chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Boris Grachev vs Petr Savosto
"All the Single Ladies" (game of the day Oct-08-2017)
White Nights (2001), St. Petersburg RUS, rd 1, Jun-09
Queen's Gambit Declined: Chigorin Defense (D07)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 1,255 more games of B Grachev
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-02-09  whiteshark: Q: Isn't the final position a draw after <79...Qf1>?

A: No! <80.___>

Aug-31-12  master of defence: <whiteshark> It´s a win for white after 80.Qd2!(only move to win) threatening mate, and black must give up your queen to don´t lose immediately.
Jul-10-15  SpiritedReposte: That is like a composed problem! Wasn't aware of this motif.
Jul-10-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: I decided to have a look with an end game database. Shockingly, Black's losing move was his 59th move:


click for larger view

Black to play. Qa6? loses in 54 moves. Kf3 is the only move to hold a draw. Anyone who can explain why is in a universe of their own.

Jul-10-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: FWIW 79...Qf1 80. Qd4 also wins.
Oct-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: This game is from the 2001 White Nights Tournament in St Petersburg which was originally open only to single ladies. Grachev and Savosto wrote letter to Vladimir Putin saying how unfair and exclusive that was, and Putin stepped in immediately.

He made a pronouncement that ALL chess tournaments must be open to ALL members of the human race regardless of sex, marital status, race, colour, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, age, genetic information, military service, or chess playing ability or disability.

And thus it has been ever since.

HAIL PUTIN!😂

Oct-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: White missed a good move.


click for larger view

35. b4!! wins quickly.

Oct-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: What is the meaning of this pun?
Oct-08-17  rogl: In the end it's only the ladies left( if you leave out the kings)
Oct-08-17  Ratt Boy: <OhioChessFan: FWIW 79...Qf1 80. Qd4 also wins.>

I agree. 79...♕f1 80.♕d4+, ♔h1 81.♕h4+, ♕h3 82.♕xh3+ & mates next.

Oct-08-17  paavoh: @FSR: it is a Beyonce song, not that it explains the pun.
Oct-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: <paavoh: @FSR: it is a Beyonce song, not that it explains the pun.>

Um, excuse me.. but i think i rather fully explained it in my first post.. or are you ignoring me owing to my sex, marital status, race, colour, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, age, genetic information, military service, or chess playing ability or disability?

Oct-08-17  Strelets: Queen endings seem to be the most difficult to play correctly. Does anyone have a book to recommend on the topic?
Oct-08-17  TrczkWszczinsk: Thanks, offramp, for this excellent find. It is very instructive!
Oct-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  fm avari viraf: After 79...Qf1 the simplest way to win is 80.Qd2 & mates in 2
Oct-08-17  Cheapo by the Dozen: Unless I'm missing something, 80 Qd4+ also leads quickly to mate.
Oct-08-17  TheBish: Actually, after 79...Qf1, 80. Qd2 is not a mate in 2, as Black ditches the queen to prolong mate, i.e. 80...Qh3+. Still quicker than the direct checking method with 80...Qd4+ (mate in 4 as opposed to mate in 5). But in an OTB game, most of us would take the forced mate with a series of checks!
Oct-08-17  TheBish: <offramp: White missed a good move. 35. b4!! wins quickly.>

Good call! Those pawn breakthroughs are easy to miss. Even the analysis board engine misses that win, even after making the move! Only after entering several more moves does it evaluate a clear win.

I think many GMs would miss 35. b4!, because when you already have a simple technical win, you are just looking to convert it, not usually looking for tactics or complications.

Oct-08-17  RandomVisitor: <Strelets: Queen endings seem to be the most difficult to play correctly. Does anyone have a book to recommend on the topic?>

Pulling out my copy of Basic Chess Endings we find:

II Queen and Pawn Endings

A. Queen and Pawn vs. Queen

This is a draw unless White has a bishop-pawn or center-pawn on the seventh supported by the king. As a rule, it is best for Black to have his king as far from the pawn as possible, unless, of course, it can occupy a square in front of the pawn, in which case the game is a hopeless draw.

<In general, it is impossible to advance the pawn very far. Black keeps checking until he runs out of checks and then pins the pawn.> In view of the terrific number of possible positions, precise analysis can be done only by computer. In practice, however, it is usually found that the pawn can be held back.

...But even with the king at a distance from the pawn, <there are some special winning positions>. One of these, which also shows that there are other cases besides those already mentioned where queen vs. queen with no pawns may win is [example cited here where White is able to force a queen exchange and the Black king is too far from the passed pawn]

...To sum up: Queen and pawn vs. queen wins only with bishop-pawn or center-pawn on the seventh. Black's king should be as far as possible from the pawn. A bad king position may cost Black the game in otherwise drawn positions.

Oct-09-17  kevin86: This turned out not to be as simple as it looked.
Oct-09-17  RandomVisitor: 33.f5, 33.Ke4, 33.h4 all win, but not the move played, 33.Kd4...
Oct-11-17  paavoh: <Um, excuse me.. but i think i rather fully explained it...>

Sorry <offramp>, no offense or ignoring intended. Your true story and the pun context seemed tangential at best, but that's my poor imagination, not you :-)

Feb-16-22
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: The idea of saccing the pawn with a check and hitting back with a discovered check reminds me of Bernard Horwitz study. (white to play and win)


click for larger view

1. Qe4 Qxg5+ 2. Kc6


click for larger view

And White's mates in a few moves from here, the critical lines being any BQ check is met with a discovered check.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2025, Chessgames Services LLC