Rc8 27. Qc8 Qg8 28. Qh3 Kg7 29. Qd7 Kh6 30. Nf7 Kg7 31. Nd6 Kh8 32. Qe7 Qg7 33. Qd8 Kh7 34. Ne8 Qf8 35. Nf6 Kg7 36. Ne8 Kh7 37. Qh4 Kg8 38. Nf6 Kg7 39. Nd5

Why? Because who wants to play 9 moves with their king for no apparent reason??

Feb-23-16  The Kings Domain: One of the all-time greats. First came across this in the classic "500 Master Games of Chess" and never forgot it. Love how Steinitz was one step ahead from the start and poor Von Bardeleben never had a chance and yet despite that the game hung precariously in the balance. One for the ages.
Feb-23-16  WorstPlayerEver: By the way, it's very instructive to study how the White Q+N tackle Black's position after 31. Nd6 in my previous comment.

Notice what happens at the h4-d8 diagonal and how the Nd6 hops to e8/f6 twice to catch both the f6 and the d5 pawn.

Feb-23-16  gauer: I realize that C Morales vs W Arencibia, 1989 seems to provide an 8th move alternative.

Question for User: crafty : 10 Bg5 f6 is now Von Feilitzsch vs Raymond Le Pontois, 1930 - but Steinitz vs Von Bardeleben, 1895 (kibitz #72) has a different solution. How much worse is black, really, on his 16th and 19th move alternatives? Looks like a severe case of getting steamrolled by some sort of correspondence preparation. Thanks for the help!

Feb-23-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Naka's step-father wrote a book named <Best Lessons of a Chess Coach>, in which this game appears.

Well, at least, it is in some chess book or other that I've read; I think it's Sunil's book.

The game is very famous.

Feb-23-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: This was one of the best games in a GREAT tournament. Great GOTD!
Feb-23-16  RookFile: This game is a model example of how to conduct an attack.

But it is also an object lesson for how to play defense.

Had Petrosian, for example, taken the black pieces, I don't have a doubt in the world that he would have played 16.....Kf7 rather than 16....c6. Petrosian was well known for king walks.

After the game ended in a draw, folks would have said: "Gee, that was really an interesting game. Steinitz came close to winning." Meanwhile, Petrosian wouldn't have said anything, but would have prepared for the next game.

Skill in defense tends to be underrated, but it makes all the difference in separating the champions from the also-rans.

Feb-23-16  RandomVisitor: 16...Kf7 and black has a playable game
Feb-23-16  john barleycorn: has not this great game been analysed to death?
Feb-23-16  Conrad93: <has not this great game been analysed to death?>

Yes, to the point that it has lost most of its luster.

Feb-23-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: Since black lost, I'm surprised no one have analyzed if 2... Nc6 was sound or not.
Feb-23-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Bubo bubo: <Conrad93: <has not this great game been analysed to death?>

Yes, to the point that it has lost most of its luster.>

I disagree: Of course Black could have done better as early as on move 7 (Nxe4 instead of d5), but nevertheless the well-calculated, deep and spectacular finish (all four white pieces en prise and Black threatening mate from move 22 on) render this game an absolute highlight of 19th-century chess!

Feb-23-16  imbo2010: I am new to this.How about 22 RE7 KE7?
Feb-23-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: 22.Re7+ Kxe7 23.Re1+ Kd8 24.Nd6+ Ke8 25.Nc5+ looks killer.

(25...Qe7 26.Rxe7+ Kxe7 27.Nd3)

23.Re1+ Kd6 24.Qb4+ Kc7 25.Ne6+ Kb8 26.Qf4+

Feb-23-16  Dr. J: <imbo2010> After 22...Kxe7 the critical line is 23 Re1+ Kd6 24 Qb4+ Kc7 25 Rc1+ Kb8 26 Qf4+ Rc7 27 Ne6 winning. There are a number of interesting-but-not-very-complicated side-variations that you should check out.
Feb-23-16  psmith: <RandomVisitor> as pointed out by Tarrasch in the tournament book.
Feb-27-16  kmet vlado: <sycophante> 26.Nxh7 Ke7 and knight is lost. Must move, for example 26.Ne6 or other. 1-0
Jul-09-16  AlicesKnight: 25.Rh7.... "At this point von Bardeleben is reported to have made no comment but to have put on his hat and quietly walked home...." (Abrahams). I love dignity.
Nov-07-16  mirkojorgovic: 24... Qxg7 ?? was not good, because this opened attack on squer c8, with check: 25.R:C8+,R:c8 26.Q:c8+,Qf8 27.Q:F8+,K:f8 and white can sacrifice again: 28.N:h7+!,Kg7!?,29.N:F6,K:f6 30.Kf1 and white can bloke d-line pawn,then can easy prepare 3:1(2:1 is inaf) pawn's attack kingside,with 2:2 equal position queenside.
Nov-08-16  mirkojorgovic: After 24...Qg7?? more attractive is 25.Qe6+!,25...Kf8 26.R:c8+,R:c8 27.Q:c8+,Ke7 28.Qc7+ Kf8 29.Qd8#(28...Ke8 29.Q:g7 fg5 30.Q:h7 , 1:0 )Some better is 25...Kh8!? 26.R:c8+,R:c8 27.Q:c8+,Qg8 28.Q:g8+,K:g8 29.Ne6 and white can easy realised advantage of piece vs isolated pawn.
Jun-10-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: As others have pointed out, Winter (http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...) does a fair job showing that Bardeleben's disappearing act wasn't the egregious transgression of later legend. Yet, it was amusing to read the following from the <Falkirk Herald>'s notice after Bardeleben's death (February 13th 1924, p.3):

<Mr Woollard notes in the "Yorks. O. Budget" that Bardeleben was almost as notorious a drawing master as Schlechter, and he introduced a method of resigning a lost game by the simple device of walking silently and without explanation from the board and allowing his time to run, which added a new verb "to bardeleben* to the vocabulary of his chess contemporaries.>

Jul-23-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Stonehenge: Steinitz on announcing mates:

Ow, announcing mate is only showing off and bluff. I've only done it once in my life and that's because my opponent treated me unfairly. I had played a neatly beautiful Giuoco Piano in Hastings against Von Bardeleben. A correct rook sacrifice gave me a winning game. Von Bardeleben saw that he had to lose and preferred the loss of the game due to time overrun to an honorable one. After the break he stayed away and let me wait. Finally his time had passed. I called one of the members of the committee to claim the win, which was immediately granted and told him that I has a mate in nine or queen loss for Von Bardeleben in store. All of the public, the masters included, flowed to me and burst, after I had shown them the solution, into loud applause.

In one of the games with Tchigorin in 1892 I could announce a mate in seven and didn't do it out of respect for my opponent. After all, it is as if I want to say: "Look! I have seen that mate and you did not!"

Tijdschrift van den Nederlandschen Schaakbond, nr. 5-6, 01-05-1896

Nov-06-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: Before the match, Steinitz is purported to have quipped:

"It will be Curt and it will be Curt!"

Apr-23-19  Chessmusings: Entire game with deep analysis here: https://chessmusings.wordpress.com/...
Aug-11-19
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Newcastle Courant, November 30th 1895, p.2:

<The "New Orleans Tlmes-Democrat" gives a complete translation, by Mr H Ernst of an article by Dr Tarrasch in the Frankfort "General Anzeiger,' in which the eminent German expert criticises the performances of all the competitors (including himself) in the recent Hastings tournament. In the course of his remarks on Bardeleben, Dr Tarrasch says :- To our regret, we have to say that Herr von Bardeleben provoked the indignation of all participants in the tourney by the singular way in which he used to surrender lost games. As soon as he became conscious of having a losing position, he followed the advice given in a well-known humouristic chess oouplet -

Whenever your game is bad and sore, Then sneak out and return no more.

He simply vanished and left it to the committee to declare the game lost by time-limit. Thereby Herr von Bardeleben has at least acquired the merit of adding one more to the many analogies between chess and war - the flight before the enemy.>

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 9)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 9 OF 9 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
BEST CHESS GAMES
by Holadola
Frandez's favorite games
by Frandez
game 19 steinitz vs von bardeleben
from Richard Reti's Masters of the Chessboard games by takchess
mejores partidas de la historia
by afabian
Attack and Defence
by hoodrobin
Alekinemaster31's favorite games
by Alekinemaster31
Game 58
from Guinness Book - Chess Grandmasters (Hartston) by Qindarka
wow!!!!
from 100 best of the best Chess Games by tallike
Ch1 Attack against the uncastled King along the e file
from Art of Attack in Chess Vladamir Vukovic & Chess by neontheorist
Saw it Went home Main Game
from Understanding Chess: Move By Move - John Nunn & by Ercan
Steinitz's immortal??
from MarkFinan's Classic games by histories greats by MarkFinan
13
from 125 Greatest Chess Games by mattgumm
Like Toy Soldiers
from JonathanJ's favorite games 5 by JonathanJ
Steinitz teaches the art of attack
from attacking lessons by isfsam
Greatest Chess Legends
by Orhtej
Steinitz's "Battle of Hastings"
from From Shenk's The Immortal Game by angelbeck
Strategic Advantages
from Positional Chess Handbook II by Retarf
al's favorite games
by alspookyd
Wilhelm Steinitz (1836-1900)
from PLayer of the day:notable game II by nikolaas
Game 18
from Masters of the Chessboard (Reti) by Qindarka
plus 481 more collections (not shown)


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC